Gerald Desmond Bridge. Design-Build Industry Workshop August 10, 2010

Transcription

1 Gerald Desmond Bridge Design-Build Industry Workshop August 10, 2010

2 Aug. 10 Workshop Questions? Or call

3 Agenda Introduction and Purpose Scope of Work Budget & Funding Schedule Technical Information RFQ RFP Question and Answers

4 Douglas A. Thiessen Managing Director, Engineering Port of Long Beach

5 Introduction Project history EIR certification and approved alternative NEPA update Adjacent Port facilities Ownership transfer to State

6 Project Location Project Limits Bridge

7 Gerald Desmond Bridge 42 years old Carries 15% of all U.S. waterborne container cargo Low Sufficiency Rating Replacement warranted when a bridge s rating is less than 50 GDB 2007 rating was 43 (after bridge was seismically retrofitted)

8 Current Bridge 8

9 Project Objectives Meet Caltrans geometric and seismic standards 100-year life Signature span Improve safety Reduce traffic hazards Improve traffic volume Improve vessel passage and safety under the bridge

10 Project Limits

11 Status of Design Plan About 25% complete, including: Cable stay main span High and low level approaches Right of way Utility relocations Roadways and site civil Aesthetics

12 Scope of Design-Build Contract Project-related utility relocations Foundations East and West interchanges (inc. lowlevel approaches, some related demolition and clearing) High level approaches Cable stay main span

13 Scope of Work (cont.) Work not included in design-build contract: Major long lead time and some third party utility relocations Tidelands oil field work (abandonments, re-drilling, oil field pipeline relocations) Demolition and clearing of existing bridge, approaches and other items

14 Project Features Main Bridge High Level Approaches Low Level Approaches PARSONS HNTB

15 Design-Build Costs Design-Build Costs Amount (Millions) Cable-Stayed Bridge $ 240 High-Level Approaches $ 215 Low-Level Approaches $ 210 Interchanges / Roadway $ 70 Utilities $ 10 Demolition (by contractor) $ 5 Total Design-Build Costs $ 750

16 Remaining Port Costs Remaining Port Costs Amount (Millions) Program Management / Construction Management $ 95* Utilities and ROW $ 90 Other $ 15 Total Remaining Port Costs $ 200 Total Project Costs $ 950 *(deducted the design costs on previous slide)

17 Coordination Required Other major nearby projects (ongoing): a. Middle Harbor Redevelopment b. Ocean Blvd Rail Improvements c. Heim Bridge Replacement (Caltrans/ACTA) d. I-710 Improvement (Metro) EIR

18 Eric Shen Director, Transportation Planning Port of Long Beach

19 Committed Funding Sources Description of Committed Grants Amount (Millions) Federal Highway Bridge Program (prior to FY10) $ 10.0 FederalSAFETEA-LU $ 90.0 Federal Appropriation (prior to FY09) $ 6.1 Federal Highway Bridge Program $ State Prop. 1B Trade Corridor Improvement Funds (TCIF) $ State SHOPP (Programmed in 4/2010) $ 49.8 Los Angeles County Call for Projects (2007 and 2009) $ 28.6 Total Committed Grants $ 636.4

20 Total Funding Plan Summary of Current Funding Plan Amount (Millions) Total Committed Grants $ Local Match and EstimatedGap Covered by Port Funds $ Other Public Funding Sources Being Pursued $ Proposed Project Funding $ 950.0

21 Schedule Aug. 9, 2010 Sept Nov Nov Dec Dec April 2011 EIR certified RFQ Release Receipt of SOQs Anticipated CTC Approval of D/B authority under Design-Build Demonstration Program Anticipated NEPA approval; prequalification of proposers based on SOQs Draft RFP

22 Schedule (cont.) April 2011 June 2011 Fall 2011 Late 2011 Caltrans/FHWA review and approval of final RFP Release final RFP to prequalified proposers Proposals due Selection of best value proposal

23 SemyonTreyger Greg Orsolini Bridge Design Managers, Parsons/HTNB

24 Proposed Structure Preliminary bridge typeselection Cable-stayed bridge (2,000 ft. long) Single-mast towers Shear links Composite deck Approach viaducts with 270 ft. max. spans Foundation types and locations

25 Main Span Bridge Layout Elevation PARSONS HNTB

26 Main Span Towers PARSONS HNTB

27 Main Span Typical Section Typical Section PARSONS HNTB

28 Approach Viaducts Minimum Width Section Maximum Width Section Plan and Elevation PARSONS HNTB

29 Technical Requirements To be completed by Parsons/HNTB JV prior to RFP: Bridge type selection Project-specific design criteria Seismic ground motions

30 Technical Requirements (cont.) Caltrans standard specifications as modified to reflect the design-build approach Design-Build contractor responsible for obtaining design-approval (required as a result of deviations from the selected Bridge Type). Details in RFP Design-Build contractor responsible for ROW and Utility relocations (required as a result of deviations from the concept design alignment and foundation layout). Details in RFP

31 Technical Data Available Phase I Initial Site Assessment March 2003 Phase II Contamination sampling Prior to final RFP Preliminary Geotech Report 2005 Final Geotechnical Report Prior to final RFP Potholing information Prior to final RFP Indicator Pile Program Prior to final RFP

32 Patrick Harder Nossaman, LLP

33 Procurement Jointly procured with Caltrans Two-step process (dates in schedule slides) Step 1 - Request for Qualifications RFQ released Receipt of Statements of Qualification Prequalify teams based on technical design, construction experience, labor force availability, other non-price factors

34 Procurement (cont.) Step 2 Request for Proposals Release draft RFP to prequalified proposers Industry review Review draft procurement/contract documents Meetings with proposers Release final RFP Submission of Proposals Selection of best value proposal Port considering payments to unsuccessful proposers for work product (proposals and ATCs)

35 Conflict of Interest Port developing Conflict of Interest Policy Will be attached to RFQ Current Port consultants generally prohibited from participating on a proposer team Policy will describe process to request exceptions for certain consultants Likely no exceptions for Port consultants developing contract documents or providing procurement services

36 Questions and Answers Project Website: