I-81 Exit 114 Bridge Replacement Project RFQ Information Meeting

Transcription

1 I-81 Exit 114 Bridge Replacement Project RFQ Information Meeting July 25, 2017 Phil Hammack, P.E. Design Project Manager Stephen Kindy, P.E. APD Division Project Manager and POC

2 I-81 Bridge Replacement at Exit 114 Topics Project Location Project Purpose & Need Project Overview RFQ Information Package RFQ Summary Questions / Answers 2

3 3 Project Location: I-81 Corridor Montgomery County & Town of Christiansburg

4 Project Location - Roadways Town of Christiansburg Montgomery County 4

5 Project Location - General Land Use Harkrader Sports Complex Christiansburg Middle School Route 8 Donuts Deli Mart - Citgo Residential Area Unofficial PnR Clayton Homes Residential Area Page Cemetery Humane Society International Church of the Foursquare Gospel (ICFG) Residential Area Residential Area 5

6 Project Purpose & Need Bridges were constructed The bridges are structurally deficient with sufficiency ratings of 35.8 for the NB bridge and 29.4 for the SB bridge. The deck and the superstructure have a general condition rating of 4. The substructure has a general condition rating of 5. Has fatigue prone details. Needs to be inspected every 6 months. The bridges were painted in The minimum vertical clearance is under NBL; under SBL. The bridges have required deck patching and other repairs several times since 2010 with the most recent instance being a deck patching operation on February 15,

7 Project Purpose & Need 7

8 Project Purpose & Need Northbound Southbound Some Past Repairs 02/03/11 NB & SB 05/25/11 NB 06/23/11 NB 07/06/11 NB 07/14/11 NB 07/21/11 NB 07/28/11 NB 08/04/11 NB 03/24/15 SB 06/15/15 SB 07/02/15 SB 03/08/16 SB 02/15/17 SB 8

9 Project Overview Environmental Document Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) June 29,

10 Project Overview - Environmental T&E/TOYR - Bats Streams & Wetlands 10

11 Project Overview - Environmental Asbestos Containing Material(s) (ACM) 11

12 Project Overview - Nearby Projects Christiansburg Wayfinding Signs I-81 NB Bridge over New River Replacement Exit 105 Began Late 2016 End Late

13 Project Overview - Existing Features VDOT CMS Traffic Signal Snyder-Hunt Property C burg Waterline Traffic Camera Phone/CATV Crossover OSS OHP Fiber Optic Lines VDOT CMS Crossover Well Springhouse 4 x 6 Box Culvert Woods Fill Site C burg San. Sewer Pump Station 13

14 Project Overview - VDOT Facilities I-81 NB Overhead Sign Structure 14

15 Project Overview - VDOT Facilities Traffic Camera 15

16 Project Overview - VDOT Facilities Changeable Message Signs 16

17 Project Overview - Utilities Appalachian Power Overhead Lines 17

18 Project Overview Utilities Lumos Networks Fiber Optic Line 18

19 Project Overview - Utilities Citizens Telephone Cooperative Fiber Optic Line 19

20 Project Overview - Utilities Verizon Christiansburg Waterline 20

21 Project Overview Replace Bridges I-81 over Route 8 Maintain two lanes of traffic each direction during construction Maintain interchange function Do NOT preclude future interchange configurations MASH compliant MGS guardrail Right of Way Acquisition Employ Common Sense Engineering (IIM-LD-255) 21

22 Project Overview RFQ Project Limits: From Mi. South to Mi. North of Christiansburg SCL Approximately Mi. RFQ reflects DPH design done to facilitate an additional lane in each direction on I-81 with minimal rework as well as facilitate MOT during construction. This is reflected in the geometry of the ramps. Future ramp gores would require some regrading and paving. Of further note: Full depth shoulders were provided to facilitate future widening and possible use for incidents, maintenance or as a congestion bypass. More extensive (worst case) milling and paving limits were shown to provide new pavement and accommodate new pavement markings. This included the ramps, portions of accel./decel. lanes and tapers. The limits were squared across lanes for a clean project outline. Ramp A (NB Exit) was shifted to facilitate future widening and led to the relocation of Flanagan Drive to maintain the minimum 100 urban access control distance from ramp intersection return and to provide some additional queuing length for future Route 8/NB I-81 ramp intersection approach. 22

23 Project Overview Traffic: I-81 (2014) AADT 22,300 NB; 21,700 SB I-81 (2040) AADT 34,500 NB; 33,600 SB I-81 Trucks 27% NB; 24% SB Route 8 (2014) AADT 12,900 Route 8 (2040) AADT 20,000 Route 8 Trucks 3% 23

24 Project Overview Scope / Design Features Future - Interchange Configuration Modification Future Route 8 & I-81 I-81 Grade Adjustments for new Bridges Possible Karst Guide Signage School Proximity 24

25 Project Overview I-81 classified as an Urban/Rural Interstate VDOT GS-5/GS-1 Design Standard Design Speed 70 mph Posted Speed 70 mph Design Year = 2040 Existing Mainline has 2 12 lanes in each direction Existing outside paved shoulder width is 10 Inside paved shoulder width is 3 25

26 Project Overview Route 8 classified as an Urban Other Principal Arterial VDOT GS-5 Design Standard with shoulders Design Speed mph Posted Speed 35 mph Design Year = 2040 Substandard vertical clearance Existing Mainline has 2 12 lanes in each direction Raised median with 10 left turn lanes 26

27 Project Overview Existing bridges two- 12 lanes with 3 shoulders & curb Existing bridge has rolled beams & plate girders Bridges will be widened to provide two-12 lanes, 6 inside & 12 outside shoulder 27

28 RFQ Summary VDOT POC Stephen D. Kindy, PE Alternative Project Delivery Division 1401 East Broad Street Richmond, Virginia Phone: (804) Fax: (804) Two-Phase Best Value Procurement Short-List 3 Highest Ranked Teams Estimated Contract Value - $21,000,000 28

29 RFQ Information Package RFQ Conceptual Plans Roadway Plan and Profile Bridge Programmatic Categorical Exclusion, June 2016 Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Survey Draft Interchange Modification Report 29

30 Anticipated Schedule (Section 2.5) RFQ Questions to VDOT 08/11/2017 VDOT Response to Questions 08/23/2017 SOQ Submission Date 09/06/2017 Notification of Shortlist 10/18/2017 Anticipated RFP Release Date 10/26/2017 Anticipated Award Date 05/16/2018 Final Completion 08/06/

31 FORM C-78 (ATTACHMENT 2.10) Watch VDOT s Design-Build RFQ website for responses to RFQ questions and Addendums uest-for-qualifications.asp If VDOT issues an addendum, a revised C-78 form will be included with the addendum Sign, date and include the C-78 with SOQ 31

32 Contents of Statements of Qualifications (SOQ) Letter of Submittal (Section 3.2) POC, Surety, Prequalification, Debarment, SCC, DPOR, etc. Commitment to achieving a 8% DBE participation goal Offeror s Team Structure (Section 3.3) Key Personnel Design Build Project Manager Quality Assurance Manager Design Manager Construction Manager Organizational Chart and Narrative Clear separation between QA and QC Production Forces 32

33 Contents of Statements of Qualifications (SOQ) Experience of Offeror s Team (Section 3.4) Lead Contractor Work History Form Lead Designer Work History Form Project Risks (Section 3.5) Identify 3 Critical Project Risks Why is the risk critical? What is the potential impact? Mitigation strategies? VDOT s role? 33

34 Evaluation Criteria (Section 4) Offeror s Team Structure 20% Experience of Offeror s Team 40% Project Risks 40% Total 100% Scoring Range Application Numerical score based on a 1-10 scale Evaluation Criteria included in the RFQ for each submittal requirement Design-Build Evaluation Guidelines, Revised May 2014 (On VDOT S DB Website) 34

35 Submittal Requirements (Section 5) Deadline for submitting a Statement of Qualifications is September 6, 2017 at 4:00PM 1 original paper version with original signatures 1 CD-ROM with entire SOQ 10 abbreviated paper copies Statements of Qualifications shall be: Securely bound No more than 15 pages Typed on one-side only Separated by numbered tabs Original shall include all required documentation Written in Times New Roman with a 12 point font Prepared on 8.5 x 11 white paper 35

36 RFQ Questions (Section 6) All questions and request for clarifications shall be submitted in writing to the VDOT POC. Deadline for submittal is August 11, 2017 Responses will be posted on VDOT s RFQ website by August 23,

37 Structure Inspection Reports Critical Infrastructure Information/Sensitive Security Information (CII/SSI) CII/SSI Form to be Added to RFQ Webpage Submit Completed Form to VDOT POC VDOT to Supply: Latest Bridge Inspection Reports 37

38 Conflict of Interest (Section 11.2) The following firms have been determined to have a conflict of interest: Mead & Hunt, Inc. T3 Design Corporation Hassan Water Resources, PLC Reynolds Smith and Hills, Inc. (RS&H) CES Consulting Services McCormick Taylor, Inc. Rice Associates, Inc. AI Engineers, Inc. Rice Associates, Inc. Fugro Consultants, Inc. Hurt & Proffitt, Inc. Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson (JMT) Schwartz & Associates, Inc. 38

39 Conflict of Interest (Section 11.2) Each Offeror shall identify potential conflicts of interest. See Alternate Project Delivery Office Memorandum IIM-APD-2.1 dated October 8, IIM-APD-2.1.pdf If a potential conflict of interest or competitive advantage is identified, the Offeror shall submit in writing the pertinent information to VDOT s POC. Embedded Employees within VDOT may pose a potential Conflict of Interest. 39

40 Questions