Lead-Based Paint. Risk Assessment Report

Transcription

1 Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessment Report For Fusion Management P. O. Box 2267 Lutz, Florida (727) For the Dwelling Located at: 1524 N. Vandalia Place Tulsa, Oklahoma Performed By Michael S. Burnside Certified Lead-Based Paint Inspector/Risk Assessor Oklahoma Certification RASR110160OK Burnside and Associates, Ltd. Co. P.O. Box 9 Talala, Oklahoma (918) May 21, 2014

2 Risk Assessment Background Information Burnside and Associates, Ltd. Co. have completed a lead-based paint risk assessment at 1524 N. Vandalia Place, Tulsa, Oklahoma which was performed on May 21, The dwelling interior consists of drywall with the exterior consisting of vinyl siding with un-finished wood trim. The structure is approximately 720 square feet and was built in approximately This risk assessment was conducted following the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead- Based Paint Hazards in Housing, including 1997 revisions. The standard for lead-based paint, as per HUD/EPA and the State of Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality standard for XRF measurement of > 1.0 mg/cm 2 as being classified as positive for leadbased paint was followed. The standards for lead dust and soil hazard levels are as follows: Dust Floors Window Sills Window Troughs Exterior Concrete Soil Play Area Driplines, Yards 40 μg/ft² 250 μg/ft² 400 μg/ft² 800 μg/ft² 400 ppm 1,200 ppm

3 Risk Assessment Report Summary A lead-based paint risk assessment was performed at 1524 N. Vandalia Place, Tulsa on May 21, 2014 by Burnside and Associates, Ltd. Co., (Oklahoma Certification OKFIRM11280), P. O. Box 9, Talala, Oklahoma Michael S. Burnside, a Certified Risk Assessor (Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Certification No. RASR11016OK), conducted the risk assessment. Results The risk assessment of this dwelling revealed lead-based paint hazards (as defined in the Guidelines For the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing, June 1995, issued by the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) pursuant to Title X of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992) exist in the following locations: No hazards found at this time Paint sampling for deteriorated paint was performed using a NITON XLp-303A portable X-ray fluorescent analyzer (XRF) to inspect only deteriorated paint surfaces on May 21, Current EPA and HUD guidance for paint to be less than 1.0 mg/cm² for XRF testing and 0.5% lead by weight or less than 5,000 PPM (parts per million) for Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS). Using these criteria, the paint surfaces listed above exceeded this limit and had deterioration. Additionally, there could be areas that contained lead-based paint above the HUD guidance level but did not yet show signs of deterioration. All painted surfaces were not inspected as these surfaces may not have had deterioration at the time of the risk assessment; all painted, stained, and/or wallpaper surfaces should be assumed to contain lead-based paint. All surfaces should be monitored by the owner of the dwelling to monitor the paint condition to help prevent deterioration of possible lead-based paint surfaces. Recommendations There are several different measures that can be implemented to help reduce the possibility of lead-based paint hazards at the dwelling. These can be divided into two (2) primary categories: Interim Controls and Abatement. The HUD definition of abatement can be described as a set of measures which makes the lead-based paint surface inaccessible to dwelling occupants for a minimum of twenty (20) years. Please note that this does not mean that the lead-based paint has to be completely removed; it can be controlled by enclosure or encapsulation systems which provide a dust tight enclosure or encapsulation with twenty (20) year minimum duration. Interim Controls would be all tasks which have up to a twenty (20) year duration. Interim controls are considered more of a temporary fix but with periodic monitoring and reevaluation of the lead-based paint surface, interim controls can help to reduce the

4 possibility of lead-based paint hazards quite effectively. Interim controls can include such items as painting, cleaning, owner/occupant education of lead-based paint hazards, installation of sod or other ground cover, etc. Based upon the lead hazards found at the dwelling, following is the recommended interim control options to be implemented at the dwelling with the recommended action noted in bold lettering. These are recommendations only and are not contingent upon budget constraints; options could be selected based upon the amount of money budgeted to the renovation, blending interim and abatement options. Due to changing market conditions and available trained and/or certified firms, cost estimates are not provided due to pricing variability and should be obtained from local sources in accordance with your specific funding sources. A. Interim Controls B. Abatement a. No recommendations at this time a. No recommendations at this time It should be noted that there are no recommendations for paint removal by the use of paint strippers and/or caustic agents. This process is labor intensive and is typically only cost effective where there are requirements for historic preservation of original components. Additionally, this risk assessment report addresses only those areas that have deteriorated lead-based paint, lead dust hazards, or leaded soil hazards; there are no recommendations for areas where there is not deteriorated lead based paint. Some agencies may address additional lead-based paint areas other than those noted above depending upon the requirements or funding of their particular program. Estimates should be obtained from local contractors familiar with working with lead-based paint. Contractor personnel must be either trained in lead-safe work practices or certified as lead abatement workers, depending upon the specific requirements of the rehabilitation program; the firm must also be a lead-based paint firm if using leadabatement workers certified by the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality. Depending upon if this work is done as a true abatement of lead-based paint or if it is performed as part of scheduled rehabilitation work, there are various requirements for the use of certified workers and/or supervisors. Once a plan of action has been implemented, review the intended plan of action to determine the exact certification or training requirements for the work to be performed.

5 Following are general guidelines to require of contractors performing lead-based paint contracting for your agency in addition to any other requirements of your agency: 1. Require documentation of worker protection program 2. Copy of Worker s Compensation coverage issued directly from the insurer to your agency 3. Copy of insurance certificate issued directly from the insurer to your agency 4. Copy of intended work action along with reference to this method being approved by HUD and the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) 5. Copies of all DEQ certified personnel identification cards that will be working on the project 6. Copies of all lead-safe work practices training and/or lead-abatement worker certifications for all personnel. After all work is completed, clearance testing must be performed by a DEQ certified inspector or risk assessor. Reevaluation Standard Reevaluation Schedule 2 of the HUD Guidelines apply to this dwelling, as no lead-based paint hazards were found during the risk assessment. Schedule 2 recommends reevaluation should take place at three (3) years after completion of the work, with a visual survey performed annually by the owner and whenever information indicates a possible problem. A copy of this summary must be provided to new lessees (tenants) and purchasers of this property under Federal law (24 CFR part 35 and 40 CFR part 745) before they become obligated under a lease or sales contract. The complete report must also be provided to new purchasers and it must be made available to new tenants. Landlords (lessors) and sellers are also required to distribute an educational pamphlet approved by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and include standard warning language in their leases or sales contracts to ensure that parents have the information they need to protect their children from lead-based paint hazards.

6 Burnside and Associates, Ltd. Co. make no warranty, guarantee, or representation, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, effectiveness, or usefulness of any information, method, or material in this document. Nor do we assume any liability for the use of any information, methods, or material contained herein, or for damages arising from such use; nor assume any responsibility for any injury to individuals or property, or for any financial loss, sustained as a result of the use or application of this report. This report must be considered solely as a resource document representing a consensus of opinion. It is intended the document serve as a guideline for owners or others in development of plans and activities that may be required such as disclosure to prospective purchasers and or tenants. It is not the purpose or burden of this document to provide all embracing answers to every problem of lead paint. Users bear all risks associated with reliance on these results and shall have the sole responsibility to evaluate the information contained herein and to form their own independent judgments on the use of this information as may be appropriate to specific circumstances or actions. This report includes painted and stained surfaces on the interior and exterior of the structure as identified by the inspector by a visual walk through and does not include surfaces that are non-accessible or that might otherwise be hidden surfaces. This report cannot and does not represent the condition of lead-based painted surfaces after the time and date of this inspection. The report also does not include evaluation of water, materials not visible (behind wall, ceiling, or floor surfaces), or adjacent property for the presence of lead hazards. Any other environmental hazards that may be found at this property are outside the scope of this report. The paint inspection report is for the exclusive private use of Fusion Management and the professional services of Burnside and Associates, Ltd. Co. are undertaken for and performed in the interest of Fusion Management. No contractual obligation is assumed for the benefit of any other person or company involved with this dwelling. This report is confidential and is not to be copied or disseminated to any other party without the expressed written consent of Burnside and Associates, Ltd. Co. Use of or reliance upon the report by other parties or for other transactions is strictly prohibited. A copy of this summary must be provided to new lessees (tenants) and purchasers of this property under Federal law (24 CFR part 35 and 40 CFR part 745) before they become obligated under a lease or sales contract. The complete report must also be provided to new purchasers and it must be made available to new tenants. Landlords (lessors) and sellers are also required to distribute an educational pamphlet approved by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and include standard warning language in their leases or sales contracts to ensure that parents have the information they need to protect their children from lead-based paint hazards. The information that follows in this report are the testing results and inspector certification that comprise the basis of this report. _ Date May 21, 2014 Michael Burnside Manager Burnside and Associates, Ltd. Co. Oklahoma Inspector/Risk Assessor No. RASR110160OK

7 Information Page Oklahoma Certified Firm Name: Burnside and Associates, Ltd. Co. Address: P. O. Box 9, Talala, Oklahoma Phone: Firm Certificate # OKFIRM11280 Oklahoma Certified Lead Inspector/Risk Assessor Name: Michael Burnside Address: P. O. Box 9, Talala, Oklahoma Phone: Certificate # OKRASR11016 XRF Data XRF Manufacturer NITON Corporation XRF Model number XLp 303A XRF Serial number XRF Source Strength CD 109, 40 mci Resourcing Date March 15, 2013 Locations Tested See any included XRF data results QA/QC Procedures HUD and the manufacturer s recommended calibration checks were performed NLLAP Lab For Laboratory Samples Name: Quantem Laboratories Address: 2033 Heritage Park Drive, Oklahoma City, OK Phone: Accreditation # Dust & Soil Method: EPA SW846,7420 implementing a microwave-assisted digestion process Analytical US EPA, 1994 Method 7420, FLAA Analysis of solid wastes Methodology: for lead. Test methods for evaluating solid wastes SW-846, 3 rd Edition Other Certifications Michael Burnside Oklahoma Supervisor OKSUVR11316

8 Resident Questionnaire Children/Children s Habits 1. (a) Do you have any children that live in your home? Yes No _X_ (b) If yes, how many? Ages? (c) Record blood levels, if known IF NO CHILDREN, SKIP TO Q.5 Name of Child 1. Locate the rooms/areas where each child sleeps, eats, and plays: Location of Bedroom Location of All Rooms Where Child Sleeps Primary Location Where Child Plays Indoors Primary Location Where Child Plays Outdoors 3. Where are toys stored/kept? 4. Is there any visible evidence of chewed or peeling paint on the woodwork, furniture, or toys? Yes No X Family Use Patterns 5. Which entrances are used most frequently? Sides A, B, and C 6. Which windows are opened most frequently? _Most_ 7. Do you use window air conditioners? If yes, where? (Condensation often causes paint deterioration) 8. (a) Do any household members engage in gardening? Yes No _X (b) Record the location of any vegetable garden. (c) Are you planning any landscaping activities that will remove grass or ground covering? Yes No X 9. (a) How often is the household cleaned? as needed (b) What cleaning methods do you use? vacuuming, sweeping 10. (a) Did you recently complete any building renovations? Yes No X (b) If yes, where? (c) Was building debris stored in the yard? If Yes, where? 11. Are you planning any building renovations? Where? 12. (a) Do any household members work in a lead-related industry? Yes No X (b) If yes, where are dirty clothes placed and cleaned?

9 Building Condition Form Condition Yes No Roof missing parts of surfaces (tiles, boards, shakes, etc.) X Roof has holes or large cracks X Gutters or downspouts broken N/A Chimney masonry cracked, bricks loose or missing, obviously out of plumb N/A Exterior or interior walls have obvious large cracks or holes, X requiring more than routine pointing (if masonry) or painting Exterior siding has missing boards or shingles X Water stains on interior walls or ceilings X Plaster walls or ceilings deteriorated X Two or more windows or doors broken, missing, or boarded up X Porch or steps have major elements broken, missing, or boarded up X Foundation has major cracks, missing material, structure leans, X or visibly unsound * Total Number 1 8 * If the Yes column has two or more checks, the dwelling is usually considered to be in poor condition for the purposes of a risk assessment. However, specific conditions and extenuating circumstances should be considered before determining the final condition of the dwelling and the appropriateness of a lead hazard screen. Notes:

10 Paint Conditions on Selected Surfaces (Single-Family, Owner-Occupied) Building Component Locatio n Notes Paint condition (intact, fair, poor, or not present) to be completed by Risk Assessor Intact N/A N/A Deterioration due to friction or impact? Deterioration due to moisture? Building siding Exterior trim Exterior window trim Exterior doors A,C Poor Yes Yes Railings N/A Overhead door N/A Other porch surfaces Intact Interior doors 3,4,5 Poor Yes Ceilings 2 Fair Yes Walls All Poor Yes Interior windows Intact Interior floors N/A Interior trim Intact Stairways N/A Radiator (or N/A radiator cover) Basement cabinets N/A Bathroom cabinets Intact Other surfaces: Shed Poor Yes Foundation Fair Yes Location of painted component with visible bite marks If the overall condition of a component is similar throughout a dwelling, that condition should be recorded. If a component in a couple of locations is in poor condition, but the overall condition is good or fair, the specific sites of the badly deteriorated paint should be noted. The specific locations of any component with bite marks should be recorded.

11 Field Sampling Form for Dust (Single-Surface Sampling) Name of Risk Assessor Michael Burnside Lab. ID# Name of property owner Property address 1524 N. Vandalia Place, Tulsa Dwelling selection protocol All dwellings Targeted Worst case Random Target dwelling criteria (check all that apply) Code violations Judged to be in poor condition Presence of two or more children between ages of 6 months and 6 years Serves as day-care facility Recently prepared for reoccupancy Sample number Room (record name of room used by the owner or resident) Playroom _Room Playroom _Room Kitchen _Room Kitchen _Room 6_ Bedroom 1 _Room Bedroom 1 _Room 4_ Bedroom 2 Bedroom 2 Surface type (circle the type) Is surface smooth and cleanable? Dimensions* of sample area (inches inches) Area (ft²) Result of lab analysis (µg/ft²) Floor Yes _12_ _12_ 1.0 <9.0 Window sill No 3 5/8 34 ¼ Floor Yes _12 _12_ Window sill Yes 4 34 ¼ <9.46 Floor Yes _12_ _12_ 1.0 <9.0 Window sill No 3 ¾ 34 ½ < Blank Floor 12 _12_ 1.0 <9.0 * Measure to the nearest 1/8 inch. HUD standards: 40 µg/ft²(floor), 250 µg/ft²(int. window sill), 400 µg/ft²(window trough), exterior concrete 800 μg/ft² Total number of samples on this page 7 Page 1 of 1 Date of sample collection 5/21/14_ Date shipped to lab 5/21/14 _ _

12 Date 5/21/14 Name of clearance examiner License no. (if applicable) Name of Property owner Property Address Lead Hazard Control Soil Sampling Form (Composite Sampling Only) Michael Burnside OKRASR N. Vandalia Place, Tulsa Sample number Location Bare or covered Lab result( g/g)/ppm Side A dripline Covered Side C dripline Covered 104 Sketch soil sampling plot plan. Collect only the top ½" of soil. Total number of sample on this page 2 Page 1 of 1 Date of sample collection 5/21/14 Date shipped to lab 5/21/14 HUD Standards: 400 µg/g (ppm) for play areas, 1200 µg/g in bare soil for the remainder of the yard. Above 5000 µg/g, abatement of soil required. BRL Below reporting limit

13 DETERIORATED PAINT XRF READINGS Note: Under the heading Side listed in the following data table, the listing A would refer to the address side wall of the dwelling with the B, C, and D designations referring to the remaining walls in a clockwise rotation.

14 Room Legend Room 1 Living room Room 2 Front bedroom Room 3 Hall Room 4 Rear bedroom Room 5 Bathroom Room 6 Kitchen

15 No Side Room Structure Feature Substrate Color Condition Results PbC 1 Calibrate Positive 1 2 Calibrate Positive 1 3 Calibrate Positive A Rm. 01 Wall Drywall Beige Fair Negative 0 5 B Rm. 01 Wall Drywall Beige Poor Negative 0 6 C Rm. 01 Wall Drywall Beige Poor Negative 0 7 D Rm. 01 Wall Drywall Beige Poor Negative 0 8 C Rm. 02 Wall Drywall Beige Fair Negative 0 9 D Rm. 02 Wall Drywall Beige Poor Negative 0 10 D Rm. 02 Ceiling Drywall White Fair Negative 0 11 A Rm. 04 Wall Drywall Beige Fair Negative 0 12 D Rm. 04 Wall Drywall Beige Fair Negative 0 13 A Rm. 04 Door Door Wood White Poor Negative 0 14 D Rm. 05 Wall Drywall Beige Poor Negative 0 15 A Rm. 05 Door Door Wood White Poor Negative C Rm. 03 Door Door Wood White Poor Negative < LOD 17 A Rm. 06 Wall Drywall White Poor Negative 0 18 B Rm. 06 Wall Drywall White Fair Negative 0 19 A Exterior Wall Foundation Concrete Grey Fair Negative 0 20 C Exterior Wall Foundation Concrete Grey Fair Negative C Exterior Stair Handrail Metal Silver Poor Negative 0 22 C Exterior Door Jamb Wood White Fair Negative 0 23 D Exterior Wall Foundation Concrete Grey Fair Negative Calibrate Positive 1 25 Calibrate Positive 1 26 Calibrate Positive 1.1

16 Photo 1 Front view of dwelling Photo 2 Rear view of dwelling

17

18

19 LABORATORY RESULTS

20

21

22

23

24 PERSONNEL CERTIFICATION