Wendy Landry, AIA, LEED AP Richard Rodriguez, LEED AP

Transcription

1 Wendy Landry, AIA, LEED AP Richard Rodriguez, LEED AP Wendy Landry, Associate Principal, Green Building Services 112 Lake Ave., Orlando, FL 32801, , Richard Rodriguez, Project Director, WELBRO Building Corporation 2301 Maitland Center Parkway, #250, Maitland, FL 32751, ,

2 How is Cost Defined? Design Approach Design/Construction Process Key Steps to Success Cost Breakdown Benefits Conclusion: How is the Question Answered? Q&A

3 At the end of this course you will: Recognize the impacts of design and construction decisions on: The Project Budget LEED Certification Potential Be aware of approaches to cost modeling Understand the difference between Conventional and Integrated Design Understand the benefits of LEED certification

4

5 Perception 19% Perception 17% Reality 40% Reality 0 5% Source: World Business Council for Sustainable Development Energy Efficiency in Buildings: Business realities and opportunities, Summary Report

6 Hard Cost Renovation Costs Project Cost Soft Cost Employee Health & Benefits Operating Expense

7

8 Design to meet code minimum standards Design to meet optimized environmental standards Component Driven Integrated Seeks Compliance Seeks Optimization

9 timeless and durable carbon-neutral market differentiation daylight and views for occupants increase productivity 40% better than ASHRAE building as educational tool healthy interiors minimum 10% ROI

10 Planning, Site Selection, Programming Design Development Construction Administration Schematic Design Construction Documents Occupancy and Ongoing Operations

11 Start SD CD Construction Occupancy Program DD Bid Eco-Charrette Calculations & Analysis Prebid Conference Specifications Construction Administration Preconstruction Conference Submittal Review Submit Documentation Preliminary Review Energy Modeling Commissioning Program SD DD CD Bid Construction

12 High Skeptical participant Company is highly motivated by CSR Leader Willing to drive/lead adoption but individual is not convinced Needs clear argument for why Convince Why Believes in the economics, the climate impact and the regulatory incentives Personal Know-how Educate how Educate how Low Unengaged Very low knowledge levels Pessimistic about doability Unengaged on environmental issues Convince Why Uninformed enthusiast Pessimistic about the economics, the climate impact and the incentives Doesn t know how to get involved Passionate about the environment Low Personal commitment High Source: World Business Council for Sustainable Development

13 Can-do attitude Open communication Willing to invest time Leader Willing to drive/lead adoption Believes in the economics, the climate impact and the regulatory incentives

14

15 80,192 sq ft, 3-stories Programs: Dental Hygiene CVT-Cardiovascular Technology Radiology Respiratory Therapy General Sciences Biology & Micro-Biology General, Organic, & Inorganic Chemistry

16 17,333 sq ft, one story Program areas: Assembly spaces State of the Art Meeting Spaces Architectural Design Studio Culinary Arts kitchen Front porch design with specific building orientation to capture sunlight year round Modern interpretation of Florida Vernacular Mauricio Maso, HuntonBrady Architects

17

18 The Creation, Exploration, and Presentation of Ideas The program is identified

19 The Total Sum of Money set aside or needed for a purpose The Budget is established The budget is established

20 Design a Facility that: Meets the Needs of the Desired Program Is in Alignment with the Facility Standards Environmental Goals Energy Conservation Goals Does Not Exceed the Master Budget

21 Understand Client Expectations Establish Building Imagery/Architecture Program Verification Sustainability Requirements Occupancy / Fiscal Projections Prepare initial project budgets

22 Establish Global Design Parameters Department Team Meetings Understand Client Operational Needs Confirm sustainability requirements Provide alternative design solutions Prepare schematic construction budget

23 Design and Engineering Detail building systems MEP selected and sized Initiate project pre-plan process Constructability reviews

24 All details come together Finalize equipment selection Selection of finishes look & feel Complete constructability and quality control reviews Prepare GMP

25

26 Cross check phases Open communication Follow-through Monitor goals & objectives

27

28 Description Total General Requirements (Division 1) 692,653 Division ,097,040 TOTAL ALL DIVISIONS 16,089,653 G/Cs & Contingencies 1,559,203 TOTAL COST OF WORK 17,648,856 Fees & Insurance 1,120,192 TOTAL PROPOSED GMP $19,469,048

29 Description Total General Requirements (Division 1) 346,836 Division ,215,294 TOTAL ALL DIVISIONS 4,562,130 G/Cs & Contingencies 369,149 TOTAL COST OF WORK 4,931,279 Fees & Insurance 318,721 TOTAL PROPOSED GMP $5,250,000

30 Description Schematic Design Design Development GMP General Requirements (Division 1) 750,000 Division ,227,844 TOTAL ALL DIVISIONS 15,977,844 G/Cs & Contingencies 1,057,433 TOTAL COST OF WORK 17,035,277 Fees & Insurance 1,715,459 TOTAL PROPOSED GMP $18,750, ,000 16,019,853 16,769,853 1,074,845 17,844,698 1,715,459 $19,560, ,653 16,097,040 16,089,653 1,559,203 17,648,856 1,120,192 $19,469,048 LEED Category Schematic Design April 2007 Yes Maybe No Design Development March 2008 Yes Maybe No GMP July 2009 Yes Maybe No SUSTAINABLE SITES WATER EFFICIENCY ENERGY & ATMOSPHERE MATERIALS & RESOURCES INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY INNOVATION & DESIGN TOTALS

31 Description Schematic Design Design Development GMP General Requirements (Division 1) 250,000 Division ,437,357 TOTAL ALL DIVISIONS 4,687,357 G/Cs & Contingencies 411,260 TOTAL COST OF WORK 5,098,617 Fees & Insurance 402,396 TOTAL PROPOSED GMP $5,501, ,000 4,338,505 4,588, ,260 4,999, ,396 $5,402, ,836 4,215,294 4,562, ,149 4,931, ,721 $5,250,000 LEED Category Schematic Design December 2006 Yes Maybe No Design Development December 2007 Yes Maybe No GMP January 2009 Yes Maybe No SUSTAINABLE SITES WATER EFFICIENCY ENERGY & ATMOSPHERE MATERIALS & RESOURCES INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY INNOVATION & DESIGN TOTALS

32

33 By Lisa Fay Matthiessen and Peter Morris

34 Examines 221 buildings 83 at some level of LEED Certified 138 no goal of LEED Certification Building on a previous study Costing Green: A Comprehensive Cost Database and Budget Methodology Released in 2004 Basically the same findings

35 Library Buildings Community Centers Ambulatory Care Facilities Academic Buildings Laboratory Buildings

36 Source: Cost of Green Revisited

37 Source: Cost of Green Revisited

38 Source: Cost of Green Revisited

39 VCC Special Events Center $302/SF Source: Cost of Green Revisited

40 VCC Allied Health & Sciences $243/SF Source: Cost of Green Revisited

41 Findings Many projects are achieving LEED within their budgets, and in the same cost range as non-leed projects Construction costs have risen dramatically, but projects are still achieving LEED The idea that green is an added feature continues to be a problem

42 Conclusion There is a very large variation in costs of buildings, even within the same building program category Cost differences between buildings are due primarily to program type There are low cost and high cost green buildings There are low cost and high cost non-green buildings

43

44 Habitat Ecosystem services Fresh air Clean water Food Waste Absorption Beauty & awe Reduce resource depletion Reduce pollution impacts Environment Reduce total environmental footprint Society Economy Community Health Transportation Cultural resources Educational opportunities Demonstrate environmental leadership Operational saving Utility saving Increase productivity Financial incentives Demonstrate fiscal responsibility

45 Operational savings Less water use Less energy use Ability to closely monitor energy consumption User experience Pleasant day lit spaces Healthy indoor environments

46 Campus Initiatives Green housekeeping policy Recycling policy Site lighting and stormwater plans Landscape approach Student/staff education Indirect Educational Benefits

47

48 Wendy Landry, AIA, LEED AP Associate Principal, Green Building Services Richard Rodriguez, LEED AP Project Director, WELBRO Building Corporation