HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc.

Transcription

1 Phone (303) To: City of Montrose / Mr. Mark Armstrong HERRON Project No.: Job No.: Verbal Location: Multiple Buildings, 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd., Montrose, CO Dates of Service: November 20, 2014 Services Requested: Environmental Consultation/ Per your request, and under the guidelines defined, (HERRON ) has concluded the Environmental Consultation/ at the aforementioned property. Local, state and/or federal regulations, including but not limited to AQCC Regulation 8 (State), 29 CFR (OSHA), 40 CFR Part 61 EPA (NESHAP), and 40 CFR 763 EPA (AHERA) may require a comprehensive asbestos inspection prior to a renovation or demolition. This inspection requires an AHERA and State certified asbestos building inspector identifying and sampling any friable and non-friable asbestos containing materials which could be affected by the activity. HERRON was contracted by the Client, to perform: 1. The Client has advised that Multiple Buildings, 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd., Montrose, CO is a complete demolition by wrecking; a. is intended to confirm Environmental Hazards, specifically Asbestos-Containing Materials; Refer to attached site plans; Building #1 Outhouse (Outbuilding) 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd. 40 ft 2 Building #2 Shack (Outbuilding) 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd. 250 ft 2 Building #3 Shack (Outbuilding) 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd. 450 ft 2 Building #4 Shack (Outbuilding) 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd. 250 ft 2 Building #5 Underground Cellar (Outbuilding) 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd. 1,080 ft 2 Building #6 Shack (Outbuilding) 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd. 228 ft 2 Building #7 Horse Stable (Outbuilding) 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd. 675 ft 2 Building #8 Workshop (Outbuilding) 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd. 300 ft 2 Building #9 Chicken Shack (Outbuilding) 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd. 400 ft 2 Building #10 Underground Cellar (Outbuilding) 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd. 144 ft 2 Building #11 Storage Shed (Outbuilding) 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd. 50 ft 2 Two Story House 970 Chipeta Rd. 1,550 ft 2 Detached Two Car Garage 970 Chipeta Rd. 475 ft 2 Double Wide Mobile Home 950 Chipeta Rd. 1,152 ft 2 i. Non-destructive building material sampling; ii. 5 Day Turnaround PLM Analyses. b. Review and usage (where applicable) of previous inspections submitted by the Client have been included as reference documents; i. Not applicable. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 1 of 91

2 c. All EPA suspect Materials not requested: i. Limited to locations of the submitted plans, only. Any locations/materials not specifically identified, assumed to be a Regulated Asbestos Containing Material, and should be inspected prior to any activity which may disturb the material; 1. Refer to materials identified in the report; 2. Inspection does not take into consideration any areas outside of the inspection area(s); 3. All materials not previously indicated by Client; a. Building 5 Observation of the accessible portions of the building indicate construction of wood and metal. Cellar has collapsed and is not accessible at the time of the inspection. At the time of demolition, access to the cellar should be made to confirm the absence of asbestos-containing materials. b. Building 6 asbestos transite irrigation pipe (and debris) laying on ground observed during inspection. At the time of this report, Client confirmed that this material had been properly collected by the City. Client advised of subsurface potential of asbestos transite irrigation pipe is not included in this inspection. HERRON was subsequently contracted by the Client, to perform: 1. Not applicable. Closure This report is provided for the use of the Client as it applies to the subject property. Its preparation has been in accordance with generally accepted practices in hazardous materials, indoor air quality, and industrial hygiene. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. Should you have any questions or comments regarding this report, please do not hesitate to call Sincerely, Michael W. Herron, Sr. Project Manager Personnel: Michael W. Herron, Sr./Project Manager, Industrial Hygienist Technician, and Jamie L. Herron-Carson/Project Manager, Industrial Hygienist Technician HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 2 of 91

3 Recommendations The Client has advised that Multiple Buildings, 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd., Montrose, CO is a complete demolition by wrecking. As Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials were not discovered during this inspection, further action is not required with the following exceptions: 1. Building 5 Observation of the accessible portions of the building indicate construction of wood and metal. Cellar has collapsed and is not accessible at the time of the inspection. At the time of demolition, access to the cellar should be made to confirm the absence of asbestos-containing materials. 2. Building 6 asbestos transite irrigation pipe (and debris) laying on ground observed during inspection. At the time of this report, Client confirmed that this material had been properly collected by the City. Client advised of subsurface potential of asbestos transite irrigation pipe is not included in this inspection. Should a renovation or demolition occur which could affect locations that are potentially Asbestos, HERRON would recommend as a minimum Plan of Action: 1. Demolition Notification: is required, i.e., prior to demolition (or demolition of a load bearing wall), the Colorado Department of Health and Environment requires that the building(s) be certified by the State Certified Asbestos Building Inspector as: a. not having any regulated asbestos existing anywhere in the building(s); b. this document serves as a certified notification to the owner/operator of the facility and the demolition contractor; i. the non-friable asbestos-containing building materials, i.e., window glazing and caulking, tar impregnated asphaltic roofing materials, floor tiles, mastics, etc. will be allowed to be demolished with the building provided that the proposed building demolition methods do not include explosives, sawing, grinding, abrading or blasting that will render the materials friable; ii. any asbestos-containing material allowed to stay in the facility must remain non-friable during demolition. c. Once the Demolition Notification has been endorsed, the Owner/Contractor is to submit an original to the Colorado Department of Health and Environment, which then undergoes a ten (10) working day notification process, after which a Demolition Approval will be issued, to be posted at the project site during operations. d. After receipt of the CDPHE demolition approval and Building Department demolition permit, renovate or demolish the areas of the Building(s) inspected (recycling prohibited), in accordance with local, state, and/or federal regulations as indicated (only). e. The Owner has been advised of the soil regulations 6 CCR , the Colorado Solid Waste Regulations- Asbestos and Asbestos Contaminated Soil. The demolition contractor is required to remove all demolition building material debris from the project site. This would include all small pieces of the structure. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 3 of 91

4 Conclusion Building #1 Outhouse (Outbuilding) 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd. 40 ft 2 The Client has advised that Multiple Buildings, 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd., Montrose, CO is a complete demolition by wrecking. Based on the information generated by this report, we conclude that the aforementioned property does not contain Regulated Asbestos Containing Material(s) (RACM): None detected. In order to comply with local, state, and/or federal regulations, the following Asbestos Containing Materials, or assumed Asbestos Containing Materials will have to be removed if they will be made friable during a renovation or demolition (if the composition of drywall/joint compound is <=1.0% Asbestos, when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface, floor tile/mastic, asphaltic roofing materials, pliable window glazing/caulking, etc., are normally demolished with the structure, if conducted in accordance with local, state and/or federal regulations, however, require removal during a renovation): None detected. Although a material may have been determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos, such as the composition of drywall/joint compound (when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface), traces of asbestos in surfacing materials, thermal system insulation materials, or miscellaneous materials, etc., which is not considered Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials by NESHAPS, EPA (AHERA), or the State of Colorado, may still be regulated by OSHA. OSHA regulations may apply during potential disturbance activities, and the inspection document will serve as a Hazard Communication and should be reviewed during an activity such as a renovation or demolition, to ensure that an exposure does not occur. The Maximum Allowable Asbestos Level (MAAL) may not be exceeded at any time in accordance with local, state, and/or federal regulations, including but not limited to AQCC Regulation 8 (State), 29 CFR (OSHA), 40 CFR Part 61 EPA (NESHAP), and 40 CFR 763 EPA (AHERA). This document serves as a certified notification to the owner/operator of the facility and the demolition contractor that any asbestos-containing material allowed to stay in the facility must remain non-friable during demolition. All building material field information concerning sampling protocols, locations, assessments, etc. is available in our files for Client use should the need arise. Suspect materials which were sampled and determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos (refer to Attachments), by PLM and/or PLM Point Count analysis are: 1. Not applicable; a. Building constructed of wood and metal. Suspect materials which were not within the Scope of Work at the time of the inspection were: 1. All EPA suspect Materials not requested: a. Limited to locations of the submitted plans, only. Any locations/materials not specifically identified, assumed to be a Regulated Asbestos Containing Material, and should be inspected prior to any activity which may disturb the material; i. Refer to materials identified in the report; ii. Inspection does not take into consideration any areas outside of the inspection area(s); iii. All materials not previously indicated by Client; 1. Not applicable. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 4 of 91

5 2. During a normal inspection, and more specifically when non-destructive sampling techniques are employed, it is not within the scope of the inspection to remove surface materials to inspect or quantify the structures and/or materials which may be under the surface, i.e., within or under concealed areas such as under carpet, under sub-floors, within chases, walls, crawlspaces, tunnels, etc., to remove suspect Asbestos Containing Material(s), to move and/or sample electrical wiring which has not been 'locked out', etc. All said areas are to be assumed as containing >1.0% Asbestos, until such a time that these areas are made accessible, and/or rendered safe so that sampling can be performed. Prior to renovations or demolition of these areas, it is recommended that a more destructive protocol be utilized in order to make these determinations. Concealed Materials Based on the nature of the Asbestos which could be concealed, it is recommended: Extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials throughout the property in order to determine if concealed locations contain an Asbestos or if isolated to a specific era of remodeling; or If extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials is not possible, and presumptions that concealed locations are potentially Asbestos, then it is recommended that a site specific Management Plan be developed and implemented which could effectively manage the future renovations of the property. A Management Plan can be designed to review specific locations of renovation locations, i.e., destructive sampling and quantification through concealed chases, and under carpeting prior to disturbance of these areas by the Owner or Contractors which will assist in the recognition and response to potential health risks from concealed Asbestos. 3. HERRON recommends extreme caution during a renovation or demolition of these areas in the event that an area which was not suspect, visible, accessible and/or specified during the inspection, is discovered to contain or is suspected of containing an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). Under local, state and/or federal regulations, should such an event occur, the Client and or Contractor is required to cease operations which may effect this (these) material(s) until an inspection is concluded and a determination is made by an AHERA and State Certified Asbestos Building Inspector. 4. Disturbance of these areas could create a potential health hazard. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 5 of 91

6 Suspect materials which were visually inspected and determined to be Non-ACM materials at the time of the inspection were: Fiberglass Wood Glass Metal Plastic Concrete Etc. Inspection Methodology: 1. HERRON selected sample locations and frequency of sampling based on observations, Client requirements and/or the assumption that like materials in the same area are homogeneous in accordance with EPA Publication EPA 560 / a Asbestos in Buildings: Simplified Sampling Scheme. 2. Sample locations and frequency of sampling of Walls and Ceilings are based on EPA 9/30/94 EPA Sampling Bulletin - ASBESTOS SAMPLING BULLETIN September 30, Supplementary Guidance on Bulk Sample Collection and Analysis. Section V of this guidance bulletin offers a suggested strategy for distinguishing between joint compound found at joints in wallboard systems or when the material was applied as a skim coat; i.e., for determining whether joint compound has been applied as a skim coat over a wall surface (as referred to in the NESHAP Jan. 5, 1994 FR notice.). HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 6 of 91

7 Conclusion Building #2 Shack (Outbuilding) 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd. 250 ft 2 The Client has advised that Multiple Buildings, 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd., Montrose, CO is a complete demolition by wrecking. Based on the information generated by this report, we conclude that the aforementioned property does not contain Regulated Asbestos Containing Material(s) (RACM): None detected. In order to comply with local, state, and/or federal regulations, the following Asbestos Containing Materials, or assumed Asbestos Containing Materials will have to be removed if they will be made friable during a renovation or demolition (if the composition of drywall/joint compound is <=1.0% Asbestos, when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface, floor tile/mastic, asphaltic roofing materials, pliable window glazing/caulking, etc., are normally demolished with the structure, if conducted in accordance with local, state and/or federal regulations, however, require removal during a renovation): None detected. Although a material may have been determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos, such as the composition of drywall/joint compound (when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface), traces of asbestos in surfacing materials, thermal system insulation materials, or miscellaneous materials, etc., which is not considered Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials by NESHAPS, EPA (AHERA), or the State of Colorado, may still be regulated by OSHA. OSHA regulations may apply during potential disturbance activities, and the inspection document will serve as a Hazard Communication and should be reviewed during an activity such as a renovation or demolition, to ensure that an exposure does not occur. The Maximum Allowable Asbestos Level (MAAL) may not be exceeded at any time in accordance with local, state, and/or federal regulations, including but not limited to AQCC Regulation 8 (State), 29 CFR (OSHA), 40 CFR Part 61 EPA (NESHAP), and 40 CFR 763 EPA (AHERA). This document serves as a certified notification to the owner/operator of the facility and the demolition contractor that any asbestos-containing material allowed to stay in the facility must remain non-friable during demolition. All building material field information concerning sampling protocols, locations, assessments, etc. is available in our files for Client use should the need arise. Suspect materials which were sampled and determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos (refer to Attachments), by PLM and/or PLM Point Count analysis are: Yellow Latex Paint on Doors, Surfacing Material (S), <1,000 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), throughout Exterior, 1 Sample(s) (Confirmation), A, W Wall, 3 from S Edge, 5 from Ground, photo Red Latex Paint on Fence attached to building, Surfacing Material (S), <1,000 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), throughout Exterior, 1 Sample(s) (Confirmation), A, W Wall, 10 from N Edge, 4 from Ground, photo HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 7 of 91

8 Suspect materials which were not within the Scope of Work at the time of the inspection were: 1. All EPA suspect Materials not requested: a. Limited to locations of the submitted plans, only. Any locations/materials not specifically identified, assumed to be a Regulated Asbestos Containing Material, and should be inspected prior to any activity which may disturb the material; i. Refer to materials identified in the report; ii. Inspection does not take into consideration any areas outside of the inspection area(s); iii. All materials not previously indicated by Client; 1. Not applicable. 2. During a normal inspection, and more specifically when non-destructive sampling techniques are employed, it is not within the scope of the inspection to remove surface materials to inspect or quantify the structures and/or materials which may be under the surface, i.e., within or under concealed areas such as under carpet, under sub-floors, within chases, walls, crawlspaces, tunnels, etc., to remove suspect Asbestos Containing Material(s), to move and/or sample electrical wiring which has not been 'locked out', etc. All said areas are to be assumed as containing >1.0% Asbestos, until such a time that these areas are made accessible, and/or rendered safe so that sampling can be performed. Prior to renovations or demolition of these areas, it is recommended that a more destructive protocol be utilized in order to make these determinations. Concealed Materials Based on the nature of the Asbestos which could be concealed, it is recommended: Extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials throughout the property in order to determine if concealed locations contain an Asbestos or if isolated to a specific era of remodeling; or If extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials is not possible, and presumptions that concealed locations are potentially Asbestos, then it is recommended that a site specific Management Plan be developed and implemented which could effectively manage the future renovations of the property. A Management Plan can be designed to review specific locations of renovation locations, i.e., destructive sampling and quantification through concealed chases, and under carpeting prior to disturbance of these areas by the Owner or Contractors which will assist in the recognition and response to potential health risks from concealed Asbestos. 3. HERRON recommends extreme caution during a renovation or demolition of these areas in the event that an area which was not suspect, visible, accessible and/or specified during the inspection, is discovered to contain or is suspected of containing an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). Under local, state and/or federal regulations, should such an event occur, the Client and or Contractor is required to cease operations which may effect this (these) material(s) until an inspection is concluded and a determination is made by an AHERA and State Certified Asbestos Building Inspector. 4. Disturbance of these areas could create a potential health hazard. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 8 of 91

9 Suspect materials which were visually inspected and determined to be Non-ACM materials at the time of the inspection were: Fiberglass Wood Glass Metal Plastic Concrete Etc. Inspection Methodology: 1. HERRON selected sample locations and frequency of sampling based on observations, Client requirements and/or the assumption that like materials in the same area are homogeneous in accordance with EPA Publication EPA 560 / a Asbestos in Buildings: Simplified Sampling Scheme. 2. Sample locations and frequency of sampling of Walls and Ceilings are based on EPA 9/30/94 EPA Sampling Bulletin - ASBESTOS SAMPLING BULLETIN September 30, Supplementary Guidance on Bulk Sample Collection and Analysis. Section V of this guidance bulletin offers a suggested strategy for distinguishing between joint compound found at joints in wallboard systems or when the material was applied as a skim coat; i.e., for determining whether joint compound has been applied as a skim coat over a wall surface (as referred to in the NESHAP Jan. 5, 1994 FR notice.). HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 9 of 91

10 Conclusion Building #3 Shack (Outbuilding) 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd. 450 ft 2 The Client has advised that Multiple Buildings, 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd., Montrose, CO is a complete demolition by wrecking. Based on the information generated by this report, we conclude that the aforementioned property does not contain Regulated Asbestos Containing Material(s) (RACM): None detected. In order to comply with local, state, and/or federal regulations, the following Asbestos Containing Materials, or assumed Asbestos Containing Materials will have to be removed if they will be made friable during a renovation or demolition (if the composition of drywall/joint compound is <=1.0% Asbestos, when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface, floor tile/mastic, asphaltic roofing materials, pliable window glazing/caulking, etc., are normally demolished with the structure, if conducted in accordance with local, state and/or federal regulations, however, require removal during a renovation): None detected. Although a material may have been determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos, such as the composition of drywall/joint compound (when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface), traces of asbestos in surfacing materials, thermal system insulation materials, or miscellaneous materials, etc., which is not considered Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials by NESHAPS, EPA (AHERA), or the State of Colorado, may still be regulated by OSHA. OSHA regulations may apply during potential disturbance activities, and the inspection document will serve as a Hazard Communication and should be reviewed during an activity such as a renovation or demolition, to ensure that an exposure does not occur. The Maximum Allowable Asbestos Level (MAAL) may not be exceeded at any time in accordance with local, state, and/or federal regulations, including but not limited to AQCC Regulation 8 (State), 29 CFR (OSHA), 40 CFR Part 61 EPA (NESHAP), and 40 CFR 763 EPA (AHERA). This document serves as a certified notification to the owner/operator of the facility and the demolition contractor that any asbestos-containing material allowed to stay in the facility must remain non-friable during demolition. All building material field information concerning sampling protocols, locations, assessments, etc. is available in our files for Client use should the need arise. Suspect materials which were sampled and determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos (refer to Attachments), by PLM and/or PLM Point Count analysis are: White Latex Paint on Windows, Surfacing Material (S), <1,000 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), throughout Exterior, 1 Sample(s) (Confirmation), A, W Wall, 8 from S Edge, 5 from Ground, photo HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 10 of 91

11 Suspect materials which were not within the Scope of Work at the time of the inspection were: 1. All EPA suspect Materials not requested: a. Limited to locations of the submitted plans, only. Any locations/materials not specifically identified, assumed to be a Regulated Asbestos Containing Material, and should be inspected prior to any activity which may disturb the material; i. Refer to materials identified in the report; ii. Inspection does not take into consideration any areas outside of the inspection area(s); iii. All materials not previously indicated by Client; 1. Not applicable. 2. During a normal inspection, and more specifically when non-destructive sampling techniques are employed, it is not within the scope of the inspection to remove surface materials to inspect or quantify the structures and/or materials which may be under the surface, i.e., within or under concealed areas such as under carpet, under sub-floors, within chases, walls, crawlspaces, tunnels, etc., to remove suspect Asbestos Containing Material(s), to move and/or sample electrical wiring which has not been 'locked out', etc. All said areas are to be assumed as containing >1.0% Asbestos, until such a time that these areas are made accessible, and/or rendered safe so that sampling can be performed. Prior to renovations or demolition of these areas, it is recommended that a more destructive protocol be utilized in order to make these determinations. Concealed Materials Based on the nature of the Asbestos which could be concealed, it is recommended: Extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials throughout the property in order to determine if concealed locations contain an Asbestos or if isolated to a specific era of remodeling; or If extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials is not possible, and presumptions that concealed locations are potentially Asbestos, then it is recommended that a site specific Management Plan be developed and implemented which could effectively manage the future renovations of the property. A Management Plan can be designed to review specific locations of renovation locations, i.e., destructive sampling and quantification through concealed chases, and under carpeting prior to disturbance of these areas by the Owner or Contractors which will assist in the recognition and response to potential health risks from concealed Asbestos. 3. HERRON recommends extreme caution during a renovation or demolition of these areas in the event that an area which was not suspect, visible, accessible and/or specified during the inspection, is discovered to contain or is suspected of containing an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). Under local, state and/or federal regulations, should such an event occur, the Client and or Contractor is required to cease operations which may effect this (these) material(s) until an inspection is concluded and a determination is made by an AHERA and State Certified Asbestos Building Inspector. 4. Disturbance of these areas could create a potential health hazard. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 11 of 91

12 Suspect materials which were visually inspected and determined to be Non-ACM materials at the time of the inspection were: Fiberglass Wood Glass Metal Plastic Concrete Etc. Inspection Methodology: 1. HERRON selected sample locations and frequency of sampling based on observations, Client requirements and/or the assumption that like materials in the same area are homogeneous in accordance with EPA Publication EPA 560 / a Asbestos in Buildings: Simplified Sampling Scheme. 2. Sample locations and frequency of sampling of Walls and Ceilings are based on EPA 9/30/94 EPA Sampling Bulletin - ASBESTOS SAMPLING BULLETIN September 30, Supplementary Guidance on Bulk Sample Collection and Analysis. Section V of this guidance bulletin offers a suggested strategy for distinguishing between joint compound found at joints in wallboard systems or when the material was applied as a skim coat; i.e., for determining whether joint compound has been applied as a skim coat over a wall surface (as referred to in the NESHAP Jan. 5, 1994 FR notice.). HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 12 of 91

13 Conclusion Building #4 Shack (Outbuilding) 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd. 250 ft 2 The Client has advised that Multiple Buildings, 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd., Montrose, CO is a complete demolition by wrecking. Based on the information generated by this report, we conclude that the aforementioned property does not contain Regulated Asbestos Containing Material(s) (RACM): None detected. In order to comply with local, state, and/or federal regulations, the following Asbestos Containing Materials, or assumed Asbestos Containing Materials will have to be removed if they will be made friable during a renovation or demolition (if the composition of drywall/joint compound is <=1.0% Asbestos, when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface, floor tile/mastic, asphaltic roofing materials, pliable window glazing/caulking, etc., are normally demolished with the structure, if conducted in accordance with local, state and/or federal regulations, however, require removal during a renovation): None detected. Although a material may have been determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos, such as the composition of drywall/joint compound (when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface), traces of asbestos in surfacing materials, thermal system insulation materials, or miscellaneous materials, etc., which is not considered Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials by NESHAPS, EPA (AHERA), or the State of Colorado, may still be regulated by OSHA. OSHA regulations may apply during potential disturbance activities, and the inspection document will serve as a Hazard Communication and should be reviewed during an activity such as a renovation or demolition, to ensure that an exposure does not occur. The Maximum Allowable Asbestos Level (MAAL) may not be exceeded at any time in accordance with local, state, and/or federal regulations, including but not limited to AQCC Regulation 8 (State), 29 CFR (OSHA), 40 CFR Part 61 EPA (NESHAP), and 40 CFR 763 EPA (AHERA). This document serves as a certified notification to the owner/operator of the facility and the demolition contractor that any asbestos-containing material allowed to stay in the facility must remain non-friable during demolition. All building material field information concerning sampling protocols, locations, assessments, etc. is available in our files for Client use should the need arise. Suspect materials which were sampled and determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos (refer to Attachments), by PLM and/or PLM Point Count analysis are: Yellow Latex Paint on Block, Debris, Surfacing Material (S), <1,000 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), Scattered throughout Site, 1 Sample(s) (Confirmation), A, Debris, 25 from N Edge of property, 200 from E Edge of property, photo HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 13 of 91

14 Suspect materials which were not within the Scope of Work at the time of the inspection were: 1. All EPA suspect Materials not requested: a. Limited to locations of the submitted plans, only. Any locations/materials not specifically identified, assumed to be a Regulated Asbestos Containing Material, and should be inspected prior to any activity which may disturb the material; i. Refer to materials identified in the report; ii. Inspection does not take into consideration any areas outside of the inspection area(s); iii. All materials not previously indicated by Client; 1. Not applicable. 2. During a normal inspection, and more specifically when non-destructive sampling techniques are employed, it is not within the scope of the inspection to remove surface materials to inspect or quantify the structures and/or materials which may be under the surface, i.e., within or under concealed areas such as under carpet, under sub-floors, within chases, walls, crawlspaces, tunnels, etc., to remove suspect Asbestos Containing Material(s), to move and/or sample electrical wiring which has not been 'locked out', etc. All said areas are to be assumed as containing >1.0% Asbestos, until such a time that these areas are made accessible, and/or rendered safe so that sampling can be performed. Prior to renovations or demolition of these areas, it is recommended that a more destructive protocol be utilized in order to make these determinations. Concealed Materials Based on the nature of the Asbestos which could be concealed, it is recommended: Extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials throughout the property in order to determine if concealed locations contain an Asbestos or if isolated to a specific era of remodeling; or If extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials is not possible, and presumptions that concealed locations are potentially Asbestos, then it is recommended that a site specific Management Plan be developed and implemented which could effectively manage the future renovations of the property. A Management Plan can be designed to review specific locations of renovation locations, i.e., destructive sampling and quantification through concealed chases, and under carpeting prior to disturbance of these areas by the Owner or Contractors which will assist in the recognition and response to potential health risks from concealed Asbestos. 3. HERRON recommends extreme caution during a renovation or demolition of these areas in the event that an area which was not suspect, visible, accessible and/or specified during the inspection, is discovered to contain or is suspected of containing an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). Under local, state and/or federal regulations, should such an event occur, the Client and or Contractor is required to cease operations which may effect this (these) material(s) until an inspection is concluded and a determination is made by an AHERA and State Certified Asbestos Building Inspector. 4. Disturbance of these areas could create a potential health hazard. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 14 of 91

15 Suspect materials which were visually inspected and determined to be Non-ACM materials at the time of the inspection were: Fiberglass Wood Glass Metal Plastic Concrete Etc. Inspection Methodology: 1. HERRON selected sample locations and frequency of sampling based on observations, Client requirements and/or the assumption that like materials in the same area are homogeneous in accordance with EPA Publication EPA 560 / a Asbestos in Buildings: Simplified Sampling Scheme. 2. Sample locations and frequency of sampling of Walls and Ceilings are based on EPA 9/30/94 EPA Sampling Bulletin - ASBESTOS SAMPLING BULLETIN September 30, Supplementary Guidance on Bulk Sample Collection and Analysis. Section V of this guidance bulletin offers a suggested strategy for distinguishing between joint compound found at joints in wallboard systems or when the material was applied as a skim coat; i.e., for determining whether joint compound has been applied as a skim coat over a wall surface (as referred to in the NESHAP Jan. 5, 1994 FR notice.). HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 15 of 91

16 Conclusion Building #5 Underground Cellar (Outbuilding) 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd. 1,080 ft 2 The Client has advised that Multiple Buildings, 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd., Montrose, CO is a complete demolition by wrecking. Based on the information generated by this report, we conclude that the aforementioned property does not contain Regulated Asbestos Containing Material(s) (RACM): None detected. In order to comply with local, state, and/or federal regulations, the following Asbestos Containing Materials, or assumed Asbestos Containing Materials will have to be removed if they will be made friable during a renovation or demolition (if the composition of drywall/joint compound is <=1.0% Asbestos, when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface, floor tile/mastic, asphaltic roofing materials, pliable window glazing/caulking, etc., are normally demolished with the structure, if conducted in accordance with local, state and/or federal regulations, however, require removal during a renovation): None detected. Although a material may have been determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos, such as the composition of drywall/joint compound (when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface), traces of asbestos in surfacing materials, thermal system insulation materials, or miscellaneous materials, etc., which is not considered Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials by NESHAPS, EPA (AHERA), or the State of Colorado, may still be regulated by OSHA. OSHA regulations may apply during potential disturbance activities, and the inspection document will serve as a Hazard Communication and should be reviewed during an activity such as a renovation or demolition, to ensure that an exposure does not occur. The Maximum Allowable Asbestos Level (MAAL) may not be exceeded at any time in accordance with local, state, and/or federal regulations, including but not limited to AQCC Regulation 8 (State), 29 CFR (OSHA), 40 CFR Part 61 EPA (NESHAP), and 40 CFR 763 EPA (AHERA). This document serves as a certified notification to the owner/operator of the facility and the demolition contractor that any asbestos-containing material allowed to stay in the facility must remain non-friable during demolition. All building material field information concerning sampling protocols, locations, assessments, etc. is available in our files for Client use should the need arise. Suspect materials which were sampled and determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos (refer to Attachments), by PLM and/or PLM Point Count analysis are: 1. Not applicable; a. Building 5 Observation of the accessible portions of the building indicate construction of wood and metal. Cellar has collapsed and is not accessible at the time of the inspection. At the time of demolition, access to the cellar should be made to confirm the absence of asbestos-containing materials. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 16 of 91

17 Suspect materials which were not within the Scope of Work at the time of the inspection were: 1. All EPA suspect Materials not requested: a. Limited to locations of the submitted plans, only. Any locations/materials not specifically identified, assumed to be a Regulated Asbestos Containing Material, and should be inspected prior to any activity which may disturb the material; i. Refer to materials identified in the report; ii. Inspection does not take into consideration any areas outside of the inspection area(s); iii. All materials not previously indicated by Client; 1. Building 5 Observation of the accessible portions of the building indicate construction of wood and metal. Cellar has collapsed and is not accessible at the time of the inspection. At the time of demolition, access to the cellar should be made to confirm the absence of asbestos-containing materials. 2. During a normal inspection, and more specifically when non-destructive sampling techniques are employed, it is not within the scope of the inspection to remove surface materials to inspect or quantify the structures and/or materials which may be under the surface, i.e., within or under concealed areas such as under carpet, under sub-floors, within chases, walls, crawlspaces, tunnels, etc., to remove suspect Asbestos Containing Material(s), to move and/or sample electrical wiring which has not been 'locked out', etc. All said areas are to be assumed as containing >1.0% Asbestos, until such a time that these areas are made accessible, and/or rendered safe so that sampling can be performed. Prior to renovations or demolition of these areas, it is recommended that a more destructive protocol be utilized in order to make these determinations. Concealed Materials Based on the nature of the Asbestos which could be concealed, it is recommended: Extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials throughout the property in order to determine if concealed locations contain an Asbestos or if isolated to a specific era of remodeling; or If extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials is not possible, and presumptions that concealed locations are potentially Asbestos, then it is recommended that a site specific Management Plan be developed and implemented which could effectively manage the future renovations of the property. A Management Plan can be designed to review specific locations of renovation locations, i.e., destructive sampling and quantification through concealed chases, and under carpeting prior to disturbance of these areas by the Owner or Contractors which will assist in the recognition and response to potential health risks from concealed Asbestos. 3. HERRON recommends extreme caution during a renovation or demolition of these areas in the event that an area which was not suspect, visible, accessible and/or specified during the inspection, is discovered to contain or is suspected of containing an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). Under local, state and/or federal regulations, should such an event occur, the Client and or Contractor is required to cease operations which may effect this (these) material(s) until an inspection is concluded and a determination is made by an AHERA and State Certified Asbestos Building Inspector. 4. Disturbance of these areas could create a potential health hazard. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 17 of 91

18 Suspect materials which were visually inspected and determined to be Non-ACM materials at the time of the inspection were: Fiberglass Wood Glass Metal Plastic Concrete Etc. Inspection Methodology: 1. HERRON selected sample locations and frequency of sampling based on observations, Client requirements and/or the assumption that like materials in the same area are homogeneous in accordance with EPA Publication EPA 560 / a Asbestos in Buildings: Simplified Sampling Scheme. 2. Sample locations and frequency of sampling of Walls and Ceilings are based on EPA 9/30/94 EPA Sampling Bulletin - ASBESTOS SAMPLING BULLETIN September 30, Supplementary Guidance on Bulk Sample Collection and Analysis. Section V of this guidance bulletin offers a suggested strategy for distinguishing between joint compound found at joints in wallboard systems or when the material was applied as a skim coat; i.e., for determining whether joint compound has been applied as a skim coat over a wall surface (as referred to in the NESHAP Jan. 5, 1994 FR notice.). HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 18 of 91

19 Conclusion Building #6 Shack (Outbuilding) 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd. 228 ft 2 The Client has advised that Multiple Buildings, 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd., Montrose, CO is a complete demolition by wrecking. Based on the information generated by this report, we conclude that the aforementioned property does not contain Regulated Asbestos Containing Material(s) (RACM) however, asbestos transite irrigation pipe (and debris) laying on ground observed during inspection. At the time of this report, Client confirmed that this material had been properly collected by the City. Client advised of subsurface potential of asbestos transite irrigation pipe is not included in this inspection: Sample No. Homogeneous Material Description Transite Pipe, Miscellaneous Material (M), Non-Friable, Good Condition (Breakage, Current Condition), Scattered throughout Site 1 Approximate Quantity 2 AHERA Rating 12 LF 6 >1.0% Asbestos Laboratory Results Layer/ Physical Description A Debris, 15 from N Edge of property, 100 from E Edge of property, photo , Sample 1 of % C 3.0% CR A: Tan fibrous cementitious material Building 6 asbestos transite irrigation pipe (and debris) laying on ground observed during inspection. At the time of this report, Client confirmed that this material had been properly collected by the City. Client advised of subsurface potential of asbestos transite irrigation pipe is not included in this inspection. 1 Quantification may not be within the scope of this inspection. 2 AHERA Rating based on current usage however, may change dependent on the use of the property. In order to comply with local, state, and/or federal regulations, the following Asbestos Containing Materials, or assumed Asbestos Containing Materials will have to be removed if they will be made friable during a renovation or demolition (if the composition of drywall/joint compound is <=1.0% Asbestos, when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface, floor tile/mastic, asphaltic roofing materials, pliable window glazing/caulking, etc., are normally demolished with the structure, if conducted in accordance with local, state and/or federal regulations, however, require removal during a renovation): None detected. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 19 of 91

20 AHERA RATINGS Rating Surfacing Material TSI Miscellaneous Material 1 Damaged or Significantly Damaged 2 Damaged 3 Significantly Damaged 4 Damaged or Significantly Damaged 5 Good Condition with Potential for Damage Good Condition with Potential for Damage Good Condition with Potential for Damage 6 Good Condition with Potential for Significant Damage Good Condition with Potential for Significant Damage Good Condition with Potential for Significant Damage 7 Good Condition with Low Potential Good Condition with Low Potential Good Condition with Low Potential Asbestos Forms C = Chrysotile A = Amosite TA = Tremolite- Actinolite Although a material may have been determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos, such as the composition of drywall/joint compound (when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface), traces of asbestos in surfacing materials, thermal system insulation materials, or miscellaneous materials, etc., which is not considered Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials by NESHAPS, EPA (AHERA), or the State of Colorado, may still be regulated by OSHA. OSHA regulations may apply during potential disturbance activities, and the inspection document will serve as a Hazard Communication and should be reviewed during an activity such as a renovation or demolition, to ensure that an exposure does not occur. The Maximum Allowable Asbestos Level (MAAL) may not be exceeded at any time in accordance with local, state, and/or federal regulations, including but not limited to AQCC Regulation 8 (State), 29 CFR (OSHA), 40 CFR Part 61 EPA (NESHAP), and 40 CFR 763 EPA (AHERA). This document serves as a certified notification to the owner/operator of the facility and the demolition contractor that any asbestos-containing material allowed to stay in the facility must remain non-friable during demolition. All building material field information concerning sampling protocols, locations, assessments, etc. is available in our files for Client use should the need arise. Suspect materials which were sampled and determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos (refer to Attachments), by PLM and/or PLM Point Count analysis are: Cream Latex Paint on Metal, Debris, Surfacing Material (S), <1,000 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), Scattered throughout Site, 1 Sample(s) (Confirmation), A, 3 from N Edge of Building 6, 1 from E Edge of Building 6, photo HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 20 of 91

21 Suspect materials which were not within the Scope of Work at the time of the inspection were: 1. All EPA suspect Materials not requested: a. Limited to locations of the submitted plans, only. Any locations/materials not specifically identified, assumed to be a Regulated Asbestos Containing Material, and should be inspected prior to any activity which may disturb the material; i. Refer to materials identified in the report; ii. Inspection does not take into consideration any areas outside of the inspection area(s); iii. All materials not previously indicated by Client; 1. Building 6 asbestos transite irrigation pipe (and debris) laying on ground observed during inspection. At the time of this report, Client confirmed that this material had been properly collected by the City. Client advised of subsurface potential of asbestos transite irrigation pipe is not included in this inspection. 2. During a normal inspection, and more specifically when non-destructive sampling techniques are employed, it is not within the scope of the inspection to remove surface materials to inspect or quantify the structures and/or materials which may be under the surface, i.e., within or under concealed areas such as under carpet, under sub-floors, within chases, walls, crawlspaces, tunnels, etc., to remove suspect Asbestos Containing Material(s), to move and/or sample electrical wiring which has not been 'locked out', etc. All said areas are to be assumed as containing >1.0% Asbestos, until such a time that these areas are made accessible, and/or rendered safe so that sampling can be performed. Prior to renovations or demolition of these areas, it is recommended that a more destructive protocol be utilized in order to make these determinations. Concealed Materials Based on the nature of the Asbestos which could be concealed, it is recommended: Extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials throughout the property in order to determine if concealed locations contain an Asbestos or if isolated to a specific era of remodeling; or If extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials is not possible, and presumptions that concealed locations are potentially Asbestos, then it is recommended that a site specific Management Plan be developed and implemented which could effectively manage the future renovations of the property. A Management Plan can be designed to review specific locations of renovation locations, i.e., destructive sampling and quantification through concealed chases, and under carpeting prior to disturbance of these areas by the Owner or Contractors which will assist in the recognition and response to potential health risks from concealed Asbestos. 3. HERRON recommends extreme caution during a renovation or demolition of these areas in the event that an area which was not suspect, visible, accessible and/or specified during the inspection, is discovered to contain or is suspected of containing an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). Under local, state and/or federal regulations, should such an event occur, the Client and or Contractor is required to cease operations which may effect this (these) material(s) until an inspection is concluded and a determination is made by an AHERA and State Certified Asbestos Building Inspector. 4. Disturbance of these areas could create a potential health hazard. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 21 of 91

22 Suspect materials which were visually inspected and determined to be Non-ACM materials at the time of the inspection were: Fiberglass Wood Glass Metal Plastic Concrete Etc. Inspection Methodology: 1. HERRON selected sample locations and frequency of sampling based on observations, Client requirements and/or the assumption that like materials in the same area are homogeneous in accordance with EPA Publication EPA 560 / a Asbestos in Buildings: Simplified Sampling Scheme. 2. Sample locations and frequency of sampling of Walls and Ceilings are based on EPA 9/30/94 EPA Sampling Bulletin - ASBESTOS SAMPLING BULLETIN September 30, Supplementary Guidance on Bulk Sample Collection and Analysis. Section V of this guidance bulletin offers a suggested strategy for distinguishing between joint compound found at joints in wallboard systems or when the material was applied as a skim coat; i.e., for determining whether joint compound has been applied as a skim coat over a wall surface (as referred to in the NESHAP Jan. 5, 1994 FR notice.). HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 22 of 91

23 Conclusion Building #7 Horse Stable (Outbuilding) 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd. 675 ft 2 The Client has advised that Multiple Buildings, 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd., Montrose, CO is a complete demolition by wrecking. Based on the information generated by this report, we conclude that the aforementioned property does not contain Regulated Asbestos Containing Material(s) (RACM): None detected. In order to comply with local, state, and/or federal regulations, the following Asbestos Containing Materials, or assumed Asbestos Containing Materials will have to be removed if they will be made friable during a renovation or demolition (if the composition of drywall/joint compound is <=1.0% Asbestos, when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface, floor tile/mastic, asphaltic roofing materials, pliable window glazing/caulking, etc., are normally demolished with the structure, if conducted in accordance with local, state and/or federal regulations, however, require removal during a renovation): None detected. Although a material may have been determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos, such as the composition of drywall/joint compound (when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface), traces of asbestos in surfacing materials, thermal system insulation materials, or miscellaneous materials, etc., which is not considered Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials by NESHAPS, EPA (AHERA), or the State of Colorado, may still be regulated by OSHA. OSHA regulations may apply during potential disturbance activities, and the inspection document will serve as a Hazard Communication and should be reviewed during an activity such as a renovation or demolition, to ensure that an exposure does not occur. The Maximum Allowable Asbestos Level (MAAL) may not be exceeded at any time in accordance with local, state, and/or federal regulations, including but not limited to AQCC Regulation 8 (State), 29 CFR (OSHA), 40 CFR Part 61 EPA (NESHAP), and 40 CFR 763 EPA (AHERA). This document serves as a certified notification to the owner/operator of the facility and the demolition contractor that any asbestos-containing material allowed to stay in the facility must remain non-friable during demolition. All building material field information concerning sampling protocols, locations, assessments, etc. is available in our files for Client use should the need arise. Suspect materials which were sampled and determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos (refer to Attachments), by PLM and/or PLM Point Count analysis are: 1. Not applicable; a. Building constructed of wood and metal. Suspect materials which were not within the Scope of Work at the time of the inspection were: 1. All EPA suspect Materials not requested: a. Limited to locations of the submitted plans, only. Any locations/materials not specifically identified, assumed to be a Regulated Asbestos Containing Material, and should be inspected prior to any activity which may disturb the material; i. Refer to materials identified in the report; ii. Inspection does not take into consideration any areas outside of the inspection area(s); iii. All materials not previously indicated by Client; 1. Not applicable. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 23 of 91

24 2. During a normal inspection, and more specifically when non-destructive sampling techniques are employed, it is not within the scope of the inspection to remove surface materials to inspect or quantify the structures and/or materials which may be under the surface, i.e., within or under concealed areas such as under carpet, under sub-floors, within chases, walls, crawlspaces, tunnels, etc., to remove suspect Asbestos Containing Material(s), to move and/or sample electrical wiring which has not been 'locked out', etc. All said areas are to be assumed as containing >1.0% Asbestos, until such a time that these areas are made accessible, and/or rendered safe so that sampling can be performed. Prior to renovations or demolition of these areas, it is recommended that a more destructive protocol be utilized in order to make these determinations. Concealed Materials Based on the nature of the Asbestos which could be concealed, it is recommended: Extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials throughout the property in order to determine if concealed locations contain an Asbestos or if isolated to a specific era of remodeling; or If extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials is not possible, and presumptions that concealed locations are potentially Asbestos, then it is recommended that a site specific Management Plan be developed and implemented which could effectively manage the future renovations of the property. A Management Plan can be designed to review specific locations of renovation locations, i.e., destructive sampling and quantification through concealed chases, and under carpeting prior to disturbance of these areas by the Owner or Contractors which will assist in the recognition and response to potential health risks from concealed Asbestos. 3. HERRON recommends extreme caution during a renovation or demolition of these areas in the event that an area which was not suspect, visible, accessible and/or specified during the inspection, is discovered to contain or is suspected of containing an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). Under local, state and/or federal regulations, should such an event occur, the Client and or Contractor is required to cease operations which may effect this (these) material(s) until an inspection is concluded and a determination is made by an AHERA and State Certified Asbestos Building Inspector. 4. Disturbance of these areas could create a potential health hazard. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 24 of 91

25 Suspect materials which were visually inspected and determined to be Non-ACM materials at the time of the inspection were: Fiberglass Wood Glass Metal Plastic Concrete Etc. Inspection Methodology: 1. HERRON selected sample locations and frequency of sampling based on observations, Client requirements and/or the assumption that like materials in the same area are homogeneous in accordance with EPA Publication EPA 560 / a Asbestos in Buildings: Simplified Sampling Scheme. 2. Sample locations and frequency of sampling of Walls and Ceilings are based on EPA 9/30/94 EPA Sampling Bulletin - ASBESTOS SAMPLING BULLETIN September 30, Supplementary Guidance on Bulk Sample Collection and Analysis. Section V of this guidance bulletin offers a suggested strategy for distinguishing between joint compound found at joints in wallboard systems or when the material was applied as a skim coat; i.e., for determining whether joint compound has been applied as a skim coat over a wall surface (as referred to in the NESHAP Jan. 5, 1994 FR notice.). HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 25 of 91

26 Conclusion Building #8 Workshop (Outbuilding) 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd. 300 ft 2 The Client has advised that Multiple Buildings, 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd., Montrose, CO is a complete demolition by wrecking. Based on the information generated by this report, we conclude that the aforementioned property does not contain Regulated Asbestos Containing Material(s) (RACM): None detected. In order to comply with local, state, and/or federal regulations, the following Asbestos Containing Materials, or assumed Asbestos Containing Materials will have to be removed if they will be made friable during a renovation or demolition (if the composition of drywall/joint compound is <=1.0% Asbestos, when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface, floor tile/mastic, asphaltic roofing materials, pliable window glazing/caulking, etc., are normally demolished with the structure, if conducted in accordance with local, state and/or federal regulations, however, require removal during a renovation): None detected. Although a material may have been determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos, such as the composition of drywall/joint compound (when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface), traces of asbestos in surfacing materials, thermal system insulation materials, or miscellaneous materials, etc., which is not considered Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials by NESHAPS, EPA (AHERA), or the State of Colorado, may still be regulated by OSHA. OSHA regulations may apply during potential disturbance activities, and the inspection document will serve as a Hazard Communication and should be reviewed during an activity such as a renovation or demolition, to ensure that an exposure does not occur. The Maximum Allowable Asbestos Level (MAAL) may not be exceeded at any time in accordance with local, state, and/or federal regulations, including but not limited to AQCC Regulation 8 (State), 29 CFR (OSHA), 40 CFR Part 61 EPA (NESHAP), and 40 CFR 763 EPA (AHERA). This document serves as a certified notification to the owner/operator of the facility and the demolition contractor that any asbestos-containing material allowed to stay in the facility must remain non-friable during demolition. All building material field information concerning sampling protocols, locations, assessments, etc. is available in our files for Client use should the need arise. Suspect materials which were sampled and determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos (refer to Attachments), by PLM and/or PLM Point Count analysis are: Beige Latex Paint, Surfacing Material (S), <1,000 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), throughout Interior, 1 Sample(s) (Confirmation), A, Ceiling, 7 from N Wall, 5 from W Wall, photo White Sheet Flooring, Debris, Miscellaneous Material (M), >160 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), Scattered throughout Site North of Building 8, 1 Sample(s), A, 50 from N Edge of Building 8, 50 from E Edge of property, photo HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 26 of 91

27 Suspect materials which were not within the Scope of Work at the time of the inspection were: 1. All EPA suspect Materials not requested: a. Limited to locations of the submitted plans, only. Any locations/materials not specifically identified, assumed to be a Regulated Asbestos Containing Material, and should be inspected prior to any activity which may disturb the material; i. Refer to materials identified in the report; ii. Inspection does not take into consideration any areas outside of the inspection area(s); iii. All materials not previously indicated by Client; 1. Not applicable. 2. During a normal inspection, and more specifically when non-destructive sampling techniques are employed, it is not within the scope of the inspection to remove surface materials to inspect or quantify the structures and/or materials which may be under the surface, i.e., within or under concealed areas such as under carpet, under sub-floors, within chases, walls, crawlspaces, tunnels, etc., to remove suspect Asbestos Containing Material(s), to move and/or sample electrical wiring which has not been 'locked out', etc. All said areas are to be assumed as containing >1.0% Asbestos, until such a time that these areas are made accessible, and/or rendered safe so that sampling can be performed. Prior to renovations or demolition of these areas, it is recommended that a more destructive protocol be utilized in order to make these determinations. Concealed Materials Based on the nature of the Asbestos which could be concealed, it is recommended: Extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials throughout the property in order to determine if concealed locations contain an Asbestos or if isolated to a specific era of remodeling; or If extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials is not possible, and presumptions that concealed locations are potentially Asbestos, then it is recommended that a site specific Management Plan be developed and implemented which could effectively manage the future renovations of the property. A Management Plan can be designed to review specific locations of renovation locations, i.e., destructive sampling and quantification through concealed chases, and under carpeting prior to disturbance of these areas by the Owner or Contractors which will assist in the recognition and response to potential health risks from concealed Asbestos. 3. HERRON recommends extreme caution during a renovation or demolition of these areas in the event that an area which was not suspect, visible, accessible and/or specified during the inspection, is discovered to contain or is suspected of containing an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). Under local, state and/or federal regulations, should such an event occur, the Client and or Contractor is required to cease operations which may effect this (these) material(s) until an inspection is concluded and a determination is made by an AHERA and State Certified Asbestos Building Inspector. 4. Disturbance of these areas could create a potential health hazard. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 27 of 91

28 Suspect materials which were visually inspected and determined to be Non-ACM materials at the time of the inspection were: Fiberglass Wood Glass Metal Plastic Concrete Etc. Inspection Methodology: 1. HERRON selected sample locations and frequency of sampling based on observations, Client requirements and/or the assumption that like materials in the same area are homogeneous in accordance with EPA Publication EPA 560 / a Asbestos in Buildings: Simplified Sampling Scheme. 2. Sample locations and frequency of sampling of Walls and Ceilings are based on EPA 9/30/94 EPA Sampling Bulletin - ASBESTOS SAMPLING BULLETIN September 30, Supplementary Guidance on Bulk Sample Collection and Analysis. Section V of this guidance bulletin offers a suggested strategy for distinguishing between joint compound found at joints in wallboard systems or when the material was applied as a skim coat; i.e., for determining whether joint compound has been applied as a skim coat over a wall surface (as referred to in the NESHAP Jan. 5, 1994 FR notice.). HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 28 of 91

29 Conclusion Building #9 Chicken Shack (Outbuilding) 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd. 400 ft 2 The Client has advised that Multiple Buildings, 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd., Montrose, CO is a complete demolition by wrecking. Based on the information generated by this report, we conclude that the aforementioned property does not contain Regulated Asbestos Containing Material(s) (RACM): None detected. In order to comply with local, state, and/or federal regulations, the following Asbestos Containing Materials, or assumed Asbestos Containing Materials will have to be removed if they will be made friable during a renovation or demolition (if the composition of drywall/joint compound is <=1.0% Asbestos, when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface, floor tile/mastic, asphaltic roofing materials, pliable window glazing/caulking, etc., are normally demolished with the structure, if conducted in accordance with local, state and/or federal regulations, however, require removal during a renovation): None detected. Although a material may have been determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos, such as the composition of drywall/joint compound (when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface), traces of asbestos in surfacing materials, thermal system insulation materials, or miscellaneous materials, etc., which is not considered Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials by NESHAPS, EPA (AHERA), or the State of Colorado, may still be regulated by OSHA. OSHA regulations may apply during potential disturbance activities, and the inspection document will serve as a Hazard Communication and should be reviewed during an activity such as a renovation or demolition, to ensure that an exposure does not occur. The Maximum Allowable Asbestos Level (MAAL) may not be exceeded at any time in accordance with local, state, and/or federal regulations, including but not limited to AQCC Regulation 8 (State), 29 CFR (OSHA), 40 CFR Part 61 EPA (NESHAP), and 40 CFR 763 EPA (AHERA). This document serves as a certified notification to the owner/operator of the facility and the demolition contractor that any asbestos-containing material allowed to stay in the facility must remain non-friable during demolition. All building material field information concerning sampling protocols, locations, assessments, etc. is available in our files for Client use should the need arise. Suspect materials which were sampled and determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos (refer to Attachments), by PLM and/or PLM Point Count analysis are: 1. Not applicable; a. Building constructed of wood and metal. Suspect materials which were not within the Scope of Work at the time of the inspection were: 1. All EPA suspect Materials not requested: a. Limited to locations of the submitted plans, only. Any locations/materials not specifically identified, assumed to be a Regulated Asbestos Containing Material, and should be inspected prior to any activity which may disturb the material; i. Refer to materials identified in the report; ii. Inspection does not take into consideration any areas outside of the inspection area(s); iii. All materials not previously indicated by Client; 1. Not applicable. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 29 of 91

30 2. During a normal inspection, and more specifically when non-destructive sampling techniques are employed, it is not within the scope of the inspection to remove surface materials to inspect or quantify the structures and/or materials which may be under the surface, i.e., within or under concealed areas such as under carpet, under sub-floors, within chases, walls, crawlspaces, tunnels, etc., to remove suspect Asbestos Containing Material(s), to move and/or sample electrical wiring which has not been 'locked out', etc. All said areas are to be assumed as containing >1.0% Asbestos, until such a time that these areas are made accessible, and/or rendered safe so that sampling can be performed. Prior to renovations or demolition of these areas, it is recommended that a more destructive protocol be utilized in order to make these determinations. Concealed Materials Based on the nature of the Asbestos which could be concealed, it is recommended: Extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials throughout the property in order to determine if concealed locations contain an Asbestos or if isolated to a specific era of remodeling; or If extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials is not possible, and presumptions that concealed locations are potentially Asbestos, then it is recommended that a site specific Management Plan be developed and implemented which could effectively manage the future renovations of the property. A Management Plan can be designed to review specific locations of renovation locations, i.e., destructive sampling and quantification through concealed chases, and under carpeting prior to disturbance of these areas by the Owner or Contractors which will assist in the recognition and response to potential health risks from concealed Asbestos. 3. HERRON recommends extreme caution during a renovation or demolition of these areas in the event that an area which was not suspect, visible, accessible and/or specified during the inspection, is discovered to contain or is suspected of containing an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). Under local, state and/or federal regulations, should such an event occur, the Client and or Contractor is required to cease operations which may effect this (these) material(s) until an inspection is concluded and a determination is made by an AHERA and State Certified Asbestos Building Inspector. 4. Disturbance of these areas could create a potential health hazard. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 30 of 91

31 Suspect materials which were visually inspected and determined to be Non-ACM materials at the time of the inspection were: Fiberglass Wood Glass Metal Plastic Concrete Etc. Inspection Methodology: 1. HERRON selected sample locations and frequency of sampling based on observations, Client requirements and/or the assumption that like materials in the same area are homogeneous in accordance with EPA Publication EPA 560 / a Asbestos in Buildings: Simplified Sampling Scheme. 2. Sample locations and frequency of sampling of Walls and Ceilings are based on EPA 9/30/94 EPA Sampling Bulletin - ASBESTOS SAMPLING BULLETIN September 30, Supplementary Guidance on Bulk Sample Collection and Analysis. Section V of this guidance bulletin offers a suggested strategy for distinguishing between joint compound found at joints in wallboard systems or when the material was applied as a skim coat; i.e., for determining whether joint compound has been applied as a skim coat over a wall surface (as referred to in the NESHAP Jan. 5, 1994 FR notice.). HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 31 of 91

32 Conclusion Building #10 Underground Cellar (Outbuilding) 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd. 144 ft 2 The Client has advised that Multiple Buildings, 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd., Montrose, CO is a complete demolition by wrecking. Based on the information generated by this report, we conclude that the aforementioned property does not contain Regulated Asbestos Containing Material(s) (RACM): None detected. In order to comply with local, state, and/or federal regulations, the following Asbestos Containing Materials, or assumed Asbestos Containing Materials will have to be removed if they will be made friable during a renovation or demolition (if the composition of drywall/joint compound is <=1.0% Asbestos, when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface, floor tile/mastic, asphaltic roofing materials, pliable window glazing/caulking, etc., are normally demolished with the structure, if conducted in accordance with local, state and/or federal regulations, however, require removal during a renovation): None detected. Although a material may have been determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos, such as the composition of drywall/joint compound (when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface), traces of asbestos in surfacing materials, thermal system insulation materials, or miscellaneous materials, etc., which is not considered Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials by NESHAPS, EPA (AHERA), or the State of Colorado, may still be regulated by OSHA. OSHA regulations may apply during potential disturbance activities, and the inspection document will serve as a Hazard Communication and should be reviewed during an activity such as a renovation or demolition, to ensure that an exposure does not occur. The Maximum Allowable Asbestos Level (MAAL) may not be exceeded at any time in accordance with local, state, and/or federal regulations, including but not limited to AQCC Regulation 8 (State), 29 CFR (OSHA), 40 CFR Part 61 EPA (NESHAP), and 40 CFR 763 EPA (AHERA). This document serves as a certified notification to the owner/operator of the facility and the demolition contractor that any asbestos-containing material allowed to stay in the facility must remain non-friable during demolition. All building material field information concerning sampling protocols, locations, assessments, etc. is available in our files for Client use should the need arise. Suspect materials which were sampled and determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos (refer to Attachments), by PLM and/or PLM Point Count analysis are: White Latex Paint, Surfacing Material (S), <1,000 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), throughout Interior, 1 Sample(s) (Confirmation), A, Ceiling, 2 from E Wall, 6 from S Wall, photo Cream Textured Paint, Surfacing Material (S), <1,000 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), throughout Exterior 3 Sample(s), A, N Wall, 2 from W Edge of Building 10, 3 from Ground, photo B, N Wall, 4 from W Edge of Building 10, 5 from Ground, photo C, W Wall,.25 from S Edge of Building 10, 2 from Ground, photo HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 32 of 91

33 Suspect materials which were not within the Scope of Work at the time of the inspection were: 1. All EPA suspect Materials not requested: a. Limited to locations of the submitted plans, only. Any locations/materials not specifically identified, assumed to be a Regulated Asbestos Containing Material, and should be inspected prior to any activity which may disturb the material; i. Refer to materials identified in the report; ii. Inspection does not take into consideration any areas outside of the inspection area(s); iii. All materials not previously indicated by Client; 1. Not applicable. 2. During a normal inspection, and more specifically when non-destructive sampling techniques are employed, it is not within the scope of the inspection to remove surface materials to inspect or quantify the structures and/or materials which may be under the surface, i.e., within or under concealed areas such as under carpet, under sub-floors, within chases, walls, crawlspaces, tunnels, etc., to remove suspect Asbestos Containing Material(s), to move and/or sample electrical wiring which has not been 'locked out', etc. All said areas are to be assumed as containing >1.0% Asbestos, until such a time that these areas are made accessible, and/or rendered safe so that sampling can be performed. Prior to renovations or demolition of these areas, it is recommended that a more destructive protocol be utilized in order to make these determinations. Concealed Materials Based on the nature of the Asbestos which could be concealed, it is recommended: Extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials throughout the property in order to determine if concealed locations contain an Asbestos or if isolated to a specific era of remodeling; or If extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials is not possible, and presumptions that concealed locations are potentially Asbestos, then it is recommended that a site specific Management Plan be developed and implemented which could effectively manage the future renovations of the property. A Management Plan can be designed to review specific locations of renovation locations, i.e., destructive sampling and quantification through concealed chases, and under carpeting prior to disturbance of these areas by the Owner or Contractors which will assist in the recognition and response to potential health risks from concealed Asbestos. 3. HERRON recommends extreme caution during a renovation or demolition of these areas in the event that an area which was not suspect, visible, accessible and/or specified during the inspection, is discovered to contain or is suspected of containing an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). Under local, state and/or federal regulations, should such an event occur, the Client and or Contractor is required to cease operations which may effect this (these) material(s) until an inspection is concluded and a determination is made by an AHERA and State Certified Asbestos Building Inspector. 4. Disturbance of these areas could create a potential health hazard. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 33 of 91

34 Suspect materials which were visually inspected and determined to be Non-ACM materials at the time of the inspection were: Fiberglass Wood Glass Metal Plastic Concrete Etc. Inspection Methodology: 1. HERRON selected sample locations and frequency of sampling based on observations, Client requirements and/or the assumption that like materials in the same area are homogeneous in accordance with EPA Publication EPA 560 / a Asbestos in Buildings: Simplified Sampling Scheme. 2. Sample locations and frequency of sampling of Walls and Ceilings are based on EPA 9/30/94 EPA Sampling Bulletin - ASBESTOS SAMPLING BULLETIN September 30, Supplementary Guidance on Bulk Sample Collection and Analysis. Section V of this guidance bulletin offers a suggested strategy for distinguishing between joint compound found at joints in wallboard systems or when the material was applied as a skim coat; i.e., for determining whether joint compound has been applied as a skim coat over a wall surface (as referred to in the NESHAP Jan. 5, 1994 FR notice.). HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 34 of 91

35 Conclusion Building #11 Storage Shed (Outbuilding) 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd. 50 ft 2 The Client has advised that Multiple Buildings, 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd., Montrose, CO is a complete demolition by wrecking. Based on the information generated by this report, we conclude that the aforementioned property does not contain Regulated Asbestos Containing Material(s) (RACM): None detected. In order to comply with local, state, and/or federal regulations, the following Asbestos Containing Materials, or assumed Asbestos Containing Materials will have to be removed if they will be made friable during a renovation or demolition (if the composition of drywall/joint compound is <=1.0% Asbestos, when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface, floor tile/mastic, asphaltic roofing materials, pliable window glazing/caulking, etc., are normally demolished with the structure, if conducted in accordance with local, state and/or federal regulations, however, require removal during a renovation): None detected. Although a material may have been determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos, such as the composition of drywall/joint compound (when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface), traces of asbestos in surfacing materials, thermal system insulation materials, or miscellaneous materials, etc., which is not considered Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials by NESHAPS, EPA (AHERA), or the State of Colorado, may still be regulated by OSHA. OSHA regulations may apply during potential disturbance activities, and the inspection document will serve as a Hazard Communication and should be reviewed during an activity such as a renovation or demolition, to ensure that an exposure does not occur. The Maximum Allowable Asbestos Level (MAAL) may not be exceeded at any time in accordance with local, state, and/or federal regulations, including but not limited to AQCC Regulation 8 (State), 29 CFR (OSHA), 40 CFR Part 61 EPA (NESHAP), and 40 CFR 763 EPA (AHERA). This document serves as a certified notification to the owner/operator of the facility and the demolition contractor that any asbestos-containing material allowed to stay in the facility must remain non-friable during demolition. All building material field information concerning sampling protocols, locations, assessments, etc. is available in our files for Client use should the need arise. Suspect materials which were sampled and determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos (refer to Attachments), by PLM and/or PLM Point Count analysis are: 1. Not applicable; a. Building constructed of wood and metal. Suspect materials which were not within the Scope of Work at the time of the inspection were: 1. All EPA suspect Materials not requested: a. Limited to locations of the submitted plans, only. Any locations/materials not specifically identified, assumed to be a Regulated Asbestos Containing Material, and should be inspected prior to any activity which may disturb the material; i. Refer to materials identified in the report; ii. Inspection does not take into consideration any areas outside of the inspection area(s); iii. All materials not previously indicated by Client; 1. Not applicable. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 35 of 91

36 2. During a normal inspection, and more specifically when non-destructive sampling techniques are employed, it is not within the scope of the inspection to remove surface materials to inspect or quantify the structures and/or materials which may be under the surface, i.e., within or under concealed areas such as under carpet, under sub-floors, within chases, walls, crawlspaces, tunnels, etc., to remove suspect Asbestos Containing Material(s), to move and/or sample electrical wiring which has not been 'locked out', etc. All said areas are to be assumed as containing >1.0% Asbestos, until such a time that these areas are made accessible, and/or rendered safe so that sampling can be performed. Prior to renovations or demolition of these areas, it is recommended that a more destructive protocol be utilized in order to make these determinations. Concealed Materials Based on the nature of the Asbestos which could be concealed, it is recommended: Extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials throughout the property in order to determine if concealed locations contain an Asbestos or if isolated to a specific era of remodeling; or If extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials is not possible, and presumptions that concealed locations are potentially Asbestos, then it is recommended that a site specific Management Plan be developed and implemented which could effectively manage the future renovations of the property. A Management Plan can be designed to review specific locations of renovation locations, i.e., destructive sampling and quantification through concealed chases, and under carpeting prior to disturbance of these areas by the Owner or Contractors which will assist in the recognition and response to potential health risks from concealed Asbestos. 3. HERRON recommends extreme caution during a renovation or demolition of these areas in the event that an area which was not suspect, visible, accessible and/or specified during the inspection, is discovered to contain or is suspected of containing an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). Under local, state and/or federal regulations, should such an event occur, the Client and or Contractor is required to cease operations which may effect this (these) material(s) until an inspection is concluded and a determination is made by an AHERA and State Certified Asbestos Building Inspector. 4. Disturbance of these areas could create a potential health hazard. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 36 of 91

37 Suspect materials which were visually inspected and determined to be Non-ACM materials at the time of the inspection were: Fiberglass Wood Glass Metal Plastic Concrete Etc. Inspection Methodology: 1. HERRON selected sample locations and frequency of sampling based on observations, Client requirements and/or the assumption that like materials in the same area are homogeneous in accordance with EPA Publication EPA 560 / a Asbestos in Buildings: Simplified Sampling Scheme. 2. Sample locations and frequency of sampling of Walls and Ceilings are based on EPA 9/30/94 EPA Sampling Bulletin - ASBESTOS SAMPLING BULLETIN September 30, Supplementary Guidance on Bulk Sample Collection and Analysis. Section V of this guidance bulletin offers a suggested strategy for distinguishing between joint compound found at joints in wallboard systems or when the material was applied as a skim coat; i.e., for determining whether joint compound has been applied as a skim coat over a wall surface (as referred to in the NESHAP Jan. 5, 1994 FR notice.). HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 37 of 91

38 Conclusion Two Story House 970 Chipeta Rd. 1,550 ft 2 The Client has advised that Multiple Buildings, 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd., Montrose, CO is a complete demolition by wrecking. Based on the information generated by this report, we conclude that the aforementioned property does not contain Regulated Asbestos Containing Material(s) (RACM): None detected. In order to comply with local, state, and/or federal regulations, the following Asbestos Containing Materials, or assumed Asbestos Containing Materials will have to be removed if they will be made friable during a renovation or demolition (if the composition of drywall/joint compound is <=1.0% Asbestos, when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface, floor tile/mastic, asphaltic roofing materials, pliable window glazing/caulking, etc., are normally demolished with the structure, if conducted in accordance with local, state and/or federal regulations, however, require removal during a renovation): None detected. Although a material may have been determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos, such as the composition of drywall/joint compound (when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface), traces of asbestos in surfacing materials, thermal system insulation materials, or miscellaneous materials, etc., which is not considered Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials by NESHAPS, EPA (AHERA), or the State of Colorado, may still be regulated by OSHA. OSHA regulations may apply during potential disturbance activities, and the inspection document will serve as a Hazard Communication and should be reviewed during an activity such as a renovation or demolition, to ensure that an exposure does not occur. The Maximum Allowable Asbestos Level (MAAL) may not be exceeded at any time in accordance with local, state, and/or federal regulations, including but not limited to AQCC Regulation 8 (State), 29 CFR (OSHA), 40 CFR Part 61 EPA (NESHAP), and 40 CFR 763 EPA (AHERA). This document serves as a certified notification to the owner/operator of the facility and the demolition contractor that any asbestos-containing material allowed to stay in the facility must remain non-friable during demolition. All building material field information concerning sampling protocols, locations, assessments, etc. is available in our files for Client use should the need arise. Suspect materials which were sampled and determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos (refer to Attachments), by PLM and/or PLM Point Count analysis are: Brown Latex Paint, Surfacing Material (S), <1,000 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), throughout Exterior, 1 Sample(s) (Confirmation), A, E Wall, 3 from S Wall, 1 from Ground, photo White Caulk, Miscellaneous Material (M), <160 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), throughout Exterior, 2 Sample(s), A, E Wall, 5 from S Wall, 4 from Ground, photo B, S Wall, 6 from W Wall, 3 from Ground, photo Beige Latex Paint, Surfacing Material (S), <1,000 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), throughout Exterior, 1 Sample(s) (Confirmation), A, N Wall, 10 from E Wall, 6 from Ground, photo HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 38 of 91

39 White Latex Paint, Surfacing Material (S), <1,000 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), throughout Interior kitchen, 1 Sample(s) (Confirmation), A, W Wall, 8 from N Wall, 4 from Ground, photo Brown Sheet Flooring, Miscellaneous Material (M), >160 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), throughout Interior kitchen and bathroom, 2 Sample(s), A, 2 from E Wall, 1 from N Wall, on Floor, photo B, 1 from E Wall, 5 from N Wall, on Floor, photo Black Latex Paint, Surfacing Material (S), <1,000 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), throughout Interior floors, 1 Sample(s) (Confirmation), A, 5 from S Wall,.25 from W Wall, on Floor, photo Green Latex Paint, Surfacing Material (S), <1,000 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), throughout Interior floors, 1 Sample(s), A,.25 from S Wall,.25 from E Wall, on Floor, photo White Rough Textured Plaster Walls and Ceilings, Surfacing Material (S), >5,000 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), throughout Interior, 9 Sample(s), A, E Wall, 3 from N Wall, 7 from Floor, photo B, 1 from E Wall, 3 from S Wall, on Ceiling, photo C, W Wall,.25 from N Wall, 2 from Floor, photo D, N Wall, 12 from W Wall, 5 from Floor, photo E, S Wall, 4 from E Wall, 5 from Floor, photo F, N Wall, 2 from S Wall, 3 from Floor, photo G, 2 from N Wall, 2 from W Wall, on Ceiling, photo H, 1 from W Wall, 5 from N Wall, on Ceiling, photo I, S Wall, 12 from E Wall, 7 from Floor, photo White Troweled Textured Plaster Column, Surfacing Material (S), <1,000 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), throughout Interior, 3 Sample(s), A, W Wall, 4 from N Wall, 4 from Floor, photo B, N Wall, 2 from W Wall, 5 from Floor, photo C, E Wall, 3 from N Wall, 2 from Floor, photo White Caulk, Miscellaneous Material (M), <160 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), throughout Living Room, 1 Sample(s), A, N Wall, 10 from E Wall, 7 from Ground, photo Suspect materials which were not within the Scope of Work at the time of the inspection were: 1. All EPA suspect Materials not requested: a. Limited to locations of the submitted plans, only. Any locations/materials not specifically identified, assumed to be a Regulated Asbestos Containing Material, and should be inspected prior to any activity which may disturb the material; i. Refer to materials identified in the report; ii. Inspection does not take into consideration any areas outside of the inspection area(s); iii. All materials not previously indicated by Client; 1. Not applicable. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 39 of 91

40 2. During a normal inspection, and more specifically when non-destructive sampling techniques are employed, it is not within the scope of the inspection to remove surface materials to inspect or quantify the structures and/or materials which may be under the surface, i.e., within or under concealed areas such as under carpet, under sub-floors, within chases, walls, crawlspaces, tunnels, etc., to remove suspect Asbestos Containing Material(s), to move and/or sample electrical wiring which has not been 'locked out', etc. All said areas are to be assumed as containing >1.0% Asbestos, until such a time that these areas are made accessible, and/or rendered safe so that sampling can be performed. Prior to renovations or demolition of these areas, it is recommended that a more destructive protocol be utilized in order to make these determinations. Concealed Materials Based on the nature of the Asbestos which could be concealed, it is recommended: Extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials throughout the property in order to determine if concealed locations contain an Asbestos or if isolated to a specific era of remodeling; or If extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials is not possible, and presumptions that concealed locations are potentially Asbestos, then it is recommended that a site specific Management Plan be developed and implemented which could effectively manage the future renovations of the property. A Management Plan can be designed to review specific locations of renovation locations, i.e., destructive sampling and quantification through concealed chases, and under carpeting prior to disturbance of these areas by the Owner or Contractors which will assist in the recognition and response to potential health risks from concealed Asbestos. 3. HERRON recommends extreme caution during a renovation or demolition of these areas in the event that an area which was not suspect, visible, accessible and/or specified during the inspection, is discovered to contain or is suspected of containing an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). Under local, state and/or federal regulations, should such an event occur, the Client and or Contractor is required to cease operations which may effect this (these) material(s) until an inspection is concluded and a determination is made by an AHERA and State Certified Asbestos Building Inspector. 4. Disturbance of these areas could create a potential health hazard. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 40 of 91

41 Suspect materials which were visually inspected and determined to be Non-ACM materials at the time of the inspection were: Fiberglass Wood Glass Metal Plastic Concrete Etc. Inspection Methodology: 1. HERRON selected sample locations and frequency of sampling based on observations, Client requirements and/or the assumption that like materials in the same area are homogeneous in accordance with EPA Publication EPA 560 / a Asbestos in Buildings: Simplified Sampling Scheme. 2. Sample locations and frequency of sampling of Walls and Ceilings are based on EPA 9/30/94 EPA Sampling Bulletin - ASBESTOS SAMPLING BULLETIN September 30, Supplementary Guidance on Bulk Sample Collection and Analysis. Section V of this guidance bulletin offers a suggested strategy for distinguishing between joint compound found at joints in wallboard systems or when the material was applied as a skim coat; i.e., for determining whether joint compound has been applied as a skim coat over a wall surface (as referred to in the NESHAP Jan. 5, 1994 FR notice.). HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 41 of 91

42 Conclusion Detached Two Car Garage 970 Chipeta Rd. 475 ft 2 The Client has advised that Multiple Buildings, 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd., Montrose, CO is a complete demolition by wrecking. Based on the information generated by this report, we conclude that the aforementioned property does not contain Regulated Asbestos Containing Material(s) (RACM): None detected. In order to comply with local, state, and/or federal regulations, the following Asbestos Containing Materials, or assumed Asbestos Containing Materials will have to be removed if they will be made friable during a renovation or demolition (if the composition of drywall/joint compound is <=1.0% Asbestos, when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface, floor tile/mastic, asphaltic roofing materials, pliable window glazing/caulking, etc., are normally demolished with the structure, if conducted in accordance with local, state and/or federal regulations, however, require removal during a renovation): None detected. Although a material may have been determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos, such as the composition of drywall/joint compound (when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface), traces of asbestos in surfacing materials, thermal system insulation materials, or miscellaneous materials, etc., which is not considered Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials by NESHAPS, EPA (AHERA), or the State of Colorado, may still be regulated by OSHA. OSHA regulations may apply during potential disturbance activities, and the inspection document will serve as a Hazard Communication and should be reviewed during an activity such as a renovation or demolition, to ensure that an exposure does not occur. The Maximum Allowable Asbestos Level (MAAL) may not be exceeded at any time in accordance with local, state, and/or federal regulations, including but not limited to AQCC Regulation 8 (State), 29 CFR (OSHA), 40 CFR Part 61 EPA (NESHAP), and 40 CFR 763 EPA (AHERA). This document serves as a certified notification to the owner/operator of the facility and the demolition contractor that any asbestos-containing material allowed to stay in the facility must remain non-friable during demolition. All building material field information concerning sampling protocols, locations, assessments, etc. is available in our files for Client use should the need arise. Suspect materials which were sampled and determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos (refer to Attachments), by PLM and/or PLM Point Count analysis are: 1. Not applicable; a. Building constructed of wood and metal. Suspect materials which were not within the Scope of Work at the time of the inspection were: 1. All EPA suspect Materials not requested: a. Limited to locations of the submitted plans, only. Any locations/materials not specifically identified, assumed to be a Regulated Asbestos Containing Material, and should be inspected prior to any activity which may disturb the material; i. Refer to materials identified in the report; ii. Inspection does not take into consideration any areas outside of the inspection area(s); iii. All materials not previously indicated by Client; 1. Not applicable. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 42 of 91

43 2. During a normal inspection, and more specifically when non-destructive sampling techniques are employed, it is not within the scope of the inspection to remove surface materials to inspect or quantify the structures and/or materials which may be under the surface, i.e., within or under concealed areas such as under carpet, under sub-floors, within chases, walls, crawlspaces, tunnels, etc., to remove suspect Asbestos Containing Material(s), to move and/or sample electrical wiring which has not been 'locked out', etc. All said areas are to be assumed as containing >1.0% Asbestos, until such a time that these areas are made accessible, and/or rendered safe so that sampling can be performed. Prior to renovations or demolition of these areas, it is recommended that a more destructive protocol be utilized in order to make these determinations. Concealed Materials Based on the nature of the Asbestos which could be concealed, it is recommended: Extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials throughout the property in order to determine if concealed locations contain an Asbestos or if isolated to a specific era of remodeling; or If extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials is not possible, and presumptions that concealed locations are potentially Asbestos, then it is recommended that a site specific Management Plan be developed and implemented which could effectively manage the future renovations of the property. A Management Plan can be designed to review specific locations of renovation locations, i.e., destructive sampling and quantification through concealed chases, and under carpeting prior to disturbance of these areas by the Owner or Contractors which will assist in the recognition and response to potential health risks from concealed Asbestos. 3. HERRON recommends extreme caution during a renovation or demolition of these areas in the event that an area which was not suspect, visible, accessible and/or specified during the inspection, is discovered to contain or is suspected of containing an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). Under local, state and/or federal regulations, should such an event occur, the Client and or Contractor is required to cease operations which may effect this (these) material(s) until an inspection is concluded and a determination is made by an AHERA and State Certified Asbestos Building Inspector. 4. Disturbance of these areas could create a potential health hazard. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 43 of 91

44 Suspect materials which were visually inspected and determined to be Non-ACM materials at the time of the inspection were: Fiberglass Wood Glass Metal Plastic Concrete Etc. Inspection Methodology: 1. HERRON selected sample locations and frequency of sampling based on observations, Client requirements and/or the assumption that like materials in the same area are homogeneous in accordance with EPA Publication EPA 560 / a Asbestos in Buildings: Simplified Sampling Scheme. 2. Sample locations and frequency of sampling of Walls and Ceilings are based on EPA 9/30/94 EPA Sampling Bulletin - ASBESTOS SAMPLING BULLETIN September 30, Supplementary Guidance on Bulk Sample Collection and Analysis. Section V of this guidance bulletin offers a suggested strategy for distinguishing between joint compound found at joints in wallboard systems or when the material was applied as a skim coat; i.e., for determining whether joint compound has been applied as a skim coat over a wall surface (as referred to in the NESHAP Jan. 5, 1994 FR notice.). HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 44 of 91

45 Conclusion Double Wide Mobile Home 950 Chipeta Rd. 1,152 ft 2 The Client has advised that Multiple Buildings, 950 and 970 Chipeta Rd., Montrose, CO is a complete demolition by wrecking. Based on the information generated by this report, we conclude that the aforementioned property does not contain Regulated Asbestos Containing Material(s) (RACM): None detected. In order to comply with local, state, and/or federal regulations, the following Asbestos Containing Materials, or assumed Asbestos Containing Materials will have to be removed if they will be made friable during a renovation or demolition (if the composition of drywall/joint compound is <=1.0% Asbestos, when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface, floor tile/mastic, asphaltic roofing materials, pliable window glazing/caulking, etc., are normally demolished with the structure, if conducted in accordance with local, state and/or federal regulations, however, require removal during a renovation): None detected. Although a material may have been determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos, such as the composition of drywall/joint compound (when the joint compound does not cover the entire surface), traces of asbestos in surfacing materials, thermal system insulation materials, or miscellaneous materials, etc., which is not considered Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials by NESHAPS, EPA (AHERA), or the State of Colorado, may still be regulated by OSHA. OSHA regulations may apply during potential disturbance activities, and the inspection document will serve as a Hazard Communication and should be reviewed during an activity such as a renovation or demolition, to ensure that an exposure does not occur. The Maximum Allowable Asbestos Level (MAAL) may not be exceeded at any time in accordance with local, state, and/or federal regulations, including but not limited to AQCC Regulation 8 (State), 29 CFR (OSHA), 40 CFR Part 61 EPA (NESHAP), and 40 CFR 763 EPA (AHERA). This document serves as a certified notification to the owner/operator of the facility and the demolition contractor that any asbestos-containing material allowed to stay in the facility must remain non-friable during demolition. All building material field information concerning sampling protocols, locations, assessments, etc. is available in our files for Client use should the need arise. Suspect materials which were sampled and determined to contain <=1.0% Asbestos (refer to Attachments), by PLM and/or PLM Point Count analysis are: Multi Colored Wallpaper on Drywall Walls, Surfacing Material (S), <5,000 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), throughout Interior, 5 Sample(s), A, S Wall, 3 from W Wall, 4 from Floor, photo B, N Wall, 4 from E Wall, 3 from Floor, photo C, W Wall, 4 from S Wall, 3 from Floor, photo D, N Wall, 4.5 from E Wall, 5 from Floor, photo E, N Wall, 3 from W Wall, 4.5 from Floor, photo White Popcorn Ceiling Textured on Drywall Ceilings, Surfacing Material (S), <1,000 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), throughout Interior, 3 Sample(s), A, 2 from E Wall, 3 from S Wall, on Ceiling, photo B, 1 from W Wall, 3 from N Wall, on Ceiling, photo C, 1 from N Wall, 6 from W Wall, on Ceiling, photo HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 45 of 91

46 White Orange Peel Textured Drywall on Walls, Surfacing Material (S), <1,000 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), throughout Interior Living Room, Hall and Dining Room, 3 Sample(s), A, NE Corner, 6 from Floor, photo B, S Wall, 6 from W Wall, 6 from Floor, photo C, S Wall, 2 from E Wall, 2 from Floor, photo Tan Sheet Flooring, Miscellaneous Material (M), >160 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), throughout Interior Laundry Room, 2 Sample(s), A, 3 from N Wall, 6 from W Wall, on Floor, photo B,.25 from W Wall, 1 from N Wall, on Floor, photo Tan Shingle Roof, Miscellaneous Material (M), >160 square feet, Good Condition (Current Condition), throughout Roof, 1 Sample(s), A, N Edge, 20 from E Wall, on Roof, photo Suspect materials which were not within the Scope of Work at the time of the inspection were: 1. All EPA suspect Materials not requested: a. Limited to locations of the submitted plans, only. Any locations/materials not specifically identified, assumed to be a Regulated Asbestos Containing Material, and should be inspected prior to any activity which may disturb the material; i. Refer to materials identified in the report; ii. Inspection does not take into consideration any areas outside of the inspection area(s); iii. All materials not previously indicated by Client; 1. Not applicable. 2. During a normal inspection, and more specifically when non-destructive sampling techniques are employed, it is not within the scope of the inspection to remove surface materials to inspect or quantify the structures and/or materials which may be under the surface, i.e., within or under concealed areas such as under carpet, under sub-floors, within chases, walls, crawlspaces, tunnels, etc., to remove suspect Asbestos Containing Material(s), to move and/or sample electrical wiring which has not been 'locked out', etc. All said areas are to be assumed as containing >1.0% Asbestos, until such a time that these areas are made accessible, and/or rendered safe so that sampling can be performed. Prior to renovations or demolition of these areas, it is recommended that a more destructive protocol be utilized in order to make these determinations. Concealed Materials Based on the nature of the Asbestos which could be concealed, it is recommended: Extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials throughout the property in order to determine if concealed locations contain an Asbestos or if isolated to a specific era of remodeling; or If extensive destructive sampling and quantification of these materials is not possible, and presumptions that concealed locations are potentially Asbestos, then it is recommended that a site specific Management Plan be developed and implemented which could effectively manage the future renovations of the property. A Management Plan can be designed to review specific locations of renovation locations, i.e., destructive sampling and quantification through concealed chases, and under carpeting prior to disturbance of these areas by the Owner or Contractors which will assist in the recognition and response to potential health risks from concealed Asbestos. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 46 of 91

47 3. HERRON recommends extreme caution during a renovation or demolition of these areas in the event that an area which was not suspect, visible, accessible and/or specified during the inspection, is discovered to contain or is suspected of containing an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). Under local, state and/or federal regulations, should such an event occur, the Client and or Contractor is required to cease operations which may effect this (these) material(s) until an inspection is concluded and a determination is made by an AHERA and State Certified Asbestos Building Inspector. 4. Disturbance of these areas could create a potential health hazard. Suspect materials which were visually inspected and determined to be Non-ACM materials at the time of the inspection were: Fiberglass Wood Glass Metal Plastic Concrete Etc. Inspection Methodology: 1. HERRON selected sample locations and frequency of sampling based on observations, Client requirements and/or the assumption that like materials in the same area are homogeneous in accordance with EPA Publication EPA 560 / a Asbestos in Buildings: Simplified Sampling Scheme. 2. Sample locations and frequency of sampling of Walls and Ceilings are based on EPA 9/30/94 EPA Sampling Bulletin - ASBESTOS SAMPLING BULLETIN September 30, Supplementary Guidance on Bulk Sample Collection and Analysis. Section V of this guidance bulletin offers a suggested strategy for distinguishing between joint compound found at joints in wallboard systems or when the material was applied as a skim coat; i.e., for determining whether joint compound has been applied as a skim coat over a wall surface (as referred to in the NESHAP Jan. 5, 1994 FR notice.). HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 47 of 91

48 Note: Plans not to scale. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 48 of 91

49 Note: Plans not to scale. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 49 of 91

50 Note: Plans not to scale. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 50 of 91

51 HERR RON Enterprises USA, Inc. Environmentall Services*Industriall Hygienists Phone (303) W. Hampden Ave., Lakewood, Colorado Asbestos Transite Note: Plans not to scale. HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 51 of 91

52 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 52 of 91

53 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 53 of 91

54 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 54 of 91

55 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 55 of 91

56 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 56 of 91

57 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 57 of 91

58 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 58 of 91

59 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 59 of 91

60 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 60 of 91

61 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 61 of 91

62 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 62 of 91

63 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 63 of 91

64 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 64 of 91

65 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 65 of 91

66 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 66 of 91

67 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 67 of 91

68 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 68 of 91

69 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 69 of 91

70 Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual Effective January 1, 2014 T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc December 2, 2014 Subcontract Number: NA Laboratory Report: RES Project # / P.O. # Project Description: None Given Lennie Herron Herron Enterprises, USA, Inc W. Hampden Ave. Lakewood CO Dear Customer, Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. is an analytical laboratory accredited for the analysis of Industrial Hygiene and Environmental matrices by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP), Lab Code for Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis and the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA), Lab ID Accreditation Certificate #480 for Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) analysis. This laboratory is currently proficient in both Proficiency Testing and PAT programs respectively. Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. has analyzed the following samples for asbestos content as per your request. The analysis has been completed in general accordance with the appropriate methodology as stated in the attached analysis table. The results have been submitted to your office. RES is the job number assigned to this study. This report is considered highly confidential and the sole property of the customer. Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. will not discuss any part of this study with personnel other than those of the client. The results described in this report only apply to the samples analyzed. This report must not be used to claim endorsement of products or analytical results by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval from Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Samples will be disposed of after sixty days unless longer storage is requested. If you have any questions about this report, please feel free to call Sincerely, Jeanne Spencer President P: F: Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO RESI-ENV HERRON Project No Page 1 of 13 Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 70 of 91

71 Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. NVLAP Lab Code TDH Licensed Laboratory # Effective January 1, 2014 T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc TABLE PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME RES Job Number: RES Client: Herron Enterprises, USA, Inc. Client Project Number / P.O Client Project Description: None Given Date Samples Received: November 21, 2014 Method: EPA 600/R-93/116 - Short, Bulk Turnaround: 3-5 Day Date Analyzed: December 2, 2014 =None Detected TR=Trace, <1% Visual Estimate Trem-Act=Tremolite-Actinolite Client Lab L Asbestos Content Non Non- Sample ID Number A Sub Asbestos Fibrous Number Y Physical Part Fibrous Components E Description (%) Mineral Visual Components (%) R Estimate (%) (%) A EM A Off white plaster A EM A Tan fibrous cementitious material 100 Chrysotile Crocidolite A EM A Off white sheet vinyl w/ white fibrous backing material A EM A Tan granular material A EM A Brown wood w/ off white paint A EM A Brown/multi-colored paint P: F: HERRON Project No Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO RESI-ENV Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises Page 2 of 13 USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 71 of 91

72 Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. NVLAP Lab Code TDH Licensed Laboratory # Effective January 1, 2014 T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc TABLE PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME RES Job Number: RES Client: Herron Enterprises, USA, Inc. Client Project Number / P.O Client Project Description: None Given Date Samples Received: November 21, 2014 Method: EPA 600/R-93/116 - Short, Bulk Turnaround: 3-5 Day Date Analyzed: December 2, 2014 =None Detected TR=Trace, <1% Visual Estimate Trem-Act=Tremolite-Actinolite Client Lab L Asbestos Content Non Non- Sample ID Number A Sub Asbestos Fibrous Number Y Physical Part Fibrous Components E Description (%) Mineral Visual Components (%) R Estimate (%) (%) A EM A Fibrous material w/ green/white paint A EM A Brown wood w/ red paint A EM A Brown wood w/ red paint A EM A Off white resinous material w/ red paint B EM A White resinous material w/ dark red paint A EM A Tan fibrous material w/ clear granular texture & white paint P: F: HERRON Project No Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO RESI-ENV Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises Page 3 of 13 USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 72 of 91

73 Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. NVLAP Lab Code TDH Licensed Laboratory # Effective January 1, 2014 T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc TABLE PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME RES Job Number: RES Client: Herron Enterprises, USA, Inc. Client Project Number / P.O Client Project Description: None Given Date Samples Received: November 21, 2014 Method: EPA 600/R-93/116 - Short, Bulk Turnaround: 3-5 Day Date Analyzed: December 2, 2014 =None Detected TR=Trace, <1% Visual Estimate Trem-Act=Tremolite-Actinolite Client Lab L Asbestos Content Non Non- Sample ID Number A Sub Asbestos Fibrous Number Y Physical Part Fibrous Components E Description (%) Mineral Visual Components (%) R Estimate (%) (%) A EM A B Gray plaster Off white granular material B EM A Off white granular material w/ off white paint TR C EM A B Gray plaster Off white granular material A EM A Brown wood w/ yellow/multi-colored paint P: F: HERRON Project No Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO RESI-ENV Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises Page 4 of 13 USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 73 of 91

74 Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. NVLAP Lab Code TDH Licensed Laboratory # Effective January 1, 2014 T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc TABLE PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME RES Job Number: RES Client: Herron Enterprises, USA, Inc. Client Project Number / P.O Client Project Description: None Given Date Samples Received: November 21, 2014 Method: EPA 600/R-93/116 - Short, Bulk Turnaround: 3-5 Day Date Analyzed: December 2, 2014 =None Detected TR=Trace, <1% Visual Estimate Trem-Act=Tremolite-Actinolite Client Lab L Asbestos Content Non Non- Sample ID Number A Sub Asbestos Fibrous Number Y Physical Part Fibrous Components E Description (%) Mineral Visual Components (%) R Estimate (%) (%) A EM A Brown/multi-colored paint A EM A B C Yellow mastic Tan/multi-colored sheet vinyl w/ white fibrous backing material Black fibrous backing material B EM A B Tan/multi-colored sheet vinyl w/ white fibrous backing material Black fibrous backing material A EM A B Black resinous material Off white plaster P: F: HERRON Project No Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO RESI-ENV Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises Page 5 of 13 USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 74 of 91

75 Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. NVLAP Lab Code TDH Licensed Laboratory # Effective January 1, 2014 T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc TABLE PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME RES Job Number: RES Client: Herron Enterprises, USA, Inc. Client Project Number / P.O Client Project Description: None Given Date Samples Received: November 21, 2014 Method: EPA 600/R-93/116 - Short, Bulk Turnaround: 3-5 Day Date Analyzed: December 2, 2014 =None Detected TR=Trace, <1% Visual Estimate Trem-Act=Tremolite-Actinolite Client Lab L Asbestos Content Non Non- Sample ID Number A Sub Asbestos Fibrous Number Y Physical Part Fibrous Components E Description (%) Mineral Visual Components (%) R Estimate (%) (%) A EM A Off white plaster w/ green paint A EM A B C White plaster w/ light green/multi-colored paint White texture w/ green/multi-colored paint Gray granular plaster TR B EM A B C White plaster w/ off white paint White texture w/ tan paint Gray granular plaster TR C EM A B C White texture w/ off white paint White compound w/ blue/multi-colored paint Gray granular plaster TR P: F: HERRON Project No Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO RESI-ENV Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises Page 6 of 13 USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 75 of 91

76 Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. NVLAP Lab Code TDH Licensed Laboratory # Effective January 1, 2014 T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc TABLE PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME RES Job Number: RES Client: Herron Enterprises, USA, Inc. Client Project Number / P.O Client Project Description: None Given Date Samples Received: November 21, 2014 Method: EPA 600/R-93/116 - Short, Bulk Turnaround: 3-5 Day Date Analyzed: December 2, 2014 =None Detected TR=Trace, <1% Visual Estimate Trem-Act=Tremolite-Actinolite Client Lab L Asbestos Content Non Non- Sample ID Number A Sub Asbestos Fibrous Number Y Physical Part Fibrous Components E Description (%) Mineral Visual Components (%) R Estimate (%) (%) D EM A B White texture w/ tan paint Gray granular plaster w/ yellow paint TR E EM A B C White texture w/ blue/multi-colored paint White plaster w/ tan paint Gray granular plaster TR F EM A B White texture w/ off white paint Gray granular plaster TR P: F: HERRON Project No Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO RESI-ENV Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises Page 7 of 13 USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 76 of 91

77 Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. NVLAP Lab Code TDH Licensed Laboratory # Effective January 1, 2014 T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc TABLE PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME RES Job Number: RES Client: Herron Enterprises, USA, Inc. Client Project Number / P.O Client Project Description: None Given Date Samples Received: November 21, 2014 Method: EPA 600/R-93/116 - Short, Bulk Turnaround: 3-5 Day Date Analyzed: December 2, 2014 =None Detected TR=Trace, <1% Visual Estimate Trem-Act=Tremolite-Actinolite Client Lab L Asbestos Content Non Non- Sample ID Number A Sub Asbestos Fibrous Number Y Physical Part Fibrous Components E Description (%) Mineral Visual Components (%) R Estimate (%) (%) G EM A B White texture w/ off white paint Gray granular plaster TR H EM A B Yellow paint w/ gray granular plaster White/off white texture w/ tan paint TR I EM A B White texture w/ off white paint Gray granular plaster TR A EM A Brown granular material w/ off white paint P: F: HERRON Project No Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO RESI-ENV Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises Page 8 of 13 USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 77 of 91

78 Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. NVLAP Lab Code TDH Licensed Laboratory # Effective January 1, 2014 T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc TABLE PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME RES Job Number: RES Client: Herron Enterprises, USA, Inc. Client Project Number / P.O Client Project Description: None Given Date Samples Received: November 21, 2014 Method: EPA 600/R-93/116 - Short, Bulk Turnaround: 3-5 Day Date Analyzed: December 2, 2014 =None Detected TR=Trace, <1% Visual Estimate Trem-Act=Tremolite-Actinolite Client Lab L Asbestos Content Non Non- Sample ID Number A Sub Asbestos Fibrous Number Y Physical Part Fibrous Components E Description (%) Mineral Visual Components (%) R Estimate (%) (%) B EM A Brown granular material w/ off white paint 100 TR C EM A Gray granular plaster w/ off white paint 100 TR A EM A White resinous material w/ off white paint A EM A B White/multi-colored wall covering White/tan drywall B EM A B White/tan wall covering White/tan drywall P: F: HERRON Project No Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO RESI-ENV Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises Page 9 of 13 USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 78 of 91

79 Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. NVLAP Lab Code TDH Licensed Laboratory # Effective January 1, 2014 T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc TABLE PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME RES Job Number: RES Client: Herron Enterprises, USA, Inc. Client Project Number / P.O Client Project Description: None Given Date Samples Received: November 21, 2014 Method: EPA 600/R-93/116 - Short, Bulk Turnaround: 3-5 Day Date Analyzed: December 2, 2014 =None Detected TR=Trace, <1% Visual Estimate Trem-Act=Tremolite-Actinolite Client Lab L Asbestos Content Non Non- Sample ID Number A Sub Asbestos Fibrous Number Y Physical Part Fibrous Components E Description (%) Mineral Visual Components (%) R Estimate (%) (%) C EM A B White/tan wall covering White/tan drywall D EM A B White/tan wall covering White/tan drywall E EM A B White/green wall covering White/tan drywall A EM A B C D Yellow foam White fibrous woven material White foamy texture White/tan drywall P: F: HERRON Project No Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO RESI-ENV Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises Page 10 of 13 USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 79 of 91

80 Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. NVLAP Lab Code TDH Licensed Laboratory # Effective January 1, 2014 T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc TABLE PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME RES Job Number: RES Client: Herron Enterprises, USA, Inc. Client Project Number / P.O Client Project Description: None Given Date Samples Received: November 21, 2014 Method: EPA 600/R-93/116 - Short, Bulk Turnaround: 3-5 Day Date Analyzed: December 2, 2014 =None Detected TR=Trace, <1% Visual Estimate Trem-Act=Tremolite-Actinolite Client Lab L Asbestos Content Non Non- Sample ID Number A Sub Asbestos Fibrous Number Y Physical Part Fibrous Components E Description (%) Mineral Visual Components (%) R Estimate (%) (%) B EM A B White foamy texture White/tan drywall C EM A B White foamy texture White/tan drywall A EM A B C D White texture w/ white paint White tape White joint compound Tan/white drywall P: F: HERRON Project No Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO RESI-ENV Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises Page 11 of 13 USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 80 of 91

81 Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. NVLAP Lab Code TDH Licensed Laboratory # Effective January 1, 2014 T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc TABLE PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME RES Job Number: RES Client: Herron Enterprises, USA, Inc. Client Project Number / P.O Client Project Description: None Given Date Samples Received: November 21, 2014 Method: EPA 600/R-93/116 - Short, Bulk Turnaround: 3-5 Day Date Analyzed: December 2, 2014 =None Detected TR=Trace, <1% Visual Estimate Trem-Act=Tremolite-Actinolite Client Lab L Asbestos Content Non Non- Sample ID Number A Sub Asbestos Fibrous Number Y Physical Part Fibrous Components E Description (%) Mineral Visual Components (%) R Estimate (%) (%) B EM A B White texture w/ white paint White/tan drywall C EM A B White texture w/ white paint White/tan drywall A EM A Off white/tan sheet vinyl w/ off white fibrous backing material P: F: HERRON Project No Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO RESI-ENV Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises Page 12 of 13 USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 81 of 91

82 Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. NVLAP Lab Code TDH Licensed Laboratory # Effective January 1, 2014 T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc TABLE PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME RES Job Number: RES Client: Herron Enterprises, USA, Inc. Client Project Number / P.O Client Project Description: None Given Date Samples Received: November 21, 2014 Method: EPA 600/R-93/116 - Short, Bulk Turnaround: 3-5 Day Date Analyzed: December 2, 2014 =None Detected TR=Trace, <1% Visual Estimate Trem-Act=Tremolite-Actinolite Client Lab L Asbestos Content Non Non- Sample ID Number A Sub Asbestos Fibrous Number Y Physical Part Fibrous Components E Description (%) Mineral Visual Components (%) R Estimate (%) (%) B EM A Off white sheet vinyl w/ off white fibrous backing material A EM A B Black fibrous tar Gray/white/black shingle TEM Analysis recommended for organically bound material (i.e. floor tile) if PLM results are <1%. Analyzed by: Data QA: P: F: HERRON Project No Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO RESI-ENV Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises Page 13 of 13 USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 82 of 91

83 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 83 of 91

84 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 84 of 91

85 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 85 of 91

86 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 86 of 91

87 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 87 of 91

88 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 88 of 91

89 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 89 of 91

90 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 90 of 91

91 HERRON Project No Copyright 2014 HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 91 of 91