Conservation and Demand Management Plan July 1, 2014

Transcription

1 Conservation and Demand Management Plan July 1, 2014

2 Version Control Date Author Change Version July 16, 2014 Roy Oommen Issue to Public 0 1 P a g e

3 Table of Contents Conservation and Demand Management Plan College Profile College Campus Building Profiles Roles and Responsibilities Commitment by College Goals and Objectives Energy Conservation Proposed Technical Measures Proposed Costs and Savings Energy Monitoring Meters Motor Upgrades Recommissioning of HVAC Systems Building HVAC Controls Replacement Lightning Retrofit Costs Energy Usage P a g e

4 Conservation and Demand Management Plan 1.0 College Profile Seneca is a leading postsecondary educational institution with a reputation for offering high quality programs at the baccalaureate, diploma, certificate and post-graduate levels. The college has 25,000 full time students annually, along with 70,000 continuing education registrations annually. Seneca has a proud history, and continues to build an even more exciting future. Anchored in Canada s largest city and economic engine, Seneca is active in meeting the demand for postsecondary education in one of the fastest growing regions of Ontario. Seneca students, faculty, staff and alumni share a passion for the College. Hardworking, ambitious and compassionate: that approach, that culture, is what Seneca is all about. Seneca is constantly looking for ways to improve and innovate. 3 P a g e

5 1.1 College Campus Building Profiles Building List by Campus Campus Name Building Name Gross(sqft) JANE (JN) JANE 21,765 KING BOAT HOUSE 3,300 KING CHILD CARE CENTRE(KOLTS) 8,643 KING CRIME SCENE LAB 1,658 KING EATON HALL 50,172 KING ENVIRO LANDSCAPE MNGMT 7,071 KING GREENHOUSE BUILDING 10,237 KING GARRIOCK HALL 143,837 KING KING RESIDENCE 82,894 KING KW BUILDING 6,825 KING LAW LODGE 4,567 KING PAVILION 3,339 KING PORTABLE CLASSROOM 8,530 KING QUARTERMASTER OFFICE 1,077 KING RED HORSE BARN 15,821 KING RECREATION ISLAND 2,671 KING RIGGING SHOP 1,031 KING SHEEP & COW BARN 1,576 KING UNDERWATER SKILL STORE 864 KING VET TECH 21,816 KING (KG) Total KING 375,929 MARKHAM (MK) MARKHAM 328,176 NEWNHAM NEWNHAM BLDG A 272,457 NEWNHAM NEWNHAM BLDG B 198,890 NEWNHAM BUS GARAGE 9,000 NEWNHAM NEWNHAM BLDG C 64,476 NEWNHAM NEWNHAM BLDG D 159,778 NEWNHAM NEWNHAM BLDG E 30,638 NEWNHAM NEWNHAM BLDG F 16,991 NEWNHAM NEWNHAM BLDG G 89,649 4 P a g e

6 NEWNHAM NEWNHAM BLDG H 8,270 NEWNHAM NEWNHAM BLDG L 10,110 NEWNHAM MAINTENANCE SHOP 4,123 NEWNHAM NEWNHAM RESIDENCE 395,290 Newnham (NH) Total NEWNHAM 1,259,673 YORK S.E.QUINLAN 456,925 YORK TEL 201,520 S@Y Total YORK 658,444 NEWMARKET (NM) NEWMARKET 11,252 SCARBOROUGH (SC) SCARBOROUGH 5,401 VAUGHAN (VN) VAUGHAN 7,933 YORK GATE (YG) YORK GATE 17,352 PETERBOROUGH (PB) PETERBOROUGH 26,500 5 P a g e

7 1.2 Roles and Responsibilities Name Position Role Roy Oommen Sr. Manager Energy, Projects & CDM Plan Administrator Business Planning Alex Lapusan Facility Manager Newnham Campus Technical Support Luciano Colussi Facility Manager York Technical Support Campus Rick Greenlaw Facility Manager King Campus Technical Support Colin Cheung Director of Facilities Management Facilitator 1.3 Commitment by College The appropriate authority of Seneca College approves of the Conservation and Demand Management Plan. By approval of the CDM plan Seneca is affirming their commitment to implementing this plan. 6 P a g e

8 2.0 Goals and Objectives Energy Conservation Seneca College is committed in establishing itself as a leader in achieving substantial and measurable environmental and financial improvement through the Conservation and Demand Management Plan. The CDM plan will align with Seneca s core values in sustainability and being environmental stewards. Through co-operation and engagement with the college s staff, faculty and students it is intended that a holistic and all-encompassing approach to environmental stewardship can be achieved. Through this plan Seneca will aim to reduce its energy consumption and manage its demand for energy. This plan will optimize energy efficiency through energy saving retrofits and upgrades. In addition it is the goal of the college to reduce energy operating costs by examining existing building systems and recommission systems where improvements can be made. 2.1 Proposed Technical Measures. Item Location Description Implementation Fiscal Year Installation of Energy Monitoring Meters Newnham Installation of monitoring devices, to benchmark point of use 2014 Building Chiller Pump Replacement Recommissioning of HVAC Systems Exterior Lighting Retrofits Building HVAC & Controls Replacement Interior Lighting Retrofits Replacement of Motors York Newnham, York, King, Markham Newnham, York, King, Markham Newnham Newnham, York, King, Markham Newnham Replace existing motors with more high efficiency energy motors Optimization of Building systems Review use of LED Fixtures 2015 HVAC and controls for Building E to improve energy efficiency 2015 Review use of LED Fixtures 2015 Replacement of exiting motors with more high efficiency energy motors P a g e

9 2.2 Proposed Costs and Savings Energy Monitoring Meters Monitoring of total utility consumption (hydro, gas & water) will provide important data that can be analyzed to give key cost reduction information. By the monitoring the College s consumption, the meters will provide the ability to verify efficiency improvements, effectively reduce loads and determine effects of conservation measures. Benefits of Monitoring Energy: - Gives better information for analysis of energy consumptionand performance improvement trends - Provides technical and financial information needed to make strategic decisions regarding operating activities - Identifies inconsistencies in operating and shutdown procedure - Information to justify and support a strategy for achieving improvements, through target setting and development of benchmarks There is a direct payback from the installation and use of the energy monitoring meters. The payback is received from changes in organizational behavior and business process. Type Capital Cost Annual Operational Utillity Costs Reduction in Utility Costs Simple Payback Hydro, Gas, Water $40,000 $5,000,000 $50, months Campus Motor Upgrades Motor Size Operational Hours Average Load Current Motor Efficiency Cost/kWh Operational Costs Capital Cost New Motor Efficiency Operational Costs Net Savings Incentive (Toronto Hydro) Newnham 60hp % 89% $0.15 $15,200 $5,000 95% $14,200 $1,000 $1, yrs York 30hp % 85% $0.15 $9,930 $3,040 95% $8,890 $1,040 $1, yrs King 30hp % 85% $0.15 $9,930 $3,040 95% $8,890 $1,040 $1, yrs Simple Payback 8 P a g e

10 2.2.3 Recommissioning of HVAC Systems Recommisioning involves a systematic process to improve the College s building performance. Seneca will look at recalibration of existing equipment. The concept of recommissioning is identifying low cost/no cost operational improvements to increase comforot and promote energy savings. In 2012, Seneca spent approximately $5M in utility costs. Through the recommissioning of building systems, the college hopes to achieve a 2% reduction in utility usage, with a financial savings of $100,000 Type Capital Cost Annual Operational Utillity Costs Reduction in Utility Costs Simple Payback Recommissiong $10,000 $5,000,000 $100,000 Immediate Building HVAC Controls Replacement The current HVAC/controls in Seneca s Newnham campus (Building E) is exceeding their usefule life as they are thirty years old. The replacement of this equipment will reduce operating and maintenance costs and improve energy efficiency. Type Capital Cost Annual Operational Hydro Costs Reduction in Utility Costs Simple Payback HVAC Controls Replacement $70,000 $3,500,000 $35,000 2 years 9 P a g e

11 2.2.5 Lightning Retrofit Costs PRELIMINARY QUOTATION / SCOPE OF WORK (SCHEDULE A) PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY PROJECT SENECA COLLEGE - Markham campus Atique Choudhry 8 The Seneca Way (Highway 7 and Highway 404) Markham, Ontario L3R 5Y1 Contact Florent Balsez, Account Manager Site Contact: Voltage: 120V Tel: , Ext Tel: Date: March 20, 2014 EXISTING EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDED EQUIPMENT SAVINGS KILO TOTAL ELECTRICITY WATTS Existing Measured WATTS Projected Unit WATT KILOWATT Total Cost FIXT. Lamp PER TOTAL TOTAL Foot candle Fixture LP Lamp PER TOTAL TOTAL lamp system Turnkey Price DEMAND HOURS per measure Line LOCATION USAGE QTY. per LAMP Existing Fixtures FIXT. WATTS KILOWATT QTY DESCRIPTION QTY per FIXT. WATTS KILOWATT Lifetime Lumens per SAVING SAVED 0.12 HRS/YR Fixt. COUNT (KW) HOURS Fixt. (KW) HOURS (hrs) Fixture (KW) PER KWH 1 New Installation n/a Install new LED Wall PACK 347V 50W , ,000 $ ,847 -$342 $10,167 2 Replacement n/a , Install new LED Wall PACK 347V 50W , ,000 $ ,665 $920 $7, #DIV/0! - 0 $0 # DIV/0! #DIV/0! - 0 $0 # DIV/0! #DIV/0! - 0 $0 # DIV/0! #DIV/0! - 0 $0 # DIV/0! , , , #DIV/0! Energy & Environmental Savings This TURN-KEY proposal Includes: Total cost $ 17,692 Simple Payback 6.61 Supply and delivery of LED fixtures 4,818 Energy Savings $ 578 Energy Saved 4,818 Instalation of all the fixtures 5,000 kw/h saved Incentives $ 241 Energy Reduction 45% Permit Fee (ESA Inspection) Maintenance Savings $ 2,097 Incentive Buydown 1% 4,500 3,614 CO2 Rebate Application if applicable Net after Incentives $ 17,451 Net Payback 6.52 Disposal / recycling (with Recycling Certificate) Free Energy Savings Analysis 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 NOx SO2 kwh & Pounds 2,000 1,500 1, kw/h saved CO2 NOx SO2 Energy & Gases Saved Project Summary 10 P a g e

12 Atique Choudhry, Senior Operations manager Seneca College of Applied Arts & Technology D FOR PREPARED BY PROJECT SENECA COLLEGE - Newham Campus 1750 Finch Avenue East Toronto ON M2J 2X Finch Ave. East Toronto, ON M2J 2X5 Contact Florent Balsez, Account Manager Site Contact: Atique Choudhry Voltage: 120V and 347V Tel: , Ext Tel: Date: March 20, 2014 EXISTING EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDED EQUIPMENT SAVINGS KILO TOTAL ELECTRICITY WATTS Existing Measured WATTS Projected Unit WATT KILOWATT Total Cost FIXT. Lamp PER TOTAL TOTAL Foot candle Fixture LP Lamp PER TOTAL TOTAL lamp system Turnkey Price DEMAND HOURS per measure Line LOCATION USAGE QTY. per LAMP Existing Fixtures FIXT. WATTS KILOWATT QTY DESCRIPTION QTY per FIXT. WATTS KILOWATT Lifetime Lumens per SAVING SAVED 0.12 HRS/YR Fixt. COUNT (KW) HOURS Fixt. (KW) HOURS (hrs) Fixture (KW) PER KWH E 6 Building I (Residence) W HPS , Install new LED Wall PACK 120V 30W , ,000 $ ,000 $360 $10, , , , ,944 This TURN-KEY proposal Includes: Supply and delivery of LED fixtures Instalation of all the fixtures Permit Fee (ESA Inspection) Rebate Application if applicable Disposal / recycling (with Recycling Certificate) Free Energy Savings Analysis kwh & Pounds 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 Energy & Environmental Savings 3,000 2, kw/h saved CO2 NOx SO2 307 Total cost Energy Savings Incentives Maintenance Savings Net after Incentives $ 10,944 $ 360 $ 150 $ 2,097 $ 10,794 Project Summary Simple Payback 4.45 Energy Saved 3,000 Energy Reduction 56% Incentive Buydown 1% Net Payback kw/h saved CO2 NOx SO2 Energy & Gases Saved 11 P a g e

13 PRELIMINARY QUOTATION / SCOPE OF WORK (SCHEDULE A) Atique Choudhry, Senior Operations manager Seneca College of Applied Arts & Technology SENECA COLLEGE - Newham Campus 1750 Finch Avenue East Toronto ON M2J 2X5 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY PROJECT 1750 Finch Ave. East Toronto, ON M2J 2X5 Contact Florent Balsez, Account Manager Site Contact: Atique Choudhry Voltage: 120V and 347V Tel: , Ext Tel: Date: March 20, 2014 EXISTING EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDED EQUIPMENT SAVINGS KILO TOTAL ELECTRICITY WATTS Existing Measured WATTS Projected Unit WATT KILOWATT Total Cost FIXT. Lamp PER TOTAL TOTAL Foot candle Fixture LP Lamp PER TOTAL TOTAL lamp system Turnkey Price DEMAND HOURS per measure Line LOCATION USAGE QTY. per LAMP Existing Fixtures FIXT. WATTS KILOWATT QTY DESCRIPTION QTY per FIXT. WATTS KILOWATT Lifetime Lumens per SAVING SAVED 0.12 HRS/YR Fixt. COUNT (KW) HOURS Fixt. (KW) HOURS (hrs) Fixture (KW) PER KWH 1 Building A n/a , Install new LED Wall PACK 347V 30W , ,000 $ ,621 $194 $7,460 2 Building A n/a Install new LED Landscape Flood 347V 50W ,000 $ $105 $3,032 3 Building B W HPS ,300 5 Install new LED Wall PACK 347V 30W ,000 $ ,643 $197 $3,071 4 Building D W HPS , Install new LED Wall PACK 347V 30W , ,000 $ ,497 $300 $9,829 5 Building L (Portable) W HPS WP ,117 3 Install new LED Wall PACK 347V 30W ,000 $ $87 $1, , , , ,936 Project Summary This TURN-KEY proposal Includes: Energy & Environmental Savings Supply and delivery of LED fixtures Total cost $ 24,936 Simple Payback 9.00 Instalation of all the fixtures 5,606 kw/h saved Permit Fee (ESA Inspection) Rebate Application if applicable Disposal / recycling (with Recycling Certificate) Free Energy Savings Analysis kwh & Pounds 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 4, CO2 NOx SO2 574 Energy Savings Incentives Maintenance Savings Net after Incentives $ 673 $ 280 $ 2,097 $ 24,656 Energy Saved 5,606 Energy Reduction 51% Incentive Buydown 1% Net Payback P a g e

14 3.0 Energy Consumption See attached appendix