Public Disclosure Copy. Public Disclosure Copy. The World Bank

Transcription

1 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized losure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Implementation Status & Results Brazil Rio de Janeiro Sustainable Integrated Ecosystem Management in Productive Landscapes of the North-Northwestern Fluminense (GEF) (P75 379) Operation Name: Rio de Janeiro Sustainable Integrated Ecosystem Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 11 Status: ARCHIVED Last Modified : 6-Nov-21 Management in Productive Landscapes of the North- Northwestern Fluminense (GEF) (P75 379) Country: Brazil Approval FY: 25 Product Line: Global Environment Project Region: LATIN AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Secretariat of Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development (SEAPPA) Key s Board Approval 31-May-25 Original Closing 3-Nov-21 Planned Mid Term Review 16-Jun-28 Last Archived ISR 28-May-21 Effectiveness 3-Dec-25 Revised Closing 3-Nov-21 Actual Mid Term Review 21-Sep-29 Global Environmental Objectives Global Environmental Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) The development objective of the proposed project is to promote an integrated ecosystem management (IEM) approach to guide the development and implementation of sustainable land management (SLM) practices in the North and Northwest (NNWF) regions of Rio de Janeiro State. The desired principal outcomes for the primary target group (smallholder families and communities) are: (i) improved capacity and organization for NRM, and (ii) increased adoption of IEM and SLM concepts and practices. The global environmental objectives are to: (i) address threats to biodiversity of global importance, (ii) reverse land degradation in agricultural landscapes, (iii) enhance carbon sequestration, and (iv) increase awareness at all levels of the value of adopting an IEM approach in the management of natural resources. The desired principal outcomes for the global environment are: (i) conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, and (ii) increased carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project? Yes Component(s) No Component Name Component Cost Planning for IEM Actions.94 Systems for the Adoption of IEM/SLM practices 8.8 Organization and Capacity Building for IEM 2.47 Project Management and M&E 2.74 Overall Ratings Previous Rating Current Rating Progress towards achievement of GEO Moderately Satisfactory Satisfactory Page 1 of 6

2 Previous Rating Current Rating Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Satisfactory Satisfactory Overall Risk Rating Implementation Status Overview Implementation has continued to improve; overall performance is satisfactory and the project is now on track to fully achieving its development objective. Results Global Environmental Objective Indicators IEM/SLM practices adopted by farmers, thereby reverting land degradation and improving rural livelihoods. 3-Dec farmers (in 24 communities/ microcatchments); 1117 investment proposals prepared. 19-Oct-21 1,9 farmers (in 4 communities in as many 4 microcatchments) 3-Nov-21 Coordinating bodies with significant stakeholder representation from microcatchment and municipal levels active at the regional andlocal levels. 3-Dec-25 1 regional committee established 47 local/microcatchment committees established 19-Oct-21 1 regional committee by PY1; 4 local/microcatchment committees by PY2 3-Nov-21 Change in total land area characterized by biodiversity-friendly agricultural practices that enhance soil structure stability in microcatchments. 3-Dec-25 17,22 ha 19-Oct-21 32, ha 3-Nov-21 Page 2 of 6

3 Area of biodiversity conservation-friendly land use mosaics established on private lands supporting corridor connectivity in project watersheds. 3-Dec ha 25-May-21 1,24 ha 3-Nov-21 Rural community organizations that have adopted and implemented IEM strategies in microcatchments. 3-Dec rural community organizations created in selected microcatchments for IEM strategy adoption and implementation 25-May-21 4 organizations in 4 microcatchments 3-Nov-21 Intermediate Results Indicators Watershed Management Strategies developed (in coordination with Microcatchment Development Plans and related farm-level plans developed in microcatchments). 3-Dec Oct-21 5 Management Strategies for Rural Development in sub-basins developed 3-Nov-21 Page 3 of 6

4 Technical assistance and financial support for on the ground investments received by rural producer and stakeholder groups lending to the adoption of improved production and env mgmt practices 3-Dec-25 1,236 ind. producers/87 groups in 4 microcatchments 19-Oct-21 At least 1,45 producers/15 groups in 4 project microcatchments. 3-Nov-21 Rural community organizations created or strenghtened and adopting initiatives focused on self-management of natural resources 3-Dec organizations strengthened 19-Oct-21 4 organizations 3-Nov-21 Training in environmental education events 3-Dec-25 2,6 participants in training events 19-Oct-21 3, participants, including stakeholders from 5 project watersheds (24 municipalities) 3-Nov-21 Environmental projects prepared in local schools 3-Dec-25 2 projects 19-Oct projects 3-Nov-21 Page 4 of 6

5 Microcatchment Development Plans and related farm-level plans developed in microcatchments. Data on Financial Performance (as of 26-Aug-21) 3-Dec microcatchment management plans and 1,236 farm-level plans developed in microcatchments 19-Oct-21 4 management plans; 1,45 farmlevel investment plans 3-Nov-21 Financial Agreement(s) Key s Project Loan No. Status Approval Signing Effectiveness Closing P75379 TF Effective 3-Jun-25 3-Jun-25 3-Dec-25 3-Nov-21 Disbursements (in Millions) Project Loan No. Status Currency Original Revised Cancelled Disbursed Undisbursed % Disbursed P75379 TF Effective USD Disbursement Graph Page 5 of 6

6 Key Decisions Regarding Implementation None Restructuring History There has been no restructuring to date. Related Projects There are no related projects. Page 6 of 6