Asbestos Survey & Lead-Based Paint Inspection/Risk Assessment Report

Transcription

1 Asbestos Survey & Lead-Based Paint Inspection/Risk Assessment Report Fourplex 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN Property BB Housing Associates (651) Property Owner & Phone Number Submitted to: BB Housing Associates Submitted by: Environmental Health Testing Services 2811 Texas Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota Certified Lead Firm: License No: LF3281 Submittal Date: September 12, 2013

2 Environmental Health Testing Services 2811 Texas Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN Phone: (952) Website: September 12, 2013 Attn: Mr. Michael Buelow BB Housing Associates 1645 Palace Avenue St. Paul, MN RE: Asbestos Sampling Survey, & Lead-Based Paint Inspection/Assessment Fourplex, 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, Minnesota Dear Mr. Buelow: In accordance with your authorization, we conducted a pre-renovation asbestos survey and a lead-based paint inspection and risk assessment for the above-referenced property. The purpose of this survey was to identify building materials with asbestos and/or lead-based paints in preparation for renovation work at the above-reference property. Items surveyed for this project included building components planned to be disturbed during the renovation. Please refer to the attached report for the scope, methods and conclusions of our survey. We appreciate the opportunity to provide our professional services to you for this project. If you have any questions regarding this or the attached report, I may be contacted at Sincerely, Kristine Stahl, Consultant

3 Contents 1.0 Executive Summary Project Scope Site Description Asbestos Survey Lead-Based Paint Inspection/ Risk Assessment (PIRA) Additional Pre-Renovation Items of Concern Closure... 6 Appendices A: Figures B: MDH Inspector Certifications and Laboratory Certificates C: TABLE 1: Inventory of Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials D: Standard Operating Procedures for Lead Paint Inspections and Risk Assessments E: TABLE 2: (Lead Analysis) F: TABLES 3 and 4: Summary of Lead Dust Analytical Results G: TABLE 5: Lead Hazard Reduction Options H: Table 6: Maintenance/Monitoring Schedule I: Disclosure J: Analytical Laboratory Reports (Asbestos and Lead Analysis)

4 1.0 Executive Summary A pre-renovation asbestos survey and a lead-based paint inspection/risk assessment have been completed of the vacant fourplex located at 861 and 863 Burr Street, Ramsey County, Minnesota (Site.) Based on our visual observations and our evaluation of analytical data, we conclude the following: The following materials meet the definition of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) per the results of our survey: functional space material description asbestos content approximate quantity unit nd level kitchen gold vinyl linoleum 20% 200 s.f. The following materials meet the definition of containing lead-based paints per the results of our survey: UNIT ROOM/AREA COMPONENT exterior white wood window casings (side A only), gray wood porch ceiling, st floor bathroom white ceramic tile baseboards, nd floor bathroom beige metal tub, nd floor stairway to attic white wood stair stringer, 863 common entry and front stairway white wood stringer, blue stair treads and risers, white vinyl floor, st floor bathroom yellow ceramic wall tile, white ceramic tile baseboards, st floor stairway to white wood ledge (side B), basement nd floor bathroom white ceramic tile tub surround, and white ceramic tile baseboards. The Pre-Renovation and Demolition Rule (Minn. R ) requires solid wastes, hazardous wastes, oil, tanks, appliances, and any components or items with loose or peeling lead-based paints, mercury, asbestos (depending on the type and condition), Chlorofluorocarbons and/or poly-chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) to be removed prior to renovation or demolition.

5 September 12, Project Scope The purpose of this survey included the following: to identify and sample suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) and to provide information regarding the identity, location, and approximate quantities of analyticallyconfirmed ACMs in preparation for renovation of the fourplex; and to conduct a lead-based paint inspection/ risk assessment. A lead-based paint inspection is a surface-by-surface investigation to determine the presence of lead-based paint. A risk assessment involves evaluating a dwelling for lead-based paint hazards, and if present, providing lead hazard reduction options. 3.0 Site Description The subject site is located at 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota (Site). The parcel identification (PID) for the Site is At the time of this survey, the structure at the Site included a vacant wood-frame-constructed two-story fourplex with a basement foundation. A Site location map and a Site sketch of the floor plans are shown on Figures 1 and 2, respectively (Figures, Appendix A). Building materials within the fourplex appeared of similar age, of similar construction, and of similar materials. Building materials within the units consisted of dry-wall walls and ceilings, wood and vinyl window components, wood and metal door components, wood baseboards, vinyl flooring, tile flooring, carpeted flooring and fiberglass wall and attic insulation. 4.0 Asbestos Survey Asbestos Bulk Sampling Results The Site was surveyed for asbestos-containing materials (ACM) on August 23, 2013 by Kristine Stahl, Certified Asbestos Inspector #AI8690 ( MDH Inspector Certifications and Laboratory Certificate, Appendix B), in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Health Asbestos Abatement Rules (MR Chapter 4620), and the Pre-Renovation and Demolition Rule (Minn. R ) Bulk sampling was performed in general accordance with the sampling protocols established in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFRJ) 40, Section 763, Subpart E. Sampling within the structure included the collection of ceiling, wall, flooring materials, and the exterior siding. The bulk samples collected for laboratory asbestos analysis were submitted to Environmental Hazards Services, an accredited NVLAP laboratory for analysis using polarized light microscopy (EPA 600/R-93/116 Method.) Laboratory analysis results indicate the presence of 2

6 September 12, 2013 asbestos (an asbestos content of more than one percent (1%) in the following materials surveyed for this project: functional space material description asbestos content approximate quantity unit nd level kitchen gold vinyl linoleum 20% 200 s.f. Additional sampling information is summarized on Table 1 (Inventory of Suspect Asbestos- Containing Materials Surveyed, Appendix C), the approximate sampling locations of flooring materials are shown on Figures 2 (Figures, Appendix A), and the laboratory analytical report is attached to this report. Ceiling and walls materials at the Site consisted of drywall and appeared homogeneous throughout the fourplex. Discussion Asbestos abatement should be performed by properly trained abatement contractors using appropriate controls to prevent fiber emissions during the removal process. Workers performing removal should be properly protected to prevent exposure, including the use of respiratory protection with HEPA filtration. Asbestos containing waste materials should be properly contained and transported for offsite disposal at a properly permitted facility. The contractor conducting abatement work is responsible for complying with local, state, and federal standards for worker protection and NESHAP regulations regarding asbestos fiber emissions. The MPCA and the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) must be notified of asbestosrelated work. A Notification of Asbestos-Related Work must be submitted to the MPCA and Minnesota Department of Health prior to asbestos abatement work. The MPCA must be notified of demolition work. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) must be notified with a Notification of Intent to Perform a Demolition ten working days prior to the start date of a demolition project. All materials regulated under the Pre- Renovation and Demolition Rule, including RACM, building components with peeling leadbased paints and all other items prohibited from being deposited in a landfill, must be removed from the structure two days prior to the start date that was submitted for the notification. Limitations Statement Asbestos was widely used until the late 1970 s in thousands of building materials, making it difficult to locate all areas of ACM usage. This assessment reflects the data collected from the specific locations tested to identify ACM in those locations and may not be all encompassing. There is always potential for asbestos containing materials to be missed due to problems with accessibility, and the broad variety of uses. The conclusions and recommendations within this report are based on current regulations and the professional experience of the certified professionals involved in this project. 3

7 September 12, Lead-Based Paint Inspection/ Risk Assessment (PIRA) This project included a lead-based paint inspection and risk assessment. Additional information on statues, rules, and protocols used for this inspection are described in the Standard Operating Procedures for Lead-Based Paint Inspections, Appendix D attached to this report. The on-site lead-based paint inspection/ risk assessment was conducted on September 4, 2013 and involved testing surfaces using an X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy (XRF) to determine lead concentrations. Interior sampling included the ceilings, the walls, the window components, the door components, the cabinets, the stair components, two tubs, the baseboards, and the flooring. Exterior sampling included the siding, the window components, the door components, the front porch and the fascia. The XRF results indicated lead-based paints (a lead concentration above the action level of 1.0 mg/cm 2 ) are present on the following: UNIT ROOM/AREA COMPONENT exterior white wood window casings (side A only), gray wood porch ceiling, st floor bathroom white ceramic tile baseboards, nd floor bathroom beige metal tub, nd floor stairway to attic white wood stair stringer, 863 common entry and front stairway white wood stringer, blue stair treads and risers, white vinyl floor, st floor bathroom yellow ceramic wall tile, white ceramic tile baseboards, st floor stairway to white wood ledge (side B), basement nd floor bathroom white ceramic tile tub surround, and white ceramic tile baseboards. The XRF testing locations and results are summarized on Table 2 (, Appendix E.) 4

8 September 12, 2013 To further screen for lead risk hazards, six dust wipe samples were collected from each unit at the Site and submitted to Accurate Analytical Testing, an accredited laboratory. The results of the following dust wipe samples indicated lead levels above HUD and the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) standards for lead in dust: unit 861, first-floor front living room entry floor, unit 863 first-floor entry floor (near kitchen), and unit 863 first-floor bedroom floor. A summary of the dust wipe and collection with the analytical results for each unit are summarized on Tables 3 thru 6 (Summary of Laboratory Analytical Results, Appendix F), and copies of the laboratory reports are attached to this report. Soil sampling was not required for this project, since the ground surface at the Site was covered with vegetation and mulch with no bare soil noted around the foundation of the home or in the yard at the time of this inspection. Recommended lead hazard control measures and a reevaluation schedule are provided on Tables 7 and 8, respectively (Lead Hazard Reduction Options, Appendix G and Maintenance/Monitoring Schedule, Appendix H.) In general, all painted surfaces should be monitored. A negative result does not necessarily indicate that no lead is present in that surface, but rather indicates that any lead present in that surface is below the 1.0 mg/cm 2 threshold in the area tested. Therefore, all painted surfaces should be maintained in intact condition. Based on the findings of the lead-based paint survey, lead safe work practices should be followed if building components identified with lead-based paints above are disturbed. Painted surface to be disturbed means a paint surface that is to be scraped, sanded, cut, penetrated or otherwise affected by rehabilitation work in a manner that could potentially create a lead-based paint hazard by generating dust, fumes, or paint chips (24 CFR Definitions.) Lead Safe Certified contractors should use extreme care and lead safe work practices should be followed during the rehabilitation work. All available records and reports concerning lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards are required to be disclosed to purchasers and tenants at the time of sale or lease or upon lease renewal. Disclosure Information is attached to this report (Disclosure Information, Appendix I). This lead inspection/risk assessment report should be kept by the inspector and all future owners for the life of the structure. 5

9 September 12, Additional Pre-Renovation Items of Concern The Pre-Renovation and Demolition Rule (Minn. R ) requires solid wastes, hazardous wastes, oil, tanks, appliances, and any components or items with loose or peeling lead-based paints, mercury, asbestos (depending on the type and condition), Chlorofluorocarbons and/or poly-chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) to be recycled or properly disposed of prior to renovation or demolition. 7.0 Closure We appreciate the opportunity in providing environmental services for your project. If additional information or assistance is needed, I may be reached at ENVIORONMENTAL HEALTH TESTING SERVICES, LLC Prepared by: Kristine Stahl, Consultant MN-Licensed Asbestos Inspector, #AI8690 MN-Licensed Lead Risk Assessor, #LR944 6

10 Figure1 Site Location Map Fourplex, 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota

11

12

13

14

15

16 September 12, 2013 Appendix C: Inventory of Suspect Asbestos Containing Materials Surveyed N.D. not detected TABLE 1 Inventory of Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials Surveyed Fourplex; 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota Material Friable Homogenous Material Sample Area Sampled # color and description? areas Category S main-level kitchen ceiling - popcorn n throughout surf N.D S main-level bedroom ceiling - popcorn n throughout surf N.D. S main-level living room ceiling - popcorn n throughout surf N.D. S main-level bedroom ceiling - popcorn n throughout surf N.D. S nd -level living room ceiling - popcorn n throughout surf N.D. S nd level bedroom ceiling popcorn n throughout surf N.D. S nd level kitchen ceiling - popcorn n throughout surf N.D. S nd level bathroom ceiling - popcorn n throughout surf N.D. S-9 2 nd level common hall ceiling - popcorn n throughout surf N.D. S main-level living room wall drywall n throughout surf N.D. S main-level hallway wall - drywall n throughout misc N.D. S-12 2 nd level common hall wall - drywall n throughout misc N.D. S main-level entrance floor - tan & white vinyl tiles n see Figure 2 misc N.D. S main-level living room floor -brown laminate n see Figure 2 misc N.D. S main-level entry floor - brown vinyl tiles n see Figure 2 misc N.D. S main-level bathroom floor -- small yellow ceramic tiles n see Figure 2 misc N.D. S-17 common area hall and stairs floor - white vinyl tiles n see Figure 2 misc N.D. S nd level kitchen floor - gold linoleum n see Figure 2 misc 18% S nd floor bathroom floor - small white ceramic tile n see Figure 2 misc N.D. S nd floor bathroom floor - small beige ceramic tile n see Figure 2 misc N.D. Asbestos Content S main-level entry floor & mastic - underlying beige n see Figure 2 misc N.D. ceramic tile S main-level living room floor & mastic - underlying tan vinyl n see Figure 2 misc N.D. S main-level kitchen floor & mastic - underlying tan n see Figure 2 misc N.D. ceramic tile S nd level bathroom baseboard mastic - white n see Figure 2 misc N.D. S basement fibrous window material n see Figure 2 misc N.D. S-26 attic attic - orange foam-like insulation y tsi N.D. Notes

17 September 12, 2013 Appendix C: Inventory of Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials TABLE 1 Inventory of Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials Surveyed Fourplex; 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota Sample # Area Sampled Material color and description Friable? Homogenous areas Material Category Asbestos Content around access door to roof S-27 exterior siding - gray fibrous material n throughout misc N.D. S-28 exterior siding - underlying white asphalt n throughout misc N.D. material n throughout misc N.D. S-29 exterior siding - underlying black asphalt material Notes Material Category tsi = thermal system insulation, surf = surfacing material, misc miscellaneous material 18

18 September 12, 2013 Appendix C: Inventory of Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials Table 1 Definitions Asbestos-containing material or ACM. Asbestos-containing material or ACM is defined by the asbestos NESHAP as any material containing more than one percent (1%) asbestos as determined using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM.) Asbestos-containing building material (ACBM). Surfacing ACM, thermal system insulation ACM, or miscellaneous ACM that is found in or on interior structural members or other parts of a building. Friable asbestos material. Friable asbestos material means any material containing more than one percent asbestos by microscopic visual estimation by area, that hand pressure can crumble, pulverize, or reduce to powder when dry. Friable asbestos material includes previously nonfriable asbestos material which becomes damaged to the extent that when dry all or a portion of the material may be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Homogeneous area. Homogeneous area means an area of surfacing materials, thermal system insulation materials, flooring, or other miscellaneous materials which upon examination for properties such as age, color, and texture appear to be composed of the same material. Functional Space. A room, group of rooms, or homogeneous area (including crawl spaces or the space between a dropped ceiling and the floor or roof deck above), such as classroom(s), a cafeteria, gymnasium, hallway(s), designated by a person accredited to prepare management plans, design abatement projects, or conduct response actions. Regulated Asbestos Containing Material (RACM) Miscellaneous material. Interior building materials on structural components, structural members or fixtures, such as floor and ceilings tiles and does not include surfacing material or thermal system insulation. Nonfriable material. Material when dry may not be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Surfacing Material. Material in a building that is sprayed-on, troweled-on, or otherwise applied to surfaces, such as acoustical plaster on ceilings or fireproofing materials on structural members, or other materials on surfaces for acoustical, fireproofing, or other purposes. Thermal system insulation. Material in a building applied to pipes, fittings, boilers, breeching, tanks, ducts, or other interior structural components to prevent heat loss or gain, or water condensation, or for other purposes. 19

19 September 12, 2013 Appendix E: TABLE 2 Fourplex 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 12:48 Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index cps 0 2 CALIBRATION CHECK Positive 1.2 mg / cm ^ CALIBRATION CHECK Positive 1.1 mg / cm ^ CALIBRATION CHECK Positive 1.2 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR GRAY WOOD SIDING A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD SIDING trim A POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window A 1 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD FRAME window A 1 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE VINYL FRAME window A 2 INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE VINYL FRAME window A 2 INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE VINYL FRAME window A 2 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window A 2 FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window A 3 FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window A 4 FAIR Positive 4.6 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD FRAME window A 4 FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD porch posts A 4 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR GRAY WOOD porch floor A 4 FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR GRAY WOOD porch ceiling A 4 INTACT Positive 4.8 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE VINYL DOOR A 1 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING door A 1 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^

20 September 12, 2013 Appendix E: TABLE 2 Fourplex 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 12:48 Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index 21 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING door A 2 INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE VINYL DOOR A 2 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR RED METAL DOOR A 2 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD JAMB door A 2 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR GRAY WOOD SIDING B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD SIDING trim B POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window B 1 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window B 2 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window B 3 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window B 4 FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window B 5 FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window B 6 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD WELL WINDOW B 7 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR GRAY WOOD SIDING C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window C 1 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window C 2 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD WELL WINDOW C 3 POOR Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR RED METAL DOOR C FAIR Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING door C POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD JAMB door C POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD railing C POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^

21 September 12, 2013 Appendix E: TABLE 2 Fourplex 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 12:48 Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index 42 EXTERIOR GRAY WOOD SIDING D INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD SIDING trim D POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window D 1 FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window D 2 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window D 3 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window D 4 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD WELL WINDOW D 5 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD FASCIA A FAIR Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD FASCIA A FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING window A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD FRAME window A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM RED METAL DOOR A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door A INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD JAMB door A FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD DOOR C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^

22 September 12, 2013 Appendix E: TABLE 2 Fourplex 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 12:48 Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index st LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD BASEBOARD A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM BROWN VINYL FLOOR INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM WHITE VINYL FLOOR INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st KITCHEN WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ st KITCHEN WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ st KITCHEN WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st KITCHEN BROWN WOOD CABINET B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st KITCHEN WHITE WOOD BASEBOARD D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st KITCHEN WHITE VINYL FLOOR INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ st KITCHEN WHITE VINYL FLOOR INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ st KITCHEN WHITE VINYL FLOOR INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st HALL WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ st HALL WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st HALL WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0.5 mg / cm ^ st HALL BROWN WOOD DOOR B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st HALL BROWN WOOD CASING door B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^

23 September 12, 2013 Appendix E: TABLE 2 Fourplex 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 12:48 Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index st HALL BROWN WOOD JAMB door B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st HALL WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st HALL WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st HALL BROWN WOOD BASEBOARD D INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ st HALL BROWN VINYL FLOOR INTACT Negative 0.03 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD DOOR A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD CASING door A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD CASING window B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD FRAME window B INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD DOOR D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD CASING door D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD JAMB door D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD BASEBOARD D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 BROWN VINYL FLOOR INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^

24 September 12, 2013 Appendix E: TABLE 2 Fourplex 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 12:48 Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM BROWN WOOD CASING window B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM BROWN WOOD FRAME window B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM WHITE VINYL TUB C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM WHITE VINYL TUB SURROUND C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM BROWN WOOD DOOR D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door D INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM BROWN WOOD JAMB door D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM WHITE CERAMIC tile BASEBOARD A INTACT Positive 1.8 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM BLUE VINYL FLOOR INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM BLUE VINYL FLOOR INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 2 WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 2 BLUE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 2 WHITE VINYL DOOR A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 2 BROWN WOOD CASING door A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 2 BROWN WOOD JAMB door A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^

25 September 12, 2013 Appendix E: TABLE 2 Fourplex 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 12:48 Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index st BEDROOM 2 BLUE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 2 BROWN WOOD DOOR B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 2 WHITE WOOD CASING door B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 2 WHITE WOOD JAMB door B POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 2 WHITE DRYWALL CLOSET WALL B FAIR Negative 0.03 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 2 WHITE DRYWALL CLOSET CEILING POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 2 BLUE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 2 WHITE WOOD CASING window C POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 2 BROWN WOOD FRAME window C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 2 BLUE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 2 WHITE WOOD BASEBOARD D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st HALL stairs common WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st HALL stairs common WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st HALL stairs common WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st HALL stairs common WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ st HALL stairs common RED METAL DOOR C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st HALL stairs common BROWN WOOD CASING door C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st HALL stairs common BROWN WOOD BASEBOARD C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st HALL stairs common WHITE VINYL FLOOR INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ st HALL stairs common BLUE TREAD STAIRS INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st HALL stairs common BLUE RISER STAIRS INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^

26 September 12, 2013 Appendix E: TABLE 2 Fourplex 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 12:48 Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index nd LIVING ROOM WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0.5 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD DOOR A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD JAMB door A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING window B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD FRAME window B INTACT Negative 0.02 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD TROUGH window B POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM GRAY METAL DOOR D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD JAMB door D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD DOOR C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD JAMB door C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD BASEBOARD D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM BLACK CERAMIC tile FLOOR INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BEDROOM 1 WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^

27 September 12, 2013 Appendix E: TABLE 2 Fourplex 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 12:48 Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index nd BEDROOM 1 WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0.6 mg / cm ^ nd BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ nd BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD CASING window A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BEDROOM 1 WHITE WOOD TROUGH window A POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ nd BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD DOOR C 1 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD CASING door C 1 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD CASING door C 2 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD JAMB door C 2 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BEDROOM 1 WHITE WOOD DOOR C 2 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD BASEBOARD D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd KITCHEN WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ nd KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd KITCHEN BROWN WOOD CASING window B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd KITCHEN BROWN WOOD TROUGH window B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd KITCHEN BEIGE CERAMIC tile WALL C INTACT Negative 0.02 mg / cm ^ nd KITCHEN BROWN WOOD CABINET C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^

28 September 12, 2013 Appendix E: TABLE 2 Fourplex 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 12:48 Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index nd KITCHEN BROWN WOOD BASEBOARD D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd KITCHEN WHITE VINYL FLOOR INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM BEIGE CERAMIC tile WALL A INTACT Positive 2.2 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM BROWN WOOD DOOR A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM BROWN WOOD JAMB door A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM BROWN WOOD CASING window C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM BROWN WOOD SILL window C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM BEIGE METAL TUB C INTACT Positive 27.4 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM BEIGE CERAMIC tile FLOOR INTACT Negative 0.06 mg / cm ^ nd stairs attic WHITE WOOD railing INTACT Negative 0.07 mg / cm ^ nd stairs attic WHITE WOOD STRINGER STAIR INTACT Positive 1.4 mg / cm ^ nd stairs attic WHITE WOOD WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd common stairs front WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0.5 mg / cm ^ nd common stairs front WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd common stairs front BROWN WOOD WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^

29 September 12, 2013 Appendix E: TABLE 2 Fourplex 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 12:48 Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index nd common stairs front BROWN WOOD DOOR A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd common stairs front BROWN WOOD CASING door A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd common stairs front WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd common stairs front WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ nd common stairs front WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd common stairs front WHITE WOOD railng D POOR Negative 0.08 mg / cm ^ nd common stairs front WHITE WOOD STRINGER STAIR B POOR Positive 20.1 mg / cm ^ nd common stairs front BLUE TREAD STAIRS INTACT Positive 6.1 mg / cm ^ nd common stairs front BLUE RISER STAIRS INTACT Positive 3.7 mg / cm ^ nd common stairs front WHITE VINYL FLOOR INTACT Positive 1.7 mg / cm ^ nd common stairs front WHITE VINYL FLOOR INTACT Null 0.06 mg / cm ^ nd common stairs front WHITE VINYL FLOOR INTACT Positive 1.8 mg / cm ^ nd stairs attic BROWN TREAD STAIRS INTACT Negative 0.05 mg / cm ^ nd stairs attic BROWN RISER STAIRS INTACT Negative 0.27 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING window A INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD SILL window A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD DOOR B 1 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD CASING door B 1 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^

30 September 12, 2013 Appendix E: TABLE 2 Fourplex 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 12:48 Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index st LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD JAMB door B 1 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD DOOR B 2 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD CASING door B 2 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD JAMB door B 2 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD DOOR B 3 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD CASING door B 3 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD JAMB door B 3 INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL C 3 INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL C 3 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ st LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD BASEBOARD D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st KITCHEN WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st KITCHEN BROWN WOOD CABINET A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st KITCHEN WHITE WOOD BASEBOARD B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st KITCHEN BROWN VINYL FLOOR INTACT Negative 0.5 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0.7 mg / cm ^

31 September 12, 2013 Appendix E: TABLE 2 Fourplex 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 12:48 Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM BROWN WOOD DOOR B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM WHITE WOOD CASING door B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM WHITE WOOD JAMB door B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM YELLOW CERAMIC tile WALL C INTACT Positive 1.8 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM WHITE METAL TUB C INTACT Negative mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM WHITE WOOD CASING window D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM WHITE WOOD SILL window D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM WHITE CERAMIC tile BASEBOARD D INTACT Positive 1.7 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM YELLOW CERAMIC tile FLOOR INTACT Null 0.02 mg / cm ^ st BATHROOM YELLOW CERAMIC tile FLOOR INTACT Negative 0.02 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 WHITE WOOD DOOR A 1 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 WHITE WOOD CASING door A 1 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 WHITE WOOD JAMB door A 1 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^

32 September 12, 2013 Appendix E: TABLE 2 Fourplex 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 12:48 Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index st BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD DOOR A 2 INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD DOOR A 2 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 WHITE WOOD CASING door A 2 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD FRAME window C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 WHITE WOOD CASING window C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 WHITE WOOD BASEBOARD A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st BEDROOM 1 BROWN VINYL FLOOR INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st STAIRWAY BASEMENT BEIGE VINYL TREAD STAIRS INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st STAIRWAY BASEMENT BEIGE VINYL RISER STAIRS FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st STAIRWAY BASEMENT WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ st STAIRWAY BASEMENT WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ st STAIRWAY BASEMENT WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st STAIRWAY BASEMENT WHITE WOOD WALL B INTACT Positive 5.8 mg / cm ^ st STAIRWAY BASEMENT WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ st STAIRWAY BASEMENT WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD DOOR A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^

33 September 12, 2013 Appendix E: TABLE 2 Fourplex 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 12:48 Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD JAMB door A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM WHITE METAL DOOR B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door B INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD JAMB door B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD DOOR C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD TROUGH window D POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING window D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD BASEBOARD D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd KITCHEN WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd KITCHEN BROWN WOOD CABINET A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd KITCHEN BROWN WOOD CASING window C INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ nd KITCHEN BROWN WOOD SILL window C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^

34 September 12, 2013 Appendix E: TABLE 2 Fourplex 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 12:48 Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index nd KITCHEN BROWN WOOD BASEBOARD B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd KITCHEN BEIGE LINOLEUM FLOOR INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM BROWN WOOD DOOR A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM BROWN WOOD JAMB door A INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM WHITE CERAMIC tile TUB SURROUND C INTACT Positive 2.3 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM WHITE METAL TUB C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM BROWN WOOD CASING window C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM BROWN WOOD SILL window C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM WHITE CERAMIC tile BASEBOARD B INTACT Positive 2.5 mg / cm ^ nd BATHROOM WHITE CERAMIC tile FLOOR INTACT Negative 0.08 mg / cm ^ nd STAIRWAY ATTIC WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd STAIRWAY ATTIC WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^ nd STAIRWAY ATTIC WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd STAIRWAY ATTIC WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd STAIRWAY ATTIC WHITE WOOD STRINGER STAIR D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^

35 September 12, 2013 Appendix E: TABLE 2 Fourplex 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 12:48 Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index nd STAIRWAY ATTIC PURPLE TREAD STAIRS INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ nd STAIRWAY ATTIC PURPLE RISER STAIRS INTACT Negative 0.16 mg / cm ^ CALIBRATION CHECK INTACT Positive 1.1 mg / cm ^ CALIBRATION CHECK INTACT Null 1.1 mg / cm ^ CALIBRATION CHECK INTACT Positive 1.2 mg / cm ^ CALIBRATION CHECK INTACT Positive 1.1 mg / cm ^ GARAGE GRAY VINYL SIDING A INTACT Negative 0.5 mg / cm ^ GARAGE WHITE WOOD DOOR A POOR Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^ GARAGE WHITE WOOD CASING door A FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ GARAGE WHITE WOOD SOFFIT A POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ GARAGE BEIGE VINYL SIDING A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^ GARAGE BEIGE VINYL SIDING C INTACT Negative 0.5 mg / cm ^ GARAGE GRAY WOOD SIDING D FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^ CALIBRATION CHECK Positive 1.2 mg / cm ^ CALIBRATION CHECK Positive 1.1 mg / cm ^ CALIBRATION CHECK Positive 1.1 mg / cm ^

36 August 2, 2011 Appendix E: Table 2 Definitions Components - Each room equivalent is made up of components. Components in a room include the ceiling, floor, walls, a door and its casing, the window sash, and window casings, etc. In general, the first occurrence of a component moving from corner to corner on each wall is tested, and represents all components of that type in the room. If multiples of a component type are observed, the first occurrence moving from corner to corner on each wall is labeled component 1, the second component is labeled component 2, etc. (e.g. door 1, then door 2 or window 1, then window 2). Substrate - The substrate is the material underneath the paint. Many substrates exist, however, the HUD Final Guidelines recommend classifying substrates into one of six substrate types: brick, concrete, drywall, metal, plaster, and wood. These substrate types are intended to include a broad range of materials. If the true substrate is not one of the six types, the substrate that most closely matches the true substrate is selected. Side - Walls are listed in each room by letter with wall A being closest to the street of address, proceeding clockwise to B, C, D etc. Multiple components (i.e. windows or doors) are listed moving right to left along each external wall, and left to right on internal walls. E.g. moving from the D-A corner to the A-B corner. Condition The condition of paint is evaluated as poor, fair, or intact. Room - A room equivalent is identified as a room, a house exterior, a foyer, staircase, hallway, or an exterior area. Closets or other similar areas adjoining rooms are not considered as separate room equivalents unless they are obviously dissimilar from the adjoining room equivalent. Room equivalents are generally listed by number, starting with the 1 st room on the main entrance and proceeding clockwise on each floor. Refer to drawings to confirm room number assignments. Results - HUD and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines specify a positive determination of lead in paint when the lead content is equal to or greater than 1.0 milligrams of lead per square centimeter of painted surface (mg/cm 2 ) when measured by X-ray Fluorescence (XRF). Depth Index The depth index is a numerical value indicating the amount of non-leaded paint covering the lead (if any) detected by the analyzer. A depth index of less than 1.5 indicates a reading very near the surface. A depth index between 1.6 and 4.0 indicates a moderate depth. A depth index of greater than 4.0 indicates a deeply buried reading. PbC Pb is the chemical symbol for lead. The C stands for Combined K+L shell readings. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) technology works at the atomic level by releasing photons that dislodge electrons from an atom. Electrons within an atom exist in electron shells, which are labeled K, L, M, N, O, P, and Q. The analyzer provides K shell, L shell and combined (K+L shell) readings. [Type text]

37 August 2, 2011 Appendix F: SOP for Lead Paint Inspections Standard Operating Procedures for Lead-Based Paint Inspections and Assessments Inspections and assessments are conducted in accordance with the following statues and rules: The Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Guidelines for Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing; HUD Lead Safe Housing Rule, 24 CFR Part 35; Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 745 Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention in Certain Residential Structures; Minnesota Statues ; and Minnesota Rules HUD and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines specify a positive determination of lead in paint when the lead content is equal to or greater than 1.0 milligrams of lead per square centimeter of painted surface (mg/cm2) when measured by X-ray Fluorescence (XRF). The lead based paint testing performed for this project used a NITON XLP Series X-ray Fluorescence Analyzer (Serial Number 25591, K + L Mode). Room equivalents are generally listed by number, starting with the 1 st room on the main entrance and proceeding clockwise on each floor. Refer to drawings to confirm room number assignments. Walls are listed in each room by letter with wall A being closest to the street of address, proceeding clockwise to B, C, D etc. Multiple components (i.e. windows or doors) are listed moving right to left along each external wall, and left to right on internal walls. E.g. moving from the D-A corner to the A-B corner. Components: Each room equivalent is made up of components. Components in a room include the ceiling, floor, walls, a door and its casing, the window sash, and window casings, etc. In general, the first occurrence of a component moving from corner to corner on each wall is tested, and represents all components of that type in the room. If multiples of a component type are observed, the first occurrence moving from corner to corner on each wall is labeled component 1, the second component is labeled component 2, etc. (e.g. door 1, then door 2 or window 1, then window 2). Delineation of Room Equivalents: A room equivalent is identified as a room, a house exterior, a foyer, staircase, hallway, or an exterior area. Closets or other similar areas adjoining rooms are not considered as separate room equivalents unless they are obviously dissimilar from the adjoining room equivalent. Substrate: The substrate is the material underneath the paint. Many substrates exist, however, the HUD Final Guidelines recommend classifying substrates into one of six substrate types: brick, concrete, drywall, metal, plaster, and wood. These substrate types are intended to include a broad range of materials. If the true substrate is not one of the [Type text]

38 August 2, 2011 six types, the substrate that most closely matches the true substrate is selected. XRF Testing: Lead-based paint inspections and assessment involve testing surfaces using an X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy (XRF) to determine lead concentrations. Sampling protocols are performed in accordance with HUD Guidelines, Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing( Chapter 5, Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessments, and Chapter 7, Lead-Based Paint Inspections), the requirements of the Performance Characteristic Sheet (Performance Characteristic Sheet for the Niton XLp Portable XRF Spectrum Analyzer) and Niton s requirements of the XRF unit. Three calibration check readings on a 1.02 mg/cm 2 NIST SRM film are taken before and after obtaining the XRF readings. The Niton XRF instrument is determined to be in calibration if the difference between the first calibration check average and 1.02 mg/cm 2 (NIST SRM) is not greater than the 0.3 mg/cm 2 calibration check tolerance limit obtained from the XRF Performance Characteristic Sheet. Appendix F: SOP for Lead Paint Inspections & Assessments Soil Sampling: Assessment may include collecting composite soil samples for laboratory analysis of lead in soil. Sampling protocols are performed in accordance with HUD Guidelines Chapter 5 Appendix 13.3, Soil Sampling Protocol for Housing and the Minnesota Department of Health Lead Poisoning Prevention Rules Soil samples are submitted to an accredited NLLAP laboratory for analysis performed in accordance with US EPA Method 6010B, the Analysis of Lead using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission. Dust Wipe Sampling: Sampling protocols for dust wipe sampling are performed in accordance with Protocols for Dust and Soil Sampling, Final Report (EPA report number 7474-R , March 1995.) Dust wipe sampling also includes collecting one blank sample per single-family residence for quality assurance. Dust wipe and blank samples collected for laboratory analysis are submitted to an NLLAP (National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program) laboratory for analysis in accordance with EPA SW

39 August 2, 2011 Appendix F: SOP for Lead Paint Inspections TABLE 3 Summary of Dust Wipe Collection and Analytical Results Main-Level Unit Fourplex; 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN Room Sample Sample Surface Sample Sample Area Lead HUD/State Location Number Type Type Condition Measurements g/ft 2 Standards (inches) g/ft 2 front entry/living room w-1 fl g 12 x hall w-2 fl v g 12 x bedroom #1 w-3 fl v g 12 x bedroom #2 w-4 fl v g 12 x 12 <10 40 living room w-5 ws s g 18 x bedroom #2 w-6 ws s g 18 x BLANK w-7 <10 TABLE 4 Summary of Dust Wipe Collection and Analytical Results 861 2nd-Level Unit Fourplex; 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN Room Sample Sample Surface Sample Sample Area Lead HUD/State Location Number Type Type Condition Measurements g/ft 2 Standards (inches) g/ft 2 kitchen w-1 fl v g 12 x 12 <10 40 living room w-2 fl g 12 x 12 <10 40 bedroom #1 w-3 fl g 12 x 12 <10 40 bathroom w-4 fl o g 12 x living room w-5 ws s g 18 x 2 < bedroom #1 w-6 ws s g 18 x BLANK w-7 <10 Sample Type: (fl) floor (ws)-window sill (ww)-window well/trough (cp)-carpeted floor Surface Type: (v)-vinyl -carpet (s)-stain/varnish (p)-painted (m)-metal (o)-other Surface Condition: (g)-good (f)-fair (p)-poor Dust Removal Dust removal without controlling the source of the dust does not prevent the dust problem from arising again. Therefore, dust removal should be conducted along with controlling the source of the dust. Dust removal, in general, can be accomplished by using a HEPA vacuum and wet washing surfaces containing lead dust. For upholstered furnishings, the HEPA vacuum alone may be used and rugs may be sent out to be cleaned. 55

40 August 2, 2011 Appendix F: SOP for Lead Paint Inspections & Assessments TABLE 5 Summary of Dust Wipe Collection and Analytical Results Main-Level Unit Fourplex; 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN Room Sample Sample Surface Sample Sample Area Lead HUD/State Location Number Type Type Condition Measurements g/ft 2 Standards (inches) g/ft 2 living room w-1 fl g 12 x 12 <10 40 kitchen w-2 fl v g 12 x 12 <10 40 entry/hall w-3 fl v g 12 x bedroom #1 w-4 fl v g 12 x living room w-5 ws s g 18 x 2 < bedroom #1 w-6 ws s g 18 x BLANK w-7 <10 TABLE 6 Summary of Dust Wipe Collection and Analytical Results 863 2nd-Level Unit Fourplex; 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN Room Sample Sample Surface Sample Sample Area Lead HUD/State Location Number Type Type Condition Measurements g/ft 2 Standards (inches) g/ft 2 kitchen w-1 fl v g 12 x living room w-2 fl g 12 x 12 <10 40 bedroom #1 w-3 fl g 12 x 12 <10 40 bathroom w-4 fl o g 12 x living room w-5 ws s f 18 x beroom #1 w-6 ww s g 18 x BLANK w-7 <10 Sample Type: (fl) floor (ws)-window sill (ww)-window well/trough (cp)-carpeted floor Surface Type: (v)-vinyl -carpet (s)-stain/varnish (p)-painted (m)-metal (o)-other Surface Condition: (g)-good (f)-fair (p)-poor Dust Removal Dust removal without controlling the source of the dust does not prevent the dust problem from arising again. Therefore, dust removal should be conducted along with controlling the source of the dust. Dust removal, in general, can be accomplished by using a HEPA vacuum and wet washing surfaces containing lead dust. For upholstered furnishings, the HEPA vacuum alone may be used and rugs may be sent out to be cleaned. 56

41 August 2, 2011 Appendix F: SOP for Lead Paint Inspections I. Lead Paint Hazard Reduction Options Lead Safe Work Practices Federal law (Lead Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule; 40 CFR 745, Subpart E) requires contractors that disturb painted surfaces in homes, child care facilities and schools built before 1978 to be certified and follow specific work practices to prevent lead contamination. Always ask to see your contractor s certification. Firms must be certified by EPA and use certified renovators who are trained by EPAapproved training providers to follow lead-safe work practices. Federal law requires that individuals receive certain information before renovating more than six square feet of painted surfaces in a room for interior projects or more than twenty square feet of painted surfaces for exterior projects or window replacement or demolition in housing, child care facilities and schools built before Homeowners and tenants: renovators must give you this pamphlet before starting work. Child care facilities, including preschools and kindergarten classrooms, and the families of children under six years of age that attend those facilities: renovators must provide a copy of this pamphlet to child care facilities and general renovation information to families whose children attend those facilities. Lead safe work practices shall be followed when any lead-based paints are disturbed during renovation or repair work. Before lead hazard reduction, all work areas should be prepped with drop cloths and dust containment barriers. The work area shall be cleaned on a daily basis to remove paint chips and dust. At the conclusion of work, all walls, trim and floors not freshly painted shall be wet washed and vacuumed or vacuumed with a high efficiency particle accumulator vacuum (HEPA) to remove remaining dirt. For exterior paint scraping, tarps or plastic sheeting must be used to collect paint chips. Paint chips and dust must be double-bagged and disposed of properly. Occupants should not be present during lead hazard reduction. The dwelling unit should not be reoccupied until clearance has been achieved. Minnesota Statutes require any contractor who abates lead-based paint as regulated lead work to have a Minnesota Lead Abatement License. Each member of the work crew must be a licensed lead worker. Lead abatement licenses are issued by the Minnesota Department of Health ( ). Minnesota Rules, Chapters 4671, require that a licensed lead supervisor must notify the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) by mail or fax at least five working days before starting any regulated 57

42 August 2, 2011 Appendix F: SOP for Lead Paint Inspections & Assessments lead work. A property owner who intends to perform lead hazard reduction must notify MDH by mail or fax at least ten working days before starting regulated lead work. Building components with lead-based paints are not considered a lead hazard if they are in intact condition and are not disturbed to create lead dust. However, recommended lead hazard control measures are provided for all building components identified with lead-based paints for this project in the event they become deteriorated. The following table is for surfaces identified with lead-based paints: TABLE 7 Recommended Lead Hazard Control Measures 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, Minnesota Room Component Control Measure Options exterior white wood 1. window replacement total 1, exterior unit st floor bathroom unit nd floor bathroom unit 863 common entry and front stairway window casings (side A only) gray wood porch ceiling white ceramic baseboards 2. window enclosure covering window components with a wrap 2 3. window stabilization and painting enclose well 3 1. remove and dispose 4 2. abatement strip to bare wood 5 3. enclosure system 6 4. encapsulation 7 5. paint stabilization 8 1. remove and dispose 4 2. Building materials with lead-based paints and in good condition may be maintained by not using harsh abrasives on them. beige metal tub 1. remove and dispose 4 white wood stringer, blue wood stair treads and risers 2. Lead-based tubs in good condition may be maintained by not using harsh abrasives on them. Other options of control consist of placing a liner within the tub, or refinishing it. 1. remove and dispose 4 2. abatement strip to bare wood 5 3. encapsulation 7 4. paint stabilization 8 unit 863 white vinyl 1. remove and dispose 4 58

43 August 2, 2011 Appendix F: SOP for Lead Paint Inspections & Assessments TABLE 7 Recommended Lead Hazard Control Measures 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, Minnesota Room Component Control Measure Options common entry flooring 2. encapsulation 7 and front stairway unit st floor bathroom unit nd floor bathroom yellow ceramic wall tiles and white ceramic tile baseboards white ceramic tile tub surround and white ceramic tile baseboards 1. remove and dispose 4 2. Building materials with lead-based paints and in good condition may be maintained by not using harsh abrasives on them. 1. remove and dispose 4 2. Building materials with lead-based paints and in good condition may be maintained by not using harsh abrasives on them. Recommendations are listed in order from most effective to least effective. 1Window Replacement Total Remove, package and dispose of entire window unit. Install pre-hung window unit. Replace casing and/or trim to match original. Prime and topcoat. 2Window Enclosure Covering Window Components with a Wrap Enclosure consists of attaching a durable barrier to building components, such as aluminum window wrap to a window casing, and sealing the edges with caulk or other sealant. To enclose a surface containing lead-based paint: Stencil lead paint at four-foot intervals on existing surface. Apply a Tyvek or equivalent vapor barrier to enclose the lead containing paint. Protect Tyvek with vinyl or aluminum wrap or other building component installed in accordance with manufacturer specifications. 59

44 August 2, 2011 Appendix F: SOP for Lead Paint Inspections & Assessments 3Window Stabilization and Painting Enclose Well Wet scrape all interior and exterior window components including sashes, jambs and stops. Re-glaze as required. Laminate well with back-caulked aluminum or vinyl coil stock. HEPA vacuum all visible dust. Spot prime and topcoat interior and exterior components. 4Remove and Dispose Remove, package and dispose of lead painted building components. Install replacement components. For exterior siding, weatherize exterior walls. 5Abatement Strip to Bare Wood Scrape to bare substrate. Minor residue may be cleaned with paint remover. Wash surface with a lead specific detergent or equivalent, rinse, prime and topcoat. Dry scraping/sanding and operation of heat gun above 700 degree F is prohibited. 6Enclosure Systems Enclosure systems consist of attaching a durable barrier to building components, such as aluminum vinyl siding to an exterior finish, and sealing the edges with caulk or other sealant. To enclose a surface containing lead-based paint: Stencil lead paint at four-foot intervals on existing surface. Apply a Tyvek or equivalent vapor barrier to enclose the lead containing paint. Protect Tyvek with vinyl or aluminum siding or other building component installed in accordance with manufacturer specifications. 7Encapsulation Encapsulation provides a barrier by using a liquid-applied coating and/or an adhesively bonded covering material so the lead-based paint is inaccessible. In order for a product to qualify as an encapsulant, the manufacture must provide a 20-year warranty of the effectiveness of the products. This process also involves patch testing and visual monitoring. 8Paint Stabilization Stabilizing building components containing lead-based paints entails repairing deteriorated paint and then applying new intact paint or varnish to the surface. To stabilize a surface containing lead-based paint: Repair any existing moisture or substrate problems, 60

45 August 2, 2011 Appendix F: SOP for Lead Paint Inspections & Assessments Remove all loose surface material through wet scraping or wet sanding. Mist defective paint with water to the point of saturation. Lightly scrape all loose paint. Rinse and dry or remove surface contamination by cleaning and deglossing using a chemical degreaser or sanding with a high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) vacuum, washing with trisodium phosphate (TSP) detergents, and thoroughly rising the surface to remove efflorescence (salts). Spot prime and topcoat with products from the same manufacturer. II. Lead Dust Hazard Reduction Options Dust removal without controlling the source of the dust does not prevent the dust problem from arising again. Therefore, dust removal should be conducted along with controlling the source of the dust. Dust removal, in general, can be accomplished by using a HEPA vacuum and wet washing surfaces containing lead dust. For upholstered furnishings, the HEPA vacuum alone may be used and rugs may be sent out to be cleaned. For removing lead dust, HUD recommends the following three steps: 1. clean the surface using a HEPA vacuum, 2. clean the surfacing by wet washing the area with a general detergent or a special cleaner made for removing lead, 3. clean the surface using a HEPA vacuum for a final cleaning. III. Lead Soil Hazard Reduction Options The sources of lead in soil at this property are most likely due to the weathering and chalking and/or previous repainting work that involved the scraping of paint on the underlying siding and/or other exterior building components with lead-based paints. Research shows that exposure to lead occurs though both direct ingestion of bare soil, and/or trackin of lead contaminated soil into the interior of dwellings. Sources of lead from soil can significantly contribute to the blood-lead levels found in children. Recommended interim control options of reducing exposure of lead from soil consist of the following: Planting ground cover or shrubbery to reduce exposure to bare soil, Mulching around the perimeter of the house and garage, and in bare soil areas, Restricting access by fencing or other actions, and Controlling further contamination of the areas. 61

46 August 2, 2011 Appendix F: SOP for Lead Paint Inspections TABLE 8 Recommended Re-evaluation Schedule 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN Control Measure Re-evaluation Type of Re-evaluation Paint Stabilization 8 Annually Visual Inspection Dust Wipe Sampling Encapsulation 7 Annually Visual Inspection Enclosure Systems 6 Annually Visual Inspection Maintenance and Monitoring Schedule The preceding lead reduction recommendations include different ways to treat each lead hazard that was identified by the risk assessment. They are listed in order from most effective to least effective. The most effective treatments are considered abatement and require little or no on-going maintenance to preserve a lead safe environment. The less effective treatments are called interim controls and require an increase amount of on-going maintenance to preserve a lead safe environment. The owner should conduct a visual survey at turnover and/or annually to identify any deteriorated paint. In general, all painted surfaces should be monitored. A negative result does not necessarily indicate that no lead is present in that surface, but rather indicates that any lead present in that surface does not rise above the 1.0 mg/cm 2 threshold in the area tested. Therefore, all painted surfaces should be maintained in intact condition. Bare soil should be monitored by the owner. Intact ground cover should always be maintained. 62

47 September 12, 2013 Appendix G: Disclosure Disclosure The Federal Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act, 42 U.S.C. 4852d, requires sellers and landlords of most residential housing built before 1978 to disclose all available records and reports concerning lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards, including the test results contained in this notice, to purchasers and tenants at the time of sale or lease or upon lease renewal. This disclosure must occur even if hazard reduction or abatement has been completed. Sellers and Landlords are also required to provide the pamphlet Protect Your Family from Lead in Your Home or another similar document approved by the EPA. Sample forms and pamphlets can be obtained from the EPA or HUD website and duplicated as necessary. To find out more information about your obligations under federal lead-based paint requirements call LEAD. 63

48 Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C Whitepine Rd Richmond, VA Telephone: Report Number: Asbestos Bulk Analysis Report Client: Environmental Health Testing Svc Received Date: 09/06/ Texas Ave. South Analyzed Date: 09/09/2013 St. Louis Park, MN Reported Date: 09/11/2013 Project/Test Address: EHTS ; 861 & 863 Burr Street, St. Paul Client Number: Laboratory Results Fax Number: Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Layer Type Lab Gross Description Asbestos Other Materials EHTS S-1 White Paint-Like; Granular; Inhomogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous EHTS S-2 White Paint-Like; Granular; Inhomogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous EHTS S-3 White Paint-Like; Granular; Inhomogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous EHTS S-4 White Paint-Like; Granular; Inhomogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous EHTS S-5 White Paint-Like; Granular; Inhomogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous Page 1 of 7

49 Client Number: Project/Test Address: Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C Report Number: EHTS ; 861 & 863 Burr Street, St. Paul Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Layer Type Lab Gross Description Asbestos Other Materials EHTS S-6 White Paint-Like; Granular; Inhomogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous EHTS S-7 White Paint-Like; Granular; Inhomogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous EHTS S-8 White Paint-Like; Granular; Inhomogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous EHTS S-9 White Paint-Like; Granular; Inhomogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous EHTS S-10 Off-White Paint-Like; White Chalky; Tan Granular; Brown Fibrous; Inhomogeneous 35% Cellulose 65% Non-Fibrous EHTS S-11 Off-White Paint-Like; White Chalky; Granular; Brown Fibrous; Inhomogeneous 35% Cellulose 65% Non-Fibrous EHTS S-12 White Paint-Like; Chalky; Brown Fibrous; Inhomogeneous 30% Cellulose 2% Fibrous Glass 68% Non-Fibrous No joint compound present. Page 2 of 7

50 Client Number: Project/Test Address: Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C Report Number: EHTS ; 861 & 863 Burr Street, St. Paul Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Layer Type Lab Gross Description Asbestos Other Materials A EHTS S-13 Tile Tan/White Vinyl; Homogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous B EHTS S-13 Mastic Clear Adhesive; Homogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous EHTS S-14 Brown Brittle; Fibrous; Inhomogeneous 45% Cellulose 55% Non-Fibrous A EHTS S-15 Tile Brown Vinyl; Homogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous B EHTS S-15 Mastic Tan Adhesive; Homogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous A EHTS S-16 Ceramic Tile Yellow Hard; Homogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous B EHTS S-16 Grout Gray Cementitious; Homogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous A EHTS S-17 Tile White/Tan Vinyl; Homogeneous 2% Synthetic 98% Non-Fibrous Page 3 of 7

51 Client Number: Project/Test Address: Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C Report Number: EHTS ; 861 & 863 Burr Street, St. Paul Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Layer Type Lab Gross Description Asbestos Other Materials B EHTS S-17 Mastic Tan Adhesive; Homogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous A EHTS S-18 Linoleum Gold Vinyl; Gray Fibrous; Inhomogeneous 20% Chrysotile 18% Cellulose 62% Non-Fibrous Total Asbestos: 20% Chrysotile present in the fibrous backing B EHTS S-18 Mastic Yellow Adhesive; Homogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous A EHTS S-19 Ceramic Tile White Hard; Homogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous B EHTS S-19 Grout Gray Cementitious; Homogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous C EHTS S-19 Mastic Pale Yellow Adhesive; Homogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous A EHTS S-20 Ceramic Tile Beige Hard; Homogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous B EHTS S-20 Grout Gray Cementitious; Homogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous Page 4 of 7

52 Client Number: Project/Test Address: Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C Report Number: EHTS ; 861 & 863 Burr Street, St. Paul Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Layer Type Lab Gross Description Asbestos Other Materials C EHTS S-20 Mastic Pale Yellow Adhesive; Homogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous A EHTS S-21 Ceramic Tile Beige Hard; Homogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous B EHTS S-21 Mastic White Rubbery Adhesive; Homogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous A EHTS S-22 Flooring Tan Vinyl; Fibrous; Inhomogeneous 65% Cellulose 35% Non-Fibrous B EHTS S-22 Mastic White Adhesive; Homogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous A EHTS S-23 Ceramic Tile Tan Hard; Homogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous B EHTS S-23 Mastic Gray Adhesive; Homogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous A EHTS S-24 Ceramic Tile White Hard; Homogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous Page 5 of 7

53 Client Number: Project/Test Address: Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C Report Number: EHTS ; 861 & 863 Burr Street, St. Paul Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Layer Type Lab Gross Description Asbestos Other Materials B EHTS S-24 Mastic I Brown Adhesive; Homogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous C EHTS S-24 Mastic II White Adhesive; Homogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous EHTS S-25 Brown Fibrous; Homogeneous 95% Cellulose 5% Non-Fibrous EHTS S-26 Orange Foam-Like; Homogeneous 100% Non-Fibrous EHTS S-27 Gray Brittle; Brown Fibrous; Inhomogeneous 85% Cellulose 15% Non-Fibrous EHTS S-28 Gray/Brown Aggregate; Black Tar-Like; Brown Fibrous; Inhomogeneous 70% Cellulose 30% Non-Fibrous EHTS S-29 Gray/Brown Aggregate; Black Tar-Like; Brown Fibrous; Inhomogeneous 70% Cellulose 30% Non-Fibrous Page 6 of 7

54 Client Number: Project/Test Address: Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C Report Number: EHTS ; 861 & 863 Burr Street, St. Paul Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Layer Type Lab Gross Description Asbestos Other Materials QC Sample: QC Blank: Reporting Limit: Method: Analyst: 39-M SRM 1866 Fiberglass 1% Asbestos EPA Method 600/R-93/116, EPA Method 600/M Sami Hosn Reviewed By Authorized Signatory: Tasha Eaddy QA/QC Clerk The condition of the samples analyzed was acceptable upon receipt per laboratory protocol unless otherwise noted on this report. Each distinct component in an inhomogeneous sample was analyzed separately and reported as a composite. Results represent the analysis of samples submitted by the client. Sample location, description, area, volume, etc., was provided by the client. This report cannot be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of the Environmental Hazards Service, L.L.C. California Certification #2319 NY ELAP #11714 NVLAP # All information concerning sampling location, date, and time can be found on Chain-of-Custody. Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C. does not perform any sample collection. Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C. recommends reanalysis by point count (for more accurate quantification) or Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), (for enhanced detection capabilities) for materials regulated by EPA NESHAP (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants) and found to contain less than ten percent (<10%) asbestos by polarized light microscopy (PLM). Both services are available for an additional fee. 400 Point Count Analysis, where noted, performed per EPA Method 600/R-93/116 with a Reporting Limit of 0.25%. * All California samples analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy, EPA Method 600/M , Dec LEGEND: = no asbestos detected Page 7 of 7

55

56

57

58 12950 Haggerty Road Belleville, MI Ph: (734) 699-labs; Fax: (734) Certificate of Analysis: Lead In Dust Wipe by NIOSH Method 7082 Client : EHTS 2950 Aquila Avenue South St. Louis Park, MN Attn : Kris kris@healthyhom.com Phone : Fax : Project Location : 861 BURR STREET-ST. PAUL MAIN-LEVEL UNIT AAT Project : Sampling Date : Date Received : Date Analyzed : Date Reported : Analyst : /23/ /03/ /04/ /04/2013 Ranjana Valecha Client Project : EHTS A Lab Sample ID Client Code Sample Description Length (inch) Width (inch) Area (Sq ft) Results Lead μg/ft2 * W-1 FLOOR-FRONT ENTRY LIVING W-2 FLOOR-HALL W-3 FLOOR-BEDROOM # W-4 FLOOR-BEDROOM # <10.00 W-5 SILL-LIVING ROOM W-6 SILL-BEDROOM # W-7 FLOOR-LAUNDRY <10.00 Analyst Signature (ND=Not Detected, N/A Not Available, RL Reporting Limit, Analytical Reporting Limit is 10 ug/sample) * For true values assume (2) significant figures. The method and batch QC is acceptable unless otherwise stated. EPA HUD Regulatory Limits: 40 ug/ft2 (Floors Carpeted/uncarpeted), 250ug/ft2 (Window Sill/Stools), 400 ug/ft2 (Window Trough /Well/Ext Concrete Surfaces) The laboratory operates in accord with ISO guidelines and holds limited scopes of accreditation under AIHA and NY State DOH ELAP programs. These results are submitted pursuant to AAT LLC current terms and conditions of sale, including the company's standard warranty and limitation of liability provisions. Analytical results relate to the samples as AIHA ELLAP- Lab ID #100986, NY State DOH ELAP -Lab ID #11864, State of Ohio- Lab ID # Date Printed: 09/04/2013 1:50PM AAT Project: Page 1 of 2

59 12950 Haggerty Road Belleville, MI Ph:(734) 699-labs; Fax:(734) To : EHTS 2950 Aquila Avenue South St. Louis Park, MN Attn : Kris kris@healthyhom.com Phone : Project Location : 861 BURR STREET-ST. PAUL MAIN-LEVEL UNIT AAT Project : Client Project : Date Reported : EHTS A 09/04/2013 Sample Client Code Analysis Requested Completed W-1 Dust Wipe 09/04/ W-2 Dust Wipe 09/04/ W-3 Dust Wipe 09/04/ W-4 Dust Wipe 09/04/ W-5 Dust Wipe 09/04/ W-6 Dust Wipe 09/04/ W-7 Dust Wipe 09/04/2013 Reviewed By Quality Assurance Coordinator - Robert A Theys This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify AAT immediately. Thank you. AIHA ELLAP- Lab ID #100986, NY State DOH ELAP -Lab ID #11864, State of Ohio- Lab ID # Date Printed: 09/04/2013 1:50PM AAT Project: Page 2 of 2

60

61 12950 Haggerty Road Belleville, MI Ph: (734) 699-labs; Fax: (734) Certificate of Analysis: Lead In Dust Wipe by NIOSH Method 7082 Client : EHTS 2950 Aquila Avenue South St. Louis Park, MN Attn : Kris kris@healthyhom.com Phone : Fax : Project Location : 861 BURR STREET-ST. PAUL 2ND FLOOR UNIT AAT Project : Sampling Date : Date Received : Date Analyzed : Date Reported : Analyst : /23/ /03/ /04/ /04/2013 Zack Whiddon Client Project : EHTS B Lab Sample ID Client Code Sample Description Length (inch) Width (inch) Area (Sq ft) Results Lead μg/ft2 * W-1 FLOOR-KITCHEN <10.00 W-2 FLOOR-LIVING ROOM <10.00 W-3 FLOOR-BEDROOM # <10.00 W-4 FLOOR-BATHROOM W-5 SILL-LIVING ROOM <40.00 W-6 SILL-BEDROOM # W-7 FLOOR-FRONT PORCH <10.00 Analyst Signature (ND=Not Detected, N/A Not Available, RL Reporting Limit, Analytical Reporting Limit is 10 ug/sample) * For true values assume (2) significant figures. The method and batch QC is acceptable unless otherwise stated. EPA HUD Regulatory Limits: 40 ug/ft2 (Floors Carpeted/uncarpeted), 250ug/ft2 (Window Sill/Stools), 400 ug/ft2 (Window Trough /Well/Ext Concrete Surfaces) The laboratory operates in accord with ISO guidelines and holds limited scopes of accreditation under AIHA and NY State DOH ELAP programs. These results are submitted pursuant to AAT LLC current terms and conditions of sale, including the company's standard warranty and limitation of liability provisions. Analytical results relate to the samples as AIHA ELLAP- Lab ID #100986, NY State DOH ELAP -Lab ID #11864, State of Ohio- Lab ID # Date Printed: 09/04/2013 3:35PM AAT Project: Page 1 of 2

62 12950 Haggerty Road Belleville, MI Ph:(734) 699-labs; Fax:(734) To : EHTS 2950 Aquila Avenue South St. Louis Park, MN Attn : Kris kris@healthyhom.com Phone : Project Location : 861 BURR STREET-ST. PAUL 2ND FLOOR UNIT AAT Project : Client Project : Date Reported : EHTS B 09/04/2013 Sample Client Code Analysis Requested Completed W-1 Dust Wipe 09/04/ W-2 Dust Wipe 09/04/ W-3 Dust Wipe 09/04/ W-4 Dust Wipe 09/04/ W-5 Dust Wipe 09/04/ W-6 Dust Wipe 09/04/ W-7 Dust Wipe 09/04/2013 Reviewed By Quality Assurance Coordinator - Robert A Theys This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify AAT immediately. Thank you. AIHA ELLAP- Lab ID #100986, NY State DOH ELAP -Lab ID #11864, State of Ohio- Lab ID # Date Printed: 09/04/2013 3:35PM AAT Project: Page 2 of 2

63

64 12950 Haggerty Road Belleville, MI Ph: (734) 699-labs; Fax: (734) Certificate of Analysis: Lead In Dust Wipe by NIOSH Method 7082 Client : EHTS 2950 Aquila Avenue South St. Louis Park, MN Attn : Kris kris@healthyhom.com Phone : Fax : Project Location : 863 BURR STREET-ST. PAUL MAIN-LEVEL UNIT AAT Project : Sampling Date : Date Received : Date Analyzed : Date Reported : Analyst : /23/ /03/ /04/ /04/2013 Nathan Ditty Client Project : EHTS C Lab Sample ID Client Code Sample Description Length (inch) Width (inch) Area (Sq ft) Results Lead μg/ft2 * W-1 FLOOR-LIVING ROOM <10.00 W-2 FLOOR-KITCHEN <10.00 W-3 FLOOR-ENTRY W-4 FLOOR-BEDROOM # W-5 SILL-LIVING ROOM <40.00 W-6 SILL-BEDROOM # W-7 FLOOR-LAUNDRY <10.00 Analyst Signature (ND=Not Detected, N/A Not Available, RL Reporting Limit, Analytical Reporting Limit is 10 ug/sample) * For true values assume (2) significant figures. The method and batch QC is acceptable unless otherwise stated. EPA HUD Regulatory Limits: 40 ug/ft2 (Floors Carpeted/uncarpeted), 250ug/ft2 (Window Sill/Stools), 400 ug/ft2 (Window Trough /Well/Ext Concrete Surfaces) The laboratory operates in accord with ISO guidelines and holds limited scopes of accreditation under AIHA and NY State DOH ELAP programs. These results are submitted pursuant to AAT LLC current terms and conditions of sale, including the company's standard warranty and limitation of liability provisions. Analytical results relate to the samples as AIHA ELLAP- Lab ID #100986, NY State DOH ELAP -Lab ID #11864, State of Ohio- Lab ID # Date Printed: 09/04/2013 3:45PM AAT Project: Page 1 of 2

65 12950 Haggerty Road Belleville, MI Ph:(734) 699-labs; Fax:(734) To : EHTS 2950 Aquila Avenue South St. Louis Park, MN Attn : Kris kris@healthyhom.com Phone : Project Location : 863 BURR STREET-ST. PAUL MAIN-LEVEL UNIT AAT Project : Client Project : Date Reported : EHTS C 09/04/2013 Sample Client Code Analysis Requested Completed W-1 Dust Wipe 09/04/ W-2 Dust Wipe 09/04/ W-3 Dust Wipe 09/04/ W-4 Dust Wipe 09/04/ W-5 Dust Wipe 09/04/ W-6 Dust Wipe 09/04/ W-7 Dust Wipe 09/04/2013 Reviewed By Quality Assurance Coordinator - Robert A Theys This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify AAT immediately. Thank you. AIHA ELLAP- Lab ID #100986, NY State DOH ELAP -Lab ID #11864, State of Ohio- Lab ID # Date Printed: 09/04/2013 3:45PM AAT Project: Page 2 of 2

66

67 12950 Haggerty Road Belleville, MI Ph: (734) 699-labs; Fax: (734) Certificate of Analysis: Lead In Dust Wipe by NIOSH Method 7082 Client : EHTS 2950 Aquila Avenue South St. Louis Park, MN Attn : Kris Phone : Client Project : EHTS Fax : kris@healthyhom.com AAT Project : Sampling Date : Date Received : Date Analyzed : Date Reported : Analyst : /26/ /05/ /06/ /06/2013 Ralph Horvat Project Location : 863 BURR STREET ST.PAUL 2ND LEVEL UNIT Lab Sample ID Client Code Sample Description Length (inch) Width (inch) Area (Sq ft) Results Lead μg/ft2 * W-1 FLOOR- KITCHEN W-2 FLOOR-LIVING <10.00 W-3 FLOOR-BEDROOM <10.00 W-4 FLOOR-BATHROOM W-5 SILL-LIVING ROOM W-6 SILL-BEDROOM W-7 FLOOR-LAUNDRY <10.00 Analyst Signature (ND=Not Detected, N/A Not Available, RL Reporting Limit, Analytical Reporting Limit is 10 ug/sample) * For true values assume (2) significant figures. The method and batch QC is acceptable unless otherwise stated. EPA HUD Regulatory Limits: 40 ug/ft2 (Floors Carpeted/uncarpeted), 250ug/ft2 (Window Sill/Stools), 400 ug/ft2 (Window Trough /Well/Ext Concrete Surfaces) The laboratory operates in accord with ISO guidelines and holds limited scopes of accreditation under AIHA and NY State DOH ELAP programs. These results are submitted pursuant to AAT LLC current terms and conditions of sale, including the company's standard warranty and limitation of liability provisions. Analytical results relate to the samples as AIHA ELLAP- Lab ID #100986, NY State DOH ELAP -Lab ID #11864, State of Ohio- Lab ID # Date Printed: 09/06/ :49AM AAT Project: Page 1 of 2

68 12950 Haggerty Road Belleville, MI Ph:(734) 699-labs; Fax:(734) To : EHTS 2950 Aquila Avenue South St. Louis Park, MN Attn : Kris kris@healthyhom.com Phone : Project Location : 863 BURR STREET ST.PAUL 2ND LEVEL UNIT AAT Project : Client Project : Date Reported : EHTS /06/2013 Sample Client Code Analysis Requested Completed W-1 Dust Wipe 09/06/ W-2 Dust Wipe 09/06/ W-3 Dust Wipe 09/06/ W-4 Dust Wipe 09/06/ W-5 Dust Wipe 09/06/ W-6 Dust Wipe 09/06/ W-7 Dust Wipe 09/06/2013 Reviewed By Quality Assurance Coordinator - Robert A Theys This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify AAT immediately. Thank you. AIHA ELLAP- Lab ID #100986, NY State DOH ELAP -Lab ID #11864, State of Ohio- Lab ID # Date Printed: 09/06/ :49AM AAT Project: Page 2 of 2

69