ENERGY AUDIT REPORT. (Photo From Google Maps) City of Kenai Airport 305 North Willow Kenai, Alaska CAEC Project No. CIRI-ENA-CAEC-04 May 2012
|
|
- Linda Horn
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ENERGY AUDIT REPORT (Photo From Google Maps) City of Kenai Airport 305 North Willow Kenai, Alaska CAEC Project No. CIRI-ENA-CAEC-04 May 2012 SUBMITTED BY: PRIMARY CONTACT: 220 SE 51 st Street Lakefront Drive Issaquah, WA Soldotna, Alaska Phone (425) Fax (425) Phone (907) Fax (907) CONTACT: Andrew Waymire, C.E.M. CONTACT: Jerry P. Herring, P.E., C.E.A.
2 REPORT DISCLAIMER Privacy The information contained within this report, including any attachment(s), was produced under contract to Alaska Housing Finance Corporation (AHFC). IGAs are the property of the State of Alaska, and may be incorporated into AkWarm-C, the Alaska Retrofit Information System (ARIS), or other state and/or public information systems. AkWarm-C is a building energy modeling software developed under contract by AHFC. This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number DE- EE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Limitations of Study This energy audit is intended to identify and recommend potential areas of energy savings, estimate the value of the savings, and provide an opinion of the costs to implement the recommendations. This audit meets the criteria of a Level 2 Investment Grade Audit (IGA) per the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, Air-conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) and the Association of Energy Engineers (AEE), and is valid for one year. The life of the IGA may be extended on a case-by-case basis, at the discretion of AHFC. In preparing this report, the preparers acted with the standard of care prevalent in this region for this type of work. All results are dependent on the quality of input data provided. Not all data could be verified and no destructive testing or investigations were undertaken. Some data may have been incomplete. This report is not intended to be a final design document. Any modifications or changes made to a building to realize the savings must be designed and implemented by licensed, experienced professionals in their fields. Lighting upgrades should undergo a thorough lighting analysis to assure that the upgrades will comply with State of Alaska Statutes as well as Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) recommendations. All liabilities for upgrades, including but not limited to safety, design, and performance are incumbent upon the professional(s) who prepare the design. Siemens Industry, Inc (SII) and Central Alaska Engineering Company (CAEC) bear no responsibility for work performed as a result of this report. Financial ratios may vary from those forecasted due to the uncertainty of the final installed design, configuration, equipment selected, installation costs, related additional work, or the operating schedules and maintenance provided by the owner. Furthermore, many ECMs are interactive, so implementation of one ECM may impact the performance of another ECM. SII and CAEC accept no liability for financial loss due to ECMs that fail to meet the forecasted financial ratios.
3 The economic analyses for the ECMs relating to lighting improvements are based solely on energy savings. Additional benefits may be realized in reduced maintenance cost, deferred maintenance, and improved lighting quality. The new generation lighting systems have significantly longer life leading to long term labor savings, especially in high areas like Gyms and exterior parking lots. Lighting upgrades displace re-lamping costs for any fixtures whose lamps would otherwise be nearing the end of their lifecycle. This reduces maintenance costs for 3- years after the upgrade. An overall improvement in lighting quality, quantified by numerous studies, improves the performance of students and workers in the built environment. New lighting systems can be designed to address all of the above benefits.
4 Table of Contents REPORT DISCLAIMER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AUDIT AND ANALYSIS BACKGROUND Kenai Airport Terminal ENERGY COST SAVING MEASURES...21 Appendix A Major Equipment List...29 Appendix B Partial Lighting Inventory...30 Appendix C REAL Utility Data...31
5 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report was prepared for the City of Kenai using ARRA funds as part of a contract for: City of Kenai Contact: Rick R. Koch 2 Fidalgo Avenue P.O. Box 120 Kenai, Alaska Anchorage, Alaska 995 Alaska Housing Finance Corporation Contact: Rebekah Luhrs Phone (907) Phone (907) rkoch@ci.kenai.ak.us rluhrs@ahfc.us The scope of the audit focused on Kenai Airport Terminal. The scope of this report is a comprehensive energy study, which included an analysis of building shell, interior and exterior lighting systems, HVAC systems, and plug loads. Based on electricity and fuel oil prices in effect at the time of the audit, the annual predicted energy costs for the buildings analyzed are as follows: $93,650 for Electricity $35,532 for Natural Gas The total energy costs are $129,182 per year. Table 1.1 below summarizes the energy efficiency measures analyzed for the Kenai Airport Terminal. Listed are the estimates of the annual savings, installed costs, and two different financial measures of investment return. Table 1.1 PRIORITY LIST ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES Rank Feature Improvement Description Annual Energy Savings Installed Cost Savings to Investment Ratio, SIR 1 Simple Payback (Years) 2 1 Lighting: Main Replace with 2 FLUOR CFL, $57 $ terminal lobby A Lamp 15W TOTAL, cost-effective measures $57 $ The following measures were not found to be cost-effective: $120 $ Lighting: Main terminal lobby Replace with 2 FLUOR (4) T8 4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver Instant StdElectronic 3 HVAC And DHW Condensing Gas Boilers, Hydronic Flush $7,438 $134, AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 5 of 37
6 Table 1.1 PRIORITY LIST ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES Rank Feature Improvement Description 4 Lighting: Main Replace with LED (4) terminal lobby 17W Module StdElectronic 5 Lighting: Main Replace with 2 FLUOR (2) T8 terminal lobby 4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver Instant StdElectronic 6 Lighting: Exterior Replace with 26 LED 150W fixtures Module StdElectronic 7 Lighting: Main Replace with 2 LED (2) 17W terminal lobby Module StdElectronic 8 Lighting: Main Replace with 17 LED 17W terminal lobby Module StdElectronic 9 Lighting: Offices, luggage Lighting: Offices, luggage 11 Lighting: Main terminal lobby 12 Lighting: Exterior fixtures 13 Lighting: Exterior fixtures 14 Lighting: Offices, luggage 15 Setback Thermostat: Airport Terminal 16 Lighting: Main terminal lobby 17 Lighting: Main terminal lobby Replace with 22 FLUOR (4) T8 4' F32T8 25W Energy- Saver Instant StdElectronic Replace with 6 FLUOR (4) T8 4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver Program StdElectronic Replace with 5 FLUOR (2) T8 4' F32T8 28W Energy-Saver Instant StdElectronic Replace with 19 LED 60W Module StdElectronic Replace with 5 LED 72W Module StdElectronic Replace with 38 FLUOR (2) T8 4' F32T8 25W Energy- Saver Instant StdElectronic Implement a Heating Temperature Unoccupied Setback to 62.0 deg F for the Airport Terminal space. Replace with 31 FLUOR T8 4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver Instant StdElectronic Replace with 507 FLUOR T8 4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver Instant StdElectronic Annual Energy Savings Installed Cost Savings to Investment Ratio, SIR 1 Simple Payback (Years) 2 $704 $5, $71 $ $2,751 $30, $57 $1, $443 $8, $356 $7, $97 $2, $76 $1, $976 $30, $180 $6, $308 $13, $1,302 $129, $126 $11, $2,048 $180, TOTAL, all measures $17,111 $564, Table Notes: 1 Savings to Investment Ratio (SIR) is a life cycle cost measure calculated by dividing the total savings over the life of a project (expressed in today s dollars) by its investment costs. The SIR is an indication of the profitability of a measure; the higher the SIR, the more profitable the project. An SIR greater than 1.0 indicates a cost effective project (i.e. more savings than cost). Remember that this profitability is based on the position of that Energy Efficiency Measure (EEM) in the overall list and assumes that the measures above it are implemented first. 2 Simple Payback (SP) is a measure of the length of time required for the savings from an EEM to payback the investment cost, not counting interest on the investment and any future changes in energy prices. It is calculated by dividing the investment cost by the expected first year savings of the EEM. AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 6 of 37
7 With all of these energy efficiency measures in place, the annual utility cost can be reduced by $17,111 per year, or 13.2% of the buildings total energy costs. These measures are estimated to cost $564,858, for an overall simple payback period of 33.0 years. If only the cost effective measures are implemented, the annual utility cost can be reduced by $57 per year, or 0.0% of the buildings total energy costs. These measures are estimated to cost $255, for an overall simple payback period of 4.5 years. Table 1.2 below is a breakdown of the annual energy cost across various energy end use types, such as Space Heating and Water Heating. The first row in the table shows the breakdown for the building as it is now. The second row shows the expected breakdown of energy cost for the building assuming all of the retrofits in this report are implemented. Finally, the last row shows the annual energy savings that will be achieved from the retrofits. Description Space Heating Space Cooling Water Heating Lighting Existing Building $65,05 6 $2,628 $570 $39,73 8 With All $62,11 $2,277 $316 $25,72 Proposed 9 8 Retrofits SAVINGS $2,936 $351 $255 $14,01 0 Table 1.2 Annual Energy Cost Estimate Refrigera tion Other Electrical Cooking Clothes Drying Ventilatio n Fans Service Fees Total Cost $0 $14,342 $0 $0 $3,734 $3,113 $129,182 $0 $14,691 $0 $0 $3,826 $3,113 $112,070 $0 $350 $0 $0 $91 $0 $17,111 AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 7 of 37
8 2. AUDIT AND ANALYSIS BACKGROUND 2.1 Program Description This audit included services to identify, develop, and evaluate energy efficiency measures at the Kenai Airport Terminal. The scope of this project included evaluating building shell, lighting and other electrical systems, and HVAC equipment, motors and pumps. Measures were analyzed based on life cycle cost techniques, which include the initial cost of the equipment, life of the equipment, annual energy cost, annual maintenance cost, and a discount rate of 3.0%/year in excess of general inflation. 2.2 Audit Description Preliminary audit information was gathered in preparation for the site survey. The site survey provides critical information in deciphering where energy is used and what opportunities exist within a building. The entire site was surveyed to inventory the following to gain an understanding of how each building operates: Building envelope (roof, windows, etc.) Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning equipment (HVAC) Lighting systems and controls Building specific equipment Water consumption, treatment (optional) & disposal The building site visit was performed to survey all major building components and systems. The site visit included detailed inspection of energy consuming components. Summary of building occupancy schedules, operating and maintenance practices, and energy management programs provided by the building manager were collected along with the system and components to determine a more accurate impact on energy consumption. Details collected from Kenai Airport Terminal enable a model of the building s energy usage to be developed, highlighting the building s total energy consumption, energy consumption by specific building component, and equivalent energy cost. The analysis involves distinguishing the different fuels used on site, and analyzing their consumption in different activity areas of the building. Kenai Airport Terminal is classified as being made up of the following activity areas: 1) Airport Terminal: 26,2 square feet In addition, the methodology involves taking into account a wide range of factors specific to the building. These factors are used in the construction of the model of energy used. The factors include: Occupancy hours AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 8 of 37
9 Local climate conditions Prices paid for energy 2.3. Method of Analysis Data collected was processed using AkWarm Energy Use Software to estimate energy savings for each of the proposed energy efficiency measures (EEMs). The recommendations focus on the building envelope; HVAC; lighting, plug load, and other electrical improvements; and motor and pump systems that will reduce annual energy consumption. EEMs are evaluated based on building use and processes, local climate conditions, building construction type, function, operational schedule, existing conditions, and foreseen future plans. Energy savings are calculated based on industry standard methods and engineering estimations. Our analysis provides a number of tools for assessing the cost effectiveness of various improvement options. These tools utilize Life Cycle Costing, which is defined in this context as a method of cost analysis that estimates the total cost of a project over the period of time that includes both the construction cost and ongoing maintenance and operating costs. Savings to Investment Ratio (SIR) = Savings divided by Investment Savings includes the total discounted dollar savings considered over the life of the improvement. When these savings are added up, changes in future fuel prices as projected by the Department of Energy are included. Future savings are discounted to the present to account for the time value of money (i.e. money s ability to earn interest over time). The Investment in the SIR calculation includes the labor and materials required to install the measure. An SIR value of at least 1.0 indicates that the project is cost effective total savings exceed the investment costs. Simple payback is a cost analysis method whereby the investment cost of a project is divided by the first year s savings of the project to give the number of years required to recover the cost of the investment. This may be compared to the expected time before replacement of the system or component will be required. For example, if a boiler costs $12,000 and results in a savings of $1,000 in the first year, the payback time is 12 years. If the boiler has an expected life to replacement of years, it would not be financially viable to make the investment since the payback period of 12 years is greater than the project life. The Simple Payback calculation does not consider likely increases in future annual savings due to energy price increases. As an offsetting simplification, simple payback does not consider the need to earn interest on the investment (i.e. it does not consider the time value of money). Because of these simplifications, the SIR figure is considered to be a better financial investment indicator than the Simple Payback measure. Measures are implemented in order of cost effectiveness. The program first calculates individual SIRs, and ranks all measures by SIR, higher SIRs at the top of the list. An individual measure must have an individual SIR>=1 to make the cut. Next the building is modified and resimulated with the highest ranked measure included. Now all remaining measures are re AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 9 of 37
10 evaluated and ranked, and the next most cost effective measure is implemented. AkWarm goes through this iterative process until all appropriate measures have been evaluated and installed. It is important to note that the savings for each recommendation is calculated based on implementing the most cost effective measure first, and then cycling through the list to find the next most cost effective measure. Implementation of more than one EEM often affects the savings of other EEMs. The savings may in some cases be relatively higher if an individual EEM is implemented in lieu of multiple recommended EEMs. For example implementing a reduced operating schedule for inefficient lighting will result in relatively high savings. Implementing a reduced operating schedule for newly installed efficient lighting will result in lower relative savings, because the efficient lighting system uses less energy during each hour of operation. If multiple EEM s are recommended to be implemented, AkWarm calculates the combined savings appropriately. Cost savings are calculated based on estimated initial costs for each measure. Installation costs include labor and equipment to estimate the full up front investment required to implement a change. Costs are derived from Means Cost Data, industry publications, and local contractors and equipment suppliers. 2.4 Limitations of Study All results are dependent on the quality of input data provided, and can only act as an approximation. In some instances, several methods may achieve the identified savings. This report is not intended as a final design document. The design professional or other persons following the recommendations shall accept responsibility and liability for the results. AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page of 37
11 3. Kenai Airport Terminal 3.1. Building Description (Photo From Google Maps) The 26,2 square foot Kenai Airport Terminal was constructed in 1968, with a normal occupancy of 200 people. The number of hours of operation for this building average 21 hours per day, considering all seven days of the week. Description of Heating and Cooling Plants The Heating Plants used in the building are: Burnham, Power Flame Burner Nameplate Information: Burnham Corporation Boiler MN Vg06A SN Fuel Type: Natural Gas Input Rating: 1,0,000 BTU/hr Steady State Efficiency: 65 % Idle Loss: 1.5 % Heat Distribution Type: Water Boiler Operation: All Year Electric Ceiling Heater Fuel Type: Electricity Input Rating: 0 BTU/hr Steady State Efficiency: 90 % Idle Loss: 1.5 % Heat Distribution Type: Air Gas Firing for H&V Unit Fuel Type: Natural Gas Input Rating: 850,000 BTU/hr Steady State Efficiency: 85 % Idle Loss: 1.5 % Heat Distribution Type: Air AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 11 of 37
12 Electric Heating for DHW Heaters Fuel Type: Electricity Input Rating: 0 BTU/hr Steady State Efficiency: 90 % Idle Loss: 1.5 % Heat Distribution Type: Water Boiler Operation: All Year RTU Gas heating #1 Fuel Type: Natural Gas Input Rating: 130,000 BTU/hr Steady State Efficiency: 75 % Idle Loss: 1.5 % Heat Distribution Type: Air RTU Gas heating #2 Fuel Type: Natural Gas Input Rating: 125,000 BTU/hr Steady State Efficiency: 75 % Idle Loss: 1.5 % Heat Distribution Type: Air RTU Gas Heating #3 Fuel Type: Natural Gas Input Rating: 125,000 BTU/hr Steady State Efficiency: 75 % Idle Loss: 1.5 % Heat Distribution Type: Air RTU Gas Heating #4 Fuel Type: Natural Gas Input Rating: 130,000 BTU/hr Steady State Efficiency: 75 % Idle Loss: 1.5 % Heat Distribution Type: Air RTU Gas Heating #5 Fuel Type: Natural Gas Input Rating: 125,000 BTU/hr Steady State Efficiency: 75 % Idle Loss: 1.5 % Heat Distribution Type: Air AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 12 of 37
13 The Cooling Plants used in the building are: RTU DX Coil 1 Cooling Capacity: 5.0 Tons Cooling Distribution Type: Air kw/ton Efficiency 1.40 RTU DX Coil 2 Cooling Capacity: 3.0 Tons Cooling Distribution Type: Air kw/ton Efficiency 1.40 RTU DX Coil 3 Cooling Capacity: 5.0 Tons Cooling Distribution Type: Air kw/ton Efficiency 1.40 RTU DX Coil 4 Cooling Capacity: 5.0 Tons Cooling Distribution Type: Air kw/ton Efficiency 1.40 RTU DX Coil 5 Cooling Capacity: 2.0 Tons Cooling Distribution Type: Air kw/ton Efficiency 1.40 Space Heating and Cooling Distribution Systems Hot water from the boiler is circulated to unit heaters and convectors. The five roof top units and the Heating and Ventilation unit each have their own heating units. There is also an electric ceiling heater. For cooling, roof top units utilize DX cooling coils. Domestic Hot Water System Domestic water is created by the main heating boilers via a heat exchanger located in the domestic water tank. A dedicated fractional horsepower circulating pump moves water from the primary heating loop into the domestic water heat exchanger. Description of Building Ventilation System The existing building ventilation system consists of a heating and ventilation unit as well as five roof top units. Each rooftop unit has a heating unit and DX cooling coil. Four exhaust fans serve the building. AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 13 of 37
14 Lighting Most of the interior lighting is provided by 4foot 32W T8 fixtures. A variety of incandescent bulbs can be replaced by compact fluorescents. Exterior lighting consists of metal halide and high pressure sodium fixtures. These present good retrofit opportunities. Major Equipment The equipment list, available in Appendix A, is composed of major energy consuming equipment which through energy conservation measures could yield substantial energy savings. The list shows the major equipment in the building and pertinent information utilized in energy savings calculations. 3.2 Predicted Energy Use Energy Usage / Tariffs The electric usage profile charts (below) represents the predicted electrical usage for the building. If actual electricity usage records were available, the model used to predict usage was calibrated to approximately match actual usage. The electric utility measures consumption in kilowatt hours (kwh) and maximum demand in kilowatts (kw). One kwh usage is equivalent to 1,000 watts running for one hour. One KW of electric demand is equivalent to 1,000 watts running at a particular moment. The basic usage charges are shown as generation service and delivery charges along with several non utility generation charges. The natural gas usage profile shows the predicted natural gas energy usage for the building. If actual gas usage records were available, the model used to predict usage was calibrated to approximately match actual usage. Natural gas is sold to the customer in units of 0 cubic feet (CCF), which contains approximately 0,000 BTUs of energy. The propane usage profile shows the propane usage for the building. Propane is sold by the gallon or by the pound, and its energy value is approximately 91,800 BTUs per gallon. The fuel oil usage profile shows the fuel oil usage for the building. Fuel oil consumption is measured in gallons. One gallon of #1 Fuel Oil provides approximately 132,000 BTUs of energy. The following is a list of the utility companies providing energy to the building and the class of service provided: Electricity: Homer Electric Assn (Homer) Commercial Lg Natural Gas: Enstar Natural Gas Commercial Lg AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 14 of 37
15 The average cost for each type of fuel used in this building is shown below in Table 3.1. This figure includes all surcharges, subsidies, and utility customer charges: Table 3.1 Average Energy Cost Description Average Energy Cost Electricity $ /kWh Natural Gas $ 0.71/ccf Total Energy Use and Cost Breakdown At current rates, the city of Kenai pays approximately $128,276 annually for electricity and other fuel costs for the Kenai Airport Terminal. Figure 3.1 below reflects the estimated distribution of costs across the primary end uses of energy based on the AkWarm computer simulation. Comparing the Retrofit bar in the figure to the Existing bar shows the potential savings from implementing all of the energy efficiency measures shown in this report. Figure 3.1 Annual Energy Costs by End Use Figure 3.2 below shows how the annual energy cost of the building splits between the different fuels used by the building. The Existing bar shows the breakdown for the building as it is now; the Retrofit bar shows the predicted costs if all of the energy efficiency measures in this report are implemented. AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 15 of 37
16 Figure 3.2 Annual Energy Costs by Fuel Type Figure 3.3 below addresses only Space Heating costs. The figure shows how each heat loss component contributes to those costs; for example, the figure shows how much annual space heating cost is caused by the heat loss through the Walls/Doors. For each component, the space heating cost for the Existing building is shown (blue bar) and the space heating cost assuming all retrofits are implemented (yellow bar) are shown. Figure 3.3 Annual Space Heating Cost by Component Annual Space Heating Cost by Component Air Ceiling Window Wall/Door Floor $0 $,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 Existing Retrofit The tables below show AkWarm s estimate of the monthly fuel use for each of the fuels used in the building. For each fuel, the fuel use is broken down across the energy end uses. Note, in the tables below DHW refers to Domestic Hot Water heating. AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 16 of 37
17 Electrical Consumption (kwh) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Lighting Other_Electrical Ventilation_Fans DHW Space_Heating Space_Cooling Natural Gas Consumption (ccf) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec DHW Space_Heating AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 17 of 37
18 3.2.2 Energy Use Index (EUI) Energy Use Index (EUI) is a measure of a building s annual energy utilization per square foot of building. This calculation is completed by converting all utility usage consumed by a building for one year, to British Thermal Units (Btu) or kbtu, and dividing this number by the building square footage. EUI is a good measure of a building s energy use and is utilized regularly for comparison of energy performance for similar building types. The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Buildings Technology Center under a contract with the U.S. Department of Energy maintains a Benchmarking Building Energy Performance Program. The ORNL website determines how a building s energy use compares with similar facilities throughout the U.S. and in a specific region or state. Source use differs from site usage when comparing a building s energy consumption with the national average. Site energy use is the energy consumed by the building at the building site only. Source energy use includes the site energy use as well as all of the losses to create and distribute the energy to the building. Source energy represents the total amount of raw fuel that is required to operate the building. It incorporates all transmission, delivery, and production losses, which allows for a complete assessment of energy efficiency in a building. The type of utility purchased has a substantial impact on the source energy use of a building. The EPA has determined that source energy is the most comparable unit for evaluation purposes and overall global impact. Both the site and source EUI ratings for the building are provided to understand and compare the differences in energy use. The site and source EUIs for this building are calculated as follows. (See Table 3.4 for details): Building Site EUI = (Electric Usage in kbtu + Gas Usage in kbtu + similar for other fuels) Building Square Footage Building Source EUI = (Electric Usage in kbtu X SS Ratio + Gas Usage in kbtu X SS Ratio + similar for other fuels) Building Square Footage where SS Ratio is the Source Energy to Site Energy ratio for the particular fuel. Table 3.4 Kenai Airport Terminal EUI Calculations Energy Type Building Fuel Use per Year Site Energy Use per Year, kbtu Source/Site Ratio Source Energy Use per Year, kbtu Electricity 666,634 kwh 2,275, ,599,246 Natural Gas 53,601 ccf 5,360, ,612,045 Total 7,635,342 13,211,291 BUILDING AREA 26,2 Square Feet BUILDING SITE EUI 293 kbtu/ft²/yr BUILDING SOURCE EUI 506 kbtu/ft²/yr * Site Source Ratio data is provided by the Energy Star Performance Rating Methodology for Incorporating Source Energy Use document issued March AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 18 of 37
19 3.3 AkWarm Building Simulation An accurate model of the building performance can be created by simulating the thermal performance of the walls, roof, windows and floors of the building. The HVAC system and central plant are modeled as well, accounting for the outside air ventilation required by the building and the heat recovery equipment in place. The model uses local weather data and is trued up to historical energy use to ensure its accuracy. The model can be used now and in the future to measure the utility bill impact of all types of energy projects, including improving building insulation, modifying glazing, changing air handler schedules, increasing heat recovery, installing high efficiency boilers, using variable air volume air handlers, adjusting outside air ventilation and adding cogeneration systems. For the purposes of this study, the Kenai Airport Terminal was modeled using AkWarm energy use software to establish a baseline space heating and cooling energy usage. Climate data from Kenai was used for analysis. From this, the model was be calibrated to predict the impact of theoretical energy savings measures. Once annual energy savings from a particular measure were predicted and the initial capital cost was estimated, payback scenarios were approximated. Equipment cost estimate calculations are provided in Appendix C. Limitations of AkWarm Models The model is based on typical mean year weather data for Kenai. This data represents the average ambient weather profile as observed over approximately 30 years. As such, the gas and electric profiles generated will not likely compare perfectly with actual energy billing information from any single year. This is especially true for years with extreme warm or cold periods, or even years with unexpectedly moderate weather. AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 19 of 37
20 Figure 3.4 Difference in Weather Data Kenai, AK Weather Data Actual Dry Bulb (F) TMY3 Dry Bulb (F) Dry Bulb Temperature (F) /25/20 /14/20 12/3/20 1/22/20 3/13/20 5/2/20 6/21/20 8//20 9/29/20 11/18/20 1/7/2011 Date The heating and cooling load model is a simple two zone model consisting of the building s core interior spaces and the building s perimeter spaces. This simplified approach loses accuracy for buildings that have large variations in cooling/heating loads across different parts of the building. The model does not model HVAC systems that simultaneously provide both heating and cooling to the same building space (typically done as a means of providing temperature control in the space). The energy balances shown in Section 3.1 were derived from the output generated by the AkWarm simulations. AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 20 of 37
21 4. ENERGY COST SAVING MEASURES 4.1 Summary of Results The energy saving measures are summarized in Table 4.1. Please refer to the individual measure descriptions later in this report for more detail. Calculations and cost estimates for analyzed measures are provided in Appendix C. Table 4.1 Kenai Airport Terminal, Kenai, Alaska PRIORITY LIST ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES Rank Feature Improvement Description Annual Energy Savings Installed Cost Savings to Investment Ratio, SIR Simple Payback (Years) 1 Lighting: Main Replace with 2 FLUOR CFL, $57 $ terminal lobby A Lamp 15W TOTAL, cost-effective measures $57 $ The following measures were not found to be cost-effective: $120 $ Lighting: Main terminal lobby Replace with 2 FLUOR (4) T8 4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver Instant StdElectronic 3 HVAC And DHW Condensing Gas Boilers, Hydronic Flush 4 Lighting: Main Replace with LED (4) terminal lobby 17W Module StdElectronic 5 Lighting: Main Replace with 2 FLUOR (2) T8 terminal lobby 4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver Instant StdElectronic 6 Lighting: Exterior Replace with 26 LED 150W fixtures Module StdElectronic 7 Lighting: Main Replace with 2 LED (2) 17W terminal lobby Module StdElectronic 8 Lighting: Main Replace with 17 LED 17W terminal lobby Module StdElectronic 9 Lighting: Offices, luggage Lighting: Offices, luggage 11 Lighting: Main terminal lobby 12 Lighting: Exterior fixtures 13 Lighting: Exterior fixtures 14 Lighting: Offices, luggage 15 Setback Thermostat: Airport Terminal Replace with 22 FLUOR (4) T8 4' F32T8 25W Energy- Saver Instant StdElectronic Replace with 6 FLUOR (4) T8 4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver Program StdElectronic Replace with 5 FLUOR (2) T8 4' F32T8 28W Energy-Saver Instant StdElectronic Replace with 19 LED 60W Module StdElectronic Replace with 5 LED 72W Module StdElectronic Replace with 38 FLUOR (2) T8 4' F32T8 25W Energy- Saver Instant StdElectronic Implement a Heating Temperature Unoccupied Setback to 62.0 deg F for the Airport Terminal space. $7,438 $134, $704 $5, $71 $ $2,751 $30, $57 $1, $443 $8, $356 $7, $97 $2, $76 $1, $976 $30, $180 $6, $308 $13, $1,302 $129, AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 21 of 37
22 Table 4.1 Kenai Airport Terminal, Kenai, Alaska PRIORITY LIST ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES Rank Feature Improvement Description 16 Lighting: Main Replace with 31 FLUOR T8 4' terminal lobby F32T8 25W Energy-Saver Instant StdElectronic 17 Lighting: Main terminal lobby Replace with 507 FLUOR T8 4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver Instant StdElectronic Annual Energy Savings Installed Cost Savings to Investment Ratio, SIR Simple Payback (Years) $126 $11, $2,048 $180, TOTAL, all measures $17,111 $564, Interactive Effects of Projects The savings for a particular measure are calculated assuming all recommended EEMs coming before that measure in the list are implemented. If some EEMs are not implemented, savings for the remaining EEMs will be affected. For example, if ceiling insulation is not added, then savings from a project to replace the heating system will be increased, because the heating system for the building supplies a larger load. In general, all projects are evaluated sequentially so energy savings associated with one EEM would not also be attributed to another EEM. By modeling the recommended project sequentially, the analysis accounts for interactive affects among the EEMs and does not double count savings. Interior lighting, plug loads, facility equipment, and occupants generate heat within the building. When the building is in cooling mode, these items contribute to the overall cooling demands of the building; therefore, lighting efficiency improvements will reduce cooling requirements in air conditioned buildings. Conversely, lighting efficiency improvements are anticipated to slightly increase heating requirements. Heating penalties and cooling benefits were included in the lighting project analysis. AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 22 of 37
23 4.3 Building Shell Measures No building shell improvements are recommended at this time. Primarily Envelope Measures such as windows, doors, weather stripping, and insulation are only considered cost effective if there is a visible deficiency which is noted during the audit. However it is recommended that any time the facility replaces doors or windows that it uses a replacement with a high efficiency rating. Also when renovating or constructing additions to the facility a energy cost analysis should be taken when determining if a material with a greater R value should be used instead of that of the code requirements Insulation Measures (There were no improvements in this category) Window Measures (There were no improvements in this category) Door Measures (There were no improvements in this category) Air Sealing Measures (There were no improvements in this category) AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 23 of 37
24 4.4 Mechanical Equipment Measures Heating/Cooling/Domestic Hot Water Measure Rank Recommendation 3 Condensing Gas Boilers, Hydronic Flush Installation Cost $134,198 Estimated Life of Measure (yrs) 20 Energy Savings (/yr) $8,047 Breakeven Cost $128,335 Savings to Investment Ratio 1.0 Simple Payback yrs 17 Auditors Notes: The existing Burnham boiler is fully operational but operates at a low efficiency. It is recommended that it be replaced with new high efficiency condensing gas boilers. AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 24 of 37
25 4.4.3 Night Setback Thermostat Measures Rank Building Space Recommendation 15 Airport Terminal Implement a Heating Temperature Unoccupied Setback to 62.0 deg F for the Airport Terminal space. Installation Cost $129,943 Estimated Life of Measure (yrs) 15 Energy Savings (/yr) $1,417 Breakeven Cost $17,786 Savings to Investment Ratio 0.1 Simple Payback yrs 92 Auditors Notes: Setting back the zone temperature to 62degF during unoccupied hours will provide generous heating savings. 4.5 Electrical & Appliance Measures Lighting Measures The goal of this section is to present any lighting energy conservation measures that may also be cost beneficial. It should be noted that replacing current bulbs with more energy efficient equivalents will have a small effect on the building heating and cooling loads. The building cooling load will see a small decrease from an upgrade to more efficient bulbs and the heating load will see a small increase, as the more energy efficient bulbs give off less heat a Lighting Measures Replace Existing Fixtures/Bulbs Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation 17 Main terminal lobby 507 FLUOR T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching Replace with 507 FLUOR T8 4' F32T8 25W Energy Saver Instant StdElectronic Installation Cost $180,644 Estimated Life of Measure (yrs) 7 Energy Savings (/yr) $2,039 Breakeven Cost $12,941 Savings to Investment Ratio 0.1 Simple Payback yrs 89 Auditors Notes: Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation 16 Main terminal lobby 31 FLUOR T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching Replace with 31 FLUOR T8 4' F32T8 25W Energy Saver Instant StdElectronic Installation Cost $11,045 Estimated Life of Measure (yrs) 7 Energy Savings (/yr) $125 Breakeven Cost $793 Savings to Investment Ratio 0.1 Simple Payback yrs 88 Auditors Notes: AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 25 of 37
26 Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation 14 Offices, luggage 38 FLUOR (2) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching Replace with 38 FLUOR (2) T8 4' F32T8 25W Energy Saver Instant StdElectronic Installation Cost $13,539 Estimated Life of Measure (yrs) 7 Energy Savings (/yr) $306 Breakeven Cost $1,944 Savings to Investment Ratio 0.1 Simple Payback yrs 44 Auditors Notes: Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation 13 Exterior fixtures 5 HPS 150 Watt Magnetic with Manual Switching Replace with 5 LED 72W Module StdElectronic Installation Cost $6,8 Estimated Life of Measure (yrs) 7 Energy Savings (/yr) $180 Breakeven Cost $1,140 Savings to Investment Ratio 0.2 Simple Payback yrs 34 Auditors Notes: Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation 12 Exterior fixtures 19 MH 175 Watt Magnetic with Manual Switching Replace with 19 LED 60W Module StdElectronic Installation Cost $30,540 Estimated Life of Measure (yrs) 7 Energy Savings (/yr) $975 Breakeven Cost $6,182 Savings to Investment Ratio 0.2 Simple Payback yrs 31 Auditors Notes: Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation 11 Main terminal lobby 5 FLUOR (2) T12 4' F40T12 34W Energy Saver EfficMagnetic with Manual Switching Replace with 5 FLUOR (2) T8 4' F32T8 28W Energy Saver Instant StdElectronic Installation Cost $1,782 Estimated Life of Measure (yrs) 7 Energy Savings (/yr) $75 Breakeven Cost $479 Savings to Investment Ratio 0.3 Simple Payback yrs 24 Auditors Notes: Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation Offices, luggage 22 FLUOR (4) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching Replace with 22 FLUOR (4) T8 4' F32T8 25W Energy Saver Instant StdElectronic Installation Cost $7,839 Estimated Life of Measure (yrs) 7 Energy Savings (/yr) $356 Breakeven Cost $2,257 Savings to Investment Ratio 0.3 Simple Payback yrs 22 Auditors Notes: AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 26 of 37
27 Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation 9 Offices, luggage 6 FLUOR (4) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard Program StdElectronic with Manual Switching Replace with 6 FLUOR (4) T8 4' F32T8 25W Energy Saver Program StdElectronic Installation Cost $2,138 Estimated Life of Measure (yrs) 7 Energy Savings (/yr) $97 Breakeven Cost $616 Savings to Investment Ratio 0.3 Simple Payback yrs 22 Auditors Notes: Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation 8 Main terminal lobby 17 INCAN A Lamp, Halogen 60W with Manual Switching Replace with 17 LED 17W Module StdElectronic Installation Cost $8,653 Estimated Life of Measure (yrs) 7 Energy Savings (/yr) $443 Breakeven Cost $2,8 Savings to Investment Ratio 0.3 Simple Payback yrs 20 Auditors Notes: Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation 7 Main terminal lobby 2 FLUOR (2) T12 4' F40T12 40W Standard Magnetic with Manual Switching Replace with 2 LED (2) 17W Module StdElectronic Installation Cost $1,018 Estimated Life of Measure (yrs) 7 Energy Savings (/yr) $57 Breakeven Cost $362 Savings to Investment Ratio 0.4 Simple Payback yrs 18 Auditors Notes: Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation 6 Exterior fixtures 26 HPS 400 Watt Magnetic with Manual Switching Replace with 26 LED 150W Module StdElectronic Installation Cost $30,540 Estimated Life of Measure (yrs) 7 Energy Savings (/yr) $2,734 Breakeven Cost $17,328 Savings to Investment Ratio 0.6 Simple Payback yrs 11 Auditors Notes: Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation 5 Main terminal lobby 2 FLUOR (2) T12 4' F40T12 40W Standard Magnetic with Manual Switching Replace with 2 FLUOR (2) T8 4' F32T8 25W Energy Saver Instant StdElectronic Installation Cost $764 Estimated Life of Measure (yrs) 7 Energy Savings (/yr) $70 Breakeven Cost $446 Savings to Investment Ratio 0.6 Simple Payback yrs 11 Auditors Notes: AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 27 of 37
28 Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation 4 Main terminal lobby FLUOR (4) T12 4' F40T12 40W Standard Magnetic with Manual Switching Replace with LED (4) 17W Module StdElectronic Installation Cost $5,0 Estimated Life of Measure (yrs) 7 Energy Savings (/yr) $698 Breakeven Cost $4,427 Savings to Investment Ratio 0.9 Simple Payback yrs 7 Auditors Notes: Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation 2 Main terminal lobby 2 FLUOR (4) T12 4' F40T12 40W Standard Magnetic with Manual Switching Replace with 2 FLUOR (4) T8 4' F32T8 25W Energy Saver Instant StdElectronic Installation Cost $764 Estimated Life of Measure (yrs) 7 Energy Savings (/yr) $118 Breakeven Cost $746 Savings to Investment Ratio 1.0 Simple Payback yrs 6 Auditors Notes: Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation 1 Main terminal lobby 2 INCAN A Lamp, Halogen 60W with Manual Switching Replace with 2 FLUOR CFL, A Lamp 15W Installation Cost $255 Estimated Life of Measure (yrs) 7 Energy Savings (/yr) $56 Breakeven Cost $354 Savings to Investment Ratio 1.4 Simple Payback yrs 5 Auditors Notes: AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 28 of 37
29 Appendix A Major Equipment List MAJOR EQUIPMENT INVENTORY Tag Location Function Make Model Type Capacity (input) Efficiency Motor Ashrae Service Life Nat Gas Boiler 1 Mech Room Bldg Heat Burnham Vg06A Hot water 1,0,000 BTUH 65% est n/a 20 Unit Heater 1 Bldg Heat Trane 186-S Hot Water 3 MBH 80% est.25 hp 20 Unit Heater 2 Bldg Heat Trane 126-S Hot Water 70 MBH 80% est.25 hp 20 Ceiling Heater Bldg Heat Chromalox CHX-144 Elec 660Watt 85% est 660Watt 20 Circulating Pump Mech Room Bldg Heat Grundfos UMS 5080 Centrifugal 25gpm 80% est.5 hp 20 Cabinet Unit Heater 1 Bldg Heat B-Morris K-82 Hot Water 8 MBH 80% est.25 hp 20 Cabinet Unit Heater 2 Bldg Heat Trane EX46A004 Hot Water 31 MBH 80% est.25 hp 20 Convector Bldg Heat Vulcan FSI 212 Hot Water 750 BTU-FT 80% est 20 H&V Unit Roof Heat/Ventilation Mammoth 261 MZ axial 12000cfm 95% est 7.5 hp 20 RTU 1 Roof HVAC Trane axial 85% est.5 hp 20 RTU 2 Roof HVAC Trane axial 85% est.5 hp 20 RTU 3 Roof HVAC Modine axial 85% est.5 hp 20 RTU 4 Roof HVAC Modine axial 85% est.5 hp 20 RTU 5 Roof HVAC Octagon axial 85% est.5 hp 20 Exh Fan 1 Roof Ventilation Mammoth 261 In line 6000cfm 85% est 1.5hp Exh Fan 2 Roof Ventilation Penn LB24 In line 3950cfm 85% est.75hp Exh Fan 3 Roof Ventilation Penn Z-8 In line 145cfm 85% est 0Watt Exh Fan 4 Roof Ventilation Penn Z- In line 245cfm 85% est.25hp Estimated Remaining Life Notes AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 29 of 37
30 Appendix B Partial Lighting Inventory LIGHTING INVENTORY Location T8 32W Incan 60W T12 40W MH 175W HPS 150W HPS 400W Total Offices, Luggage Main Terminal Lobby Exterior Grand Total AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 30 of 37
31 Appendix C REAL Utility Data REAL Preliminary Benchmark Data Form PART I FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Owner Facility Owned By Date City of Kenai Municipal 03/07/11 Building Name/ Identifier Building Usage Building Square Footage Kenai Airport Terminal Public Order and Safety 26,2 Building Type Community Population Year Built Mixed 7, Facility Address Facility City Facility Zip 305 N. Willow Kenai Contact Person First Name Last Name Middle Name Phone Rick Koch Mailing Address City State Zip 2 Fidalgo Ave Kenai AK Primary Operating Hours Average # of Occupants During Monday Saturday Sunday Holidays Friday Renovations Date Details 1983 Unknown 1989 Unknown PART II ENERGY SOURCES 1. Please check every energy source you use in the table below. If known, please enter the base rate you pay for the energy source. 2. Provide utilities bills for the most recent two year period for each energy source you use. Heating Oil Electricity Natural Gas Propane Wood Coal $ /gallon $ / kwh $ / CCF $ / gal $ / cord $ / ton x x Other energy sources? None AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 31 of 37
32 Kenai Airport Terminal Buiding Size Input (sf) = 26,2 20 Natural Gas Consumption (Therms) 50, Natural Gas Cost ($) 50, Electric Consumption (kwh) 7, Electric Cost ($) 120, Oil Consumption (Therms) 20 Oil Cost ($) 20 Propane Consumption (Therms) 20 Propane Cost ($) 20 Coal Consumption (Therms) 20 Coal Cost ($) 20 Wood Consumption (Therms) 20 Wood Cost ($) 20 Thermal Consumption (Therms) 20 Thermal Cost ($) 20 Steam Consumption (Therms) 20 Steam Cost ($) 20 Total Energy Use (kbtu) 7,446,3 20 Total Energy Cost ($) 170,276 Annual Energy Use Intensity (EUI) 20 Natural Gas (kbtu/sf) Electricity (kbtu/sf) Oil (kbtu/sf) 20 Propane (kbtu/sf) 20 Coal (kbtu/sf) 20 Wood (kbtu/sf) 20 Thermal (kbtu/sf) 20 Steam (kbtu/sf) 20 Energy Utilization Index (kbtu/sf) Annual Energy Cost Index (ECI) 20 Natural Gas Cost Index ($/sf) Electric Cost Index ($/sf) Oil Cost Index ($/sf) 20 Propane Cost Index ($/sf) 20 Coal Cost Index ($/sf) 20 Wood Cost Index ($/sf) 20 Thermal Cost Index ($/sf) 20 Steam Cost Index ($/sf) 20 Energy Cost Index ($/sf) 6.53 AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 32 of 37
33 20 Natural Gas Consumption (Therms) 50, Natural Gas Cost ($) 44, Electric Consumption (kwh) 712, Electric Cost ($) 97, Oil Consumption (Therms) 20 Oil Cost ($) 20 Propane Consumption (Therms) 20 Propane Cost ($) 20 Coal Consumption (Therms) 20 Coal Cost ($) 20 Wood Consumption (Therms) 20 Wood Cost ($) 20 Thermal Consumption (Therms) 20 Thermal Cost ($) 20 Steam Consumption (Therms) 20 Steam Cost ($) 20 Total Energy Use (kbtu) 7,445, Total Energy Cost ($) 141,514 Annual Energy Use Intensity (EUI) 20 Natural Gas (kbtu/sf) Electricity (kbtu/sf) Oil (kbtu/sf) 20 Propane (kbtu/sf) 20 Coal (kbtu/sf) 20 Wood (kbtu/sf) 20 Thermal (kbtu/sf) 20 Steam (kbtu/sf) 20 Energy Utilization Index (kbtu/sf) Annual Energy Cost Index (ECI) 20 Natural Gas Cost Index ($/sf) Electric Cost Index ($/sf) Oil Cost Index ($/sf) 20 Propane Cost Index ($/sf) 20 Coal Cost Index ($/sf) 20 Wood Cost Index ($/sf) 20 Thermal Cost Index ($/sf) 20 Steam Cost Index ($/sf) 200 Energy Cost Index ($/sf) 5.42 Note: 1 kwh = 3,413 Btu's 1 Therm = 0,000 Btu's 1 CF 1,000 Btu's AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 33 of 37
34 Energy Audit Draft Report Kenai Airport Terminal Natural Gas Btus/CCF = 0,000 Provider Customer # Month Start Date End Date Billing Days Consumption (CCF) Consumption (Therms) Demand Use Natural Gas Cost ($) Unit Cost ($/Therm) Demand Cost ($) Enstar NGC Nov 08 11/6/ /4/ ,017 $4,964 $0.82 Enstar NGC Dec 08 12/5/2008 1/5/ ,076 $7,156 $1.01 Enstar NGC Jan 1/6/20 2/5/ ,874 $6,954 $1.01 Enstar NGC Feb 2/6/20 3/5/ ,173 $8,255 $1.01 Enstar NGC Mar 3/6/20 4/2/ ,640 $6,719 $1.01 Enstar NGC Apr 4/3/20 5/7/ ,624 $3,696 $1.02 Enstar NGC May 5/8/20 6/11/ ,367 $2,436 $1.03 Enstar NGC Jun 6/12/20 7/6/ ,697 $1,766 $1.04 Enstar NGC Jul 7/7/20 8/6/ ,600 $1,669 $1.04 Enstar NGC Aug 8/7/20 9/4/ ,4 $1,477 $1.05 Enstar NGC Sep 9/5/20 /8/ ,953 $2,023 $1.04 Enstar NGC Oct /9/20 11/5/ ,824 $2,897 $1.03 Enstar NGC Nov 11/6/20 12/3/ ,471 $6,555 $1.01 Enstar NGC Dec 12/4/20 1/7/ ,852 $5,968 $0.84 Enstar NGC Jan 1/8/20 2/4/ ,641 $6,385 $0.84 Enstar NGC Feb 2/5/20 3/4/ ,996 $5,852 $0.84 Enstar NGC Mar 3/5/20 4/8/ ,395 $4,572 $0.85 Enstar NGC Apr 4/9/20 5/6/ ,679 $3,974 $0.85 Enstar NGC May 5/7/20 6/3/ ,791 $1,563 $0.87 Enstar NGC Jun 6/4/20 7/8/ ,668 $1,460 $0.88 Enstar NGC Jul 7/9/20 8/5/ ,619 $1,420 $0.88 Enstar NGC Aug 8/6/20 9/2/ ,283 $1,388 $1.08 Enstar NGC Sep 9/3/20 /7/ ,783 $1,788 $1.00 Enstar NGC Oct /8/20 11/4/ ,676 $3,302 $0.90 Jan to Dec total: 50,254 50,254 0 $50,012 $0.00 Jan to Dec total: 50,139 44,854 0 $44,227 $0.00 Jan to Dec avg: Jan to Dec avg: $1.03 $0.90 AkWarm ID No. CIRI ENA CAEC 04 Page 34 of 37
Comprehensive Energy Audit For Kongiganak Health Clinic
Comprehensive Energy Audit For Kongiganak Health Clinic Prepared For Native Village of Kongiganak September 15, 2011 Prepared By: ANTHC DEHE Energy Projects Group Anchorage, Alaska 99508 1 Table of Contents
More informationFor. Prepared For ANTHC DEHE
Comprehensive Energy Audit For Tuluksakk Health Clinic Prepared For Tuluksak Native Community February 7, 20122 Prepared By: ANTHC DEHE 1901 Bragaw, Suite 200 Anchorage, AK 99508 1 Table of Contents 1.
More informationComprehensive Energy Audit For. Quinhagak Utility Building
Comprehensive Energy Audit For Quinhagak Utility Building Prepared For City of Quinhagak May 11, 2016 Prepared By: ANTHC-DEHE 4500 Diplomacy Dr., Anchorage, AK 99508 1 Table of Contents PREFACE... 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS...
More informationComprehensive Energy Audit For Sleetmute Community Center
Comprehensive Energy Audit For Sleetmute Community Center Prepared For The Traditional Council of Sleetmute, and the Alaska Rural Utility Collaborative Apr 26, 2011 Prepared By: ANTHC 1901 Bragaw St. Suite
More informationKlatt Elementary School
Klatt Elementary School 1190 Juniper Drive Anchorage, Alaska 99517 AkWarm-C ID No. CIRI-ANC-CAEC-28 Submitted by: Central Alaska Engineering Company Contact: Jerry P. Herring, P.E., C.E.A. 32215 Lakefront
More informationComprehensive Energy Audit For Community Building
Comprehensive Energy Audit For Community Building Prepared For Hooper Bay Tribal Council June 29, 2012 Prepared By: ANTHC 1901 Bragaw St. Suite 200 Anchorage, AK 99508 1 Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE
More informationComprehensive Energy Audit For. Nondalton WTP
Comprehensive Energy Audit For Nondalton WTP Prepared For City of Nondalton January 2, 2015 Prepared By: ANTHC-DEHE 3900 Ambassador Drive, Suite 201 Anchorage, AK 99508 1 Table of Contents PREFACE... 2
More informationWillard Bowman Elementary School
Willard Bowman Elementary School 11700 Gregory Rd Anchorage, Alaska 99517 AkWarm ID No. CIRI-ANC-CAEC-26 Submitted by: Central Alaska Engineering Company Contact: Jerry P. Herring, P.E., C.E.A. 32215 Lakefront
More informationFor. Prepared For. June 11, 2012 ANTHC DEHE
Comprehensive Energy Audit For Tununak Tribal Police Office Prepared For Native Village of Tununak June 11, 2012 Prepared By: ANTHC DEHE 1901 Bragaw Suite, Suite 200 Anchorage, AK 99508 1 Table of Contents
More informationComprehensive Energy Audit For CMTRS Building
Comprehensive Energy Audit For CMTRS Building Prepared For Chevak Native Village December 21, 2011 Prepared By: ANTHC-DEHE 1901 Bragaw Street, Suite 200 Anchorage, AK 99508 1 Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE
More informationComprehensive Energy Audit For. Kake Water Treatment Plant and Water Dam
Comprehensive Energy Audit For Kake Water Treatment Plant and Water Dam Prepared For City of Kake August 9, 2016 Prepared By: ANTHC-DEHE 4500 Diplomacy Dr. Anchorage, AK 99508 1 Table of Contents PREFACE...
More informationComprehensive Energy Audit For Kiana Water Treatment Plant
Comprehensive Energy Audit For Kiana Water Treatment Plant Prepared For City of Kiana July 12, 2016 Prepared By: Bailey Gamble ANTHC-DEHE 4500 Diplomacy Dr., Suite 545 Anchorage, AK 99508 1 Table of Contents
More informationFor. Prepared For City. July 29, 2014 ANTHC DEHE
Comprehensive Energy Audit For Grayling WTP Prepared For City Of Grayling July 29, 2014 Prepared By: ANTHC DEHE 3900 Ambassador Drive, Suite 301 Anchorage, AK 99508 1 Table of Contents PREFACE... 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS...
More informationComprehensive Energy Audit For. Kiana Lift Station
Comprehensive Energy Audit For Kiana Lift Station Prepared For City of Kiana July 27, 2016 Prepared By: Bailey Gamble ANTHC 4500 Diplomacy Dr., Suite 545 Anchorage, AK 99508 1 Table of Contents PREFACE...
More informationENERGY AUDIT FINAL REPORT
ENERGY AUDIT FINAL REPORT Houston High School 12501 West Hawk Lane Houston, AK 99694 p (907) 892-9400 AkWarm ID No. CIRI-WOW-CAEC-02 800 F Street Anchorage, AK 99501 p (907) 276-6664 f (907) 276-5042 Contact:
More informationENERGY AUDIT. 123 Main Street Mississauga, Ontario. January 1, Report To: Mr. John Smith Smith Printing Company.
Report To: Mr. John Smith Smith Printing Company ENERGY AUDIT 123 Main Street Mississauga, Ontario January 1, 2009 120 Carlton Street, Suite 212 Toronto, Ontario M5A 4K2 Tel 416-964-3246 Toll Free 1-866-964-3246
More informationELIAS BOUDINOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Pearl and Ellis Street, Burlington NJ 08016
BURLINGTON CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ELIAS BOUDINOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Pearl and Ellis Street, Burlington NJ 08016 LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM FOR NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES September 2014
More informationLow Cost Building Automation System for Small- and Medium- Sized Commercial Buildings
Low Cost Building Automation System for Small- and Medium- Sized Commercial Buildings Srinivas Katipamula, Ph.D. Staff Scientist, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Other TAG Members: Irfan Rehmanji
More informationLow-Hanging Fruit Simple Steps Toward Energy Effective Building Operations
Low-Hanging Fruit Simple Steps Toward Energy Effective Building Operations Roger Ebbage Northwest Water / Energy Education Institute Lane Community College May 7-9 Enzian Inn - Leavenworth, Washington
More informationENERGY EFFICIENT RETROFIT OF A HIGH-RISE MULTIFAMILY BUILDING
ENERGY EFFICIENT RETROFIT OF A HIGH-RISE MULTIFAMILY BUILDING Brittany Hanam 1, Lorne Ricketts 2, Andrew Pape-Salmon 3 ABSTRACT The National Institute of Building Sciences estimates that over 70% of the
More informationCONCORD ENGINEERING GROUP 520 SOUTH BURNT MILL ROAD VOORHEES, NJ TELEPHONE: (856) FACSIMILE: (856)
ENERGY AUDIT FINAL REPORT JANUARY 6, 2010 UNION COUNTY COLLEGE ELIZABETH CAMPUS LESSNER BUILDING 12 W. JERSEY STREET ELIZABETH, NJ 07201 ATTN: MR. HENRY KEY, DIRECTOR OF FACILITIES CEG PROJECT NO. CONCORD
More informationExample LEED-NC v2.1 Energy & Atmosphere Credit 1 Submittal
Example LEED-NC v2.1 Energy & Atmosphere Credit 1 Submittal The following documentation provides an example submittal for the LEED-NC v2.1 Energy & Atmosphere Credit 1 (EAc1). This sample EAc1 submittal
More informationGround-Coupled Heat Pump And Energy Storage
Ground-Coupled Heat Pump And Energy Storage By Ed Lohrenz, Member ASHRAE; and Sergio Almeida, P.Eng., Member ASHRAE Ground-coupled heat pump (GCHP) systems consume less purchased energy than an HVAC system
More informationENERGY AND WATER CONSERVATION AND DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN
ENERGY AND WATER CONSERVATION AND DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN 2014 2019 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 1. CENTENNIAL COLLEGE - DISTRIBUTION OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN 2012... 4 1.1. Overview of Centennial College
More informationSouth Carolina Society for Hospital Engineers
South Carolina Society for Hospital Engineers Selecting Energy Partners: Criteria & Pitfalls and the Top 10 Ways to Reduce Energy in a Hospital Presented by Jon Dierking, PE, CEM, LEED AP Director of Energy
More informationVOORHEES TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION OSAGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 128 E CHEWS LANDING RD, VOORHEES, NJ, FACILITY ENERGY REPORT
VOORHEES TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION OSAGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 128 E CHEWS LANDING RD, VOORHEES, NJ, 08043 FACILITY ENERGY REPORT Voorhees Township Public Schools Osage Elementary School TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationPE, LLC. May 22, Prime Contractor: , PE, LLC. Anchorage, AK CEA #
Richard S. Armstrong,, PE, LLC Mechanical/ /Electrical Engineer Investment Grade Energy Audit Alaska Technical Center Dormitory Owner: The Northwestt Arctic Borough School District Client: Alaska Housing
More informationEnergy Benchmarking Report for Mill Pond Elementary School Lanoka Harbor, NJ
Energy Benchmarking Report for Mill Pond Elementary School Lanoka Harbor, NJ (for the period: January 2006 through December 2008) Prepared by: Background & Findings The New Jersey Clean Energy Program
More informationYWCA 1503 S. Denver Tulsa, Oklahoma 5/18/2010 Performed By
Energy Audit for YWCA 1503 S. Denver Tulsa, Oklahoma 5/18/2010 Performed By 220 E. 8th Street Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119 918-582.0229 Fax: 918.599.0665 www.craftontullsparks.com Table of Contents Cover Page...
More informationWhite Paper ENVELOPE-FIRST APPROACH TO NET-ZERO ENERGY BUILDINGS
BOULDER CHICAGO NASHVILLE SALT LAKE CITY SAN FRANCISCO SPRINGFIELD, MO WASHINGTON, DC 2540 Frontier Avenue, Suite 100 Boulder, Colorado 80301 303.444.4149 White Paper ENVELOPE-FIRST APPROACH TO NET-ZERO
More informationRequest for Proposals Town of Plymouth, New Hampshire
1. General Information Request for Proposals Town of Plymouth, New Hampshire Building Energy Audits The Town of Plymouth is seeking bids for qualified individuals or firms to provide six (6) Building Energy
More informationEnergy Study. Commercial Custom Design Program Retrofit Projects. November 2014
Energy Study Commercial Custom Design Program Retrofit Projects November 2014 Table of contents 1.0 Energy Study Guide 2 1.1 Introduction 2 1.2 Eligibility requirements 2 1.3 General requirements 3 2.0
More informationEnergy Benchmarking Report for LaMonte Elementary School Bound Brook, NJ
Energy Benchmarking Report for LaMonte Elementary School Bound Brook, NJ (for the period: March 2007 through February 2009) Prepared by: Background & Findings The New Jersey Clean Energy Program (NJCEP)
More informationDTE Energy Commercial & Industrial Energy Optimization Program. Trade Ally Meeting. Guardian Plumbing & Heating January 20, 2011
DTE Energy Commercial & Industrial Energy Optimization Program Trade Ally Meeting Guardian Plumbing & Heating January 20, 2011 Agenda Introduction DTE Energy Your Energy Savings Program Overview 2011 Program
More informationDuke Energy Corporation
Commercial Audit for Account: 12345-56789 Thank you for completing the Duke Energy Corporation Business Energy Check. We hope the information and recommendations provided will assist you in managing your
More informationBenchmarking EPA Portfolio Manager and Energy Star Certification
Benchmarking EPA Portfolio Manager and Energy Star Certification 1 What is Benchmarking? Energy Benchmarking is the practice of comparing any given building to similar buildings for the purpose of evaluating
More informationTexas Hospital. Central Plant Redesign. Central Utility Plant SECOND PLACE HEALTH CARE FACILITIES, EXISTING 2013 ASHRAE TECHNOLOGY AWARD CASE STUDIES
This article was published in ASHRAE Journal, January 2014. Copyright 2014 ASHRAE. Posted at www. ashrae.org. This article may not be copied and/or distributed electronically or in paper form without permission
More informationMOORESTOWN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS GEORGE BAKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FACILITY ENERGY REPORT 139 WEST MAPLE AVENUE MOORESTOWN, NJ 08057
MOORESTOWN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS GEORGE BAKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 139 WEST MAPLE AVENUE MOORESTOWN, NJ 08057 FACILITY ENERGY REPORT Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker TABLE OF CONTENTS I.
More informationEnergy Retrofit Loan Program
Energy Retrofit Loan Program Service Provider Profile General Firm Information Bonded Building & Engineering 76 South Street, Oyster Bay NY 11771 Primary Contact: Jerritt Gluck, (516)922-9867 x111, jerrittg@bondedbuilding.com
More informationMarysville School District Resource Conservation Program. John Bingham Marysville S.D. Ray Burton Snohomish Co. P.U.D.
Marysville School District Resource Conservation Program John Bingham Marysville S.D. Ray Burton Snohomish Co. P.U.D. Tools Resource Conservation Program Utility budget Utility tracking Benchmarking Load
More informationHamilton Board of Education Robinson Elementary School Hamilton, NJ 08610
Steven Winter Associates, Inc. 50 Washington Street Telephone (203) 857-0200 Architects and Engineers Norwalk, CT 06854 Facsimile (203) 852-0741 www.swinter.com E-mail: swinter@swinter.com July 17, 2009
More informationLeast Cost Path to Achieving 50% Reduction in Residential Energy Use (in Heating Climates)
Least Cost Path to Achieving 50% Reduction in Residential Energy Use (in Heating Climates) Jan Harris, X Prize Foundation Michael Blasnik, Blasnik and Associates ABSTRACT This paper describes the findings
More informationLOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM: ENERGY AUDIT REPORT
LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM: ENERGY AUDIT REPORT PREPARED FOR: GEORGE J. MITCHELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 950 ROUTE 539 LITTLE EGG HARBOR TWP, NJ 08087 ATTN: MS. LYNN COATES SCHOOL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR
More informationThe Mirenda Center for Sports, Spirituality, and Character Development
prepared by: Zachary Heilman MECHANICAL OPTION prepared for: James Freihaut, PhD Technical Report 3: (Mechanical Systems Existing Conditions Evaluation) Due Date: November 29, 2010 The Mirenda Center for
More informationItalcementi Center for Research and Innovation
Italcementi Center for Research and Innovation Bergamo, Italy LEED-NC v2.1 EAc1 A. Project Narrative (Viridian) analyzed the energy use of the proposed Italcementi Center for Research and Innovation located
More informationThe Energy Program Tricycle: Which Wheel Should You Put in Front?
The Energy Program Tricycle: Which Wheel Should You Put in Front? Laurie Gilmer, P.E., CFM, SFP, LEED AP, CxA Conrad Kelso, P.E., CEM Meet our Presenters Laurie Gilmer, P.E., CFM, SFP, LEED AP, CxA Vice
More informationLAWRENCE BROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 48 Sullivan Way, East Brunswick, NJ 08816
EAST BRUNSWICK BOARD OF EDUCATION LAWRENCE BROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 48 Sullivan Way, East Brunswick, NJ 08816 LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM FOR NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES February 2016
More informationENERGY AUDIT FINAL REPORT CEG PROJECT NO. 9C08134
, NJ ENERGY AUDIT FINAL REPORT CEG PROJECT NO. 9C08134 SOUTH BRUNSWICK BOARD OF EDUCATION PO BOX 181 MONMOUTH JUNCTION, NJ 08852 ATTN: MR. ANTHONY TONZINI BUSINESS ADMINSTRATOR CONCORD ENGINEERING GROUP
More informationEnergy Efficient Buildings: Realizing Money and Energy- Saving Opportunities
January 10 th, 2013 Energy Efficient Buildings: Realizing Money and Energy- Saving Opportunities 1 Energy Efficient County Buildings: Realizing Money and Energy- Saving Opportunities Energy Efficient Buildings:
More informationValue of Air Source Heat Pumps in Light of Variable Energy Prices. Jeff Haase. Energy Design Conference February 27, 2013
Value of Air Source Heat Pumps in Light of Variable Energy Prices Jeff Haase Energy Design Conference February 27, 2013 Agenda Overview of Air Source Heat Pump Technologies History, General Comparison
More informationCounty of Mercer McDade Administration Building 640 South Broad Street Trenton, NJ 08611
Steven Winter Associates, Inc. 293 Route 18, Suite 330 Telephone (866) 676-1972 Building Systems Consultants East Brunswick, NJ 08816 Facsimile (203) 852-0741 www.swinter.com October 1, 2010 Local Government
More informationENGLEWOOD CLIFFS PUBLIC SCHOOLS NORTH CLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ENERGY ASSESSMENT. for NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES CHA PROJECT NO.
ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS PUBLIC SCHOOLS NORTH CLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ENERGY ASSESSMENT for NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES CHA PROJECT NO. 24385 November 2012 Prepared by: 6 Campus Drive Parsippany, NJ 07054
More informationCondenser Water Heat Recovery"
PLEASE MUTE CELL PHONES Condenser Water Heat Recovery" Julian de Bullet ASHRAE Distinguished Lecturer Director of Industry Relations McQuay International 703-395-5054 1 What Is Sustainability? sustainable
More informationWaste Heat Recovery as an Alternative Energy Source
Waste Heat Recovery as an Alternative Energy Source D. Paul Mehta and Ryan Esch, Bradley University ABSTRACT Heat recovery can substantially lower the operating costs for a manufacturing facility by utilizing
More informationGETTING TO EFFICIENT BUILDINGS
GETTING TO EFFICIENT BUILDINGS Andy Robinson, SEDAC SEDAC + EPA Moraine Valley Community College Dec 2016 SEDAC GOALS FOR OUR CLIENTS: Save energy dollars Identify efficient equipment upgrades Identify
More informationHotels: Water and Energy
Hotels: Water and Energy Agenda 01 Introduction 05 Hotel System Options 02 Company Overview 06 Hotel Energy Conservation 03 Hotel Energy & Water Use 07 Hotel Project Examples 04 Design Philosophy Introduction
More informationElectricity Survey and Analysis
Electricity Survey and Analysis Prepared for: Centre in the Square Inc. 101 Queen St. North Kitchener, ON N2H 6P7 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 49 Frederick St. Kitchener, ON N2H 6M7 September 14,
More informationHeating, Ventilation & Air Conditioning Systems ( Member Information Page )
2017 Commercial Program Heating, Ventilation & Air Conditioning Systems ( Member Information Page ) WrightHennepin Cooperative Electric Assn., P.O. Box 330, Rockford, MN 55373 Ph: 7634773000 Business Member
More informationBELLMAWR BOROUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ETHEL M. BURKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 112 SOUTH BLACK HORSE PIKE BELLMAWR, NJ FACILITY ENERGY REPORT
BELLMAWR BOROUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ETHEL M. BURKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 112 SOUTH BLACK HORSE PIKE BELLMAWR, NJ 08031 FACILITY ENERGY REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST... 2 II. FACILITY
More informationBorough of Freehold Water Treatment Plant 111 Waterworks Road Freehold, NJ 07728
Steven Winter Associates, Inc. 293 Route 18, Suite 330 Telephone (866) 676-1972 Building Systems Consultants East Brunswick, NJ 08816 Facsimile (203) 852-0741 www.swinter.com June 02, 2010 Local Government
More informationIndiana University Glick Eye Institute. LEED Measurement & Verification Plan
Indiana University Glick Eye Institute LEED Measurement & Verification Plan April 10, 2012 1 Table of Contents General Introduction... 3 Facility Description... 4 M&V Objectives... 4 M&V Approach/Option...
More informationMy Electric Footprint
AK Target grades: 3-5 AK ELAM Standards: Mathematics 5.NBT.4 AK Science GLEs: [3] SE1.1 [3] SE2.1 [3] SE3.1 NGSS See page 5. Set up time: 15 minutes Class time: One to two class periods Overview: Students
More informationIntegrated Energy Audit:
Integrated Energy Audit: College of the Redwoods Prepared for: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Prepared by: KEMA Quality Assurance Check by: Charles Middleton (signature line) Copyright 2010 Pacific Gas
More informationLivingston Harrison Elementary School Livingston, NJ 07039
Steven Winter Associates, Inc. 293 Route 18 South, Suite 330 Telephone: (866) 676-1972 Architects and Engineers East Brunswick, NJ 08816 E-mail: swinter@swinter.com www.swinter.com February 7, 2010 Local
More informationTask 1: COMMERCIAL CODE REVIEW FOR THE 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING ENERGY CODE
Task 1: COMMERCIAL CODE REVIEW FOR THE 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING ENERGY CODE FSEC-CR-2019-16 DRAFT Final Report (Rev 2) September 9, 2016 Submitted to Department of Business and Professional Regulation Office
More informationCity of Brigantine Links at Brigantine Beach Golf Course Clubhouse 1075 North Shore Drive Brigantine, NJ 08203
Steven Winter Associates, Inc. 293 Route 18, Suite 330 Telephone (866) 676-1972 Building Systems Consultants East Brunswick, NJ 08816 Facsimile (203) 852-0741 www.swinter.com October 7, 2010 Local Government
More informationReducing Peak Energy Demand: The Hidden Benefit of Cool Roofs
Reducing Peak Energy Demand: The Hidden Benefit of Cool Roofs Dr. James L. Hoff, DBA, TEGNOS Research, Inc., Keith Gere and Robert Carnick, Duro-Last Inc. November 11, 2014 MW Peak Energy Demand 30,000
More informationPremiere Eglise Baptiste Haitienne 109 Orange Avenue Irvington, NJ 07111
Steven Winter Associates, Inc. 293 Route 18, Suite 330 Telephone (866) 676-1972 Building Systems Consultants East Brunswick, NJ 08816 Facsimile (203) 852-0741 www.swinter.com March 8, 2011 Local Government
More informationRhode Island Commercial Codes FAQs
Rhode Island Commercial Codes FAQs When does the new code go into effect? The new suite of building codes (including the new state energy conservation code, SBC-8) was adopted on July 1, 2013. A brief
More informationProperty Condition Assessment
Property Condition Assessment Pewaukee, WI 53072 Inspection Date: 1/6/15 Prepared For: Report Number: Prepared By: Shamrock Building Inspection Consultants LLC N29 W29951 Shel-Mar Dr. Pewaukee, WI 53072
More informationENERGY AUDIT FINAL REPORT CEG PROJECT NO. 9C08134
, NJ ENERGY AUDIT FINAL REPORT CEG PROJECT NO. 9C08134 SOUTH BRUNSWICK BOARD OF EDUCATION PO BOX 181 MONMOUTH JUNCTION, NJ 08852 ATTN: MR. ANTHONY TONZINI BUSINESS ADMINSTRATOR CONCORD ENGINEERING GROUP
More informationENERGY AUDIT FINAL REPORT CEG PROJECT NO. 9C08134
Crossroads North Upper Elementary School, NJ ENERGY AUDIT FINAL REPORT CEG PROJECT NO. 9C08134 SOUTH BRUNSWICK BOARD OF EDUCATION PO BOX 181 MONMOUTH JUNCTION, NJ 08852 ATTN: MR. ANTHONY TONZINI BUSINESS
More informationAnchorage Alaska Solar Tour: Saturday, June 17th, 2017 Tour Starts At 10am
Please visit alaskasolartour.org for updates on this tour Anchorage Alaska Solar Tour: Saturday, June 17th, 2017 Tour Starts At 10am Sites Times Building Address Area of town Site #1 10 10:45am CIRI Office
More informationEnergy Efficiency Programs
Program Overviews Efficiency Programs Description Delivery Model Audit Requirement/ Multifamily - Existing Building Efficiency Alliant Services include free energy assessments, rebates for property owners
More informationExisting Building Cx: Processes & Results A Cultural Journey. Barry Abramson Senior Vice President Servidyne
Existing Building Cx: Processes & Results A Cultural Journey Barry Abramson Senior Vice President Servidyne AIA Quality Assurance Learning Objectives 1. Define the key steps in the process of retrocommissioning
More informationOPPORTUNITIES FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND DEMAND RESPONSE IN CORRUGATED CARDBOARD MANUFACTURING FACILITIES
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND DEMAND RESPONSE IN CORRUGATED CARDBOARD MANUFACTURING FACILITIES Sandra Chow BASE Energy, Inc. * San Francisco, CA 94103 Ahmad R. Ganji, Ph.D., P.E. San Francisco
More informationRecreation Centers of Sun City West R.H. Johnson Campus
R.H. Johnson Campus SUN CITY WEST, AZ Renewable Energy System Feasibility Study Final Report February 21, 2014 4742 N. 24 th Street Suite 100 Phoenix, AZ 85016 (602) 429.5800 AEI Project No. 13180-00 Table
More informationPERFORMANCE OF SIDE-BY-SIDE SOUTH TEXAS HOMES Isolating the Contribution of Spray Polyurethane Foam Insulation
PERFORMANCE OF SIDE-BY-SIDE SOUTH TEXAS HOMES Isolating the Contribution of Spray Polyurethane Foam Insulation INTRODUCTION As the use of spray polyurethane foam (SPF) insulation is increasing in both
More informationReducing Costs with Energy Efficiency
Reducing Costs with Energy Efficiency Presented to Pennsylvania Demand Side Response Working Group February 9, 2007 2/9/2007 1 Austin Energy Municipally-owned 700,000 population Area > 400 sq. miles Generation
More informationAmeren Illinois Energy Efficiency Programs and Incentives. Helping public sector buildings and communities save energy and money.
Ameren Illinois Energy Efficiency Programs and Incentives Helping public sector buildings and communities save energy and money. 1 Why Energy Efficiency? Save money Reduce environmental impact Increase
More informationEnergy Savers PROGRAM BACKGROUND. Process
PAGE 25 Energy Savers This section presents an analysis of 57 properties in the Energy Savers program, beginning with background on the program, a description of the building stock and retrofit types,
More informationMEADOWLANDS MAINTENANCE GARAGE 2600 Pennhorn Avenue, North Bergen, NJ 07047
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT MEADOWLANDS MAINTENANCE GARAGE 2600 Pennhorn Avenue, North Bergen, NJ 07047 LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM FOR NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Original: March 2016 Revised:
More informationPope Science Hall Dwight Englewood School 315 East Palisade Avenue Englewood, NJ 07631
Steven Winter Associates, Inc. 293 Route 18 South, Suite 330 Telephone (866) 676-1972 Building Systems Consultants East Brunswick, NJ 08816 Facsimile (203) 852-0741 www.swinter.com June 14, 2013 Local
More informationAir Source Heat Pumps in the Commercial Market. Thursday, February 5, :00-10:30 a.m.
Air Source Heat Pumps in the Commercial Market Thursday, February 5, 2015 9:00-10:30 a.m. 1. Commercial Equipment Applications, Benefits, Limitations 2. Case Studies 3. Efficiency Vermont Technical & Financial
More informationApplication of Advanced Energy Technologies
GLOBALCON 2002 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania March 27, 2002 Application of Advanced Energy Technologies Michael K. West, Ph.D., P.E. Building Systems Scientist Advantek Consulting, Inc. www.advantekinc.com
More informationEnergy Reduction Strategy Through 2020
Through 2020 Revised: August 2017 Executive Summary Auburn University is a land, sea and space grant university established in 1856. The university consists of 11,629,000 square feet on 1,840 acres and
More informationSmart Energy Utilization System
10/4/2016 Smart Energy Utilization System 1/49 Smart Energy Utilization System Tyler Johnson Zachary Rubenfeld Claude Mickel Brooks James Dirkes Rahul Sinha Philip Maloney Garret Clark 10/4/2016 Smart
More informationTruing-Up to Billing Data
Truing-Up to Billing Data The Imperative for Accurate Software Estimations Dave Beaulieu- CSG Ethan MacCormick- PSD Presenters Ethan MacCormick Dave Beaulieu Description: This session will provide concrete
More informationNW Natural Washington Residential, Contractor Install
Want your incentive faster? Apply online. Visit www.energytrust.org/now Steps to completion: 1 Learn about energy saving potential with Energy Trust s Payback Estimator. 2 Make an energy efficiency improvement.
More information2012 IECC Cost Effectiveness Analysis
2012 IECC Cost Effectiveness Analysis Prepared for National Association of Home Builders Prepared by NAHB Research Center 400 Prince George s Boulevard Upper Marlboro, MD 20774-8731 www.nahbrc.com 301.249.4000
More informationLivingston Hillside Elementary School Livingston, NJ 07039
Steven Winter Associates, Inc. 293 Route 18 South, Suite 330 Telephone: (866) 676-1972 Architects and Engineers East Brunswick, NJ 08816 E-mail: swinter@swinter.com www.swinter.com February 7, 2010 Local
More informationEnergy Retrofit Loan Program
Energy Retrofit Loan Program Service Provider Profile General Firm Information Association for Energy Affordability, Inc 105 Bruckner Blvd., Bronx, NY 10454 Primary Contact: Patrick Brennan, 718-292-6733
More informationCaribbean Hotel Energy Efficiency Action (CHENACT)
Caribbean Hotel Energy Efficiency Action (CHENACT) Energy Efficiency Opportunities for Caribbean Hotels 31 st March 2010 Presented by: Andre Escalante Agenda Air Conditioning Energy Efficient Lighting
More informationNo Cost/Low Cost Energy
No Cost/Low Cost Energy Saving Strategies Randall D. Manteufel University of Texas at San Antonio Energy Efficiency in Local Government andschool Districts in the Border Region No Cost/Low Cost Relatively
More informationReading Your Electric Meter
AK Reading Your Electric Meter Target grades: 3-5 AK GLEs: Science Math [3/4/5] SA1.1 [3] E&C-4 [3/4/5] SA1.2 [4/5] E&C-3 [3/4] SA2.1 [3/4/5] S&P-2 Reading [3/4/5] 1.6.1 [3] 1.6.2 Set up time: 15 minutes
More informationEnergy-efficient Lighting for Florida Homes
Energy-efficient Lighting for Florida Homes Authors Parker, Danny Drake, Nick Publication Number FSEC-EN-18-91 Copyright Copyright Florida Solar Energy Center/University of Central Florida 1679 Clearlake
More informationAPPENDIX 4. Task 4. Evaluate solar walls performance and GHG impact. Evaluate the
APPENDIX 4 Task 4. Evaluate solar walls performance and GHG impact. Evaluate the performance of existing solar walls in terms of energy use and GHG emissions. I. Building-specific degree day data and solar
More informationBullitt Center s Energy Performance
Bullitt Center s Energy Performance Introduction In 2007 Congress created a Zero Net Energy Commercial Buildings Initiative with a goal of achieving a market transition to Zero Net Energy for new commercial
More information2018 Smart Energy New Homes Program Manual
2018 Smart Energy New Homes Program Manual Reduce the Use: Residential Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction... 1-1 1.1 Program Overview... 1-1 1.2 Program Administrator... 1-1 1.3 Program Contact Information...
More informationSustainable Building Operations & Upgrades
Sustainable Building Operations & Upgrades LEED for Existing Buildings 2010 Energy / Facilities Connections Conference Brightworks & Glumac Eric Baxter and Todd McGuire 12 May, 2010 The Value Proposition
More information