LIMITED ASBESTOS AND LEAD-BASED PAINT ASSESSMENT REPORT

Transcription

1 LIMITED ASBESTOS AND LEAD-BASED PAINT ASSESSMENT REPORT Frankish Building 200 South Euclid Street Ontario, CA Project No.: PREPARED FOR Hernandez, Kroone and Associates 234 East Drake Drive San Bernardino, CA March 10, 2011

2 Frankish Building 200 South Euclid Street AE Project: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION SCOPE OF WORK PROPERTY DESCRIPTION INSPECTOR S QUALIFICATIONS TESTING PROTOCOL METHOD OF TESTING SUMMARY OF RESULTS RECOMMENDATIONS INSPECTION LIMITATIONS... 9 APPENDICES APPENDIX A PHOTOS APPENDIX B ASBESTOS SAMPLING TABLE & RESULTS APPENDIX C LEAD-BASED PAINT XRF FIELD DATA APPENDIX D INSPECTOR S CERTIFICATE(S) APPENDIX E LEAD PAINT DHS 8552 APPENDIX F MAP / FLOOR PLAN Andersen Environmental Page 2 of 9

3 Frankish Building 200 South Euclid Street AE Project: INTRODUCTION Hernandez, Kroone and Associates (referred to hereunder as the client) retained Andersen Environmental (AE) to perform a limited assessment and sampling of suspect asbestos containing materials (ACM) that are to be disturbed during renovation activities in the basement and first floor commercial space of the above referenced property (referred to hereunder as subject property). The purpose of this assessment was to conduct bulk sampling in order to determine the presence or absence of ACM and Lead-Based Paint (LBP) within the basement and first floor of the subject property. This report is a record of activities, observations, analytical results and recommendations performed to date. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of this inspection and survey is to identify and assess the Lead-Based Paint (LBP) and Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) present at the subject property. Asbestos The purpose of this assessment was to conduct bulk sampling in order to determine the presence or absence of ACM at the subject property. The scope of this assessment included reviewing any provided building records and/or previous investigation records, visually identifying homogeneous areas and functional spaces, collecting bulk samples of suspect ACM, interpreting the laboratory results and producing a written report of our findings and recommendations. Lead-Based Paint The purpose of this assessment was to perform an inspection for lead-based paint at the subject property. To comply with EPA and HUD guidelines, painted and varnished surfaces in every accessible room equivalent were sampled for the presence of LBP. The intent was to ascertain the presence of lead-based paint above the federal action level. If LBP was found, the inspection would identify individual architectural components and their respective concentrations of lead in such a manner that this report would be used to characterize the presence of LBP at this property. 3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The subject property is a partially vacant commercial/residential structure that was built circa It is a three-story building with a full basement that is constructed on a concrete foundation. The exterior walls are brick, finished with stucco and plaster. The first floor and basement consists of two bathrooms, kitchen and multiple rooms. At the time of this inspection, the interior and exterior painted surfaces were observed to range from poor to good condition. Andersen Environmental Page 3 of 9

4 Frankish Building 200 South Euclid Street AE Project: INSPECTOR S QUALIFICATIONS Mr. Michael Pinkerton of Andersen Environmental performed the lead-based paint inspection at the site using an XRF spectrum analyzer instrument. Mr. Pinkerton has attended the radiation safety course for handling the instrument, and completed an EPA approved curriculum in Lead in Construction Inspector / Risk Assessor Training. At the time of this report, the California Department of Health Services, Childhood Lead Poisoning Branch, has implemented a State Certification Model Accreditation Plan adopted from the EPA. Mr. Pinkerton has received certification. Personnel certificate(s) have been provided in Appendix D. Mr. Ben Curry of Andersen Environmental performed the asbestos inspection at the site. Mr. Curry is certified by the State of California Division of Occupational Safety and Health as a Certified Asbestos Consultant. Personnel certificate(s) have been provided in Appendix D. 5.0 TESTING PROTOCOL Asbestos The sampling was performed in accordance with requirements of the following regulations: Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA); 40 CFR 763 Subpart E Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Reauthorization Act (ASHARA); Section 206 of the Toxic Substance Control Act National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS); 40 CFR 61 Subpart M. This report is a record of activities, observations, analytical results and recommendations performed to date. Lead-Based Paint Testing of the painted surfaces was patterned after the inspection protocol in Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing i. In every room equivalent within the tested property, one representative surface of each testing combination was tested. Multiple readings were collected to resolve inconsistencies in the test results. Several public (government) agencies have a published regulatory action level to classify LBP. To further complicate matters, some of the established levels are quantified in different units of measurement. Listed below are the current regulatory agencies that have defined LBP, along with the respective action level: Agency Ordinance # Action level (mg / cm 2 ) Action level (ppm ii ) HUD / EPA 24 CFR & 40 CFR mg / cm 2 5,000 ppm L.A. County Title 11, mg / cm ppm ii OSHA / CAL OSHA 29 CFR & Title 8, Not Specified 600 ppm iii Andersen Environmental Page 4 of 9

5 Frankish Building 200 South Euclid Street AE Project: HUD / EPA have recently issued the following guidance regarding units of measurement for paint samples: Report lead paint amounts in mg/cm² because this unit of measurement does not depend on the number of layers of non-lead-based paint and can usually be obtained without damaging the painted surface. All measurements of lead in paint should be in mg/cm², unless the surface area cannot be measured or if all paint cannot be removed from the measured surface area. In such cases, concentrations may be reported in weight percent (%) or parts per million by weight (ppm). iv Furthermore, EPA has previously issued guidance on lead content classification as follows: The rule, at 24 CFR and 40 CFR states that a lead-based paint free finding must demonstrate that the building is free of paint or other surface coatings that contain lead in excess of 1.0 milligrams per square centimeter (1.0 mg / cm 2 ) or 0.5 percent by weight (5000 ppm). The State standards are not applicable, whether more or less stringent, since a State cannot amend Federal requirements. v In recognition of the various action levels the testing results are classified as follows for this report: Painted surfaces with readings at or above 0.70 mg / cm 2 are considered - Positive Painted surfaces with readings at or below 0.69 mg / cm 2 are considered - Negative The individual readings have been provided on all field data sheets. Any future change in action levels by one of the regulating agencies may affect the classification of results. For purposes of this survey, any material containing any detectable level of lead is subject to OSHA s Lead Exposure in Construction Rule (29 CFR Part 1926). Any work that disturbs these materials must be performed in accordance with these and any other applicable standards. 6.0 METHOD OF TESTING Asbestos All samples were collected using a clean knife, chisel or the appropriate tools. The sample location was first moistened with water in order to limit dust release. Each sample was extracted carefully so as not to disturb adjacent materials while still penetrating through all layers of the material sampled. Each sample was sealed in the appropriate sized plastic zip lock bag and the bag then labeled with a unique identification number. The sample number, description and location was then recorded on a log and plotted on a floor plan of the structure or area. Sampling tools were cleaned after collecting each sample. Any excess dust or debris from the sample location was cleaned using a moistened cloth. Whenever possible, samples were collected from previously damaged portions of the material in order to minimize damage to the material. A total of twenty one (21) samples were submitted to LA Testing, Inc. in South Pasadena, California. LA Testing is accredited under the NIST/NVLAP program for asbestos in bulk material by polarized light microscopy and the State of California for asbestos analysis. NIST/NVLAP lab code The analyses of the samples in this report were performed using polarized light microscopy using the EPA method 600/R-93/116. The phase abundances provided are visually estimated and expressed as Andersen Environmental Page 5 of 9

6 Frankish Building 200 South Euclid Street AE Project: percent area. Total percentage of sample constituents may total greater than 100 due to trace amounts. The limit of detection for this analytical method is less than one percent. In multilayer samples, unless otherwise specified, the asbestos concentration is reported for the layer where asbestos is found. These results lie within the statistical limits of variability calculated for standard reference samples routinely analyzed in the laboratory. On a per sample basis, the accuracy and precision of the results depend on the type of sample and its asbestos content. Lead-Based Paint The XRF testing was performed with an X-Ray Fluorescence handheld unit. This unit uses a radioactive source of cadmium 109. The model used was a Niton XLp 303A by Thermo Scientific. It was calibrated to NIST standard lead concentration samples prior to and after its use. Uncoated surfaces such as unpainted aluminum window frame and other bare materials were not tested. The instrument s calibration was verified according to the manufacturer's specifications in compliance with the Performance Characteristic Sheet (PCS) developed for this instrument. The readings from this instrument produce a 95% confidence level that the lead reading accurately reflects the actual level of lead in the tested surfaces, relative to the federal action level. 7.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS Asbestos The following materials were found to contain asbestos and are considered ACM: Paper Pipe Wrap, First floor adjacent to columns (35-45 % Chrysotile) Furnace Insulation, Basement (6% Amosite & 3% Chrysotile) Mudded Elbow, Basement (7% Amosite) Brown and Red 9x9 Floor Tiles, Basement (5% Chrysotile) Floor Tile Mastic, Basement (3-7% Chrysotile) All of the above materials, with the exception of the asbestos paper pipe wrap material within both of the first floor commercial spaces, were found to be in good condition at the time of the assessment. The paper pipe wrap material was damaged due to general wear and tear and should be removed immediately. All other materials sampled in this assessment tested negative for asbestos. Please refer to the attached table for a list of ACM / ACCM Homogeneous Materials, their locations and approximate quantities. The field data and results for sampling may be found in Appendix B. Andersen Environmental Page 6 of 9

7 Frankish Building 200 South Euclid Street AE Project: Lead-Based Paint Throughout the subject property, several of the painted components indicated the presence of lead-based paint (LBP) at or above the respective action level. The following summary lists the specific components that tested above the action level and their respective locations: Location West Stairwell, Basement West Stairwell, Basement West Stairwell, Basement West Stairwell, Basement West Stairwell, Basement Northwest Room, Basement North Hallway, Basement North Hallway, Basement Northeast Room, Basement Northeast Room, Basement Southeast Room, Basement Southwest Stairwell, Basement Southwest Stairwell, Basement Restroom 1, First Floor Restroom 1, First Floor Southwest Corridor, First Floor South Hall, First Floor South Hall, First Floor South Hall First Floor North Hall, First Floor North Hall, First Floor North Hall, First Floor Restroom 2, First Floor Restroom 2, First Floor Restroom 2, First Floor Exterior Type of Material Stucco Walls Stucco Ceiling Wood Door & Door Frame Wood Window Frame Wood Handrail Wood Window Frame & Window Sash Wood Window Frame & Window Sash Metal Door Metal Pipe Metal Door Metal Pipe Stucco Walls Wood Door Frame Plaster Walls Plaster Ceiling Plaster Walls Plaster Walls Metal Post Tin Ceilings Plaster Walls Metal Post Tin Ceiling Plaster Walls Plaster Ceiling Wood Door Frame Wood Window Frames & Sash Sampling for this inspection was representative and any components that were not tested but similar to those components that tested positive for LBP should be considered and treated as lead laden. The field data and results for paint sampling may be found in Appendix C. Andersen Environmental Page 7 of 9

8 Frankish Building 200 South Euclid Street AE Project: RECOMMENDATIONS Given the clients anticipated renovation of the building, AE recommends the following: Asbestos All materials found to contain asbestos and/or presumed to contain asbestos should be removed and disposed of by a licensed and Cal/OSHA registered asbestos abatement contractor prior to any disturbance of the material. It is highly recommended that abatement monitoring be performed by the asbestos consultant (AE) if asbestos abatement is to be performed while non-abatement persons (employees, tenants, other building occupants, or general public) are present in adjacent areas. Abatement monitoring included the collection of air samples in adjacent areas to demonstrate that asbestos fibers are not migrating out of the regulated areas. In addition to air sampling, the monitoring includes oversight of the abatement contractor to ensure that the work is being conducted in compliance with all applicable regulations and in accordance with the scope of work and abatement specifications. Such abatement monitoring serves to limit the legal liabilities of the building owner. Lead-Based Paint All building components identified in this survey as being coated with LBP should be physical removed and disposed of prior to any disturbance through the demolition / renovation activities. If the components are not going to be disturbed during renovation activities, they do not need to be removed, but any loose or flakey paint must be stabilized. AE recommends that the removal activities be performed in accordance with all federal, State and local regulations dealing with the disturbance of lead containing materials. The removal of material containing any detectable level of lead is subject to OSHA s Lead Exposure in Construction Rule (29 CFR part 1926) and Title 8, Section of the California Code of Regulations. Any work that disturbs these materials must be performed in accordance with these and any other applicable standards and should be performed by a licensed and registered lead abatement contractor, using properly trained and certified personnel and state-of-the-art techniques. During the removal of the Lead Based Paint, AE should be on-site to perform area monitoring for lead dust in areas outside of the containments to ensure that adjacent areas are not being impacted by the removal of the lead-based paint. Additionally, AE should be collecting post abatement clearance wipe sampling prior to re-occupancy of the areas by un-licensed personnel. Andersen Environmental Page 8 of 9

9 Frankish Building 200 South Euclid Street AE Project: INSPECTION LIMITATIONS This inspection was limited to the first floor and basement of the subject property. The inspection was planned, developed, and implemented based on Andersen Environmental s previous experience in performing lead-based paint inspections/risk assessments. This inspection was patterned after Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing (1997 Revision). Andersen Environmental utilized state-of-the-art-practices and techniques in accordance with regulatory standards while performing this inspection/risk assessment. Andersen Environmental s evaluation of the relative risk of exposure to lead identified during this inspection/risk assessment is based on conditions observed at the time of the inspection. Andersen Environmental cannot be responsible for changing conditions that may alter the relative exposure risk or for future changes in accepted methodology. Andersen Environmental uses only qualified personnel to perform building surveys. Reasonable effort was made to survey accessible suspect materials. Additional suspect materials may be located between walls, in voids, or in other inaccessible areas; caution should be exercised regarding these areas. Andersen Environmental cannot warrant that this building does not contain LBP or asbestos in locations other than those identified in this report. Enclosed are the diagram(s), actual test results, and all relevant certifications and licenses. Survey and Report by: Benjamin Curry DOSH Certified Asbestos Consultant No DHS Certified Lead Inspector / Risk Assessor No i ii iii iv v 1997 Revision Applies to sale and application of LBP. Applies to construction related activities Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing (1997 Revision). Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, (August 20, 1996) Andersen Environmental Page 9 of 9

10 APPENDIX A

11 200 South Euclid Avenue AE Project No Figure 3: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Photo 1: The subject property building, viewed from the intersection of South Euclid Street and West Transit Street. Photo 2: The north side of the subject property building.

12 200 South Euclid Avenue AE Project No Figure 3: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Photo 3: The east side of the subject property building along Euclid Street. Photo 4: The south side of the subject property building.

13 200 South Euclid Avenue AE Project No Figure 3: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Photo 5: The interior of the first floor commercial/retail space. Note the hot water lines running up the structural columns. Photo 6: Close up of the ACM wrapped hot water lines within the first floor units.

14 200 South Euclid Avenue AE Project No Figure 3: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Photo 7: Another view of the first floor commercial/retail space. Photo 8: Water damage above the tin ceilings from the residential units above.

15 200 South Euclid Avenue AE Project No Figure 3: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Photo 9: Water damage to the plaster within the southwest stairwell. Photo 10: View of the basement storage areas.

16 200 South Euclid Avenue AE Project No Figure 3: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Photo 11: 9x9 red and brown asbestos floor tiles with associated asbestos containing mastic. Photo 12: Asbestos containing mudded elbow associated with the furnace.

17 200 South Euclid Avenue AE Project No Figure 3: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Photo 13: Furnace within the northeast portion of the basement. Photo 14: Asbestos containing furnace insulation.

18 APPENDIX B

19 Appendix B HOMOGENEOUS MATERIALS LOCATION LIST Homogeneous Material No.. Material Description Material Location (Functional Space) Total Quantity* 1 9 x9 Red and Brown Vinyl Floor Tiles with Black Mastic Basement, Southeast Portion 1,200 SF 2 Mudded Elbow Basement Northwest Portion 6 presumed 3 Furnace Insulation Basement Northwest Portion 112 SF 4 Asbestos paper Pipe Wrap First Floor, Retail Areas 40 LF * These quantities are only approximations. The exact quantities should be measured by the abatement contractor during the bidding process.

20 LA Testing 520 Mission Street, South Pasadena, CA Phone: (323) Fax: (323) Attn: Ben Curry Andersen Environmental 9937 Jefferson Boulevard Suite 200 Culver City, CA Customer ID: Customer PO: Received: LA Testing Order: 32ANDE85 03/02/11 9:00 AM Fax: Phone: (310) Project: /200 S. Euclid St. LA Testing Proj: Analysis Date: 3/7/2011 Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % % Type Moisture barrier Black 30% Cellulose 70% Non-fibrous (other) Fibrous Moisture barrier Black 30% Cellulose 70% Non-fibrous (other) Fibrous Moisture barrier Brown/Black 35% Cellulose 65% Non-fibrous (other) Fibrous Homogeneous Comp FC&BC Plaster 1st floor ceiling Gray/White/Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) Unable to seperate FC&BC Comp FC&BC Plaster 1st floor wall Gray/White/Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) Unable to seperate FC&BC DWS Brown/White 20% Cellulose 80% Non-fibrous (other) Initial report from 03/07/ :08:39 Analyst(s) Rosa Mendoza (29) Rafik Vartanian, Ph.D (5) or other approved signatory Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of LA Testing. LA Testing s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. LA Testingbears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Samples analyzed by LA Testing South Pasadena, CA NVLAP Lab Code , CA ELAP 2283 Test Report PLM Printed: 3/7/ :08:39 AM 1

21 LA Testing 520 Mission Street, South Pasadena, CA Phone: (323) Fax: (323) Attn: Ben Curry Andersen Environmental 9937 Jefferson Boulevard Suite 200 Culver City, CA Customer ID: Customer PO: Received: LA Testing Order: 32ANDE85 03/02/11 9:00 AM Fax: Phone: (310) Project: /200 S. Euclid St. LA Testing Proj: Analysis Date: 3/7/2011 Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % % Type DWS Brown/White 15% Cellulose 85% Non-fibrous (other) DWS Brown/White 15% Cellulose 75% Non-fibrous (other) Fibrous 10% Glass Floor Tile Brown 9x9 w/black mastic Red Homogeneous 95% Non-fibrous (other) 5% Chrysotile Mastic A Brown 9x9 w/black mastic Black Homogeneous 97% Non-fibrous (other) 3% Chrysotile Floor Tile Red 9x9 w/black mastic Red Homogeneous 95% Non-fibrous (other) 5% Chrysotile Mastic A Red 9x9 w/black mastic Black Homogeneous 93% Non-fibrous (other) 7% Chrysotile Initial report from 03/07/ :08:39 Analyst(s) Rosa Mendoza (29) Rafik Vartanian, Ph.D (5) or other approved signatory Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of LA Testing. LA Testing s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. LA Testingbears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Samples analyzed by LA Testing South Pasadena, CA NVLAP Lab Code , CA ELAP 2283 Test Report PLM Printed: 3/7/ :08:39 AM 2

22 LA Testing 520 Mission Street, South Pasadena, CA Phone: (323) Fax: (323) Attn: Ben Curry Andersen Environmental 9937 Jefferson Boulevard Suite 200 Culver City, CA Customer ID: Customer PO: Received: LA Testing Order: 32ANDE85 03/02/11 9:00 AM Fax: Phone: (310) Project: /200 S. Euclid St. LA Testing Proj: Analysis Date: 3/7/2011 Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % % Type Comp FC&BC Plaster basement ceiling Beige Unable to seperate FC&BC 100% Non-fibrous (other) Drywall A Plaster basement ceiling Brown/White 15% Cellulose 85% Non-fibrous (other) Mudded elbow White 93% Non-fibrous (other) 7% Amosite Fibrous Furnace insulation Brown 15% Glass 76% Non-fibrous (other) 6% Amosite Fibrous 3% Chrysotile Furnace brick Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) Cloth pipe wrap Brown 95% Cellulose 5% Non-fibrous (other) Fibrous Initial report from 03/07/ :08:39 Analyst(s) Rosa Mendoza (29) Rafik Vartanian, Ph.D (5) or other approved signatory Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of LA Testing. LA Testing s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. LA Testingbears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Samples analyzed by LA Testing South Pasadena, CA NVLAP Lab Code , CA ELAP 2283 Test Report PLM Printed: 3/7/ :08:39 AM 3

23 LA Testing 520 Mission Street, South Pasadena, CA Phone: (323) Fax: (323) Attn: Ben Curry Andersen Environmental 9937 Jefferson Boulevard Suite 200 Culver City, CA Customer ID: Customer PO: Received: LA Testing Order: 32ANDE85 03/02/11 9:00 AM Fax: Phone: (310) Project: /200 S. Euclid St. LA Testing Proj: Analysis Date: 3/7/2011 Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % % Type Finish Coat Plaster basement ceiling White 100% Non-fibrous (other) Base Coat A Plaster basement ceiling Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) Drywall B Plaster basement ceiling Brown/White 20% Cellulose 80% Non-fibrous (other) Sheet Flooring Sheet floor-south bath White/Red 20% 6% Cellulose Glass 74% Non-fibrous (other) Mastic A Sheet floor-south bath Yellow Homogeneous 100% Non-fibrous (other) BC Plaster 1st floor wall Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) No FC present for analysis Initial report from 03/07/ :08:39 Analyst(s) Rosa Mendoza (29) Rafik Vartanian, Ph.D (5) or other approved signatory Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of LA Testing. LA Testing s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. LA Testingbears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Samples analyzed by LA Testing South Pasadena, CA NVLAP Lab Code , CA ELAP 2283 Test Report PLM Printed: 3/7/ :08:39 AM 4

24 LA Testing 520 Mission Street, South Pasadena, CA Phone: (323) Fax: (323) Attn: Ben Curry Andersen Environmental 9937 Jefferson Boulevard Suite 200 Culver City, CA Customer ID: Customer PO: Received: LA Testing Order: 32ANDE85 03/02/11 9:00 AM Fax: Phone: (310) Project: /200 S. Euclid St. LA Testing Proj: Analysis Date: 3/7/2011 Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % % Type Finish Coat Plaster 1st floor wall White 100% Non-fibrous (other) Base Coat A Plaster 1st floor wall Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) Sheet Flooring Mastic A Sheet floor bath N Beige 25% Cellulose 69% Non-fibrous (other) Fibrous 6% Glass Sheet floor bath N Yellow 100% Non-fibrous (other) Homogeneous Pipe wrap 1st floor White/Beige 55% Non-fibrous (other) 45% Chrysotile Fibrous Pipe wrap 1st floor White/Beige 55% Non-fibrous (other) 45% Chrysotile Fibrous Initial report from 03/07/ :08:39 Analyst(s) Rosa Mendoza (29) Rafik Vartanian, Ph.D (5) or other approved signatory Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of LA Testing. LA Testing s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. LA Testingbears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Samples analyzed by LA Testing South Pasadena, CA NVLAP Lab Code , CA ELAP 2283 Test Report PLM Printed: 3/7/ :08:39 AM 5

25 LA Testing 520 Mission Street, South Pasadena, CA Phone: (323) Fax: (323) Attn: Ben Curry Andersen Environmental 9937 Jefferson Boulevard Suite 200 Culver City, CA Customer ID: Customer PO: Received: LA Testing Order: 32ANDE85 03/02/11 9:00 AM Fax: Phone: (310) Project: /200 S. Euclid St. LA Testing Proj: Analysis Date: 3/7/2011 Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % % Type Pipe wrap 1st floor Gray/White 5% Cellulose 60% Non-fibrous (other) 35% Chrysotile Fibrous Duct sealant 1st floor Gray/Blue Homogeneous 100% Non-fibrous (other) Duct sealant 1st floor Gray/Blue Homogeneous 100% Non-fibrous (other) Duct sealant 1st floor Gray/Blue 100% Non-fibrous (other) Initial report from 03/07/ :08:39 Analyst(s) Rosa Mendoza (29) Rafik Vartanian, Ph.D (5) or other approved signatory Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of LA Testing. LA Testing s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. LA Testingbears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Samples analyzed by LA Testing South Pasadena, CA NVLAP Lab Code , CA ELAP 2283 Test Report PLM Printed: 3/7/ :08:39 AM THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT. 6

26

27

28

29 APPENDIX C

30 200 South Euclid Ave Ontario, Ca Shot Time Level Room Component Sub-Component Substrate Side Condition Results PbC 1 2/28/ :03 Shutter. Cal Res /28/ :46 Calibration Positive /28/ :46 Calibration Positive /28/ :46 Calibration Positive 1 5 2/28/ :47 Basement West Stairwell Wall Stucco A Fair Positive /28/ :47 Basement West Stairwell Wall Stucco B Fair Positive /28/ :47 Basement West Stairwell Wall Stucco C Fair Positive /28/ :48 Basement West Stairwell Wall Stucco D Fair Positive /28/ :48 Basement West Stairwell Ceiling Stucco Fair Positive /28/ :48 Basement West Stairwell Door Frame Wood B Poor Positive /28/ :49 Basement West Stairwell Door Wood B Poor Positive /28/ :49 Basement West Stairwell Upper Window Frame Wood B Poor Positive /28/ :49 Basement West Stairwell Stair Rail Wood A Poor Positive /28/ :49 Basement North Stairwell Window Frame Wood B Poor Negative /28/ :49 Basement North Stairwell Window Sill Wood B Poor Negative /28/ :49 Basement North Stairwell Door Frame A Poor Negative /28/ :49 Basement North Stairwell Door A Poor Negative /28/ :49 Basement Northwest Room Window Sash Wood B Poor Positive /28/ :50 Basement Northwest Room Window Frame Wood B Poor Positive /28/ :50 Basement North Hallway Door Metal A Intact Positive /28/ :50 Basement North Hallway Window Sash Wood B Poor Positive /28/ :50 Basement North Hallway Window Frame Wood B Poor Positive /28/ :50 Basement Northeast Room Wall Concrete A Intact Negative /28/ :50 Basement Northeast Room Wall Concrete B Intact Negative /28/ :51 Basement Northeast Room Wall Concrete C Intact Negative /28/ :51 Basement Northeast Room Wall Concrete D Intact Negative /28/ :51 Basement Northeast Room Wall Wood A Intact Negative /28/ :52 Basement Northeast Room Wall Wood B Intact Negative /28/ :52 Basement Northeast Room Wall Wood C Intact Negative /28/ :08 Basement Northeast Room Wall Wood D Intact Negative /28/ :08 Basement Northeast Room Ceiling Pipe Metal Intact Positive /28/ :08 Basement Northeast Room Ceiling Plaster Intact Negative /28/ :09 Basement Northeast Room Column Concrete Intact Negative 0

31 200 South Euclid Ave Ontario, Ca Shot Time Level Room Component Sub-Component Substrate Side Condition Results PbC 34 2/28/ :09 Basement Northeast Room Floor Concrete Fair Negative /28/ :11 Basement Northeast Room Door Jamb Metal C Fair Negative /28/ :11 Basement Northeast Room Door Metal C Fair Positive /28/ :12 Basement Northeast Storage 1 Wall Concrete A Intact Negative /28/ :12 Basement Northeast Storage 1 Wall Concrete B Intact Negative /28/ :12 Basement Northeast Storage 1 Wall Plaster C Intact Negative /28/ :13 Basement Northeast Storage 1 Wall Plaster D Intact Negative /28/ :13 Basement Northeast Storage 1 Ceiling Plaster Intact Negative /28/ :13 Basement Northeast Storage 1 Floor Concrete Fair Negative /28/ :14 Basement Northeast Storage 2 Wall Plaster A Intact Negative /28/ :14 Basement Northeast Storage 2 Wall Concrete B Intact Negative /28/ :14 Basement Northeast Storage 2 Wall Plaster C Intact Negative /28/ :14 Basement Northeast Storage 2 Wall Plaster D Intact Negative /28/ :15 Basement Northeast Storage 2 Door Frame Wood D Intact Negative /28/ :15 Basement Northeast Storage 2 Door Wood D Intact Negative /28/ :15 Basement Southeast Room Wall Concrete A Intact Negative /28/ :15 Basement Southeast Room Wall Concrete B Intact Negative /28/ :16 Basement Southeast Room Wall Wood C Intact Negative /28/ :16 Basement Southeast Room Wall Plaster D Intact Negative /28/ :16 Basement Southeast Room Ceiling Concrete Intact Negative /28/ :16 Basement Southeast Room Ceiling Pipe Metal Intact Positive /28/ :16 Basement Southeast Room Column Concrete Intact Negative /28/ :17 Basement Southwest Room Wall Wood A Intact Negative /28/ :17 Basement Southwest Room Wall Concrete B Intact Negative /28/ :17 Basement Southwest Room Wall Concrete C Intact Negative /28/ :17 Basement Southwest Room Wall Concrete D Intact Negative /28/ :17 Basement Southwest Room Ceiling Plaster Intact Negative /28/ :17 Basement Southwest Room Column Concrete Intact Negative /28/ :18 Basement Southwest Room I Beam Metal Intact Negative /28/ :18 Basement Southwest Room Ceiling Pipe Metal Intact Negative /28/ :18 Basement Southwest Stairwell Stair Post Wood D Fair Negative /28/ :18 Basement Southwest Stairwell Stair Railing Wood D Fair Negative /28/ :19 Basement Southwest Stairwell Stair Tread Concrete D Poor Negative 0

32 200 South Euclid Ave Ontario, Ca Shot Time Level Room Component Sub-Component Substrate Side Condition Results PbC 67 2/28/ :19 Basement Southwest Stairwell Wall Stucco A Intact Positive /28/ :19 Basement Southwest Stairwell Wall Stucco B Intact Positive /28/ :19 Basement Southwest Stairwell Wall Stucco C Intact Positive /28/ :19 Basement Southwest Stairwell Wall Stucco D Intact Positive /28/ :19 Basement Southwest Stairwell Door Frame Wood C Poor Positive /28/ :19 Basement Southwest Stairwell Door Wood C Poor Negative /28/ :20 Basement Southwest Stairwell Window Sash Wood D Poor Negative /28/ :20 Main Floor Restroom 1 Wall Plaster A Intact Positive /28/ :20 Main Floor Restroom 1 Wall Plaster B Intact Positive /28/ :20 Main Floor Restroom 1 Wall Plaster C Intact Positive /28/ :20 Main Floor Restroom 1 Wall Plaster D Intact Positive /28/ :21 Main Floor Restroom 1 Ceiling Plaster Intact Positive /28/ :21 Main Floor Restroom 1 Door Jamb Wood B Poor Negative /28/ :21 Main Floor Restroom 1 Door Wood B Poor Negative /28/ :21 Main Floor Restroom 1 Window Sash Wood D Poor Negative /28/ :22 Main Floor Restroom 1 Window Sill Wood D Poor Negative /28/ :22 Main Floor Southwest Corridor Wall Wood A Intact Negative /28/ :23 Main Floor Southwest Corridor Wall Wood B Intact Negative /28/ :23 Main Floor Southwest Corridor Wall Plaster C Intact Positive /28/ :23 Main Floor Southwest Corridor Wall Plaster D Intact Positive /28/ :23 Main Floor Southwest Corridor Ceiling Wood Intact Negative /28/ :24 Main Floor South Hall Wall Plaster A Intact Positive /28/ :24 Main Floor South Hall Wall Plaster B Intact Positive /28/ :25 Main Floor South Hall Wall Plaster C Intact Positive /28/ :25 Main Floor South Hall Wall Plaster D Intact Positive /28/ :25 Main Floor South Hall Post Metal Poor Positive /28/ :25 Main Floor South Hall Ceiling Metal Poor Positive /28/ :26 Main Floor South Hall HVAC Duct Metal Intact Negative /28/ :26 Main Floor South Hall Pipe Metal B Intact Negative /28/ :26 Main Floor South Hall Window Frame Wood B Poor Negative /28/ :27 Main Floor South Hall Window Sill Wood B Poor Negative /28/ :27 Main Floor South Hall Baseboard Wood D Intact Negative /28/ :27 Main Floor South Hall Window Frame Wood A Poor Negative 0.01

33 200 South Euclid Ave Ontario, Ca Shot Time Level Room Component Sub-Component Substrate Side Condition Results PbC 100 2/28/ :27 Main Floor South Hall Upper Window Frame Wood A Poor Negative /28/ :27 Main Floor Southeast Storage Wall Plaster A Intact Negative /28/ :28 Main Floor Southeast Storage Wall Plaster B Intact Negative /28/ :28 Main Floor Southeast Storage Wall Plaster C Intact Negative /28/ :28 Main Floor Southeast Storage Wall Plaster D Intact Negative /28/ :28 Main Floor Southeast Storage Ceiling Plaster Intact Negative /28/ :28 Main Floor Southeast Storage Door Frame Wood A Intact Negative /28/ :28 Main Floor Southeast Storage Door Wood A Intact Negative /28/ :29 Main Floor North Hall Wall Plaster A Intact Positive /28/ :29 Main Floor North Hall Wall Plaster B Intact Positive /28/ :30 Main Floor North Hall Wall Plaster C Intact Positive /28/ :30 Main Floor North Hall Wall Plaster D Intact Positive /28/ :30 Main Floor North Hall Ceiling Metal Poor Positive /28/ :30 Main Floor North Hall Post Metal Poor Positive /28/ :31 Main Floor North Hall HVAC Duct Metal Intact Negative /28/ :31 Main Floor North Hall Window Sill Wood A Intact Negative /28/ :31 Main Floor North Hall Window Bench Wood A Intact Negative /28/ :32 Main Floor North Hall Upper Window Frame Wood A Intact Negative /28/ :33 Main Floor North Hall Door Frame Metal A Intact Negative /28/ :33 Main Floor North Hall Door Wood A Intact Negative /28/ :33 Main Floor North Hall Conduit Metal C Intact Negative /28/ :34 Main Floor North Hall Door Frame Wood C Fair Negative /28/ :34 Main Floor North Hall Door Wood C Fair Negative /28/ :35 Main Floor North Hall Molding Wood A Intact Negative /28/ :35 Main Floor North Hall Door Frame Wood C Poor Negative /28/ :35 Main Floor North Hall Door Wood C Poor Negative /28/ :35 Main Floor Restroom 2 Wall Plaster A Poor Positive /28/ :36 Main Floor Restroom 2 Wall Plaster B Poor Positive /28/ :36 Main Floor Restroom 2 Wall Plaster C Poor Positive /28/ :36 Main Floor Restroom 2 Wall Plaster D Poor Positive /28/ :36 Main Floor Restroom 2 Ceiling Plaster Poor Positive /28/ :36 Main Floor Restroom 2 Baseboard Wood B Poor Negative /28/ :37 Main Floor Restroom 2 Door Frame Wood A Poor Positive 1.8

34 200 South Euclid Ave Ontario, Ca Shot Time Level Room Component Sub-Component Substrate Side Condition Results PbC 133 2/28/ :37 Main Floor Restroom 2 Door Header Wood A Poor Positive /28/ :43 Exterior Pilar Concrete A Intact Negative /28/ :43 Exterior Window Sash Metal A Intact Negative /28/ :43 Exterior Window Frame Metal A Intact Negative /28/ :44 Exterior Wall Concrete C Intact Negative /28/ :44 Exterior Wall Wood C Intact Negative /28/ :45 Exterior Window Sash Wood C Poor Positive /28/ :45 Exterior Window Sill Wood C Poor Positive /28/ :45 Exterior Pilar Concrete D Intact Negative /28/ :45 Exterior Window Sash Metal D Intact Negative /28/ :46 Exterior Window Sill Metal D Intact Negative /28/ :53 Calibration Positive /28/ :54 Calibration Positive /28/ :54 Calibration Positive 1.1 Total Readings 146 Action Level - 1 Positive Readings 50 Units mg/cm^2

35 APPENDIX D

36 ilrifimrmilwilrfrm

37

38

39 APPENDIX E

40

41 APPENDIX F

42

43