ADDENDUM NO. 2. Except as hereinafter specified, the work shall be in accordance with the drawings and specifications.

Transcription

1 ITB-CD-CME Bridge Rehabilitation ADDENDUM NO. 2 ISSUE DATE: September27, 2016 DUE DATE: October 27, 2:00pm SUBJECT: Questions & Answers INTENT: This addendum is issued prior to the date bids are due in order to incorporate the following clarifications, additions, omissions, deletions, or changes into the Contract Documents. Except as hereinafter specified, the work shall be in accordance with the drawings and specifications. Bidders are to use the changed quantities of the items listed in this addendum in their proposals, and it shall become a part of the Contract Documents when construction is executed. Bidders are reminded that this addendum must be noted on the Official City Acknowledgment Form when they submit their proposal. A signed copy of the addendum must also be included with the bid submittal. 1. Please Note: Attached is the allowance sheet, additional work sheet, inspection sheet, and the engineers estimate sheet. Acknowledgment: Signature and Date Printed Name and Title Company Name END OF ADDENDUM NO. 2 *Sixty-seven pages to follow. City of Palm Coast Project Manager ITB-CD-CME Bridge Rehabilitation

2 ALLOWANCES The following Allowances shall be included in the Lump Sum Base Bid. 1.1 ALLOWANCES A. Allowances: Include in the Contract, a stipulated sum/price of the following amounts indicated for use upon the City s instruction. 1. ALLOWANCE #1 Additional Landscaping (if needed, above and beyond the expected restoration of the disturbed construction areas): $5, ALLOWANCE #2 Bridge Repairs (see exhibits 1 through 3): $30, B. Contractor's costs for products, delivery, installation, labor, insurance, payroll, taxes, equipment rental, overhead and profit will be included in Change Orders authorizing expenditure of funds from this allowance. The cost of the bond for the amount of Allowance shall be included as part of the lump sum base bid. C. Funds will be drawn from an Allowance only by Change Order. Contractor can proceed with Change Order Work against Allowance with direction from the Contract Administrator. The Contractor shall not proceed with any work that will exceed the amount of Allowance remaining. Submit proposals for purchase of products or systems included in allowances, in the form specified for Change Orders. D. Submit invoices or delivery slips to show the actual quantities of materials delivered to the Site for use in the fulfillment of each allowance. E. Credits can only be added to an Allowance by Change Order. The Contractor may not use a credit until a Change Order is fully executed. F. Notwithstanding the Contractor s objection, the City may at any time reduce the funds remaining in the Allowance by Change Order. G. At Final Payment of the Contract, funds remaining in the Allowance will be credited to the City. *NOTE: THE LUMP SUM BASE BID SHALL INCLUDE ALLOWANCES BID FORM /16/16 ITB-CD-CME REHABILITATION

3 FLORIDA DEPATMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bridge No: Inspection Date: 12/21/2015 BRIDGE LOCATION MAP West Elevation Palm Harbor Prkwy over Clubhouse WW 0.1 Mile North of Clubhouse Dr. PAGE 2 OF 14

4 FLORIDA DEPATMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bridge No: Inspection Date: 12/21/2015 SKETCHES AND PHOTOS B-1 Photo 1: Element 301: Deteriorated joint over Bent 3 at left shoulder B-2 Photo 2: Element 301: Typical unsealed abutment joint PAGE 4 OF 14 EXHIBIT 1

5 FLORIDA DEPATMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bridge No: Inspection Date: 12/21/2015 SKETCHES AND PHOTOS Photo 3: Element 109: Spall with exposed steel at diaphragm in Bay 1-1 at Bent 2 Photo 4: Element 109: Shallow spalls with exposed steel of Beam 1-4 at Abutment 1 cap PAGE 5 OF 14

6 FLORIDA DEPATMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bridge No: Inspection Date: 12/21/2015 SKETCHES AND PHOTOS Photo 5: Element 580: East swing light conduit has broken clamps and corroded hardware Photo 6: Element 215: Spall at Bay 3-4 on top of Abutment 4 Cap PAGE 6 OF 14

7 FLORIDA DEPATMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bridge No: Inspection Date: 12/21/2015 SKETCHES AND PHOTOS Photo 7: Element 234: Delamination under Bay 1-4 south face of the Abutment 1 cap Photo 8: Element 394: Undermining of southwest slope protection PAGE 7 OF 14

8 FLORIDA DEPATMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bridge No: Inspection Date: 12/21/2015 SKETCHES AND PHOTOS F-2 Photo 9: Element 394: Deteriorated joint sealant in northeast slope protection F-3 Photo 10: Element 394: Abutment 1 slope pavement/bulkhead joint packed with dirt and debris PAGE 8 OF 14 EXHIBIT 1

9 FLORIDA DEPATMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bridge No: Inspection Date: 12/21/2015 SKETCHES AND PHOTOS Photo 11: Element 321: Spalling in the northeast approach sidewalk Photo 12: Inspection Notes: Typical graffiti under Abutment 4 PAGE 9 OF 14

10 FLORIDA DEPATMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bridge No: Inspection Date: 12/21/2015 SKETCHES AND PHOTOS Photo 13: Inspection Notes: No pedestrian rail at the northwest approach guardrail Photo 14: Inspection Notes: Cracked pipe coupling at northwest corner of bridge PAGE 10 OF 14

11 FLORIDA DEPATMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bridge No: Inspection Date: 12/21/ P/S Conc Open Girder Repair spall in lower south edge Diaphragm 1-2 at Bent 2. Repair spalls in bottom face of Beam 1-4 at abutment Pourable Joint Seal Install pourable sealant in both abutment expansion joints. Repair sealant in left shoulder over Bent 3. RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION 580 Navigational Lights Remove corrosion on the brackets and anchor bolts for both swing navigational lights and apply a protective coating. Replace broken conduit clamps on east swing light conduit. 215 R/Conc Abutment Repair spalling delaminations with exposed steel up to 20in. x 20in. x 1in. at Abutment 1 Bays 1-3 and 1-4 and Abutment 4 in Bay R/Conc Cap Repair delamination in south face of Bent 2 cap under Bay R/Conc Abut Slope Pr Repair undermining at slope pavement/bulkhead cap transition southwest, northwest and northeast slope. Repair undermining top of southwest slope. Repair crack in northeast slope. Clean and seal slope joints at slope pavement/bulkhead cap transition. 321 R/Conc Approach Slab Remove unsound concrete in the southeast and northeast approach sidewalks along the construction joint beneath the aluminum rails and install a flexible sealant. Non-Structural Item: Graffiti Remove graffiti from Beams 3-2, 3-3, 3-4, Abutment 4 cap and backwall. Guardrail Install pedestrian rail at northwest approach guardrail. Utilities Repair broken conduit coupling at northwest corner. PAGE 11 OF 14

12 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 BRIDGE LOCATION MAP North Elevation Palm Harbor Pkwy over College Waterway 0.1 mile East of FL Park Dr PAGE 2 OF 12

13 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 SKETCHES AND PHOTOS Photo 1: Element 204: Pile 3-2 typical crack with corrosion bleedout. Photo 2: Element 204: Pile 2-6 typical delamination with corrosion bleedout. PAGE 5 OF 12

14 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 SKETCHES AND PHOTOS Photo 3: Element 204: Spall / delamination with exposed steel at Bent 3 strut north end. Photo 4: Element 215: Palm tree growing at the north end of Abutment 1. PAGE 6 OF 12

15 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 SKETCHES AND PHOTOS Photo 5: Element 215: Delamination at Abutment 4 cap between Beams 3-2 and 3-3. Photo 6: Element 394: Undermining south end of Abutment 1 slope protection. PAGE 7 OF 12

16 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 SKETCHES AND PHOTOS Photo 7: Inspection Notes: Graffiti on Abutment 1. Photo 8: Inspection Notes: Depression at the southwest approach guardrail second post from the end. PAGE 8 OF 12

17 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION Element 204 P/S Conc Column Repair spalls and delamination s on the following Piles 2-1, 2-2, 2-4, 2-5, 2-6, 2-7, 3-2, 3-3, 3-4, 3-5, 3-6 and 3-7. Remove unsound concrete and repair any spalls and delaminations at the strut undersides in Bents 2 and 3. Element 215 R/Conc Abutment Remove the palm tree growing at the north end of Abutment 1 cap. Repair the delamination at Abutment 4 cap between Beams 4-2 and 4-3. Element 394 Blhd Sewl Any Mater Repair the undermining on south end of Abutment 1 slope protection, adjacent to the bulkhead cap. Non-Structural Items: Approach Slopes/Shoulders Repair the depressions in the southwest and southeast approach guardrail mowing strips. Graffiti Remove / paint over graffiti at Abutment 1 and 4 slope paving, cap and beams. PAGE 9 OF 12

18 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 ADDITIONAL ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES PIL LOCATION DEFICIENCY SIZE PHOTO E 2-1 SE Corner Delamination with corrosion 30in. x 8in. bleedout South and East Delamination with corrosion in. x 22in. Faces bleedout Delamination with corrosion 2-2 SW Corner 24in. 3in. NEW. bleedout 2-4 East Face and East Half of North Face 2-5 SW Corner at Strut 2-6 SE Corner at Strut SE and NE Corner at Strut SE Corner 6in. below Strut NW Corner 12in below Strut SW Corner 6in. below Strut NW Corner below Strut SE Corner 6in. below Strut SW Corner 6in. below Strut All faces 10in. below Strut SE Corner 13in. below Strut Delamination with corrosion bleedout Delamination with corrosion bleedout Delamination with corrosion bleedout Delamination with corrosion bleedout Delamination with corrosion bleedout Delamination with corrosion bleedout Delamination with corrosion bleedout Delamination with corrosion bleedout Delamination with corrosion bleedout Delamination with corrosion bleedout 31in. x 20in. 30in. x 8in. REPAI R YES YES YES YES YES 38in. x 12in. YES YES 22in. x 6in. YES 20in. x 7in. YES YES 26in. x 7in. 20in. x 8in. 30in. x 8in. 22in. x 9in. 22in. x 9in. YES YES YES YES YES Vertical Crack 16in. x.03in. wide YES Delamination with corrosion bleedout 20in. x 6in. 3-7 North Face Corrosion bleedout NOT FOUND YES PAGE 3 OF 12

19 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 BRIDGE LOCATION MAP South Elevation Colechester Lane over College Waterway 0.4 mile E of Palm Hbr Pkwy PAGE 2 OF 8

20 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 SKETCHES AND PHOTOS Photo 1: Element 99: Slab Unit 5-2 spall with exposed rebar. PAGE 4 OF 8

21 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION Element 99 P/S Conc Slab Repair spalls with exposed rebar on the undersides of Slab Units 1-1, 2-8 and 5-2. PAGE 5 OF 8

22 Inspection/CID Report BRIDGE ID: DISTRICT: 05 Deland PAGE: 1 OF 27 INSPECTION DATE: 1/28/2016 SIVG BY: Ayres Associates STRUCTURE NAME: Colorado Dr / College Waterway OWNER: 4 City/Municipal Hwy Agy YEAR BUILT: 1974 MAINTAINED BY: 4 City/Municipal Hwy Agy SECTION NO.: STRUCTURE TYPE: 5 Prestressed Concrete - 01 Slab MP: 0.01 LOCATION: 0.2 Mi E of Palm Hrbr Pky ROUTE: SERVICE TYPE ON: SERV TYPE UND: 5 Highway-pedestrian 5 Waterway FACILITY CARRIED: FEATURE INTERSECTED: Colorado Drive College Waterway FUNCTIONALLY OBSOLETE STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT TYPE OF INSPECTION: Regular NBI DATE FIELD INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED: ABOVE WATER: 01/28/2016 UNDERWATER: 1/29/2016 SUFFICIENCY RATING: 95.0 HEALTH INDEX: This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied. REPORT ID: INSP005 (condensed) PRINTED: 03/18/2016

23

24 Inspection/CID Report BRIDGE ID: DISTRICT: 05 Deland All Elements PAGE: 3 OF 27 INSPECTION DATE: 1/28/2016 SIVG UNIT: 0 DECKS ELEMENT/ENV: 99/4 PS Conc Slab 6223 sf. ELEM CATEGORY: Decks/Slabs CONDITION STATE (5) DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 2 Repaired areas and/or potholes or impending potholes 6223 sf. and/or raveling or rutting exist. Their combined area is more than 2% but less than 10% of the total deck area. ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES: Note: There are utilities on both sidewalks along both sides of the bridge. CS2 = The asphalt overlay has several deck width x up to 1/32in. wide cracks over the expansion joints, there are longitudinal cracks up to 1/64in. wide over the slab unit joints in the eastbound lane. Both sidewalks have transverse cracks up to 1/8in. wide along the intermediate bent expansion joints outlining delaminations up to 8in. x sidewalk width. Refer to Photo 1. REPAIR Refer to Table 1 in the addendum for a list of deck underside deficiencies and Photo 2. REPAIR Noted This Inspection: CS2 = There is a 28in. x 10in. x 1 1/2in. spall with exposed steel on the underside of the closure pour in Span 2. Refer to Photo 3. REPAIR The right sidewalk along Bent 4 expansion joint has a spall 15in. x 4in. x 2 1/2in. with no exposed steel. At the base of right rail Post 3-5 there is a spall 22in x 6in. x 1in. with exposed steel. ELEMENT/ENV: 301/4 Pourable Joint Seal 169 lf. ELEM CATEGORY: Joints CONDITION STATE (3) DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 2 Minor adhesion and/or cohesion failures may be present. 143 lf. Signs of seepage along the joint may be present. Joint may be slightly impacted with debris. Minor spalls in the deck and/or headers may be present adjacent to the joint. This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied. REPORT ID: INSP005 (condensed) PRINTED: 03/18/2016

25 Inspection/CID Report BRIDGE ID: DISTRICT: 05 Deland All Elements PAGE: 4 OF 27 INSPECTION DATE: 1/28/2016 SIVG UNIT: 0 DECKS ELEMENT/ENV: 301/4 Pourable Joint Seal 169 lf. ELEM CATEGORY: Joints CONDITION STATE (3) DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 3 Major adhesion and/or cohesion failures may be present. 26 lf. Signs or observance of leakage along the joint may be present. Joint may be heavily impacted with debris and/or stones. Major spalls may be present in the deck and/or header adjacent to the joint. ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES: Note: The expansion joints are not visible due to an overlay of asphalt. CS3 = The joints are not sealed in the sidewalks. Refer to Photo 4. REPAIR CS2 = Water staining on the intermediate bent caps indicate that the expansion joints are leaking. ELEMENT/ENV: 330/4 Metal Rail Uncoated 322 lf. ELEM CATEGORY: Railing CONDITION STATE (4) DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 1 There is no evidence of active corrosion of the uncoated 314 lf. metal. 2 Surface corrosion has formed or is forming on the 8lf. uncoated metal. ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES: CS1 = Right rail Posts 1-1 and 1-2 have vertical splits up to 1/8in. wide x 8-1/2in. long near the base plates. Refer to Photo 5. REPAIR Noted This Inspection: CS2 = Left rail Posts 1-6, 2-1, 4-1, 4-4, 5-1 and right rail Posts 3-1, 3-2 and 4-4 have moderate surface corrosion at the bases. CS1 = Several rail posts are missing hardware at the connection plate. (However the rails are secure). This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied. REPORT ID: INSP005 (condensed) PRINTED: 03/18/2016

26 Inspection/CID Report BRIDGE ID: DISTRICT: 05 Deland All Elements PAGE: 5 OF 27 INSPECTION DATE: 1/28/2016 SIVG UNIT: 0 DECKS ELEMENT/ENV: 331/4 Conc Bridge Railing 322 lf. ELEM CATEGORY: Railing CONDITION STATE (4) DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 1 The element shows little or no deterioration. There may 280 lf. be discoloration, efflorescence, and/or superficial cracking but without effect on strength and/or serviceability. 2 Minor cracks, surface scaling or spalls may be present but 30 lf. there is no exposed reinforcing or surface evidence of rebar corrosion. 3 Some delaminations and/or spalls may be present and 12 lf. some reinforcing may be exposed. Corrosion of rebar may be present but loss of section is incidental and does not significantly affect the strength and/or serviceability of either the element or the bridge. ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES: CS2 and CS3 = The parapets have surface spalls up to 9in. x 4in. x 1/2in., some with exposed corroded rebar. Refer to Photo 6. REPAIR CS1 = The parapets have full width and full height, up to 1/32in. wide transverse and vertical cracks and full width and full height, up to 1/8in. wide vertical cracks at the joint over the bents. This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied. REPORT ID: INSP005 (condensed) PRINTED: 03/18/2016

27 Inspection/CID Report BRIDGE ID: DISTRICT: 05 Deland All Elements PAGE: 6 OF 27 INSPECTION DATE: 1/28/2016 SIVG UNIT: 0 SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT/ENV: 204/4 P/S Conc Column 20 ea. ELEM CATEGORY: Substructure CONDITION STATE (4) DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 1 The element shows little or no deterioration. There may 12 ea. be discoloration, efflorescence, and/or superficial cracking but without affect on strength and/or serviceability. 2 Minor cracks, spalls and scaling may be present and there 7 ea. may be exposed reinforcing with no evidence of corrosion. There is no exposure of the prestress system. 3 Moderate cracks, spalls, scaling and some delaminations 1 ea. may be present. There may be minor exposure but no deterioration of the prestress system. Corrosion of non-prestressed reinforcement may be present but loss of section is incidental and does not significantly affect the strength and/or serviceability of either the element or the bridge. ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES: CS3 = The underwater inspectors noted the following: Pile 3-2, southeast corner at the top of the marine growth, delamination 4ft. H x 7in. W. CS2 = The piles have small construction related surface spalls. CS1 = At several piles, the ends of the cut and patched pickup points are visible. The northeast corner of Pile 2-1 has a 12in. long x 1/64in. wide vertical crack with efflorescence, adjacent to west bulkhead. ELEMENT/ENV: 215/4 R/Conc Abutment 84 lf. ELEM CATEGORY: Substructure CONDITION STATE (4) DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 1 The element shows little or no deterioration. There may 82 lf. be discoloration, efflorescence, and/or superficial cracking but without affect on strength and/or serviceability. This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied. REPORT ID: INSP005 (condensed) PRINTED: 03/18/2016

28 Inspection/CID Report BRIDGE ID: DISTRICT: 05 Deland All Elements PAGE: 7 OF 27 INSPECTION DATE: 1/28/2016 SIVG UNIT: 0 SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT/ENV: 215/4 R/Conc Abutment 84 lf. ELEM CATEGORY: Substructure CONDITION STATE (4) DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 3 Some delaminations, moderate cracks, spalls and/or 2lf. scaling may be present and some reinforcing may be exposed. Corrosion of rebar may be present but loss of section is incidental and does not significantly affect the strength and/or serviceability of either the element or the bridge. ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES: CS3 = At the south end of Abutment 1 cap, there are several delaminated patches up to 4in. diameter x 1in. deep with exposed corroded rebar ends. Refer to Photo 7. REPAIR Abutment 6 cap has a 4in. diameter x 1/2in. deep spall (popout) exposing a rebar end at the south end. REPAIR CS1 = The inboard faces of the abutment caps typically have water and mildew staining. At the south end of Abutment 1, there is a 12in. section of protruding rebar which is a tripping concern. Refer to Photo 8. REPAIR ELEMENT/ENV: 234/4 R/Conc Cap 162 lf. ELEM CATEGORY: Substructure CONDITION STATE (4) DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 1 The element shows little or no deterioration. There may 157 lf. be discoloration, efflorescence, and/or superficial cracking but without affect on strength and/or serviceability. This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied. REPORT ID: INSP005 (condensed) PRINTED: 03/18/2016

29 Inspection/CID Report BRIDGE ID: DISTRICT: 05 Deland All Elements PAGE: 8 OF 27 INSPECTION DATE: 1/28/2016 SIVG UNIT: 0 SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT/ENV: 234/4 R/Conc Cap 162 lf. ELEM CATEGORY: Substructure CONDITION STATE (4) DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 3 Some delaminations, moderate cracks, spalls and/or 5lf. scaling may be present and some reinforcing may be exposed. Corrosion of rebar may be present but loss of section is incidental and does not significantly affect the strength and/or serviceability of either the element or the bridge. ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES: CS3 = Refer to Table 2 in the addendum for a list of cap deficiencies and Photo 9. REPAIR CS1 = The vertical faces of the intermediate bent caps have efflorescence, water and mildew staining. The underside of the bent caps have exposed rebar ends adjacent to several piles, due to insufficient concrete cover. ELEMENT/ENV: 390/4 Other Fender/Dolphin 110 lf. ELEM CATEGORY: Substructure CONDITION STATE (4) DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 1 There is little or no deterioration. Surface defects only are 90 lf. in evidence. Random open joints may exist. 2 There may be minor deterioration, random open joints, 20 lf. cracking and weathering. Mortar in joints may show minor deterioration. ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES: Note: This element represents the plastic type pile fender system. CS2 = The coating on the top two wales of the east fender is beginning to split along the center of the wales. This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied. REPORT ID: INSP005 (condensed) PRINTED: 03/18/2016

30 Inspection/CID Report BRIDGE ID: DISTRICT: 05 Deland All Elements PAGE: 9 OF 27 INSPECTION DATE: 1/28/2016 SIVG UNIT: 0 SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT/ENV: 393/4 Blkhd Sewl Any Mater 240 ft ELEM CATEGORY: Substructure CONDITION STATE (4) DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 2 There may be minor deterioration, random open joints, 205 ft cracking and weathering. Mortar in joints may show minor deterioration. 3 Moderate to major deterioration and cracking. Major 35 ft deterioration of joints. Minor settlement may be present. ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES: Note: This element represents the bulkheads constructed of concrete sheet piles and composite sheet piles with concrete caps. CS3 = The west bulkhead has a broken composite panel at the south side of Pile 2-5, the cap above the hole has an 11in. x 4in. x 2in. spall with no exposed steel. Refer to Photo 10. REPAIR There are composite panels (4 ea) at the north side of Pile 5-1 and south side of Pile 5-5. These panels have holes up to 11in. diameter and heavy backfill loss. Refer to Photo 11. REPAIR The cap for the east bulkhead, 8ft. south of Pile 5-5, has a 20ft. long area of delamination and spalling with exposed corroded steel, similar at northeast area north of Pile 5-1. Refer to Photo 12. REPAIR CS2 = The joints between the sheet pile bulkheads are open, up to 1-1/2in. wide, allowing minor fill migration. The bulkhead caps typically have full height x full width, 1/64in. to 1/16in. wide vertical and horizontal cracks. ELEMENT/ENV: 394/4 R/Conc Abut Slope Pr 4600 sf. ELEM CATEGORY: Substructure CONDITION STATE (4) DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 3 Some delaminations and/or spalls and/or minor settlement 3000 sf. may be present and some reinforcing may be exposed. Corrosion of rebar may be present but loss of section is incidental and does not significantly affect the strength and/or serviceability of either the element or the bridge. This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied. REPORT ID: INSP005 (condensed) PRINTED: 03/18/2016

31 Inspection/CID Report BRIDGE ID: DISTRICT: 05 Deland All Elements PAGE: 10 OF 27 INSPECTION DATE: 1/28/2016 SIVG UNIT: 0 SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT/ENV: 394/4 R/Conc Abut Slope Pr 4600 sf. ELEM CATEGORY: Substructure CONDITION STATE (4) DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 4 Advanced deterioration. Corrosion of reinforcement and/or 1600 sf. loss of concrete section and/or settlement is sufficient to warrant review to ascertain the impact on the strength and/or serviceability of either the element or the bridge. ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES: CS4 = One slope panel near the top of the east slope beneath the south edge of the bridge is heavily undermined and settled up to 24in. This appears due to loss of fill through the seawall panels. Refer to Photo 13. REPAIR. The loss of fill is also due to storm water infiltration beneath the slope pavement along the heel of the slope paving and at the abutment cap interface. Refer to Photo 14. REPAIR The flat slope paving sections behind the seawall along the south end of Bent 5 has widespread undermining and two collapsed panels. Refer to Photo 15. REPAIR CS3 = Many of the slope panels have signs of settlement and failure of the panel joint sealants, vegetation is growing from some of these joints. Refer to Photo 16. REPAIR This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied. REPORT ID: INSP005 (condensed) PRINTED: 03/18/2016

32 Inspection/CID Report BRIDGE ID: DISTRICT: 05 Deland All Elements PAGE: 11 OF 27 INSPECTION DATE: 1/28/2016 SIVG UNIT: 0 CHANNEL ELEMENT/ENV: 290/4 Channel 1 ea. ELEM CATEGORY: Channel CONDITION STATE (4) DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 3 Bank protection may be being eroded, bank protection 1 ea. may be undermined, river control devices may have severe damage or trees, brush or debris may be restricting the channel. ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES: CS3 = The west and east slope protection and bulkheads have washouts and undermining due to holes in the seawall panels. Refer to Elements 393 Bulkheads and 394 Slope Protection for comments, photos, and repair recommendations. Structure Notes BRIDGE OWNER: CITY OF PALM COAST Bridge inventoried from west to east. TRAFFIC RESTRICTIONS: Based on the current load rating analysis dated 02/15/13, the structure does not require posting. The structure is not posted. This structure is on a 12 month inspection frequency due to SIA Item 61 Channel being rated 4. Asphalt thickness = 3in. As stated in section 3.4 of the Bridge and Other Structures Inspection and Reporting as of 11/24/2009 superstructure unit numbering (Section ) and substructure unit numbering (Section 3.4.3) are designated NOT BY ORDER IN WHICH THE ELEMENTS WERE CONSTRUCTED AND PUT INTO SERVICE. Plans sheet or drawing in Topic G, Bridge Description and Drawings section of the bridge folder can confirm all references to these elements prior to this date. This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied. REPORT ID: INSP005 (condensed) PRINTED: 03/18/2016

33 Inspection/CID Report BRIDGE ID: DISTRICT: 05 Deland PAGE: 12 OF 27 INSPECTION DATE: 1/28/2016 SIVG INSPECTION NOTES: SIVG 1/28/2016 Sufficiency Rating Calculation Accepted by KNAAAJI-P at :01:34 LOAD RATING EVALUATION: This inspection noted no changes in the structure condition that would warrant a new load rating. The load rating dated 02/15/13 appears to still apply. The lead underwater inspector for the current routine inspection is Jonathan Ivey (CBI #00540). The following underwater element were inspected: 204 P/S Concrete Piling / Columns- Bents 2 through 5 each with 5 18in. concrete piling. 290 Channel 390 Fender System - Composite 393 Bulkhead INSPECTION NOTES: Non-Structural Items: Approach Parapets: The southwest approach parapet is fractured at Abutment 1. Refer to Photo 17. REPAIR Approach Shoulders: The earthen approach shoulders at the SE and SW corners of the structure are 4in. to 6in. lower than the sidewalks. There are no approach sidewalks. Guardrails: The NW and SE guardrails have panels that are lapped incorrectly. REPAIR There is a palm tree overgrowing the SW guardrail approximately 12ft. from bridge. The NE guardrail end terminal has minor impact damage The SW and NE guardrail transitions are lapped incorrectly. Refer to Photo 18. REPAIR Approach guardrail posts and cushion blocks typically have moderate weathering. Noted This Inspection: The northeast guardrail is attached with one bolt. Refer to Photo 18. REPAIR The reflective coating on the northwest guardrail end treatment is missing. Reflectors: No object markers are provided at all four corners of the bridge; however, reflectors are provided on the guardrail end terminals. Utilities: The bolts for the left utility cover have moderate to heavy corrosion. Several bolts have 100% section loss. Refer to Photo 19. REPAIR Several nuts are missing from the utility cover along the right and left sides of the structure. This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied. REPORT ID: INSP005 (condensed) PRINTED: 03/18/2016

34 Inspection/CID Report REPORT ID: INVT001A COMPREHENSIVE Page 13 of 27 Structure ID: DATE PRINTED: 03/18/2016 Description Structure Unit Identification Bridge/Unit Key: Structure Name: Description: Type: Colorado Dr / College Waterway MAIN SPAN 1 M Main Roadway Identification: NBI Structure No (8) Position/Prefix (5) Route On Structure Kind Hwy (Rte Prefix) 5 City Street Design Level of Service 1 Mainline Route Number/Suffix 00000/ 0 N/A (NBI) Feature Intersect (6) College Waterway Critical Facility Not Defense-crit Facility Carried (7) Colorado Drive Mile Point (11) 0.01 Latitude (16) 029d35'36.8" Roadway Traffic and Accidents Lanes (28) 2 Medians 0 Speed 30 mph ADT Class ADT Class 2 Recent ADT (29) 441 Year (30) 2015 Future ADT (114) 560 Year (115) 2035 Truck % ADT (109) 2 Detour Length (19) 2.0 mi Detour Speed 30 mph Accident Count -1 Rate -1 Long (17) 081d13'05.1" Roadway Classification Nat. Hwy Sys (104) 0 Not on NHS National base Net (12) Not on Base Network LRS Inventory Rte (13a) Functional Class (26) 19 Urban Local On Federal Aid System N Defense Hwy (100) 0 Not a STRAHNET hwy Direction of Traffic (102) 2 2-way traffic Emergency Sub Rte (13b) 00 Roadway Clearances Vertical (10) ft Appr. Road (32) 28.6 ft Horiz. (47) 28 ft Roadway (51) 28 ft Truck Network (110) 0 Not part of natl netwo Toll Facility (20) 3 On free road Fed. Lands Hwy (105) 0 N/A (NBI) School Bus Route Transit Route This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied.

35 Inspection/CID Report REPORT ID: INVT001A COMPREHENSIVE Page 14 of 27 Structure ID: DATE PRINTED: 03/18/2016 Structure Identification Admin Area Not located in area District (2) D5 - Deland County (3) (73)Flagler Place Code (4) Palm Coast Location (9) 0.2 Mi E of Palm Hrbr Pky Border Br St/Reg (98) Not Applicable (P) Share 0 % Border Struct No (99) FIPS State/Region (1) 12 Florida NBIS Bridge Len (112) Meets NBI Length Parallel Structure (101) No bridge exists Temp. Structure (103) Not Applicable (P) Appraisal Maint. Resp. (21) 4 City/Municipal Hwy Agy Owner (22) 4 City/Municipal Hwy Agy Historic Signif. (37) 5 Not eligible for NRHP Curb/Sidewalk (50): Bridge Median (33): Main Span Material (43A): Appr Span Material (44A): Main Span Design (43B): Appr Span Design (44B): Left Structure Appraisal Open/Posted/Closed (41) A Open, no restriction Region 4-Atlanta Geometrics Spans in Main Unit (45) 5 Approach Spans (46) 0 Structure Type and Material Deck Type and Material 0 No median 5 Prestressed Concrete Not Applicable 01 Slab Not Applicable Navigation Control (38) Permit Required Deck Geometry (68) 5 Above Tolerable Nav Vertical Clr (39) Underclearances (69) N Not applicable (NBI) Approach Alignment (72) 7-No Accel/Reduce Curve Min Vert Lift Clr (116) Bridge Railings (36a) 0 Substandard Transitions (36b) 0 Substandard Approach Guardrail (36c) 0 Substandard Approach Guardrail ends (36d) 0 Substandard Minimum Vertical Clearance Schedule Over Structure (53) 2.7 ft Right 2.7 ft Scour Critical (113) U Unknown Foundation ft Under (reference) (54a) N Feature not hwy or RR Current Inspection Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 Inspector: KNAAAJI-P - Jonathan Ivey Bridge Group: C9J75 Primary Type: Regular NBI Review Required: Deck Width (52): 38.7 ft Skew (34): Deck Type (107): Surface (108): Membrane: Deck Protection: Navigation Data 16.7 ft Nav Horizontal Clr (40) ft 0 ft 0 deg 2 Concrete Precast Panel 6 Bituminous 0 None None Pier Protection (111) 2 In-Place, Functioning Structural Eval (67) 7 Above Min Criteria Reference (55a) N Feature not hwy or RR Right Side (55b) 0 ft Under (54b) 0 ft Left Side (56) 0 ft Load Rating Design Load (31) 0 Unknown Rating Date 2/15/2013 Initials RLH Posting (70) 5 At/Above Legal Loads Length of Max Span (48) 40.1 ft Structure Length (49) ft Age and Service NBI Condition Rating Sufficiency Rating Health Index Operating Type (63) 3 LRFR Load & Res. Fact Operating rating (64) 43.6 tons Alternate -1 Inventory Type (65) 3 LRFR Load & Res. Fact Next Inspection Date Total Length ft Deck Area 6223 sqft Structure Flared (35) 0 No flare Year Built (27) 1974 Year Reconstructed (106) 0 Type of Service On (42a) 5 Highway-pedestrian Under (42b) 5 Waterway Fracture Critical Details Not Applicable Deficiency Not Deficient Minimum Lateral Underclearance Inventory Rating (66) 33.5 tons Alternate -1 Scheduled NBI: 1/28/2018 Element: 01/28/2017 Fracture Critical: Underwater: 01/29/2018 Other/Special: 01/28/2017 Alt Meth -1 This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied.

36 Inspection/CID Report REPORT ID: INVT001A COMPREHENSIVE Page 15 of 27 Structure ID: DATE PRINTED: 03/18/2016 Schedule Cont. Inspection Types Performed Fracture Critical mos Crew Hours 2 Underwater 24 mos 01/29/2016 Flagger Hours 0 Other Special 12 mos 01/28/2016 Helper Hours 0 Custom General Bridge Information Parallel Bridge Seq Channel Depth 8.1 ft Radio Frequency -1 Phone Number (000) Exception Date Exception Type Unknown Accepted By Construction 01/01/1974 Warranty Expiration 00/00/0000 NBI Element Fracture Critical Underwater Other Special Inspection Intervals Required (92) Frequency (92) Last Date (93) Inspection Resources NBI 24 mos (91) 01/28/2016 (90) Snooper Hours 0 Special Crew Hours 3 Bridge Load Rating Information Bridge Scour and Storm Information Condition NBI Rating Special Equip Hours 0 Bridge Rail 1 Other Bridge Rail 2 Other Electrical Devices No electric service Culvert Type Not applicable Maintenance Yard Not FDOT Maintained FIHS ON / OFF No Routes on FIHS Previous Structure 2nd Previous Structure Replacement Structure HS20 Govr. Span Length 28.9 ft Single Unit Truck 2 Axles 43.9 tons L-Rating Origination Field Measurements Single Unit Truck 3 Axles 46.5 tons Load Rating Date 02/15/2013 Single Unit Truck 4 Axles 45.5 tons Method Calculation AASHTO formula Combination Unit Truck 3 Axles 65.8 tons Load Dist. Factor Combination Unit Truck 4 Axles 59 tons Impact Factor 33 Combination Unit Truck 5 Axles 64.8 tons Design Method Unknown Truck Trailer 5 Axles 70.8 tons Design Measure English Posting Weight 34 tons Recommend SU Posting 99 tons Actual SU Posting 99 tons Recommend C Posting 99 tons Actual C Posting 99 tons Recommend ST Posting 99 tons Actual ST Posting 99 tons Gov FB Span 0 ft FL 120 Long Gov Span 51.6 tons Gov FB Spacing 0 ft FL 120 Trans -1 tons FB HS20 Rating 0 tons Single Axle Trans -1 tons FB SU4 Rating 0 tons Tandem Axle Trans -1 tons FB Present N Wing Span -1 ft FB INV Rating Factor 0 Web to Web Span -1 ft FB OPR Rating Factor 0 HS20 OPR Rating Max Span -1 tons FB FL tons FL120 Long Max Span 63.6 tons Pile Driving Record No pile driving records Scour Recommended I Not Applicable Foundation Type No foundation details Scour Recommended II Not Applicable Mode of Flow Tidal Scour Recommended III Not Applicable Rating Scour Eval Minimal Risk Scour Elevation 999 ft Highest Scour Eval Low Risk POA Completed Action Elevation 999 ft Storm Frequency 999 Channel (61) 4 Protection Undermined Culvert (62)N N/A (NBI) Deck (58) 7 Good Waterway (71) 8 Equal Desirable Superstructure (59) 7 Good Unrepaired Spalls -1 sq.ft. Substructure (60) 7 Good Review Required This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied.

37 Inspection/CID Report REPORT ID: INVT001A COMPREHENSIVE Page 16 of 27 Structure ID: DATE PRINTED: 03/18/2016 Elements Inspection Date: 1/28/2016SIVG Span Id Elem/Env Description Qty1 %1 Qty2 %2 Qty3 %3 Qty4 %4 Qty5 %5 T Qty 0 99/4 PS Conc Slab sf. Notes Note: There are utilities on both sidewalks along both sides of the bridge. CS2 = The asphalt overlay has several deck width x up to 1/32in. wide cracks over the expansion joints, there are longitudinal cracks up to 1/64in. wide over the slab unit joints in the eastbound lane. Both sidewalks have transverse cracks up to 1/8in. wide along the intermediate bent expansion joints outlining delaminations up to 8in. x sidewalk width. Refer to Photo 1. REPAIR Refer to Table 1 in the addendum for a list of deck underside deficiencies and Photo 2. REPAIR Noted This Inspection: CS2 = There is a 28in. x 10in. x 1 1/2in. spall with exposed steel on the underside of the closure pour in Span 2. Refer to Photo 3. REPAIR The right sidewalk along Bent 4 expansion joint has a spall 15in. x 4in. x 2 1/2in. with no exposed steel. At the base of right rail Post 3-5 there is a spall 22in x 6in. x 1in. with exposed steel /4 Pourable Joint Seal lf. Notes Note: The expansion joints are not visible due to an overlay of asphalt. CS3 = The joints are not sealed in the sidewalks. Refer to Photo 4. REPAIR CS2 = Water staining on the intermediate bent caps indicate that the expansion joints are leaking /4 Metal Rail Uncoated lf. Notes CS1 = Right rail Posts 1-1 and 1-2 have vertical splits up to 1/8in. wide x 8-1/2in. long near the base plates. Refer to Photo 5. REPAIR Noted This Inspection: CS2 = Left rail Posts 1-6, 2-1, 4-1, 4-4, 5-1 and right rail Posts 3-1, 3-2 and 4-4 have moderate surface corrosion at the bases. CS1 = Several rail posts are missing hardware at the connection plate. (However the rails are secure) /4 Conc Bridge Railing lf. Notes CS2 and CS3 = The parapets have surface spalls up to 9in. x 4in. x 1/2in., some with exposed corroded rebar. Refer to Photo 6. REPAIR CS1 = The parapets have full width and full height, up to 1/32in. wide transverse and vertical cracks and full width and full height, up to 1/8in. wide vertical cracks at the joint over the bents /4 P/S Conc Column ea. Notes CS3 = The underwater inspectors noted the following: Pile 3-2, southeast corner at the top of the marine growth, delamination 4ft. H x 7in. W. CS2 = The piles have small construction related surface spalls. CS1 = At several piles, the ends of the cut and patched pickup points are visible. The northeast corner of Pile 2-1 has a 12in. long x 1/64in. wide vertical crack with efflorescence, adjacent to west bulkhead. This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied.

38 Inspection/CID Report REPORT ID: INVT001A COMPREHENSIVE Page 17 of 27 Structure ID: DATE PRINTED: 03/18/2016 Elements Inspection Date: 1/28/2016SIVG Span Id Elem/Env Description Qty1 %1 Qty2 %2 Qty3 %3 Qty4 %4 Qty5 %5 T Qty 0 215/4 R/Conc Abutment lf. Notes CS3 = At the south end of Abutment 1 cap, there are several delaminated patches up to 4in. diameter x 1in. deep with exposed corroded rebar ends. Refer to Photo 7. REPAIR Abutment 6 cap has a 4in. diameter x 1/2in. deep spall (popout) exposing a rebar end at the south end. REPAIR CS1 = The inboard faces of the abutment caps typically have water and mildew staining. At the south end of Abutment 1, there is a 12in. section of protruding rebar which is a tripping concern. Refer to Photo 8. REPAIR 0 234/4 R/Conc Cap lf. Notes CS3 = Refer to Table 2 in the addendum for a list of cap deficiencies and Photo 9. REPAIR CS1 = The vertical faces of the intermediate bent caps have efflorescence, water and mildew staining. The underside of the bent caps have exposed rebar ends adjacent to several piles, due to insufficient concrete cover /4 Other Fender/Dolphin lf. Notes Note: This element represents the plastic type pile fender system. CS2 = The coating on the top two wales of the east fender is beginning to split along the center of the wales /4 Blkhd Sewl Any Mater ft Notes Note: This element represents the bulkheads constructed of concrete sheet piles and composite sheet piles with concrete caps. CS3 = The west bulkhead has a broken composite panel at the south side of Pile 2-5, the cap above the hole has an 11in. x 4in. x 2in. spall with no exposed steel. Refer to Photo 10. REPAIR There are composite panels (4 ea) at the north side of Pile 5-1 and south side of Pile 5-5. These panels have holes up to 11in. diameter and heavy backfill loss. Refer to Photo 11. REPAIR The cap for the east bulkhead, 8ft. south of Pile 5-5, has a 20ft. long area of delamination and spalling with exposed corroded steel, similar at northeast area north of Pile 5-1. Refer to Photo 12. REPAIR CS2 = The joints between the sheet pile bulkheads are open, up to 1-1/2in. wide, allowing minor fill migration. The bulkhead caps typically have full height x full width, 1/64in. to 1/16in. wide vertical and horizontal cracks. This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied.

39 Inspection/CID Report REPORT ID: INVT001A COMPREHENSIVE Page 18 of 27 Structure ID: DATE PRINTED: 03/18/2016 Elements Inspection Date: 1/28/2016SIVG Span Id Elem/Env Description Qty1 %1 Qty2 %2 Qty3 %3 Qty4 %4 Qty5 %5 T Qty 0 394/4 R/Conc Abut Slope Pr sf. Notes CS4 = One slope panel near the top of the east slope beneath the south edge of the bridge is heavily undermined and settled up to 24in. This appears due to loss of fill through the seawall panels. Refer to Photo 13. REPAIR. The loss of fill is also due to storm water infiltration beneath the slope pavement along the heel of the slope paving and at the abutment cap interface. Refer to Photo 14. REPAIR The flat slope paving sections behind the seawall along the south end of Bent 5 has widespread undermining and two collapsed panels. Refer to Photo 15. REPAIR CS3 = Many of the slope panels have signs of settlement and failure of the panel joint sealants, vegetation is growing from some of these joints. Refer to Photo 16. REPAIR 0 290/4 Channel ea. Notes CS3 = The west and east slope protection and bulkheads have washouts and undermining due to holes in the seawall panels. Refer to Elements 393 Bulkheads and 394 Slope Protection for comments, photos, and repair recommendations. Total Number of Elements: 11 This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied.

40 Inspection/CID Report REPORT ID: INVT001A COMPREHENSIVE Page 19 of 27 Structure ID: DATE PRINTED: 03/18/2016 Inspection Information Inspection Date: Type: Regular NBI Inspector: KNAAAJI-P - Jonathan Ivey Inspection Notes: Sufficiency Rating Calculation Accepted by KNAAAJI-P at :01:34 LOAD RATING EVALUATION: This inspection noted no changes in the structure condition that would warrant a new load rating. The load rating dated 02/15/13 appears to still apply. The lead underwater inspector for the current routine inspection is Jonathan Ivey (CBI #00540). The following underwater element were inspected: 204 P/S Concrete Piling / Columns- Bents 2 through 5 each with 5 18in. concrete piling. 290 Channel 390 Fender System - Composite 393 Bulkhead INSPECTION NOTES: Non-Structural Items: Approach Parapets: The southwest approach parapet is fractured at Abutment 1. Refer to Photo 17. REPAIR Approach Shoulders: The earthen approach shoulders at the SE and SW corners of the structure are 4in. to 6in. lower than the sidewalks. There are no approach sidewalks. Guardrails: The NW and SE guardrails have panels that are lapped incorrectly. REPAIR There is a palm tree overgrowing the SW guardrail approximately 12ft. from bridge. The NE guardrail end terminal has minor impact damage The SW and NE guardrail transitions are lapped incorrectly. Refer to Photo 18. REPAIR Approach guardrail posts and cushion blocks typically have moderate weathering. Noted This Inspection: The northeast guardrail is attached with one bolt. Refer to Photo 18. REPAIR The reflective coating on the northwest guardrail end treatment is missing. Reflectors: No object markers are provided at all four corners of the bridge; however, reflectors are provided on the guardrail end terminals. Utilities: The bolts for the left utility cover have moderate to heavy corrosion. Several bolts have 100% section loss. Refer to Photo 19. REPAIR Several nuts are missing from the utility cover along the right and left sides of the structure. This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied.

41 Inspection/CID Report REPORT ID: INVT001A COMPREHENSIVE Page 20 of 27 Structure ID: DATE PRINTED: 03/18/2016 Inspection Information Inspection Date: Type: Interim Inspector: KNVOLSE-P - Steve Eorgan Inspection Notes: Sufficiency Rating Calculation Accepted by KNVOLCW-P at :57:15 LOAD RATING EVALUATION: This inspection noted no changes in the structure condition that would warrant a new load rating. The load rating dated 02/15/13 appears to still apply. This is an interim inspection report due to SIA Item 61, Channel, being rated 4. Only elements 393, Blkhd Sewl Any Mater, 394, R/Conc Abut Slope Pr, and 290 Channel are included. Refer to the routine inspection report dated 1/15/14 for all other elements. INSPECTION NOTES: Non-Structural Items: Approach Parapets: The southwest approach parapet is fractured at Abutment 1. Refer to Photo 8. REPAIR Approach Shoulders: The earthen approach shoulders at the SE and SW corners of the structure are 4in. to 6in. lower than the sidewalks. There are no approach sidewalks. Guardrails: The NW and SE guardrails have panels that are lapped incorrectly. There is a palm tree overgrowing the SW guardrail approximately 12ft. from bridge. The NE guardrail end terminal has minor impact damage The SW and NE guardrail transitions are lapped incorrectly. Refer to Photo 9. REPAIR Approach guardrail posts and cushion blocks typically have moderate weathering. Reflectors: No object markers are provided at all four corners of the bridge; however, reflectors are provided on the guardrail end terminals. Utilities: The bolts for the left utility cover have moderate to heavy corrosion. Several bolts have 100% section loss. Refer to Photo 10. REPAIR Several nuts are missing from the utility cover along the right side of the structure. This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied.

42 Inspection/CID Report REPORT ID: INVT001A COMPREHENSIVE Page 21 of 27 Structure ID: DATE PRINTED: 03/18/2016 Inspection Information Inspection Date: Type: Regular NBI Inspector: KNVOLSH-P - Scott Hughes Inspection Notes: Sufficiency Rating Calculation Accepted by KNVOLCW-P at :25:56 LOAD RATING EVALUATION: This inspection noted no changes in the structure condition that would warrant a new load rating. The load rating dated 02/15/13 appears to still apply. The lead underwater inspector for the current routine inspection is Keith Hoogland (CBI #00341). The following underwater elements were inspected: 204 P/S Concrete Piling/Columns Bents 2 through 5 each with five 18in. concrete piling 290 Channel 390 Fender System Composite 393 Bulkhead INSPECTION NOTES: Non-Structural Items: Approach Parapets: The southwest approach parapet is fractured at Abutment 1. Refer to Photo 17. REPAIR Approach Shoulders: The earthen approach shoulders at the SE and SW corners of the structure are 4in. to 6in. lower than the sidewalks. There are no approach sidewalks. Guardrails: The NW and SE guardrails have panels that are lapped incorrectly. There is a palm tree overgrowing the SW guardrail approximately 12ft. from bridge. The NE guardrail end terminal has minor impact damage The SW and NE guardrail transitions are lapped incorrectly. Refer to Photo 18. REPAIR Approach guardrail posts and cushion blocks typically have moderate weathering. Reflectors: No object markers are provided at all four corners of the bridge; however, reflectors are provided on the guardrail end terminals. Utilities: The bolts for the left utility cover have moderate to heavy corrosion. Several bolts have 100% section loss. Refer to Photo 19. REPAIR Several nuts are missing from the utility cover along the right side of the structure. CORRECTIVE ACTION: The posting signs have been removed. The structure no longer requires posting. The void at the northwest approach sidewalk has filled in naturally. Inspection Date: Type: Special-Posted Bridge Inspector: KNVOLSH-P - Scott Hughes Inspection Notes: Sufficiency Rating Calculation Accepted by KNVOLCW-P at :48:10 LOAD RATING EVALUATION: This inspection noted no changes in the structure condition that would warrant a new load rating. The load rating dated 02/15/13 appears to still apply. This is a Special-Posted and Interim inspection, only Elements 99 P/S Conc Slab, 393 Blkhd Sewl Any Mater, 394 R/Conc Abut Slope Pr, and 290 Channel are included in this report. No dive was required during this inspection due to elements required for inspection were in less than 3ft. of water. This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied.

43 Inspection/CID Report REPORT ID: INVT001A COMPREHENSIVE Page 22 of 27 Structure ID: DATE PRINTED: 03/18/2016 Inspection Information Inspection Date: Type: Regular NBI Inspector: KNVOLRO-P - Rick O'Connor Inspection Notes: Sufficiency Rating Calculation Accepted by KNVOLCW-P at :13:29 LOAD RATING EVALUATION: This inspection noted nothing that warrants a new load rating. The current load rating dated 12/22/83 appears to still apply. The lead underwater inspector for the current routine inspection is Stephen Hays (CBI #00438). The following underwater elements were inspected: 204 P/S Concrete Piling/Columns Bents 2 through 5 each with five 18in. concrete piling 290 Channel 390 Fender System Composite 393 Bulkhead The channel NBI rating has been lowered from 5 to 4 due to widespread backfill loss through deteriorated seawall panels. Non-Structural Items: Due to a large amount of text and Pontis limitations, refer to the addendum for inspection notes. Inspection Date: Type: Special-Posted Bridge Inspector: KNKCABA-P - Michael Betz Inspection Notes: Sufficiency Rating Calculation Accepted by KNKCARL-P at :25:33 Note: This Special-Posted Bridge inspection is being conducted based on SIA Item 70, Bridge Posting, being coded a 4. Structural deficiencies affecting the load carrying capacity of Element 99 PS Conc Slab were inspected and evaluated and will be included in this report. For a comprehensive list of all other deficiencies, refer to the previous routine report dated Non-Pontis Items: Signs: The structure is posted at both approaches for the SU type vehicles as follows: SU-34 tons. The signing does not meet current FDOT Standard Index No guidelines due to the lack of advanced warning signs. Refer to photos 1 and 2. This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied.

44 Inspection/CID Report REPORT ID: INVT001A COMPREHENSIVE Page 23 of 27 Structure ID: DATE PRINTED: 03/18/2016 Inspection Information Inspection Date: Type: Regular NBI Inspector: INACTIVE - Paul Elborne Inspection Notes: Sufficiency Rating Calculation Accepted by KNKCABT-P at :53:43 Non-Pontis Items: Approach Roadways: Noted This Inspection: CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN: A new asphalt approach roadway and deck overlay has been installed. Approach Shoulders: The earthen approach shoulders at the SE and SW corners of the structure are 4in. to 6in. lower than the sidewalks. There are no approach sidewalks. The SW approach asphalt curb is crumbling 3ft. x 7in. x 6in. approximately 12ft. from the bridge. This is due to a palm tree growing adjacent to this area. A repair recommendation will not be made at this time due to the insignificance of the deficiency. Guardrails: The NW and SE (previously NW only) guardrails have panels that are lapped incorrectly. Refer to photo 19. There is a palm tree overgrowing the SW guardrail approximately 12ft. from bridge. Noted This Inspection: The NE guardrail end terminal has minor impact damage The SW and NE guardrail transitions are lapped incorrectly. Approach guardrail posts and cushion blocks typically have full height x up to 1/4in. wide checks. Reflectors: No object markers are provided at all four corners of the bridge. Signs: The structure is posted at both approaches 34 tons. The signing does not meet current FDOT Standard Index guidelines due to improper sign configuration and the lack of advanced warning signs. Refer to photos 1 and 2. Noted This Inspection: CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN: The east weight limit sign has been reset and is no longer leaning. Utilities: The bolts for the left utility cover have moderate to heavy corrosion with 10% to 75% section loss. Several bolts have 100% section loss. Refer to photo 20. Random nuts are missing from the utility cover along the right side of the structure. Refer to photo 21. This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied.

45 Inspection/CID Report REPORT ID: INVT001A COMPREHENSIVE Page 24 of 27 Structure ID: DATE PRINTED: 03/18/2016 Inspection Information Inspection Date: Type: Special-Posted Bridge Inspector: KNKCAMB-P - Brice McMinn Inspection Notes: Sufficiency Rating Calculation Accepted by knkcapo-p at :28:38 Note: This interim inspection is being conducted based on SIA Item #70 Bridge Posting being rated 4 or less. Structural deficiencies affecting the load carrying capacity of Element 99 PS Conc Slab were inspected, evaluated and will be included in this report. For a comprehensive list of all other deficiencies, refer to the previous routine report dated 1/9/08. Non-Pontis Items: Signs: Corrective Action Taken: New posting signs have been installed at the west and east bridge approaches. The signing does not meet FDOT Standard Index No guidelines, since there are no advance posting signs. Refer to photos 1 and 2. Inspection Date: Type: Regular NBI Inspector: KNKCAST-P - Timothy Sweeney Inspection Notes: Sufficiency Rating Calculation Accepted by knkcast-p at :04:38 Non-Pontis Items: Approach Roadways: Both approach roadway asphalt overlays, exhibit 1/16in. to 1/8in. wide longitudinal and transverse cracks at various locations. Approach Shoulders: The earthen approach shoulders at the southeast and southwest corners of the structure are 4in. to 6in. lower than the sidewalks. There are no approach sidewalks. The southwest approach asphalt curb is crumbling 3ft. x 7in. x 6in.; approximately 12ft. from the bridge. This is due to a palm tree growing adjacent to this area. Refer to photo 19. Guardrails: The northwest guardrail panels are lapped incorrectly. Refer to photo 20. There is a palm tree overgrowing the southwest guardrail approximately 12ft. from bridge. Reflectors: No object markers are provided at the four corners of the bridge. Signs: The structure is posted at both approaches for 34 tons. The east sign is leaning. The signing does not meet FDOT Standard Index No guidelines due to improper sign configuration and the lack of advance warning signs. Refer to photos 1 and 2. Utilities: The bolts for the left utility cover have moderate to heavy corrosion with 10% to 75% section loss. Several bolts have 100% section loss. Refer to photo 21. Random nuts are missing from the utility cover along the right side of the structure. Refer to photo 22. This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied.

46 Inspection/CID Report REPORT ID: INVT001A COMPREHENSIVE Page 25 of 27 Structure ID: DATE PRINTED: 03/18/2016 Inspection Information Inspection Date: Type: Special-Posted Bridge Inspector: 1034 Inspection Notes: Sufficiency Rating Calculation Accepted by knkcacd-p at :46:22 Note: This interim inspection is being conducted based on SIA Item #70 Bridge Posting being rated 4 or less. Structural deficiencies affecting the load carrying capacity of Element 99 PS Conc Slab were reviewed and will be included in this report. For a comprehensive list of all other deficiencies, refer to the previous routine report dated 2/15/06. Non-Pontis Items: Signs: The structure is posted at both approaches for 34 tons. The east sign is leaning. The signing does not meet FDOT Standard Index No guidelines due to improper sign configuration and the lack of advance warning signs. Refer to photos 1 and 2. Inspection Date: Type: Regular NBI Inspector: KNAAAOJ-P - John O'Grady Inspection Notes: Sufficiency Rating Calculation Accepted by kn538oj-p at :13:00 Non-Pontis Items: Approach Roadways: The approach roadway asphalt overlays exhibit 1/16in. to 1/8in. wide longitudinal and transverse cracks at various locations. Noted This Inspection: Minor settlement is present along each approach roadway/bridge deck transition. Approach Shoulders: The earthen approach shoulders at the southeast and southwest corners of the structure are 4in. to 6in. lower than the sidewalks. There are no approach sidewalks. The southwest approach asphalt curb is crumbling 3ft. x 7in. x 6in. approximately 12ft. from the bridge. This is due to a palm tree growing adjacent to this area. Refer to Photo 25. Guardrails: The guardrail panels are lapped incorrectly. Refer to Photo 26. There is a palm tree overgrowing the southwest guardrail approximately 12ft. from the bridge. Reflectors: No hazard markers are provided at all four corners of the bridge. Signs: Noted This Inspection: The structure is posted at both approaches for 34 tons. The east sign is leaning. The signing does not meet current FDOT Standard Index No guidelines due to improper sign configuration and the lack of advanced warning signs. Refer to Photos 1 and 2. CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN: New signs have been installed at each end of the structure since the previous routine inspection. Utilities: The bolts for the left utility cover have moderate to heavy corrosion with 10% to 75% section loss. Several bolts have 100% section loss. Refer to Photo 27. Noted This Inspection: Random nuts are missing from the utility cover along the right side of the structure. This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied.

47 Inspection/CID Report REPORT ID: INVT001A COMPREHENSIVE Page 26 of 27 Structure ID: DATE PRINTED: 03/18/2016 Inspection Information Inspection Date: Type: Regular NBI Inspector: KN238JK-P - James Kelley Inspection Notes: Sufficiency Rating Calculation Accepted by kn538pl-p at :08:53 KN238JK-P inspection comments - Structure Date Element 99 PS Conc Slab (continued): Noted This Inspection: Deck Top: The longitudinal cracking adjacent to the barriers is up to 1/2in. wide and the asphalt is beginning to upheave. Refer to Photo 4. Deck Underside: Slab Unit 1-3 has a 3in. x 1in. x 1/2in. spall with exposed rebar near mid-span. Refer to Photo 2. Sidewalks: The right sidewalk has a 14in. x 5in. delaminated area in the exterior edge over Bent 4. Refer to Photo 5. Non-Pontis Items: Approach Roadway: The approach roadway asphalt overlays exhibit 1/16in. to 1/8in. wide transverse and vertical cracks in various locations. Approach Shoulders: The earthen approach shoulders at the southeast and southwest corners of the structure are 4in. to 6in. lower than the sidewalks. There are no approach sidewalks. Noted This Inspection: The southwest approach asphalt curb is crumbling 3ft. x 7in. x 6in. approximately 12ft. from the bridge. This is due to a palm tree growing adjacent to this area. Refer to Photo 20. Guardrails: The northwest and southeast guardrail panels are lapped incorrectly. Refer to Photo 21. Noted This Inspection: The southwest and northeast guardrails are lapped incorrectly at the bridgerail attachment shoes. There is a palm tree overgrowing the southwest guardrail approximately 12ft. from the bridge. Refer to Photo 20. Non-Pontis Items continued in the addendum. Inspection Date: Type: Regular NBI Inspector: 256 Inspection Notes: Sufficiency Rating Calculation Accepted by kn538sf at 6/4/02 10:35:11 KN853NP inspection comments - Structure Date 2/14/02 - This structure was inventoried from west to east. Non-Pontis Items: Guardrails - > The northwest and southeast guardrail panels are lapped in the wrong direction. Roadway Condition - > The approach roadway asphalt overlays exhibit 1/16" to 1/8" wide transverse and vertical cracks in various locations. Approach Shoulders - > The earthen approach shoulders at the southeast and southwest corners of the structure are 4" to 6" lower than the sidewalks, creating a potential tripping hazardous for pedestrians. There are no approach sidewalks. This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied.

48 Inspection/CID Report REPORT ID: INVT001A COMPREHENSIVE Page 27 of 27 Structure ID: DATE PRINTED: 03/18/2016 Inspection Information Inspection Date: Type: Regular NBI Inspector: 299 Inspection Notes: Sufficiency Rating Calculation Accepted by kn538rr at 4/3/00 14:42:49 Sufficiency Rating Calculation Accepted by kn538rr at 4/3/00 13:31:54 KN538RR inspection comments - Structure Date 1/22/00 - This structure was inventoried from west to east. Approach Slopes/Shoulders The erosion at the west end of the right sidewalk and the undermining of the slope protection at the southwest corner of the structure have been filled with sod and concrete. Guardrails The northwest and southeast guardrail systems panels are lapped in the wrong direction. Roadway Condition The approach roadway asphalt overlays exhibit 1/16" to 1/8" wide transverse and vertical cracks in various locations. Previous comments > (none) Structure Notes BRIDGE OWNER: CITY OF PALM COAST Bridge inventoried from west to east. TRAFFIC RESTRICTIONS: Based on the current load rating analysis dated 02/15/13, the structure does not require posting. The structure is not posted. This structure is on a 12 month inspection frequency due to SIA Item 61 Channel being rated 4. Asphalt thickness = 3in. As stated in section 3.4 of the Bridge and Other Structures Inspection and Reporting as of 11/24/2009 superstructure unit numbering (Section ) and substructure unit numbering (Section 3.4.3) are designated NOT BY ORDER IN WHICH THE ELEMENTS WERE CONSTRUCTED AND PUT INTO SERVICE. Plans sheet or drawing in Topic G, Bridge Description and Drawings section of the bridge folder can confirm all references to these elements prior to this date. This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections (3)(a) and (3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied.

49 ADDENDUM CONTENTS OF ADDENDUM Bridge Location Map Additional Element Inspection Notes Sketches and Photos Recommended Corrective Action Load Rating Analysis Summary Scour Evaluation * Posting Photos * Fracture Critical Inspections * This section is not included in this report. PREPARED FOR: FDOT BRIDGE OWNER: CITY OF PALM COAST PREPARED BY: AYRES ASSOCIATES REPORT IDENTIFICATION Bridge Number: Regular NBI Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 Bridge Name: Colorado Dr over College Waterway Facility Carried: Colorado Dr Featured Intersected: College Waterway East Approach PAGE 1 OF 18

50 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 BRIDGE LOCATION MAP South Elevation Colorado Dr over College Waterway 0.2 mile east of Palm Hrbr Pky PAGE 2 OF 18

51 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 ADDITIONAL ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES TABLE 1 99/4 PS Conc Slab Slab Location Deficiency Size Repair Unit 1-3 Left edge near midspan Spall with exposed steel 1ft. x 1ft. x 1in. Yes 2-4 Right edge, 6ft. from Bent 3 Spall with no exposed steel 17in. x 12in. x 1-1/2in. No 3-1 Left edge, 6ft. from Bent 3 Spall with no exposed steel 6in. x 4in. x 1/2in. No 3-1 Left edge, 8ft. from Bent 3 Spall with no exposed steel 19in. x 6in. x 1/2in. No 3-5 Right edge near midspan Delaminated Patch 23in. x 5in. Yes 4-1 North end at midspan Length of exposed rebar 6in. No 4-7 Right edge, 6ft. from Bent 4 Spall with no exposed steel 10in. x 5in. x 1/2in. No TABLE 2 234/4 R/Conc Cap Bent Location Deficiency Size Repair 2 East face under Slab Unit 2-2 Popout with exposed steel 4in. Dia x 3/4in. deep No Spall with exposed corroded 3 South end, west face steel 20in. x 20in. x 2in. Yes Spall with exposed corroded 5 East face under Slab Unit 5-5 steel 10in. x 10in. x 1in. Yes Spall with exposed corroded 5 East face of north haunch steel (lack of cover) 4in. x 10in. x 1/2in. Yes PAGE 3 OF 18

52 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 LOAD RATING ANALYSIS SUMMARY PAGE 4 OF 18

53 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 SKETCHES AND PHOTOS Photo 1: Element 99: Transverse crack outlining delamination s on the right sidewalk. Photo 2: Element 99: Slab unit 1-3 left edge spall with exposed rebar. PAGE 5 OF 18

54 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 SKETCHES AND PHOTOS Photo 3: Element 99: Closure pour in Span 2 spall with exposed steel. Photo 4: Element 301: Unsealed joint on the left sidewalk. PAGE 6 OF 18

55 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 SKETCHES AND PHOTOS Photo 5: Element 330: Vertical split in right rail Post 1-1. Photo 6: Element 331: Spalls with exposed rebar on the north face of the right parapet. PAGE 7 OF 18

56 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 SKETCHES AND PHOTOS Photo 7: Element 215: Delaminated patch with rebar on the south end of Abutment 1. Photo 8: Element 215: Protruding rebar at the south end of Abutment 1. PAGE 8 OF 18

57 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 SKETCHES AND PHOTOS Photo 9: Element 234: Spall with exposed steel west face of Bent 3 cap south end. Photo 10: Element 393: West bulkhead hole in composite material. PAGE 9 OF 18

58 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 SKETCHES AND PHOTOS Photo 11: Element 393: Typical hole in composite bulkhead panel. Photo 12: Element 393: Spalled / delaminated cap south end of east bulkhead. PAGE 10 OF 18

59 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 SKETCHES AND PHOTOS Photo 13: Element 394: Undermining and collapse of slope pavement panel south end of Abutment 6. Photo 14: Element 394: Pathway for storm water infiltration at the north end of Abutment 6. PAGE 11 OF 18

60 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 SKETCHES AND PHOTOS Photo 15: Element 394: Undermining and collapse of slope pavement panel south end of Bent 5. Photo 16: Element 394: Failed joint sealant and vegetation growth. PAGE 12 OF 18

61 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 SKETCHES AND PHOTOS Photo 17: Inspection Notes: Fractured southwest approach parapet at Abutment 1. Photo 18: Inspection Notes: Northeast guardrail panels improperly lapped and attachment bolt missing. PAGE 13 OF 18

62 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 SKETCHES AND PHOTOS Photo 19: Inspection Notes: Heavy corrosion on the attaching bolts for the utility cover. PAGE 14 OF 18

63 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION Element 99 P/S Conc Slab Repair sidewalk delamination s over bents in both sidewalks. Repair all the spalls with exposed steel on the slab underside and closure pour. Element 301 Pourable Joint Seal Seal the sidewalk joints over the Abutments. Element 330 Metal Rail Uncoated Repair vertical splits in right rail Posts 1-1 and 1-2 near the base plates. Element 331 Conc Bridge Railing Repair spalls with exposed steel in the traffic faces of both parapets. Element 215 R/Conc Abutment Repair the pop outs with exposed steel at the south ends of Abutment 1 and 6 caps. Remove the rebar protruding from the south end of Abutment 1. Element 234 R/ Conc Cap Repair spalls with exposed steel in Bent caps 2, 3 and 5. Element 393 Blkd Sewl Any Mater Replace the bulkhead with composite sheet piles at both Abutments and replace lost backfill in the conjunction with slope pavement repairs. Replace 24ft. of deteriorated cap at the south end of the east bulkhead. Element 394 R/Conc Abut Slope Pro Repair widespread loss of fill beneath the east slop pavement. Repair the collapsed and settled panels in conjunction with the bulkhead repairs. Eliminate pathways for storm water infiltration beneath the slope paving along the upper edges and Abutment caps. Repair the failed joint sealant in the slope pavement. Non-Structural Items: Approach Parapets: Repair the fractured southwest approach parapet. Guardrails: Properly lap the guardrail transitions at the southwest, southeast, northwest and northeast approaches. Utilities: Remove corrosion and apply coating to the left utility cover fasteners. PAGE 15 OF 18

64 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 SCOUR EVALUATION LEFT SIDE 12/02/83 01/15/14 01/28/16 Change Abutment Bent Bent C/L of Channel Bent Bent Abutment Waterline at C/L of Channel RIGHT SIDE 12/02/83 01/15/14 01/28/16 Change Abutment Bent Bent C/L of Channel Bent Bent Abutment Waterline at C/L of Channel NOTE: - = An increase in degradation. Blank box = No previous measurement available. Relative Channel Plots Are Not To Scale. Any Vertical Curvature Of Datum Point Is Not Reflective In Plot. The waterline and mudline measurements, in reference to the top of the sidewalks, are provided for future comparison. All measurements are in feet. PAGE 16 OF 18

65 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 SCOUR EVALUATION LEFT SIDE SOUNDINGS 12/02/83 01/15/14 01/28/16 Top of Left Sidewalk 0.0 Abutment 1 Bent 2 Bent 3 C/L of Channel Bent 4 Bent 5 Abutment Vertical Distance (ft) RIGHT SIDE SOUNDINGS 12/02/83 01/15/14 01/28/16 Top of Right Sidewalk 0.0 Abutment 1 Bent 2 Bent 3 C/L of Channel Bent 4 Bent 5 Abutment Vertical Distance (ft) Relative Channel Plots Are Not To Scale. Any Vertical Curvature Of Datum Point Is Not Reflective In Plot. PAGE 17 OF 18

66 Bridge No: Inspection Date: 01/28/2016 SCOUR EVALUATION Channel Looking North Channel Looking South PAGE 18 OF 18

67 PALM COAST BRIDGE # REHAB: OPIONION OF PROBABLE COST 8/19/2016 FOOT PAY ITEM No. 1 CIVIL CONSTRUCTION MOBTIrTZATTON LS 1 $ S MATKTKNANCE OF TRAFFIC (DFTOnRl. LS 1 $ s lo.sno 00 UNIT SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION S v.'^.fion on CONTIGENCY (10%) s 7.3sn on 1 DEMOLITION / REMOVAL / ADJUSTMENTS CLEARING S GRUBBING AC 0.25 $ 4, S 1,0? ,0 4 REMOVAL OF FXTSTTNG CONCRFTF PAVEMENT SY 78 $ S 1, REGULAR EXCAVATTON (ROADWAY REMOVAL) CY 56 S 3.82 $?l. 9? MILLING EXIST ASPH PAVT, 1 1/2" AVG DEPTH.SY 410 $ 3.16 S 1.? GUARDRAIL REMOVAL LF 208 $ 1.79 S REMOVAL OF EXISTING ASPHALT CURB 1 INC. ASPH. FLUMES) LE 298 S 3.68 S 1. n9(=i. 64 REMOVAL OF EXISTING DECORATIVE, CONCRETE CURB (INC. STONE) LF 24 $ 3.68 S REMOVAL OF EXISTING 4" D.I.P. FORCE MAIN (INC. ADDTTTONAL 4" CONDUIT.S) LE 1 63 $ 2.63 S BEMOyAL.QF, EXISTING 8" D.I.P. WATER MAIN (INC. ADDITIONAL 4" CONDUITS) LF 1 63 $ 2.63 S REMOVAL OF EXISTING PEDESTRIAN RATLING LF 344 S 1.89 S 6,so. ^ f> REMOVAL OF EXISTING 12" CMP LF 47 S 5.25 S REMOVAL OF PALM TREES. 3 TOTAT, (GRIND.STUMP 6" BELOW GRADE) LS 1 S S S. 0 0 REMOVAL OF EXISTING CONCRETE CAP (SHEET PILE WALL).SY 1 05 S 24.3? S 7, RELOCATION OF EXISING MAILBOX..EA. 1 S $ 13?. 7 5 TOTAL SUBTOTAL DEMOLITION / REMOVAL s 11. r^-^? 10 CONTIGENCY (10%) S 1.1 ^ ^?1 TOTAL 12" CORREGATED METAL PIPE (CMPl " MITERED END SECTION SILT FENCE STAKED (TYPE I I I ) rloflting TVRBIDITY BARRIEP LF INLET PROTECIIOW SYSTEM Eh SEDIMENT BARRIER (SYNTHETIC BALES) 12" STABILIZED.SUB-GRADE ^ INLETS. DT BOT. TYPE C. <10' ^ GHARDRAIL - BRIDGE ANCHORAGE ASSEM Ff;I , GUARDRAIL END ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLY- PARATiLEI, EA 3, l?,44q,po CONCRETE DRIVEWAY. 5" THICK, REINFORCED , ?7Qg LIMEROCK BASE, 10" 1, flsfh STRVi:iUm CTDRSE SF-g.5 (1,3") (ROADWAY) COKCRETE CffRB i PIfTTRR - STflPPflPP _ke_ 21A , SUBTOTAL ROADWAY 70,624.8^ CONTIGENCY (10%) 7, BAHIA,.SOD SY S S 3, SUBTOTAL LANDSCAPE ;=! r^.i.rr in CONTIGENCY (10%) 3 H =^ R1 TOTAL SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS THERMOPLASTIC. STANDARD,YELLOW, SOLID. 6" LF 662 S S BRIDGE BARRIER REFLECTORS (25' SPACING)....EA 14 S 6.30 S SUBTOTAL SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MAiOCINGS S T CONTIGENCY (10%) S 10<J 44 TOTAL

68 PALM COAST BRIDGE # REHAB: OPIONION OF PROBABLE COST 8/19/ UTILITIES FORCE MAIN 6" HDPE FORCE MAIN (DTRECTTONAL DRTI.I.l LE 443 S S 23, " X 4" M.J. REDUCER EA $ S AIR RET.EA.3E VALVE AND VAULT EA 2 S S " M.J. PLlIfi WITH ROX AND COVER EA $ S CONNECT TO EXTSTTNC, 4" PVC EA?- $ GROUT FILL EXISTING 4" PVC LF 280 $ WATF.R MAIN 10" HDPE WATER MAIN (DIRECTIONAL DRILL! LE 538 $ , " X 8" M.J. TAPPING SLEEVE EA 2 S , " M.J. GATE VALVE WITH BOX AND COVER EA 2 S $ " X 8" M.J. REDUCER EA $ , SAMPLE POINT EA 2 S " SADDLE WET TAP EA 1 $ S " POLY WATER SERVICE EA 1 $ " SCH. 40 PVC CASING LF 4 5 S WATER METER wi th ROX S COVER EA 1 $ REMOVE VALVE ROX AND COVER AND ABANDON IN PLAGE EA 2 S " M.J. BLIND FLANGE EA 9. $ , " 90 DEGREE BEND EA 1 S " M.J. 90 DEGREE BEND EA S , GROUT FILL EXISTING 8" PVC LE 235 S SUBTOTAL UTILITIES.S 94.f!49.fi.'i CONTIGENCY (10%) S TOTAL S (^.-^4. fig STRUCTURAL BRIDGE REPAIR ITEMS REMOVAL OF EXISTING STRUCTURE I INC. 20'. CONT1 N'GE.XrY 1 LS 1 S , EMBANKMENT (INC. 25>. CONTINGENCY) CY 767 S , CLEANING S COATING CONCRETE SURFACE. CLASS 5 'INC..15) CONTINGENCY:. SF $ , RESTORE SPALLED AREA. PORTTAND CEMENT GROUT (ihc. 251 COSTINGEMCY! CF 22 $ 2, S 56, EPOXY MATERIAL FOR CRACK INJECTION-STRUCTURE REHAB (INC. 25' CONTINGENCY! GA 2 S , CRACK INJECT S SEAL-STRUCTURES REHAB (TNT:.?5- CONTINGENCY! T,F 19 $ , METHACRYLATE MONOMOR (INC. 25» CONTINGENCYl GA 11 S CLEANING t SEALING CONCRETE SURFACES. PENETRANT SEALER OR SF 1, 553 $ METHACRYLATES (INC.?5'- C.'JNI'INGEK'CY! 0 i! 31.";.. i.sf?.00 CONTIGENCY INCLUDED IN PRICES TOTAL S RRinCE TTEMK CLASS IT CONCRETE - SUPERSTRUCTURE CY 11.0 $ 1, REINFORCING STEEL -.SUPERSTRUCTURE LB 2, 534 S , STANDARD INTEGRAL PIIF, JACKET. NON-STRUCTURAL, LF 6 S , TO 30" (INC. 25' CONTINGENCY! PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE RAILING. ALUMINUM ONLY. 42" TYPE 1 LE 344 S , GOMCRFTF SLOPE PAVEMENT. 4". REINFORCED SY 575 S SUBTOTAL BRIDGE ITEMS.S CONTIGENCY (10%) S TOTAL S 124..'il RnT.KHRAn SHEET PILING, COMPOSITE, PERMANENT SE 5, 481 $ SHEET PILING, COMPOSITE, PERMANENT (UNDER BRIDGE! SF 1,092 S RETURN WAIJ.S LS 1 $ 2, , CONCRETE CAP LE $ , SOIL ANCHORS EA 65 S S SOIL ANCHORS (TINDER BRIDGE! EA , SUBTOTAL BULKHEAD ITEMS.S ^S.'i.."il 0.00 CONTIGENCY (10%).S.3?..'; TOTAL S TOTAL <i 1 ^ mv Qil at