Asbestos, Lead, and Regulated Materials Survey

Transcription

1 Asbestos, Lead, and Regulated Materials Survey Izaak Walton League Wildlife Management Area County Road 21 Mazeppa, Minnesota January 27, 2017 Project No. MP Prepared for: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, Minnesota Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. Minneapolis, Minnesota

2 CERTIFICATION AND SIGNATURE PAGE Project Name: Izaak Walton League Wildlife Management Area County Road 21 Mazeppa, Minnesota January 27, 2017 Project No. MP Prepared for: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, Minnesota Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc th Avenue North Minneapolis, MN Authored by: Jacob Ward Certified Asbestos Inspector AI12641 Reviewed by: Mike Willey Authorized Project Reviewer

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS CERTIFICATION AND SIGNATURE PAGE... i 1.0 INTRODUCTION Reliance BUILDING DESCRIPTION FIELD ACTIVITIES Asbestos Survey Visual Assessment Physical Assessment Sample Collection Sample Analysis Lead-Based Paint Sampling Poly-Chlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Equipment Inventory and Sampling Hazardous / Universal Waste Items and Materials Inventory REGULATORY REVIEW Asbestos Lead-Based Paint Regulated Materials FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Asbestos Survey Findings Asbestos-Containing Material Classifications Asbestos Management Recommendations Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Survey Findings LBP Recommendations Hazardous / Universal Waste Survey PCB-Containing Caulks, Sealants, and Coatings Metal-Containing Items Ozone-Depleting Chemical (ODC) Containing Items Miscellaneous Hazardous / Universal Waste Materials LIMITATIONS / GENERAL COMMENTS... 17

4 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONT D Appendix A Figure 1 Property Location Map Figure 2 Property Layout Map Figure 3 Two Story Barn Figure 4 Chicken Coop with Attached Garage Figure 5 Hog Barn with Connected Shed Figure 6 Vacant House Upstairs and Exterior Figure 7 Vacant House Downstairs and Exterior Appendix B Table I: Asbestos Assessment by Functional Area Table II: Hazardous/Universal Waste Inventory Table III: Lead Based Paint Assessment Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Bulk Asbestos Sample Laboratory Report PCB Caulk Sample Laboratory Report Certifications

5 Asbestos, Lead, and Regulated Materials Survey County Road 21 Mazeppa, Minnesota January 27, 2017 Project No. MP INTRODUCTION Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) was retained by Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to conduct an Asbestos, Lead and Regulated Materials Survey (Survey) and to prepare this report (Survey Report) for the Vacant Residential Dwelling addressed as Izaak Walton League Wildlife Management Area, County Road 21, Mazeppa, Minnesota (the Property). Figure 1 in Appendix A shows the location of the Property. Figure 2 in Appendix A is an aerial photograph of the Property showing the various buildings and surrounding features. The Survey was conducted on January 13, 2017 by a State of Minnesota certified asbestos inspector Jacob Ward in general accordance with the Proposal dated December 28, Copies of their inspector certificates are included in Appendix E. Terracon understands the Survey was requested due to planned demolition activities which will require management and documentation of various building materials, wastes and/or chemicals present within the building(s) on the Property. The project objective is based upon information required to communicate for compliance with the following summarized requirements: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulation 40 CFR 61, Subpart M, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), prohibits the release of asbestos fibers to the atmosphere during renovation or demolition activities. The asbestos NESHAP requires that potentially regulated ACM (RACM) be identified, classified and quantified prior to planned disturbances or demolition activities. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) impact some construction and demolition projects with respect to hazardous waste (i.e. solvent/thinner, fuel, stains, unused paint, oil/lubricants, compressed gas cylinders, and unpunctured aerosol cans) and universal waste (i.e. fluorescent lights, high intensity discharge lamps, mercury-containing thermostats, batteries, pesticides). Materials referenced here are generally referred to as Regulated Materials throughout the Survey Report. Additionally, Minnesota Rules Subpart 5, regarding renovation and demolition projects, identifies items and materials which will require special handling and removal prior to renovation/demolition activities. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) 29 CFR Subpart Z, Asbestos; regulates asbestos exposure during renovation/demolition activities and requires building and facility owners to determine the presence, location and quantity of Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) and/or Presumed ACM (PACM) prior to renovation/demolition activities. Responsive Resourceful Reliable 1

6 Asbestos, Lead, and Regulated Materials Survey County Road 21 Mazeppa, Minnesota January 27, 2017 Project No. MP OSHA 29 CFR Subpart D, Lead, applies to all renovation/demolition where an employee may be occupationally exposed to lead. The employer shall communicate information concerning lead hazards and communicating information concerning hazards and appropriate protective measures to employees including training. The objective of the Survey Report is to identify the presence, quantity and location of ACM, location of lead-based paint (LBP) in coatings, potential polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) in caulking(s), and providing an inventory of metal containing items, ozone depleting chemical and other universal and potential hazardous wastes in the building(s) at the time of the field assessment(s), subject to the stated reporting limitations. 1.1 RELIANCE This report is for the exclusive use of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for the project being discussed. Reliance by any other party on this report is prohibited without written authorization of Terracon and Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Reliance on this report by Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and all authorized parties will be subject to the terms, conditions, and limitations stated in the proposal, this report and Terracon s Agreement for Services. The limitations of liability defined in Terracon s Agreement for Services are the aggregate limit of Terracon s liability to Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION The Property consists of approximately one parcel of land. The current site has four separate structures which were broken down as follows: Residential house Chicken coop with attached garage Hog barn with connected shed Two story barn 3.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES 3.1 ASBESTOS SURVEY The survey was conducted by State of Minnesota certified asbestos inspector Jacob Ward. The survey was conducted in general accordance with the sample collection protocols established in EPA regulation 40 CFR 763, the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA). A summary of survey activities is provided below. Responsive Resourceful Reliable 2

7 Asbestos, Lead, and Regulated Materials Survey County Road 21 Mazeppa, Minnesota January 27, 2017 Project No. MP Visual Assessment Survey activities were initiated with visual observation of the interior and exterior of the Clientdefined areas within the building to identify homogeneous areas of suspect ACM. A homogeneous area (HA) consists of building materials that appear similar throughout in terms of color and texture with consideration given to the date of application. Interior assessment was conducted in visually accessible areas of the building proposed for renovation Physical Assessment A physical assessment of each homogeneous area of suspect ACM was conducted to assess the friability and condition of the materials. A friable material is defined by the EPA as a material that when dry, may be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure, including previously non-friable material when the material becomes damaged to the extent that when dry it may be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Friability was assessed by physically touching suspect materials. The materials were classified into the three following condition categories: Not Damaged condition (ND); material with less than or equal to one percent damage or deterioration for the subject surface; Damaged condition (D); materials which greater than one percent although less than ten percent distributed damage or less than twenty five percent localized damage. Damage is determined when deteriorated or sustained physical injury such that the internal structure (cohesion) of the material is inadequate or, if applicable, which has delaminated such that its bond to the substrate (adhesion) is inadequate or which for any other reason lacks fiber cohesion or adhesion qualities. Such damage or deterioration may be illustrated by the separation of ACM into layers; separation of ACM from the substrate; flaking, blistering, or crumbling of the ACM surface; water damage; significant or repeated water stains, scrapes, gouges, mars or other signs of physical injury on the ACM; or damage to jacketing or coatings; and Significantly Damaged condition (SD); materials where damage impacts at least ten percent of a localized subject surface area or if the damage is evenly distributed representing an area of at least twenty five percent of the subject surface area Sample Collection Based on results of the visual observation, bulk samples of suspect ACM were collected in general accordance with AHERA sampling protocols. Random samples of suspect materials were collected in each HA. Bulk samples were collected using wet methods as applicable to reduce the potential for fiber release. Samples were placed in sealable containers and labeled with unique sample numbers using an indelible marker. Responsive Resourceful Reliable 3

8 Asbestos, Lead, and Regulated Materials Survey County Road 21 Mazeppa, Minnesota January 27, 2017 Project No. MP The selection of sample locations and frequency of sampling were based on Terracon s observations and the assumption that like materials in the same area are homogeneous in content. Terracon collected thirty seven (37) bulk samples of suspect ACM from the Property that were separated by the analytical laboratory into seventy (70) individual layers for analysis Sample Analysis Bulk samples were submitted under chain of custody to Pace, Inc. (Pace) in Minneapolis, Minnesota for analysis by polarized light microscopy per EPA methodology EPA/600/R-93/116. Pace s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program code is Refer to Appendix C for the laboratory analytical report. The percentage of asbestos, where applicable, was determined by microscopic visual estimation or point counting. The MDH, OSHA and EPA define ACM as a material which contains greater than one percent asbestos by qualitative or quantitative analysis techniques. The EPA NESHAP requires quantitative analysis, commonly referred to as a point count, for all qualitative analysis results when asbestos is detected in concentrations less than one to ten percent. However, under common practice, qualitative results greater than three and less than ten percent are often accepted to be ACM. 3.2 LEAD-BASED PAINT SAMPLING Terracon analyzed representative homogeneous painted surfaces (coatings) on substrates found on the interior and exterior of the buildings on the property that may be subject to recycling for beneficial reuse, using an X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analyzer. Homogenous paints were defined as areas of similar paint history, such as color and location. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) defines LBP as a coating with a lead concentration of 1.0 milligrams per centimeter (mg/cm 2 ) or greater by XRF reading, excluding steel structures, or 0.5 percent or 5,000 parts per million lead by weight when analyzed by Atomic Absorption analysis. However, when utilizing an XRF for steel structures, LBP is defined as a coating that contains lead concentration of 0.5 mg/cm 2 or greater. Coating materials were analyzed using an Innov-X ά-4000 series multi-element spectrum analyzer, Serial No The Innox-X ά-4000 is a field portable XRF spectrum analyzer capable of identifying lead concentrations in paint, which are expressed in mg/cm 2. The XRF was calibrated as per manufacturer recommendations before and after use. The Performance Characteristic Sheet defines acceptable operating specifications and inconclusive range or thresholds based upon empirical results from using the inconclusive range. Although, no substrate correction is required all Responsive Resourceful Reliable 4

9 Asbestos, Lead, and Regulated Materials Survey County Road 21 Mazeppa, Minnesota January 27, 2017 Project No. MP substrates (brick, concrete, drywall, metal plaster wood) have an inconclusive range of mg/cm POLY-CHLORINATED BIPHENYL (PCB) EQUIPMENT INVENTORY AND SAMPLING Terracon inventoried the presence and/or quantity of building materials and equipment that could contain polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Samples of suspect PCB containing caulks were collected by Terracon and were analyzed using extraction techniques in accordance with EPA method 8082 by Pace, Inc. (Pace) in Minneapolis, Minnesota. 3.4 HAZARDOUS / UNIVERSAL WASTE ITEMS AND MATERIALS INVENTORY Terracon inventoried items and materials listed under Subpart 5 of Minnesota Rules Renovation and Demolition. These items and materials require special handling prior to demolition. Please note; this Survey Report is not intended to inventory or characterize other construction materials or existing debris, such as, concrete, wood, metal, glass, furniture, and paper or other mixed municipal waste which may influence handling and disposal landfill requirements during renovation and/or demolition work, including potential beneficial reuse considerations. 4.0 REGULATORY REVIEW 4.1 ASBESTOS The asbestos portion of NESHAP (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M) regulates asbestos fiber emissions and asbestos waste disposal practices. The asbestos NESHAP regulation also requires the identification and classification of existing ACM according to friability prior to demolition or renovation activity. Friable ACM is a material containing more than 1% asbestos that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure. All friable ACM is considered regulated asbestos-containing material (RACM). The asbestos NESHAP regulation classifies ACM as either RACM, Category I non-friable ACM or Category II non-friable ACM. RACM includes all friable ACM, along with Category I and Category II non-friable ACM that has become friable, will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading, or ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder in the course of renovation or demolition activity. Category I non-friable ACM are exclusively asbestos-containing packings, gaskets, resilient floor coverings, resilient floor covering mastics and asphalt roofing products that contain more than 1% asbestos. Category II non-friable ACM are all other non-friable materials other than Category I non-friable ACM that contain more than 1% asbestos. Responsive Resourceful Reliable 5

10 Asbestos, Lead, and Regulated Materials Survey County Road 21 Mazeppa, Minnesota January 27, 2017 Project No. MP The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) enforces the Asbestos NESHAP rules as adopted by reference by The owner or operator must provide MPCA with written notification at least 10 working days prior to the commencement of asbestos abatement activities that will disturb RACM in amounts greater than or equal to 160 square feet, 260 linear feet or 35 cubic feet. The MPCA Renovation and Demolition rule (Minn ), Subpart 5, also references , and therefore the Asbestos NESHAP rules. The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Asbestos Abatement Rules (AAR) regulate the enclosure, removal, or encapsulation of asbestos-containing material in a quantity that meets or exceeds 260 linear feet of friable asbestos-containing material on pipes, 160 square feet of friable asbestos-containing material on other facility components, or, if linear feet or square feet cannot be measured, 35 cubic feet. The AAR requires asbestos-related work is performed by licensed abatement contractors using certified workers. The abatement contractor must submit a notification to MDH at least 5 calendar days prior to the beginning of a project (may be submitted jointly with notice to MPCA). Work practices, air monitoring requirements, and clearance criteria are specified. The Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry adopts the OSHA Asbestos standard at 29 CFR and by reference at Minnesota Administrative Rule The OSHA standards 29 CFR and 29 CFR , regulate employee exposure to asbestos. The OSHA standards require that employee exposure to airborne asbestos fibers be maintained at or below 0.1 fibers per cubic centimeter of air (0.1 f/cc) as an eight hour time weighted average (TWA), and not exceed 1.0 fibers per cubic centimeter of air (1.0 f/cc) over a 30 minute time period known as an excursion limit (EL). The TWA and EL are known as OSHA s permissible exposure limits (PELs). The OSHA standard classifies construction and maintenance activities which could disturb ACM, and specifies work practices and precautions which employers must follow when engaging in each class of regulated work. Building owners are required to maintain buildings and equipment in a safe operating condition, including the repair, removal, encapsulation or enclosure of damaged ACMs. 4.2 LEAD-BASED PAINT EPA/HUD Lead Safe Housing Rule The Lead Safe Housing Rule (LSHR) (24 CFR Part 35, subparts B-R) was issued by HUD in 1999 as part of implementing Sections 1012 and 1013 of Title X. Title X holds the federal government to a higher standard of care than it does residential property owners in general by requiring most Federally assisted housing to have some specified type of evaluation for the presence of lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards, and controls based on the findings of the evaluation. This regulation includes requirements for lead abatement activities in target housing to be conducted using certified lead abatement firms and personnel in accordance with the EPA s lead training and certification rule, 40 CFR 745, subpart L, or with a State or Indian Tribal certification program authorized by the EPA under 40 CFR 745, subpart Q. Responsive Resourceful Reliable 6

11 Asbestos, Lead, and Regulated Materials Survey County Road 21 Mazeppa, Minnesota January 27, 2017 Project No. MP Note that residential facilities, including facilities to be converted into housing, which receive federal assistance are often subject to some or all provisions of EPA and HUD LBP regulations. The type and level of assistance can affect the applicability of such regulations. EPA/HUD Lead Disclosure Rule The Lead Disclosure Rule (the identical 24 CFR 35, subpart A and 40 CFR 745, subpart F) was jointly issued by HUD and the EPA in 1996 (61 FR , March 6, 1996) as part of implementing Section 1018 of the Residential Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Lead Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (commonly referred to as Title X). The offeror (owners or their agents) and any real estate agents involved in the transaction have responsibilities under Title X. These responsibilities include a requirement for the offeror to provide the potential buyer or tenant certain disclosure information as to lead hazards in the domicile, and educational information regarding lead hazards. EPA Renovation, Repair and Painting (RRP) Rule EPA s RRP rule was published on April 22, 2008, under the authority of the TSCA. RRP was effective on April 22, 2010 and addresses lead-based paint hazards created in target housing and child-occupied facilities. Target housing is a home or residential unit built before There are exceptions for elderly and disable persons and zero-bedroom dwellings. A child-occupied facility is a pre-1978 building that is visited regularly by the same child (under 6 years of age), for at least two different days during the week, and each visit lasts at least 3 hours. The combined weekly visits must be at least 6 hours, and the combined annual visits must be at least 60 hours. The RRP Final Rule Requires: Renovators (individuals) performing work in target housing or child-occupied facilities must be trained and certified. Renovation firms must be certified. Non-Certified workers must work under and be trained on-the-job by a certified renovator. Lead safe work practices must be followed. Certified renovators must educate owners/occupants. Training providers must be accredited. The requirements listed above are triggered if renovation, repair, or painting activities will disturb more than 6 square feet of interior paint or 20 square feet of exterior paint in target housing or childoccupied facilities. Please note that the RRP does not replace lead-based paint abatement regulations (40 CFR ) or the OSHA Lead in Construction Standard (29 CFR ). Federally assisted target housing must address lead hazards under the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Guidelines. Responsive Resourceful Reliable 7

12 Asbestos, Lead, and Regulated Materials Survey County Road 21 Mazeppa, Minnesota January 27, 2017 Project No. MP OSHA LBP Rules OSHA 29 CFR Subpart D, Lead, applies to all renovation/demolition where an employee may be occupationally exposed to lead. The employer shall communicate information concerning lead hazards and communicating information concerning hazards and appropriate protective measures to employees, including training. Where lead is present, it should be assumed that workers will be exposed to lead above the action level and personal protective measures (based on the type of disturbance) should be implemented until an exposure assessment is completed. State of Minnesota LBP Rules Although EPA RCRA requires profiling of potential hazardous wastes, the MPCA does not require known or potential lead paint to be encapsulated prior to demolition of a structure, regardless of whether it is firmly adhered to the substrate, as long as it is disposed as an integral part of the structure in a permitted solid waste landfill, including demolition, industrial or mixed solid waste landfills. TCLP testing is also not required by the MPCA. Beneficial reuse of materials containing LBP would require prior approval by the MPCA. The MDH Lead Poisoning Prevention Act (Statutes , and Rules ) applies to persons that do regulated lead work in or for an affected property. "Regulated lead work" includes abatement or reduction of known lead hazards of greater than 20 square feet on exteriors and six square feet for interiors, inspections and related testing work, and response to issued lead work orders (usually relating to an elevated blood lead level in an occupant). Affected property includes residences, schools, other child-occupied facilities and play areas. Persons performing regulated lead work must be certified, and contractors must be licensed. Work practices and procedures are specified, and clearance criteria are established. Note: lead work where lead hazard reduction is not the intent of the project (for example, window replacement) is not subject to these MDH rules. Of course, other regulations such as the EPA RRP and OSHA would still apply. 4.3 REGULATED MATERIALS The EPA has published waste management regulations regarding the disposal of hazardous waste (listed wastes, characteristic wastes, universal wastes and mixed wastes) including generators, transporters and storage of wastes present on construction/demolition sites as follows: Disposal of batteries, mercury-containing fluorescent light tubes, and other mercurycontaining equipment is regulated under EPA 40 CFR Part 273 Standards for Universal Waste Management. Responsive Resourceful Reliable 8

13 Asbestos, Lead, and Regulated Materials Survey County Road 21 Mazeppa, Minnesota January 27, 2017 Project No. MP Disposal of PCB-containing fluorescent light ballasts, caulks, transformers, and oils is regulated under EPA 40 CFR part 761 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Manufacturing, Processing, Distribution in Commerce, and Use Prohibitions. Disposal of mercury from other sources is regulated under EPA hazardous waste regulations 40 CFR The MPCA Renovation and Demolition rule (Minn ), Subpart 5, lists items and materials that must be removed from a building prior to renovation or demolition, including. Household hazardous waste as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 115A.96, Subdivision 1, including automotive fluids, lawn and garden chemicals, pest control products, household cleaners, and paints; Materials that constitute industrial solid waste or hazardous waste; Waste tires as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 115A.90, Subdivision 11; Appliances that meet the definition of "major appliances" in Minnesota Statutes, section 115A.03, Subdivision 17a; Items that contain elemental mercury; Items that contain polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), including transformers, transistors, capacitors in old appliances and electronic equipment, heat transfer equipment, and light ballasts, including PCB containing caulking with greater than 50 ppm PCB content; Items that contain chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section , Subdivision 3, including fire extinguishers; both portable and installed halon suppression systems; rooftop, room, and central air conditioners; walk-in coolers for refrigeration or cold storage areas; water fountains and dehumidifiers; refrigerators, freezers, and chillers; heat pumps; vending machines; and food display cases; Oils, including used oil, hydraulic oils in door closers and elevator-related tanks and piping, and oils located in heating oil tanks, piping, sumps, and traps; Lead-containing items, including lead-acid batteries, lead pipes, lead sheeting, lead flashing in roof vents, and lead paint that is not firmly adhered to the substrate. For purposes of this item, "lead paint" means a coating that contains one-half of one percent (0.5 percent) or more or 5,000 parts per million (5,000 ppm) or more of total lead by weight in the dried film, as determined by acid digestion and analysis, or contains one Responsive Resourceful Reliable 9

14 Asbestos, Lead, and Regulated Materials Survey County Road 21 Mazeppa, Minnesota January 27, 2017 Project No. MP milligram per square centimeter (1.0 mg/cm 2 ) or more of lead, as determined by X-ray fluorescence analyzer; Electronic products containing a cathode ray tube, as described in Minnesota Statutes, section 115A.9565, including televisions and computers; Electronic products containing a circuit board; Asbestos that is required to be removed under part ; Material trapped in sumps and traps, unless characterized as non-hazardous and nonliquid; Radioactive waste as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 116C.71, Subdivision 6; and These items and materials must be managed or removed from the facility two days prior to the start date of renovation/demolition, as submitted on the MPCA notification. In addition, under Subpart 8, if the owner, person authorizing renovation or demolition, or person conducting the renovation or demolition knows or has reason to know that portions of the structure may be contaminated by hazardous substances or petroleum as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 115C.02, subdivision 10, based on past uses of the structure, such as a medical building, laboratory, or manufacturing facility, that person shall, prior to the commencement of renovation or demolition, obtain appropriate samples and receive results from laboratory analysis as necessary to ensure the proper management and disposal of contaminated structural elements and any resulting debris generated. 5.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 ASBESTOS SURVEY FINDINGS Suspect homogeneous materials identified and subsequently sampled for asbestos content during the Survey are as follows: Sheetrock (no taping or compound) 1 st floor 1,000 sq ft Two story barn: Suspect Homogeneous Material(s) Fiberglass backing paper whole building 2,500 sq ft Chicken coop with attached garage: Suspect Homogeneous Material(s) Fiberglass backing paper garage 500 sq ft -- Responsive Resourceful Reliable 10

15 Asbestos, Lead, and Regulated Materials Survey County Road 21 Mazeppa, Minnesota January 27, 2017 Project No. MP Hog barn with connected shed: Suspect Homogeneous Material(s) Insulation in walls hog barn 800 sq ft Wall paneling hog barn 600 sq ft Roof paper hog barn 200 sq ft -- Residential house: Suspect Homogeneous Material(s) Sheetrock and joint compound throughout building 10,000 sq ft Sink undercoating kitchen one unit 12 x12 floor tile, misc. wood size pattern, with mastic hallway by bedroom 70 sq ft Vinyl floor, misc. size pattern, with mastic upstairs bathroom 50 sq ft Vinyl floor, rock pattern, with adhesive foyer 50 sq ft 12 x12 floor tile, white rock pattern, with mastic downstairs 700 sq ft 3 x3 ceramic wall tile, grout, and bedding downstairs bathroom 90 sq ft Fiberglass backing paper attic 800 sq ft Window caulk exterior 100 ln ft Patterned vinyl floor with adhesive kitchen 200 sq ft 12 x12 floor tile, wood pattern, with mastic upstairs bedroom 250 sq ft 3 x3 white ceramic wall tile, grout, and bedding upstairs bathroom 250 sq ft Vinyl floor, wood color, under tongue and groove upstairs living room 400 sq ft Popcorn ceiling texture throughout building 5,000 sq ft Vinyl floor, yellow, with mastic downstairs bathroom 80 sq ft 1 x1 ceramic floor tile, grout, and bedding downstairs bathroom 30 sq ft Shingles and tar paper roof 1,000 sq ft Corner beam caulk exterior 70 ln ft HVAC caulk laundry room 15 ln ft -- Upon analysis for asbestos content, the following materials were identified as ACM: Patterned vinyl floor with adhesive kitchen 200 sq ft flooring only 12 x12 floor tile, wood pattern, with mastic upstairs bedroom 250 sq ft tile only Vinyl floor, rock pattern, with adhesive foyer 50 sq ft Vinyl floor, yellow, with mastic downstairs bathroom 80 sq ft Confirmed Asbestos Containing Material(s) Sink undercoating kitchen one unit Vinyl floor misc. size with mastic upstairs bathroom 50 sq ft flooring only 12 x12 floor tile, white rock pattern, with mastic downstairs 700 sq ft tile only Drawings showing the locations of suspect ACM samples collected are included in Figures 3-7 in Appendix A. Refer to Table I in Appendix B for additional information regarding the locations and quantities of suspect ACMs assessed. The laboratory analytical report(s) is included in Appendix C. -- Responsive Resourceful Reliable 11

16 Asbestos, Lead, and Regulated Materials Survey County Road 21 Mazeppa, Minnesota January 27, 2017 Project No. MP Asbestos-Containing Material Classifications As discussed in Section 4.1, ACMs identified during the Survey were classified as; RACM ( friable ), Category I non-friable, and Category II non-friable ACM. These categories are shown on Table I in Appendix B for each material. The classifications are used because ACMs can vary in the relative hazard these materials present, based on their characteristics when disturbed by varying renovation or demolition techniques. For this reason, state and federal regulations manage these categories differently when regulating disturbance and abatement activities. Regulated Asbestos-Containing Material (RACM) RACM was identified at the building. Refer to Table I in Appendix B, which shows each functional space where RACM was found. RACM must be maintained in good condition. If renovation will disturb RACM, it must be removed prior to disturbance. All RACM must be removed prior to demolition of a building. Removal must be performed by licensed asbestos contractors using accredited personnel. Category I Non-Friable ACM Category I non-friable asbestos-containing materials were identified at the building. Refer to Table I in Appendix B for each material location. Category I non-friable asbestos-containing materials are defined by EPA as packings, gaskets, resilient floor coverings, and asphalt roofing products containing more than one percent asbestos. These materials must be assessed as to their likelihood of becoming friable during renovation or demolition activities, taking into account the nature of the material and the anticipated method of disturbance. According to EPA NESHAP regulations, resilient floor tile and associated flooring adhesives/mastics which contain asbestos, are considered Category I non-friable materials unless they are damaged to the extent that they could be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure when dry. Such Category I non-friable ACM need not be removed prior to demolition unless demolition will involve intentional burning, grinding, mechanically chipping, drilling, sand or bead blasting, explosive demolition, or other methods which could mechanically powder the material or otherwise render it friable. In addition, building debris need not be disposed of as friable asbestos-containing waste material as long as the Category I ACM remains non-friable. However, the landfill operator shall be notified that the construction debris will contain non-friable asbestoscontaining materials. If the scope of the demolition includes breaking and crushing the concrete floor slab for off-site recycling or use as structural fill material on-site, MPCA policy requires that vinyl asbestos tile and Responsive Resourceful Reliable 12

17 Asbestos, Lead, and Regulated Materials Survey County Road 21 Mazeppa, Minnesota January 27, 2017 Project No. MP mastic (and/or non-friable sheet vinyl) adhering to the slab be removed prior to the demolition in accordance with applicable federal and state regulations. In addition, if the scope of the demolition includes preparing the existing concrete slab for new construction and this action requires work procedures that could render the Category I non-friable ACM friable, such surface preparation work would have to be performed in accordance with applicable federal and state regulations. Category II Non-Friable ACM Category II non-friable asbestos-containing materials were identified at the building. Refer to Table I in Appendix B for each material location. Category II non-friable asbestos-containing materials must be assessed on a case-by-case basis as to their likelihood of becoming friable during renovation or demolition activities, taking into account the nature of the material and the anticipated method of disturbance. Materials such as transite (cement asbestos) products and brittle caulking or window glazing compounds are typically considered likely to become friable during renovation or demolition, and therefore are required by EPA to be removed prior to disturbance and disposed of as friable ACM. Other materials such as pliable or gummy caulks or mastics might be considered non-friable. Such Category II non-friable ACM need not be removed prior to demolition unless demolition will involve intentional burning, grinding, mechanically chipping, drilling, sand or bead blasting, explosive demolition or other methods which could mechanically powder the material or otherwise render it friable. In addition, building debris need not be disposed of as friable asbestos-containing waste material as long as the Category II ACM remains non-friable. However, the landfill operator shall be notified that the construction debris will contain non-friable asbestos-containing materials Asbestos Management Recommendations Terracon recommends a MDH certified asbestos Project Designer be retained to prepare a project specific specification for the management and/or abatement of ACM identified in this Survey Report, in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements. Additionally, the disposition of non-friable ACMs should be assessed by a Project Designer based on renovation or demolition plans, including specific considerations of potential for friability during renovation, demolition, and abatement, as well as disposal. Important: Supplemental inspection using destructive means is required by EPA and MPCA prior to renovation/demolition for space and locations not previously accessible for inspection and sampling, as identified in Section 6.0 in this Survey Report. Under OSHA and EPA regulations, any employee or contractor working in proximity to asbestos containing materials in the Buildings must be made aware of the asbestos inspection and its Responsive Resourceful Reliable 13

18 Asbestos, Lead, and Regulated Materials Survey County Road 21 Mazeppa, Minnesota January 27, 2017 Project No. MP limitations, and provided a copy of this Survey Report prior to commencing renovation/demolition activities. If previously inaccessible suspected ACM is discovered during renovation/demolition activities, disturbance work should immediately stop, until representative samples can be collected by a licensed asbestos building inspector and laboratory results are available to render a determination regarding asbestos content within the material discovered. 5.2 LEAD-BASED PAINT (LBP) SURVEY FINDINGS Terracon collected forty eight (48) XRF analysis readings of coated surfaces throughout the Property. The MPCA defines LBP as a coating with a lead concentration of 1.0 mg/cm 2 or greater by XRF reading, excluding steel structures, or 0.5 percent or 5,000 parts per million lead by weight when analyzed by Atomic Absorption analysis. However, when utilizing an XRF for steel structures, LBP is defined as a coating that contains lead concentration of 0.5 mg/cm 2 or greater. Please note; the XRF s PCS indicates and inconclusive range of mg/cm 2 and therefore all results greater than 0.6 mg/cm 2 are considered LBP. The following materials were identified as containing LBP: Lead-Based Paint Upstairs bathroom shower walls (ceramic tile) Upstairs bathroom tub (ceramic) Downstairs bathroom shower walls (ceramic tile) -- Refer to Figures 3-7 in Appendix A and Table III in Appendix B for additional information regarding the locations and results of the LBP test locations LBP Recommendations Terracon identified lead-coated surfaces on substrates although these substrates are unlikely to be used for beneficial reuse applications. The MPCA does not require known or potential lead paint to be encapsulated prior to demolition of a structure, regardless of whether it is firmly adhered to the substrate, as long as it is disposed as an integral part of the structure in a permitted solid waste landfill, including a demolition, industrial or mixed solid waste landfill. Additionally, Toxic Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP) testing is also not required by the MPCA provided debris is landfilled in a permitted solid waste landfill, as stated above. Beneficial reuse of materials containing LBP would require prior approval by the MPCA. Responsive Resourceful Reliable 14

19 Asbestos, Lead, and Regulated Materials Survey County Road 21 Mazeppa, Minnesota January 27, 2017 Project No. MP Please note that LBP may be present on other painted components of the Property. In accordance with OSHA regulations, sampling results (as available) should be provided to the contractor completing activities that will disturb any LBP or other coated surfaces potentially containing LBP so potential lead exposure assessment can be completed. Where lead is present, it should be assumed that workers will be exposed to lead above the action level and personal protective measures should be implemented until an exposure assessment is completed in accordance with OSHA regulation 29 CFR HAZARDOUS / UNIVERSAL WASTE SURVEY PCB-Containing Caulks, Sealants, and Coatings Terracon collected two (2) composite samples of suspect PCB containing caulk(s) from the building(s) that were analyzed by Pace. Brown window/seam caulk None Detected Brown corner beam caulk None Detected Terracon did not identify caulking containing PCBs during the Survey. Refer Appendix D for copies of the laboratory analytical reports for PCBs. Management and Disposal Considerations PCB-Containing Caulks, Sealants, and Coatings EPA has finalized a reinterpretation of its position regarding PCB contaminated building materials. The reinterpretation specifically addresses the definitions of bulk product waste (e.g., PCB contaminated caulk) and remediation waste (e.g., PCB contaminated materials). This distinction is important as it determines the appropriate cleanup requirements and disposal options. The reinterpretation allows building material (i.e., substrate) coated or serviced with PCB bulk product waste (e.g., caulk, mastics, sealants) at the time of disposal to be managed as a PCB bulk product waste, even if the PCBs have migrated from the overlying bulk product waste into the substrate. Therefore, the MPCA will allow, without testing, disposal of demolition debris that may contain PCBs in sealants and coatings, including mastics, sealers, waxes and manufactured rubber and plastic components, in any solid waste landfill permitted by the MPCA or another state, including a demolition, municipal solid waste, or industrial solid waste landfill. The MPCA considers caulks with PCB concentrations at or greater than 50 ppm, and that are removed from their substrate, as PCB remediation waste, in which case special handling and disposal is required and regulated under 40 CFR Responsive Resourceful Reliable 15

20 Asbestos, Lead, and Regulated Materials Survey County Road 21 Mazeppa, Minnesota January 27, 2017 Project No. MP Terracon recommends that all remediation waste we managed by trained and knowledgeable individual(s) in accordance with 40 CFR handling and disposal requirements. Please note; substrates may require additional investigation and testing is considered for beneficial reuse Metal-Containing Items Terracon identified thirty three (33) fluorescent light lamps of various sizes during the Survey. Four (4) mercury containing thermostats, and two (2) smoke detectors were also identified. Fluorescent light lamps and thermostats utilizing mercury switches contain mercury. Refer to Table II in Appendix B for additional information regarding the location and quantity of the above listed items. Management and Disposal Considerations Metal-Containing Items Prior to the start of demolition/renovation activities, fluorescent light bulbs are required to be removed undamaged and stored in an undamaged condition until they are reused or recycled in accordance with state and federal regulations. Devices that contain mercury switches that are required to be reused or removed and disposed of in accordance with state and federal regulations Ozone-Depleting Chemical (ODC) Containing Items Terracon identified items during the Survey that may contain ozone-depleting chemicals. Refer to Table II in Appendix B for additional information regarding the location and quantity of items containing ODCs. Management and Disposal Considerations ODC-Containing Items Items which contain ODCs must be removed and disposed of according with federal, state and local regulations prior to demolition. However, if these items are recycled or reused, this option may negate the need for an EPA Identification Number Miscellaneous Hazardous / Universal Waste Materials Terracon identified miscellaneous materials in the building(s) during the Survey that require special disposal, such as mechanical equipment, cleaning products, paint, and door closures. These materials are not accepted at demolition debris landfills and so require special disposal or recycling. Refer to Table II in Appendix B, for additional information regarding the description, location and quantity of these miscellaneous materials. Responsive Resourceful Reliable 16

21 Asbestos, Lead, and Regulated Materials Survey County Road 21 Mazeppa, Minnesota January 27, 2017 Project No. MP Management and Disposal Considerations Miscellaneous Hazardous / Universal Waste Terracon inventoried items and materials listed under Subpart 5 of Minnesota Rules Renovation and Demolition. These items and materials must be removed undamaged and stored in an undamaged condition until they are reused or recycled or disposed of in accordance with state and federal regulations. 6.0 LIMITATIONS / GENERAL COMMENTS The Survey was conducted utilizing limited destructive sampling techniques. Therefore, efforts were made to determine if multiple layers of materials were present (e.g., flooring), although limited to the extent of allowable access points with hand tools without affecting security, fire and life safety, slips, trips and/or fall hazards including unacceptable aesthetic or functional damage to building surfaces and materials, as per the judgment of the inspector at the time of the Survey. Therefore, suspect ACM may be present in concealed spaces, cavities, and plenums of the Building. Additional inspection by an accredited asbestos inspector is required by EPA prior to demolition or renovation that would impact such materials. The following general areas (not exclusive) could be concealing additional ACM: Well house interior (visibility limited due to junk storage) Functional Area(s) with Limited Access Inside Electrical Panels Functional Area(s) with No Access Beneath Foundations (waterproofing) Sub-grade Utilities and Soils This Survey was conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the same locale. The results, findings, conclusions and recommendations expressed in this report are based on conditions observed during our survey of the building. The information contained in this report is relevant to the date on which this survey was performed, and should not be relied upon to represent conditions at a later date. This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for use by Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for specific application to their project as discussed. This report is not a bidding document. Contractors or consultants reviewing this report must draw their own conclusions regarding further investigation or remediation deemed necessary. Terracon does not warrant the work of regulatory agencies, laboratories or other third parties supplying information which may have been used in the preparation of this report. No warranty, express or implied is made. Responsive Resourceful Reliable 17

22 APPENDIX A

23 APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION TOPOGRAPHIC MAP IMAGE COURTESY OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY QUADRANGLES INCLUDE: ORONOCO, MN (1/1/1980) and ZUMBRO LAKE, MN (1/1/1972). Project Manager: Project No. MJW Drawn by: SDC Checked by: MJW Approved by: MJW MP Scale: 1 =2,000 File Name: Fig 1 & 2 : 1/26/ th Ave N Plymouth, MN SITE LOCATION Exhibit MN DNR-Izaak Walton WMA County Road 21 Mazeppa, MN

24 SURVEY BUILDINGS DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES Project Manager: Project No. MJW Drawn by: SDC Checked by: MJW Approved by: MJW MP AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY MICROSOFT BING MAPS PROPERTY LAYOUT Exhibit MN DNR-Izaak Walton WMA 2 Scale: AS SHOWN File Name: Fig 1 & 2 : 1/26/ th Ave N Plymouth, MN County Road 21 Mazeppa, MN

25 DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES Project Manager: EMH Drawn by: EMH Checked by: EHL Approved by: EHL Project No. MP Scale: N.T.S. File Name: BPLAN : 1/13/ th Avenue North Minneapolis, Minnesota PH. (763) FAX. (763) SAMPLE LOCATION MAP Two Story Barn Izaak Walton Wilderness Management Area Mazeppa, MINNESOTA Figure 3

26 DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES Project Manager: EMH Drawn by: EMH Checked by: EHL Approved by: EHL Project No. MP Scale: N.T.S. File Name: BPLAN : 1/13/ th Avenue North Minneapolis, Minnesota PH. (763) FAX. (763) SAMPLE LOCATION MAP Chicken Coop with Attached Garage Izaak Walton Wilderness Management Area Mazeppa, MINNESOTA Figure 4

27 DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES Project Manager: EMH Drawn by: EMH Checked by: EHL Approved by: EHL Project No. MP Scale: N.T.S. File Name: BPLAN : 1/13/ th Avenue North Minneapolis, Minnesota PH. (763) FAX. (763) SAMPLE LOCATION MAP Hog Barn with Connected Shed Izaak Walton Wilderness Management Area Mazeppa, MINNESOTA Figure 5

28 DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES Project Manager: EMH Drawn by: EMH Checked by: EHL Approved by: EHL Project No. MP Scale: N.T.S. File Name: BPLAN : 1/13/ th Avenue North Minneapolis, Minnesota PH. (763) FAX. (763) SAMPLE LOCATION MAP House Upstairs and Exterior Izaak Walton Wilderness Management Area Mazeppa, MINNESOTA Figure 6

29 DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES Project Manager: EMH Drawn by: EMH Checked by: EHL Approved by: EHL Project No. MP Scale: N.T.S. File Name: BPLAN : 1/13/ th Avenue North Minneapolis, Minnesota PH. (763) FAX. (763) SAMPLE LOCATION MAP House Downstairs and Exterior Izaak Walton Wilderness Management Area Mazeppa, MINNESOTA Figure 7

30 APPENDIX B

31 Table I: Asbestos Assessment by Functional Space MN DNR-Izaak Walton WMA Mazeppa, MN 01/13/2017 Project No. MP Location/Functional Space Suspect Material Sample Number (HA-Code- Number) ACM RACM, Cat. I or Cat. II Non- Friable 1 Estimated Quantity Units Condition 2 Two-story Barn 1st level Sheetrock No -- 1,000 sqft D Entire building Backing paper on fiberglass batting ,3,4 No -- 2,500 sqft ND Chicken Coop with attached garage Coop no suspect materials noted Garage Backing paper on fiberglass batting ,6,7 No sqft ND Hog Barn with connected shed Hog barn Insulation in walls ,9,10 No sqft D Wall paneling No sqft D Roof Roof paper No sqft D Well House Interor no suspect materials noted (limited visibility due to junk storage) Exteror no suspect materials noted Roof Shingles and Paper No sqft ND Resident House Sheetrock and joint compound No sqft ND Kitchen Upstairs bedroom Upstairs hallway by bedroom Upstairs bathroom Patterned vinyl floor with adhesive Flooring Yes Adhesive No RACM 200 sqft ND Popcorn ceiling texture no sqft ND Sink undercoating Yes Cat. II NF 1 unit ND 12"x12" floor tile with mastic, Tile Yes wood pattern Mastic No Cat. I NF 250 sqft ND Popcorn ceiling texture Ref No sqft ND Sheetrock and joint compound Ref No sqft ND 12"x12" floor tile with mastic miscellaneous wood pattern No sqft ND Popcorn ceiling texture Ref No sqft ND Sheetrock and joint compound Ref No sqft ND 3"x3" ceramic wall tile, grout, and bedding No sqft ND Popcorn ceiling texture Ref No sqft ND Sheetrock and joint compound Ref No sqft ND Vinyl floor miscellaneous size with adhesive Flooring Yes Adhesive No RACM 50 sqft ND 1 Refer to Section 4.1 for regulatory classification 2 Refer to Section for Condition Information Responsive Resourceful Reliable Page 1 of 2

32 Table I: Asbestos Assessment by Functional Space MN DNR-Izaak Walton WMA Mazeppa, MN 01/13/2017 Project No. MP Location/Functional Space Living room Foyer Downstairs laundry room Downstairs bedroom west Downstairs bathroom Downstairs bedroom east Downstairs family room Suspect Material Sample Number (HA-Code- Number) ACM RACM, Cat. I or Cat. II Non- Friable 1 Estimated Quantity Units Condition 2 Patterned vinyl floor wood look under tonge and grove No sqft ND Popcorn ceiling texture No sqft ND Sheetrock and joint compound Ref No -- 1,000 sqft ND Vinyl floor rock pattern with adhesive Yes RACM 100 sqft ND Popcorn ceiling texture Ref No sqft ND Sheetrock and joint compound Ref No sqft ND Sheetrock and joint compound No sqft ND HVAC caulk No lnft ND 12"x12" floor tile, white rock Tile Yes pattern, with mastic Mastic No Cat. I NF 200 sqft ND Popcorn ceiling texture Ref No sqft ND Sheetrock and joint compound Ref No sqft ND Vinyl floor, yellow, with adhesive Yes RACM 80 sqft ND 3"x3" ceramic wall tile, grout, and bedding No sqft ND 1"x1" ceramic floor tile, grout, and bedding No sqft ND Popcorn ceiling texture Ref No sqft D Sheetrock and joint compound Ref No sqft ND 12"x12" floor tile, white rock Tile Yes Ref pattern, with mastic Mastic No Cat. I NF 200 sqft ND Popcorn ceiling texture No sqft D Sheetrock and joint compound Ref No sqft ND 12"x12" floor tile, white rock Tile Yes Ref pattern, with mastic Mastic No Cat. I NF 300 sqft ND Popcorn ceiling texture No sqft ND Sheetrock and joint compound Ref No sqft ND Attic Fiberglass backing No sqft ND Exterior Window caulk No lnft D Corner beam caulk No lnft ND Roof Shingles and Paper No sqft ND 1 Refer to Section 4.1 for regulatory classification 2 Refer to Section for Condition Information Responsive Resourceful Reliable Page 2 of 2

33 Table II: Hazardous/Universal Waste Survey MN DNR-Izaak Walton WMA Mazeppa, MN 01/13/2017 Project No. MP Location/Area Inventoried: Site Potential PCB-Containing Items Light Ballasts Transformers Capacitors Caulks (window caulk) Caulks (corner beam caulk) Other (describe) Metal-Containing Items Fluorescent Lamps, 4-foot or less Fluorescent Lamps, greater than 4-foot Compact Fluorescent Lights (CFLs) Light-Emitting Diode (LED) High-Intensity Discharge (HID) Neon Mercury Switch Thermostats Manometers Flame Sensors Control Switches Smoke Detectors Emergency Strobe Lights Motion Sensors Control Panels Computers/Servers Monitors - Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Monitors - Flat Panel Communication Panels Plumbing Vent Cap Sheet Lead Drain Plumbing Joint Packing Lead-Lined Walls/Doors Miscellaneous Electronic Items Other (describe) Quantity Units Items Containing Batteries Quantity Units 100 lnft 70 lnft ODC-Containing Items Quantity Units Quantity Units Air Conditioners/Heat Pumps 1 each 33 each 4 each 2 each Emergency Lighting Emergency Exit Signs Backup Power Supplies Automotive Style Other (describe) Window Air Conditioners Walk-in Coolers Water Fountains/Coolers Fire Extinguishers Refrigerators/Freezers/Vending Dehumidifiers Halon Fire Suppression Systems Other (describe) Miscellaneous Hazardous/Universal Wastes Door Closers Flammable Waste Traps Hydraulic Vehicle Lifts Hydraulic Elevators Storage Tanks (in-building) Automotive Fluids Paint (non-aerosol latex) Paint (non-aerosol oil) Paint (aerosol) Solvents Cleaning Chemicals Pesticides/Poisons Lawn and Garden Chemicals/Fertilizers Major Appliances 1 each Quantity Units 5 gallons Responsive Resourceful Reliable Page 1 of 1

34 Table III: Lead Analysis Results MN DNR-Izaak Walton WMA Mazeppa, MN 01/13/2017 Project No. MP Story Barn Location Building Component Sample Number Substrate Color Condition 4 Result Analysis (mg/cm 2 ) 3 LBP Yes/No Siding 1 Metal Red Intact 0.03 No Door frame 2 Wood White Damaged 0.00 No Door crossbeam 3 Wood Red Damaged 0.00 No Window frame 4 Plastic White Intact 0.00 No Interior Sheetrock 5 Sheetrock Yellow Intact 0.00 No Chicken coop with attached garage North siding 6 Wood Red Damaged 0.04 No Door frame 7 Wood White Damaged 0.00 No Door 8 Wood Red Damaged 0.07 No Corner post 9 Wood White Damaged 0.00 No East siding 10 Wood Red Intact 0.01 No Exterior Garage door 11 Wood White Damaged 0.00 No frame Garage door panel 12 Wood Red Damaged 0.04 No Garage door window frame 13 Wood White Damaged 0.00 No Hog barn with connected shed House Exterior Exterior First Floor Interior East siding 14 Wood Red Damaged 0.01 No East door 15 Wood Red Intact 0.00 No East door frame 16 Wood White Damaged 0.00 No North window frame 17 Wood White Intact 0.06 No North siding 18 Wood Red Damaged 0.11 No West door frame 19 Wood White Damaged 0.00 No W door 20 Wood Red Damaged 0.51 No Ramp railing 21 Wood Orange Damaged 0.00 No East siding 22 Wood Brown Intact 0.00 No East kitchen door frame 23 Wood Orange Damaged 0.00 No Notes: Quantity, Occurrence by Component with LBP Footnote descriptions are attached behind this table. Responsive Resourceful Reliable Page 1 of 4

35 Table III: Lead Analysis Results MN DNR-Izaak Walton WMA Mazeppa, MN 01/13/2017 Project No. MP Location First Floor Interior (cont'd) Exterior Second Floor Interior Building Component Sample Number Substrate Color Condition 4 Result Analysis (mg/cm 2 ) 3 LBP Yes/No East kitchen Light 24 Metal storm door Brown Intact 0.15 No East kitchen door 25 Metal White Intact 0.15 No East basement storm door 26 Metal Brown Intact 0.00 No East basement door frame 27 Wood Orange Damaged 0.00 No East basement door frame 28 Metal White Intact 0.00 No South siding 29 Wood Brown Intact 0.00 No South window frame 30 Metal White Intact 0.00 No West window frame 31 Metal White Intact 0.00 No North door frame 32 Wood Orange Damaged 0.05 No North door frame 33 Metal Brown Intact 0.00 No Kitchen wall 34 Sheetrock Green Intact 0.00 No Bathroom wall 35 Sheetrock Pink Intact 0.00 No Bathroom 36 Ceramic White Intact 2.12 Yes shower wall Bathroom tub 37 Ceramic White Intact >5.00 Yes Bathroom sink 38 Ceramic White Intact 0.00 No Bathroom wall 39 Sheetrock Green Intact 0.00 No Living room wall 40 Sheetrock Beige Intact 0.00 No Living room ceiling 41 Sheetrock White Intact 0.00 No Foyer wall 42 Sheetrock Beige Intact 0.00 No Downstairs living room wall 43 Sheetrock Orange Intact 0.00 No East bedroom wall 44 Sheetrock Pink Intact 0.00 No Notes: Quantity, Occurrence by Component with LBP Footnote descriptions are attached behind this table. Responsive Resourceful Reliable Page 2 of 4

36 Table III: Lead Analysis Results MN DNR-Izaak Walton WMA Mazeppa, MN 01/13/2017 Project No. MP Location Second Floor Interior (cont'd) Building Component Sample Number Substrate Color Condition 4 Result Analysis (mg/cm 2 ) 3 LBP Yes/No West bedroom wall 45 Sheetrock Orange Intact 0.00 No Bathroom Light 46 Ceramic shower wall Yellow Intact 4.15 Yes Bathroom Light 47 Ceramic shower floor Yellow Intact 0.03 No Bathroom wall 48 Sheetrock Pink Intact 0.00 No Notes: Quantity, Occurrence by Component with LBP Footnote descriptions are attached behind this table. Responsive Resourceful Reliable Page 3 of 4

37 Table III: Lead Analysis Results MN DNR-Izaak Walton WMA-Asbestos and Hazardous Materials Survey Mazeppa, MN 01/13/2017 Project No. MP FOOTNOTES: 1 XRF = X-Ray Fluorescence The Innov-X ά-4000 series, Serial No , is a field portable XRF multi-spectrum analyzer capable of identifying lead concentrations in paint. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) defines lead-based paint as a coating with a lead concentration of 1.0 mg/cm2 or greater by XRF readings. mg/cm 2 = milligrams per centimeter squared C = cracked, P = peeling, F = Flaking, or other description W = wood, C = cement, M = metal, S = sheetrock, V = vinyl N:\Projects\2016\MP167646\Working Files\DRAFTS (Proposal-Reports-Communications)\Survey Report\Appendix B tables\[tables I-III.xlsx]Table I Page 4 of 4

38 APPENDIX C

39 Pace Services, LLC 1800 Elm St. SE - Suite 1830 Minneapolis, MN (612) Mike Willey Terracon - Minneapolis th Avenue North Minneapolis, MN RE: MP Izaac Walton WMA Survey January 20, 2017 Work Order #: Page 1 of 12 Dear Mike Willey: Bulk Asbestos Analysis Report The microscopy department of Pace Services, LLC received your analytical request on January 17, The sample(s) were analyzed in the Pace Industrial Hygiene laboratory unless otherwise noted. The objective of this analysis was to determine the presence of asbestos using polarized light microscopy (PLM) and to determine the percent of asbestos and non-asbestos fibrous components by calibrated visual area estimation. results are summarized on the following laboratory report. Discussion None-detected floor tile results obtained by PLM analysis may contain thin asbestos fibers below the limits of resolution of the polarized light microscope. The EPA Method EPA/600/R-93/116 recommends the use of transmission electron microscopy to confirm the absence of asbestos. Methodology Bulk asbestos analysis is conducted in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) methods 40 CFR, Part 763, Ch. 1, Subpart F, Appendix A ( Edition) and EPA/600/R-93/116. All analyses are in compliance with the quality control procedures specified by the methods. All samples are examined for homogeneity. If a sample contains more than one layer, each layer is analyzed individually. Total fibrous content is calculated for joint compound/wallboard systems by combining layer results according to their percentages of the total sample. All routine quality assurance procedures were followed, unless otherwise noted. Remarks This test report relates only to the items submitted for analysis. Samples are retained at our laboratory for a period of 30 days and will be disposed of unless otherwise instructed by the client. This report can not be copied, except in its entirety, without prior written permission from Pace Services. We appreciate your decision to use Pace Services for this project. We are committed to being your vendor of choice to meet your analytical needs. If you have any questions please contact me at Sincerely, Michelle Pivec For Wyatt Dupay Analyst Wyatt Dupay Microscopist

40 Client: Terracon - Minneapolis Laboratory: Pace Services, LLC - IH Laboratory Reported: 1/20/2017 Log-In: 01/17/17 Lab Contact: Michelle Pivec For Wyatt Dupay Page 2 of 12 Client Reference: MP Izaac Walton WMA Survey PO Number: Client ID: Sample No: Brown fibrous ,11 Cellulose 80 None Detected 01/18/17 Client ID: Sample No: Insulation /18/17 Yellow fibrous (A) 90 None detected Glass Fibers 100 None Detected Brown paper (B) 10 3,7,14 Cellulose 75 Glass Fibers 15 None Detected Client ID: Sample No: Insulation /18/17 Yellow fibrous (A) 90 None detected Glass Fibers 100 None Detected Brown paper (B) 10 3,7,14 Cellulose 85 Glass Fibers 5 None Detected Client ID: Sample No: Insulation /18/17 Yellow fibrous (A) 80 None detected Glass Fibers 100 None Detected Brown paper (B) 20 3,7,14 Cellulose 80 Glass Fibers 10 None Detected Client ID: Sample No: Insulation /18/17 Pink fibrous (A) 20 None detected Glass Fibers 100 None Detected Black tar (B) 40 8 None Detected None Detected Brown paper (C) 40 3,7,14 Cellulose 96 None Detected Reports\RPT 19.04

41 Client: Terracon - Minneapolis Laboratory: Pace Services, LLC - IH Laboratory Reported: 1/20/2017 Log-In: 01/17/17 Lab Contact: Michelle Pivec For Wyatt Dupay Page 3 of 12 Client Reference: MP Izaac Walton WMA Survey PO Number: Client ID: Sample No: Insulation /18/17 Pink fibrous (A) 10 None detected Glass Fibers 100 None Detected Black tar (B) 40 8 None Detected None Detected Brown/red paper (C) 50 3 Cellulose 96 None Detected Client ID: Sample No: Insulation /18/17 Pink fibrous (A) 10 None detected Glass Fibers 100 None Detected Black tar (B) 40 8 None Detected None Detected Brown/red paper (C) 50 3,7,14 Cellulose 90 None Detected Client ID: Sample No: Brown paper ,3 Cellulose 96 None Detected 01/18/17 Client ID: Sample No: Brown paper ,3 Cellulose 96 None Detected 01/18/17 Client ID: Sample No: Brown paper ,3 Cellulose 96 None Detected 01/18/17 Reports\RPT 19.04

42 Client: Terracon - Minneapolis Laboratory: Pace Services, LLC - IH Laboratory Reported: 1/20/2017 Log-In: 01/17/17 Lab Contact: Michelle Pivec For Wyatt Dupay Page 4 of 12 Client Reference: MP Izaac Walton WMA Survey PO Number: Client ID: Sample No: Panel /18/17 Brown fibrous (A) 15 3,8 Cellulose 65 None Detected Black tar (B) 85 8 None Detected None Detected Client ID: Sample No: Black tar ,8 Cellulose 5 None Detected 01/18/17 Client ID: Sample No: Sheetrock ,3,11 Cellulose 41 None Detected 01/18/17 Brown paper (A) 40 3,11 Cellulose 96 None Detected White chalky (B) 60 1,3 Cellulose 5 None Detected Client ID: Sample No: Linoleum /18/17 Tan vinyl (A) 5 1,3,9 None Detected None Detected White fibrous (B) 90 1,3 None Detected Chrysotile 50 Yellow adhesive (C) 5 1,7 Cellulose <1 None Detected Client ID: Sample No: Black tarry ,8 None Detected Chrysotile 2 01/18/17 Reports\RPT 19.04

43 Client: Terracon - Minneapolis Laboratory: Pace Services, LLC - IH Laboratory Reported: 1/20/2017 Log-In: 01/17/17 Lab Contact: Michelle Pivec For Wyatt Dupay Page 5 of 12 Client Reference: MP Izaac Walton WMA Survey PO Number: Client ID: Sample No: Floor tile with adhesive /18/17 Brown floor tile (A) 99 1,3,9 None Detected Chrysotile 2 Yellow adhesive (B) 1 1,7 None Detected None Detected Client ID: Sample No: Floor tile with adhesive /18/17 Brown floor tile (A) 99 1,3,9 None Detected None Detected Yellow adhesive (B) 1 1,7 None Detected None Detected Client ID: Sample No: Ceramic tile /18/17 White ceramic tile (A) 95 1,3 None Detected None Detected Yellow adhesive (B) 5 1,7 None Detected None Detected Client ID: Sample No: Linoleum /18/17 Tan vinyl (A) 10 1,3,9 None Detected None Detected Gray fibrous backing (B) 80 1,3 Cellulose 5 Chrysotile 45 Yellow adhesive (C) 10 1,7 Cellulose 10 None Detected Client ID: Sample No: Floor tile with adhesive /18/17 Brown floor tile (A) 99 1,3,9 None Detected None Detected Yellow adhesive (B) 1 1,7 None Detected None Detected Reports\RPT 19.04

44 Client: Terracon - Minneapolis Laboratory: Pace Services, LLC - IH Laboratory Reported: 1/20/2017 Log-In: 01/17/17 Lab Contact: Michelle Pivec For Wyatt Dupay Page 6 of 12 Client Reference: MP Izaac Walton WMA Survey PO Number: Client ID: Sample No: Linoleum /18/17 Brown vinyl (A) 30 1,3,9 None Detected None Detected Gray fibrous backing with adhesive (B) 70 1,3,7 Cellulose 5 Chrysotile 45 Client ID: Sample No: White granular texture ,3,11 Cellulose <1 None Detected 01/18/17 Client ID: Sample No: White granular texture ,3,10,11 Cellulose <1 None Detected 01/18/17 Client ID: Sample No: Sheetrock ,3,11 Cellulose 18 None Detected 01/18/17 White powdery compound with paint (A) 15 1,3,11 None Detected None Detected Brown/white paper (B) 15 3 Cellulose 96 None Detected White chalky (C) 70 1,3 Cellulose 5 None Detected Client ID: Sample No: Floor tile with adhesive /18/17 Tan floor tile (A) 98 1,3,9 None Detected Chrysotile 3 Yellow adhesive (B) 2 1,7 None Detected None Detected Reports\RPT 19.04

45 Client: Terracon - Minneapolis Laboratory: Pace Services, LLC - IH Laboratory Reported: 1/20/2017 Log-In: 01/17/17 Lab Contact: Michelle Pivec For Wyatt Dupay Page 7 of 12 Client Reference: MP Izaac Walton WMA Survey PO Number: Client ID: Sample No: Linoleum /18/17 Tan vinyl (A) 30 1,3,9 None Detected None Detected White fibrous backing with adhesive (B) 70 1,3,7 None Detected Chrysotile 50 Client ID: Sample No: Ceramic tile /18/17 Tan ceramic tile (A) 85 1,3 None Detected None Detected Tan granular cementitous (B) 12 1,3 None Detected None Detected Brown adhesive (C) 3 1,7 None Detected None Detected Client ID: Sample No: Ceramic tile /18/17 Tan/gray ceramic tile (A) 95 1,3 None Detected None Detected White granular cementitious (B) 5 1,3 None Detected None Detected Client ID: Sample No: White granular texture ,3,6 Cellulose <1 None Detected 01/18/17 Client ID: Sample No: White granular texture ,3,6 Cellulose <1 None Detected 01/18/17 Reports\RPT 19.04

46 Client: Terracon - Minneapolis Laboratory: Pace Services, LLC - IH Laboratory Reported: 1/20/2017 Log-In: 01/17/17 Lab Contact: Michelle Pivec For Wyatt Dupay Page 8 of 12 Client Reference: MP Izaac Walton WMA Survey PO Number: Client ID: Sample No: Insulation /18/17 Pink fibrous (A) 40 None detected Glass Fibers 100 None Detected Black tar paper (B) 60 8 Cellulose 20 None Detected Client ID: Sample No: Insulation /18/17 Pink fibrous (A) 10 None detected Glass Fibers 100 None Detected Black tar (B) 40 8 None Detected None Detected Brown paper (C) 50 3 Cellulose 96 None Detected Client ID: Sample No: Insulation /18/17 Pink fibrous (A) 20 None detected Glass Fibers 100 None Detected Black tar (B) 40 8 None Detected None Detected Brown paper (C) 40 3 Cellulose 96 None Detected Client ID: Sample No: Roofing material /18/17 Black fibrous tarry with stones (A) 60 1,8 Glass Fibers 10 None Detected Black fibrous tarry with stones (B) 40 1,8 Glass Fibers 15 None Detected Client ID: Sample No: Brown/white caulk ,3,7 None Detected None Detected 01/18/17 Reports\RPT 19.04

47 Client: Terracon - Minneapolis Laboratory: Pace Services, LLC - IH Laboratory Reported: 1/20/2017 Log-In: 01/17/17 Lab Contact: Michelle Pivec For Wyatt Dupay Page 9 of 12 Client Reference: MP Izaac Walton WMA Survey PO Number: Client ID: Sample No: Brown/white caulk ,3,7 None Detected None Detected 01/18/17 Client ID: Sample No: Tan adhesive ,7 None Detected None Detected 01/18/17 < Less Than > Greater Than Footnotes and Definitions * Key to Components 1 = Rock/Mineral fragments 5 = Diatoms 9 = Vinyl 13 = Spores/Pollen 2 = Mica/Vermiculite 6 = Perlite 10 = Foam/Rubber 14 = Foil 3 = Binders 7 = Adhesive/Mastic 11 = Paint 4 = Opaques 8 = Tar 12 = Other Reports\RPT 19.04

48 Client: Terracon - Minneapolis Laboratory: Pace Services, LLC - IH Laboratory Reported: 1/20/2017 Log-In: 01/17/17 Lab Contact: Michelle Pivec For Wyatt Dupay Page 10 of 12 Client Reference: MP Izaac Walton WMA Survey PO Number: Reports\RPT 19.04

49 Client: Terracon - Minneapolis Laboratory: Pace Services, LLC - IH Laboratory Reported: 1/20/2017 Log-In: 01/17/17 Lab Contact: Michelle Pivec For Wyatt Dupay Page 11 of 12 Client Reference: MP Izaac Walton WMA Survey PO Number: Reports\RPT 19.04

50 Client: Terracon - Minneapolis Laboratory: Pace Services, LLC - IH Laboratory Reported: 1/20/2017 Log-In: 01/17/17 Lab Contact: Michelle Pivec For Wyatt Dupay Page 12 of 12 Client Reference: MP Izaac Walton WMA Survey PO Number: Reports\RPT 19.04

51 APPENDIX D

52 #=CL# Pace Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN (612) LIMS USE: FR - MIKE WILLEY LIMS OBJECT ID: January 20, 2017 Mike Willey Terracon / Liesch th Ave S Plymouth, MN RE: Project: MP Izaac Walton WMA Surv Pace Project No.: Dear Mike Willey: Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on January 13, The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the most current, applicable TNI/NELAC standards and the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual, where applicable, unless otherwise noted in the body of the report. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Amanda Albrecht amanda.albrecht@pacelabs.com Project Manager Enclosures REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Services, LLC. Page 1 of 11

53 #=CP# Pace Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN (612) CERTIFICATIONS Project: Pace Project No.: MP Izaac Walton WMA Surv Minnesota Certification IDs 1700 Elm Street SE Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN Alaska Certification UST N 8th Street, Salina, KS A2LA Certification #: Alaska Certification #: UST-078 Alaska Certification #MN00064 Alabama Certification #40770 Arizona Certification #: AZ-0014 Arkansas Certification #: California Certification #: 01155CA Colorado Certification #Pace Connecticut Certification #: PH-0256 EPA Region 8 Certification #: 8TMS-L Florida/NELAP Certification #: E87605 Guam Certification #:14-008r Georgia Certification #: 959 Georgia EPD #: Pace Idaho Certification #: MN00064 Hawaii Certification #MN00064 Illinois Certification #: Indiana Certification#C-MN-01 Iowa Certification #: 368 Kansas Certification #: E Kentucky Dept of Envi. Protection - DW #90062 Kentucky Dept of Envi. Protection - WW #:90062 Louisiana DEQ Certification #: 3086 Louisiana DHH #: LA Maine Certification #: Maryland Certification #: 322 Michigan DEPH Certification #: 9909 Minnesota Certification #: Mississippi Certification #: Pace Montana Certification #: MT0092 Nevada Certification #: MN_00064 Nebraska Certification #: Pace New Jersey Certification #: MN-002 New York Certification #: North Carolina Certification #: 530 North Carolina State Public Health #: North Dakota Certification #: R-036 Ohio EPA #: 4150 Ohio VAP Certification #: CL101 Oklahoma Certification #: 9507 Oregon Certification #: MN Oregon Certification #: MN Pennsylvania Certification #: Puerto Rico Certification Saipan (CNMI) #:MP0003 South Carolina #: Texas Certification #: T Tennessee Certification #: Utah Certification #: MN Virginia DGS Certification #: 251 Virginia/VELAP Certification #: Pace Washington Certification #: C486 West Virginia Certification #: 382 West Virginia DHHR #:9952C Wisconsin Certification #: REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Services, LLC. Page 2 of 11

54 #=SS# Pace Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN (612) SAMPLE SUMMARY Project: Pace Project No.: MP Izaac Walton WMA Surv Lab ID Sample ID Matrix Collected Received Other 01/13/17 00:00 01/13/17 16: Other 01/13/17 00:00 01/13/17 16:24 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Services, LLC. Page 3 of 11

55 #=SA# Pace Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN (612) SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT Project: Pace Project No.: MP Izaac Walton WMA Surv Lab ID Sample ID Method Analysts Analytes Reported EPA 8082A SNG EPA 8082A SNG 11 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Services, LLC. Page 4 of 11

56 #=AR# Pace Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN (612) ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: MP Izaac Walton WMA Surv Pace Project No.: Sample: Lab ID: Collected: 01/13/17 00:00 Received: 01/13/17 16:24 Matrix: Other Results reported on a "wet-weight" basis Report Parameters Results Units Limit MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8082A GCS PCB Method: EPA 8082A Preparation Method: EPA 3546 PCB-1016 (Aroclor 1016) ND ug/kg /18/17 12:48 01/19/17 16: PCB-1221 (Aroclor 1221) ND ug/kg /18/17 12:48 01/19/17 16: PCB-1232 (Aroclor 1232) ND ug/kg /18/17 12:48 01/19/17 16: PCB-1242 (Aroclor 1242) ND ug/kg /18/17 12:48 01/19/17 16: PCB-1248 (Aroclor 1248) ND ug/kg /18/17 12:48 01/19/17 16: PCB-1254 (Aroclor 1254) ND ug/kg /18/17 12:48 01/19/17 16: PCB-1260 (Aroclor 1260) ND ug/kg /18/17 12:48 01/19/17 16: PCB-1262 (Aroclor 1262) ND ug/kg /18/17 12:48 01/19/17 16: PCB-1268 (Aroclor 1268) ND ug/kg /18/17 12:48 01/19/17 16: Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (S) 85 % /18/17 12:48 01/19/17 16: Decachlorobiphenyl (S) 96 % /18/17 12:48 01/19/17 16: REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS : 01/20/ :59 PM This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Services, LLC. Page 5 of 11

57 #=AR# Pace Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN (612) ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: MP Izaac Walton WMA Surv Pace Project No.: Sample: Lab ID: Collected: 01/13/17 00:00 Received: 01/13/17 16:24 Matrix: Other Results reported on a "wet-weight" basis Report Parameters Results Units Limit MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8082A GCS PCB Method: EPA 8082A Preparation Method: EPA 3546 PCB-1016 (Aroclor 1016) ND ug/kg /18/17 12:48 01/19/17 17: PCB-1221 (Aroclor 1221) ND ug/kg /18/17 12:48 01/19/17 17: PCB-1232 (Aroclor 1232) ND ug/kg /18/17 12:48 01/19/17 17: PCB-1242 (Aroclor 1242) ND ug/kg /18/17 12:48 01/19/17 17: PCB-1248 (Aroclor 1248) ND ug/kg /18/17 12:48 01/19/17 17: PCB-1254 (Aroclor 1254) ND ug/kg /18/17 12:48 01/19/17 17: PCB-1260 (Aroclor 1260) ND ug/kg /18/17 12:48 01/19/17 17: PCB-1262 (Aroclor 1262) ND ug/kg /18/17 12:48 01/19/17 17: PCB-1268 (Aroclor 1268) ND ug/kg /18/17 12:48 01/19/17 17: Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (S) 85 % /18/17 12:48 01/19/17 17: Decachlorobiphenyl (S) 98 % /18/17 12:48 01/19/17 17: REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS : 01/20/ :59 PM This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Services, LLC. Page 6 of 11

58 #=QC# Pace Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN (612) QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: Pace Project No.: MP Izaac Walton WMA Surv QC Batch: QC Batch Method: EPA 3546 Associated Lab Samples: , Analysis Method: Analysis : EPA 8082A 8082A GCS PCB METHOD BLANK: Associated Lab Samples: , Parameter Units Blank Result Matrix: Solid Reporting Limit MDL Analyzed PCB-1016 (Aroclor 1016) ug/kg ND /19/17 16:17 PCB-1221 (Aroclor 1221) ug/kg ND /19/17 16:17 PCB-1232 (Aroclor 1232) ug/kg ND /19/17 16:17 PCB-1242 (Aroclor 1242) ug/kg ND /19/17 16:17 PCB-1248 (Aroclor 1248) ug/kg ND /19/17 16:17 PCB-1254 (Aroclor 1254) ug/kg ND /19/17 16:17 PCB-1260 (Aroclor 1260) ug/kg ND /19/17 16:17 PCB-1262 (Aroclor 1262) ug/kg ND /19/17 16:17 PCB-1268 (Aroclor 1268) ug/kg ND /19/17 16:17 Decachlorobiphenyl (S) % /19/17 16:17 Tetrachloro-m-xylene (S) % /19/17 16:17 Qualifiers LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE & LCSD: Parameter Units Spike Conc LCS LCSD Result Result LCS LCSD % Rec % Rec % Rec Limits RPD PCB-1016 (Aroclor 1016) ug/kg PCB-1260 (Aroclor 1260) ug/kg Decachlorobiphenyl (S) % Tetrachloro-m-xylene (S) % Max RPD Qualifiers Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS : 01/20/ :59 PM This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Services, LLC. Page 7 of 11

59 #=QL# Pace Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN (612) QUALIFIERS Project: Pace Project No.: MP Izaac Walton WMA Surv DEFINITIONS DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to dilution of the sample aliquot. ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit. J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit. MDL - Adjusted Method Detection Limit. PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit. RL - Reporting Limit. S - Surrogate 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine decomposes to and cannot be separated from Azobenzene using Method The result for each analyte is a combined concentration. Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values. LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate) MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate) DUP - Sample Duplicate RPD - Relative Percent Difference NC - Not Calculable. SG - Silica Gel - Clean-Up U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected. N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method The result reported for each analyte is a combined concentration. Pace is TNI accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes. TNI - The NELAC Institute. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS : 01/20/ :59 PM This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Services, LLC. Page 8 of 11

60 #=CR# Pace Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN (612) QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE Project: Pace Project No.: MP Izaac Walton WMA Surv Lab ID Sample ID QC Batch Method QC Batch Method Batch EPA EPA 8082A EPA EPA 8082A REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS : 01/20/ :59 PM This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Services, LLC. Page 9 of 11

61 Page 10 of 11

62 1/17/17 AA1 Temp Ok for caulk 1/17/17 Page 11 of 11

63 APPENDIX E

64