Appendix H Amanda Estates Drainage Study

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Appendix H Amanda Estates Drainage Study"

Transcription

1 Appendix H Amanda Estates Drainage Study Hunsaker & Associates 2015

2

3 Contents 1 Scope Existing Conditions Project Description Methodology Hydrology Hydraulics Results and Conclusions References Watershed Information Appendices List of Appendices Appendix 1 Soils Information Appendix 2 Hydrology Calculations and Exhibits Appendix 3 Detention Basin Analysis Appendix 4 Hydraulic Calculations Appendix 5 Gamble Lane Storm Drain Reference Plans

4 1 Scope The purpose of this study is to provide flood control calculations in support of a proposed subdivision of land for creation of 21 single family residential lots in the City of Escondido, CA. This report will provide preliminary calculations for existing and proposed runoff for the 50-year frequency storm event. 2 Existing Conditions The Amanda Estates project site is acres, located in the City of Escondido, California. The property is located west of the proposed extension of Amanda Lane, north of Gamble Lane, east of Greenwood Place, and south of Blackhawk Glen. See Vicinity Map below. The pre-project topography varies from 842 to 743 MSL. A hill is currently centrally located with a residential home at its peak. An access road to the home connects it to Amanda Lane. Drainage is radial down the slope. However, runoff from the eastern half of the site is eventually directed towards the southeast within both man-made and naturally occurring drainage channels. This runoff sheet flows in a southeasterly

5 direction and confluences with runoff generated by areas south and east of the project boundary. A riser located at the northwest corner of Gamble Lane and Eucalyptus Avenue collects this flow and directs it south within the existing 48 storm drain on Eucalyptus Avenue. The eastern portion of the site is within the Hamilton Lane storm drain basin as designated in the City of Escondido Drainage Master Plan. The western portion of the site slopes towards the west. Runoff from this area is collected by storm drain facilities located at the rear of two existing residential lots along Greenwood Place. Cumulative, both lots receive runoff from approximately 5.4 acres of the Amanda Estates project area. This area is part of the Del Dios Avenue Drainage Basin as designated in the City s Drainage Master Plan. The Existing Condition hydrologic model included within this report includes analysis of areas south of Gamble Lane. These areas were included to analyze the existing storm drain since developed flows from Amanda Estates are proposed to be added to the Gamble Lane storm drain system. Existing and proposed condition hydraulic analysis on the existing system is included in Appendix 4. Hydrologic and Geotechnical Characteristics; The project is situated at the divide of two drainage basin; Hamilton Lane and Del Dios Avenue. The Hamilton Lane Drainage Basin is tributary to Felicita Creek and Lake Hodges, as part of the San Dieguito Hydrologic Unit, Hodges Hydrologic Area, and the Felicita Creek Hydrologic Subarea (basin number ). The Del Dios Drainage Basin is tributary to the Escondido Creek within the Escondido Creek Hydrologic Area (basin number 904.6) within the Carlsbad Watershed. The site is mapped within a Zone X, described to be an area determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain. According to the NRCS Web Spoil Survey website, the onsite soils consist of Fallbrook sandy loam which are within the hydrologic soil type C classification. The hydrologic calculations included herein assumed a more conservative type D soil which will result in higher runoffs.

6 3 Project Description The proposed development will create 21 single residential lots. Amanda Lane, which provides access to the site from Gamble Lane, will also be improved between the site and Gamble Lane. Project improvements will include sidewalks and streets as well as include storm drain facilities and utilities such as water and sewer. The site layout of Amanda Estates will have an interior looped street which connects to Amanda Lane. Additional offsite improvements associated with the site will include street improvements in the vicinity of the Gamble Lane- Amanda Lane intersection which includes storm drain, curb and street pavement. Drainage Routing and Improvements: The proposed onsite site design will cut and flatten the existing hill. Street grades will vary between 4-12% and slope towards the southwest corner of the site. A small portion of area which previously drained west is diverted east in the proposed design. Approximately 2.68 acres will be diverted from the west (Del Dios Drainage Basin) to the east (Hamilton Lane Drainage Basin). The reduction in area towards the west will reduce the amount of runoff currently flowing onto two residential lots along Greenwood Place. No impervious areas will be added to the westward-draining areas. On the other hand, the increase in acreage towards the east will increase the unmitigated peak flow amounts. Therefore, an onsite detention basin is proposed to attenuate the peak developed flows draining to the southeast corner of the site and will reduce them below existing condition. This basin will also serve water quality and hydromodification uses as described in the Major Stormwater Management Plans (SWMP) for Amanda Estates (February 2015). Currently, drainage from the areas west of Amanda Lane generally sheet flows across Amanda Lane towards the east then southeast till it reaches a riser located at the northwest corner of Gamble Lane and Eucalyptus Avenue. The improvements of Amanda Lane will slightly alter this existing drainage scenario. For example, offsite flows from the northern portion of existing Amanda Lane will be collected with catch basin inlets and be conveyed together with developed Amanda Estate flows south towards the existing storm drain on Gamble Lane. These offsite flows are from approximately 4 acres of land east of Amanda Lane. The drainage patterns associated with the southern portion of Amanda Lane will remain unaffected by the Amanda Estate project and continue to flow overland towards the northwest corner of Gamble Lane and Eucalyptus Avenue and continue downstream in the existing 48 storm drain. A small portion of Amanda Lane at the entrance to the developed site will include a bioretention swale along the east side of the road to collect and treat the 85 th percentile rainfall event as described in the SWMP for Amanda Estates.

7 The proposed onsite detention basin was sized to attenuate peak flows to below existing condition in order to insure that the existing downstream storm drain infrastructure along Gamble Lane and Eucalyptus Avenue was not compromised. Appendix 4 includes the preliminary hydraulic analysis for the Gamble Lane storm drain system. The analysis routes the proposed flows to verify adequacy of the existing system.

8 4 Methodology 4.1 Hydrology The Rational Method as described in the June 2003 San Diego County Hydrology Manual (SDCHM), Section 3, was used for the hydrologic calculations for this project. The Rational Method formula is expressed as follows: Q = C I A I = 7.44P 6 T c T c = T t + T i T t = (11.9*L 3 / ΔE) Where: Q = Peak discharge, in cubic feet per second (cfs). C = Runoff coefficient, proportion of the rainfall that runs off the surface. The C coefficient was obtained from Table 3-1 of the SDCHM. It has no units and is based on the soil group and the development type for the drainage sub-area. A = Drainage area contributing to the design location (ac). I = Average rainfall intensity (in/hr). The formula can be found on Figure 3-2 of the SDCHM. P 6 = 6-hour precipitation (in). This value was taken from the 6-hour isopluvial maps found in Appendix B of the SDCHM. T i = Initial time of concentration, from Table 3-2 of the SDCHM. T t = Travel time (min), from Figure 3-4 of the SDCHM. L = Longest flow path distance (mi). ΔE = Change in elevation along flowpath (ft). 4.2 Hydraulics In order to provide adequate flood control, increases in peak flow rates at the outfall location for this site were mitigated using the design of the proposed basin. Mitigation within the basin was modeled using RickRatHydro as an input to Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD Civil 3D RickRatHydro was used to produce a hydrograph for the project drainage areas, based on the area, time of concentration, P6 value, runoff coefficient, and peak flow rate. The hydrograph was then imported into Hydraflow Hydrographs and was routed through the proposed basin by using an iteration of outlet structures, until the resulting outlet structure provided a flow rate to the outfall that was equal to or less than that during the existing condition, and the water surface elevation was below the top of the basin.

9 Storm drain analysis along Gamble Lane was prepared using a separate extension of AutoCAD Civil 3D 2011 named Storm Sewer. Pre and Post condition hydraulic analysis was prepared to verify storm drain adequacy. See Appendix 4 for results.

10 5 Results and Conclusions Table 1 Rational Method Results Existing Condition Location/Node #* Area (ac) 50-Year Peak Flow (cfs) Totals: Proposed Condition Location/Node #* Area (ac) 50-Year Peak Flow (cfs) Totals: *Nodes locations are shown the hydrology exhibits in Appendix 2. As illustrated above, development of the Amanda Estates project site will decrease the cumulative amount of peak flow by approximately 10 cfs. This reduction can be attributed to the site design and its inclusion of a detention to reduce peak flow amounts below existing condition. Therefore, the proposed drainage design and peak flow routing by the Amanda Estates project will not adversely affect the existing downstream infrastructures. Due to the addition of storm drain and flows from Amanda Estates and Amanda Lane, a portion of the existing upper reach of the Gamble storm drain system will be replace/relocated. Hydraulic analysis confirms that the downstream reaches of the existing Gamble Lane are adequate for the proposed flows.

11 6 References Plans for the Improvement of Escondido Tract No. 692, Manitou Engineering Company, September 3, Major Storm Water Management Plan for Amanda Estates, Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc., February San Diego County Hydrology Manual, June City of San Diego Drainage Design Manual, April 1984 City of Escondido- Design Standards and Standard Drawings, April 2, FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (Firmette).

12 7 Watershed Information City of Escondido- Runoff intensity duration curves and runoff coefficients. FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (Firmette).

13

14

15 8 Appendices

16 Appendix 1 - Soils Information

17

18

19

20

21 Appendix 2 - Hydrology Calculations and Exhibits

22 EXISTING CONDITION

23 RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE Reference: SAN DIEGO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 2003,1985,1981 HYDROLOGY MANUAL (c) Copyright Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver Release Date: 07/01/2010 License ID 1239 Analysis prepared by: Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc Waples Street San Diego, CA ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * Amanda Lane * * EXISTING CONDITION, 50 year return interval * * W.O , DLN 1166 * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: R:\1166\HYD\CALCS\AES\50EX.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 10:49 02/11/2015 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 RAINFALL-INTENSITY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR = *USER SPECIFIED: NUMBER OF [TIME,INTENSITY] DATA PAIRS = 9 1) 5.000; ) ; ) ; ) ; ) ; ) ; ) ; ) ; ) ; SAN DIEGO HYDROLOGY MANUAL "C"-VALUES USED FOR RATIONAL METHOD NOTE: ONLY PEAK CONFLUENCE VALUES CONSIDERED *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= /0.018/ GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.3500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MIN.) = WARNING: THE MAXIMUM OVERLAND FLOW SLOPE, 10.%, IS USED IN Tc CALCULATION! 50 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.25 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.18 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.25 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 53 >>>>>COMPUTE NATURAL MOUNTAIN CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<

24 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = CHANNEL SLOPE = NOTE: CHANNEL FLOW OF 1. CFS WAS ASSUMED IN VELOCITY ESTIMATION CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = 0.25 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC) = 2.47 (PER LACFCD/RCFC&WCD HYDROLOGY MANUAL) TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.22 Tc(MIN.) = 8.49 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< 50 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.3500 AREA-AVERAGE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 2.71 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.32 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.9 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.54 TC(MIN.) = 8.49 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.3500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MIN.) = WARNING: THE MAXIMUM OVERLAND FLOW SLOPE, 10.%, IS USED IN Tc CALCULATION! 50 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.18 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.13 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.18 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 53 >>>>>COMPUTE NATURAL MOUNTAIN CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = CHANNEL SLOPE = NOTE: CHANNEL FLOW OF 1. CFS WAS ASSUMED IN VELOCITY ESTIMATION CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = 0.18 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC) = 2.10 (PER LACFCD/RCFC&WCD HYDROLOGY MANUAL) TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.09 Tc(MIN.) = 8.35 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< 50 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.3500 AREA-AVERAGE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 2.38 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.94 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.5 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.10 TC(MIN.) = 8.35 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.4000 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = 10.00

25 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MIN.) = WARNING: THE MAXIMUM OVERLAND FLOW SLOPE, 10.%, IS USED IN Tc CALCULATION! 50 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.35 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.22 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.35 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 51 >>>>>COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = CHANNEL SLOPE = CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = "Z" FACTOR = MANNING'S FACTOR = MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.3500 TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 1.63 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 3.19 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.05 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 4.22 Tc(MIN.) = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 2.21 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.47 AREA-AVERAGE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.4 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.75 END OF SUBAREA CHANNEL FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.07 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 3.79 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.19 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 2.43 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 2.75 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.3500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = 6.30 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MIN.) = YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.14 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.11 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.14 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 53 >>>>>COMPUTE NATURAL MOUNTAIN CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = CHANNEL SLOPE = NOTE: CHANNEL FLOW OF 1. CFS WAS ASSUMED IN VELOCITY ESTIMATION CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = 0.14 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC) = 1.66 (PER LACFCD/RCFC&WCD HYDROLOGY MANUAL) TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 7.57 Tc(MIN.) = LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< 50 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 2.712

26 USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.4500 AREA-AVERAGE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 3.35 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.09 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.5 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.19 TC(MIN.) = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.71 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 3.46 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 4.19 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) (ACRE) RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 6.53 Tc(MIN.) = TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 5.9 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 31 >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 6.8 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 6.53 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.30 Tc(MIN.) = LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.69 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 5.89 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 6.53 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.3500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = 10.00

27 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MIN.) = WARNING: THE MAXIMUM OVERLAND FLOW SLOPE, 10.%, IS USED IN Tc CALCULATION! 50 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.36 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.26 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.36 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 52 >>>>>COMPUTE NATURAL VALLEY CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = CHANNEL SLOPE = NOTE: CHANNEL FLOW OF 1. CFS WAS ASSUMED IN VELOCITY ESTIMATION CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = 0.36 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC) = 4.57 (PER LACFCD/RCFC&WCD HYDROLOGY MANUAL) TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 3.75 Tc(MIN.) = LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< 50 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.4000 AREA-AVERAGE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 9.97 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 10.2 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = TC(MIN.) = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.20 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) (ACRE) RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = Tc(MIN.) = TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 16.1 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 52 >>>>>COMPUTE NATURAL VALLEY CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = CHANNEL SLOPE = CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC) = 6.19 (PER LACFCD/RCFC&WCD HYDROLOGY MANUAL) TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.80 Tc(MIN.) = LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET.

28 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< 50 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.4000 AREA-AVERAGE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 4.29 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 5.18 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 20.4 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = TC(MIN.) = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.02 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.4000 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MIN.) = WARNING: THE MAXIMUM OVERLAND FLOW SLOPE, 10.%, IS USED IN Tc CALCULATION! 50 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.34 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.21 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.34 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 53 >>>>>COMPUTE NATURAL MOUNTAIN CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = CHANNEL SLOPE = NOTE: CHANNEL FLOW OF 1. CFS WAS ASSUMED IN VELOCITY ESTIMATION CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = 0.34 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC) = 2.06 (PER LACFCD/RCFC&WCD HYDROLOGY MANUAL) TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 3.78 Tc(MIN.) = 9.63 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< 50 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.3500 AREA-AVERAGE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 3.72 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.26 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.9 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.54 TC(MIN.) = 9.63 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 52 >>>>>COMPUTE NATURAL VALLEY CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = CHANNEL SLOPE = CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = 4.54 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC) = 5.04 (PER LACFCD/RCFC&WCD HYDROLOGY MANUAL)

29 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.56 Tc(MIN.) = LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< 50 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.4500 AREA-AVERAGE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 4.51 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 6.05 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 8.4 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = TC(MIN.) = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.98 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 8.44 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) (ACRE) RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = Tc(MIN.) = TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 28.9 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.4900 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = 1.70 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MIN.) = WARNING: INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW PATH LENGTH IS GREATER THAN THE MAXIMUM OVERLAND FLOW LENGTH = (Reference: Table 3-1B of Hydrology Manual) THE MAXIMUM OVERLAND FLOW LENGTH IS USED IN Tc CALCULATION! 50 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.65 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.36 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.65 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 61 >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<

30 >>>>>(STANDARD CURB SECTION USED)<<<<< UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = STREET LENGTH(FEET) = CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = 5.00 INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 2 STREET PARKWAY CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Back-of-Walk Flow Section = **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 6.28 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.31 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 9.41 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 3.13 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.98 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 3.71 Tc(MIN.) = YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.4600 AREA-AVERAGE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 7.90 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 8.3 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.36 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 3.93 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 1.43 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< 50 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.4000 AREA-AVERAGE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 2.71 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.33 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 11.0 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = TC(MIN.) = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 31 >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 9.9 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.34 Tc(MIN.) = LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.04 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<<

31 USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.4600 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = 1.70 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MIN.) = WARNING: INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW PATH LENGTH IS GREATER THAN THE MAXIMUM OVERLAND FLOW LENGTH = (Reference: Table 3-1B of Hydrology Manual) THE MAXIMUM OVERLAND FLOW LENGTH IS USED IN Tc CALCULATION! 50 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.77 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.46 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.77 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 61 >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STANDARD CURB SECTION USED)<<<<< UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = STREET LENGTH(FEET) = CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = 7.00 INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 2 STREET PARKWAY CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Back-of-Walk Flow Section = **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 3.71 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.27 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 7.26 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.87 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.78 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.60 Tc(MIN.) = YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.4600 AREA-AVERAGE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 4.06 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 5.88 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 4.5 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 6.55 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.32 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 9.45 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 3.24 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 1.02 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 31 >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 11.3 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 5.60 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 6.55 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.36 Tc(MIN.) = LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.11

32 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.52 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 6.55 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) (ACRE) RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = Tc(MIN.) = TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 15.5 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET. END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 15.5 TC(MIN.) = PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS

33 LEGEND: HYDROLOGY NODE WATERSHED AREA WATERSHED BOUNDARY SUB-WATERSHED BOUNDARY FLOW DIRECTION PREPARED BY: EXHIBIT 1 2 DEVELOPED EXISTING CONDITION CONDITION HYDROLOGY MAP MAP AMANDA ESTATES OF CITY OF ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA

34 PROPOSED CONDITION

35 RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE Reference: SAN DIEGO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 2003,1985,1981 HYDROLOGY MANUAL (c) Copyright Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver Release Date: 07/01/2010 License ID 1239 Analysis prepared by: Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc Waples Street San Diego, CA ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * Amanda Lane * * PROPOSED CONDITION, 50 year return interval * * W.O , DLN 1166 * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: R:\1166\HYD\CALCS\AES\50PR.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 10:52 02/11/2015 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 RAINFALL-INTENSITY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR = *USER SPECIFIED: NUMBER OF [TIME,INTENSITY] DATA PAIRS = 9 1) 5.000; ) ; ) ; ) ; ) ; ) ; ) ; ) ; ) ; SAN DIEGO HYDROLOGY MANUAL "C"-VALUES USED FOR RATIONAL METHOD NOTE: ONLY PEAK CONFLUENCE VALUES CONSIDERED *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= /0.018/ GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.3500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MIN.) = WARNING: THE MAXIMUM OVERLAND FLOW SLOPE, 10.%, IS USED IN Tc CALCULATION! 50 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.21 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.15 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.21 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 53 >>>>>COMPUTE NATURAL MOUNTAIN CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<

36 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = CHANNEL SLOPE = NOTE: CHANNEL FLOW OF 1. CFS WAS ASSUMED IN VELOCITY ESTIMATION CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = 0.21 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC) = 2.30 (PER LACFCD/RCFC&WCD HYDROLOGY MANUAL) TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.76 Tc(MIN.) = 9.02 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< 50 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.3500 AREA-AVERAGE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.28 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.52 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.4 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.70 TC(MIN.) = 9.02 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.3500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MIN.) = WARNING: THE MAXIMUM OVERLAND FLOW SLOPE, 10.%, IS USED IN Tc CALCULATION! 50 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.25 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.18 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.25 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 53 >>>>>COMPUTE NATURAL MOUNTAIN CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = CHANNEL SLOPE = NOTE: CHANNEL FLOW OF 1. CFS WAS ASSUMED IN VELOCITY ESTIMATION CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = 0.25 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC) = 0.75 (PER LACFCD/RCFC&WCD HYDROLOGY MANUAL) TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 4.99 Tc(MIN.) = LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< 50 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.3500 AREA-AVERAGE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.14 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.23 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.3 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.42 TC(MIN.) = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<<

37 USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.5500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = 0.70 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MIN.) = WARNING: INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW PATH LENGTH IS GREATER THAN THE MAXIMUM OVERLAND FLOW LENGTH = (Reference: Table 3-1B of Hydrology Manual) THE MAXIMUM OVERLAND FLOW LENGTH IS USED IN Tc CALCULATION! 50 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.55 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.28 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.55 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 61 >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STANDARD CURB SECTION USED)<<<<< UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = STREET LENGTH(FEET) = CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = 8.00 INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 STREET PARKWAY CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Back-of-Walk Flow Section = **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 2.18 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.23 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 5.38 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 5.35 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 1.25 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.87 Tc(MIN.) = YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.5500 AREA-AVERAGE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.87 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.28 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.2 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.77 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.27 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 7.16 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 5.97 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 1.61 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.18 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 2.15 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 3.77 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.5500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = 0.70 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MIN.) = YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.45

38 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.23 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.45 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 61 >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STANDARD CURB SECTION USED)<<<<< UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = STREET LENGTH(FEET) = CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = 8.00 INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 STREET PARKWAY CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Back-of-Walk Flow Section = **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 1.28 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.24 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 5.69 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.90 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.70 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.54 Tc(MIN.) = YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.5500 AREA-AVERAGE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.97 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.66 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.2 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.06 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.27 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 7.26 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 3.19 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.87 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.12 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.20 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 2.06 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) (ACRE) RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 5.74 Tc(MIN.) = TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.4 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 31 >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) =

39 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 9.1 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 6.44 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 5.74 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.20 Tc(MIN.) = LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.10 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 3.35 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 5.74 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.5500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = 0.70 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MIN.) = WARNING: INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW PATH LENGTH IS GREATER THAN THE MAXIMUM OVERLAND FLOW LENGTH = (Reference: Table 3-1B of Hydrology Manual) THE MAXIMUM OVERLAND FLOW LENGTH IS USED IN Tc CALCULATION! 50 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.45 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.23 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.45 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 61 >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STANDARD CURB SECTION USED)<<<<< UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = STREET LENGTH(FEET) = CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = 8.00 INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 STREET PARKWAY CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Back-of-Walk Flow Section = **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 1.67 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.22 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 4.78 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 4.83 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 1.07 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.38 Tc(MIN.) = YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.5500 AREA-AVERAGE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.42 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.45 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.6 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.84 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.26 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 6.45 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 5.32 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 1.36 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET.

40 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.13 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.65 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 2.84 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) (ACRE) RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 8.56 Tc(MIN.) = TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 5.0 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.10 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 5.00 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 8.56 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< USER-SPECIFIED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =.5500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = 0.70 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MIN.) = WARNING: INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW PATH LENGTH IS GREATER THAN THE MAXIMUM OVERLAND FLOW LENGTH = (Reference: Table 3-1B of Hydrology Manual) THE MAXIMUM OVERLAND FLOW LENGTH IS USED IN Tc CALCULATION! 50 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.53 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.27 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.53 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 61 >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STANDARD CURB SECTION USED)<<<<< UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = STREET LENGTH(FEET) = CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = 8.00 INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1

City Plaza Residential (TPM ) Preliminary Hydrology Report

City Plaza Residential (TPM ) Preliminary Hydrology Report Hydrology Study City Plaza Residential (TPM 2016-127) Preliminary Hydrology Report Orange, Orange County, California Prepared For: Greenlaw Partners 18301 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 250 Irvine, CA 92612

More information

APPENDIX F HYDROLOGY REPORT

APPENDIX F HYDROLOGY REPORT APPENDIX F HYDROLOGY REPORT UCSD LONG RANGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN HYDROLOGY STUDY MAY 2004 PREPARED FOR: UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 10280 NORTH TORREY PINES ROAD, SUITE 340 LA JOLLA, CA 92093-0965

More information

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT FOR THE EDI MASTER PLAN

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT FOR THE EDI MASTER PLAN PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT FOR THE EDI MASTER PLAN April 5, 2015 Wayne W. Chang, MS, PE 46548 Chang Civil Engineering Hydrology Hydraulics Sedimentation P.O. Box 9496 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 (858) 692-0760

More information

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY For 34 th & J Residences 3402 J St. San Diego, CA 92102 A.P.N 545-250-08 Prepared By: Kenneth J. Discenza, P.E. Site Design Associates, Inc. 1016 Broadway, Suite A El Cajon,

More information

HYDROLOGY STUDY PREPARED FOR: MARKHAM PERRIS LLC 302 WEST FIFTH STREET, SUITE 103 SAN PEDRO, CA (310) FOR THE PROJECT:

HYDROLOGY STUDY PREPARED FOR: MARKHAM PERRIS LLC 302 WEST FIFTH STREET, SUITE 103 SAN PEDRO, CA (310) FOR THE PROJECT: HYDROLOGY STUDY PREPARED FOR: MARKHAM PERRIS LLC 302 WEST FIFTH STREET, SUITE 103 SAN PEDRO, CA 90731 (310) 241-2992 FOR THE PROJECT: PERRIS VALLEY COMMERCE CENTER BUILDING PERRIS, CALIFORNIA PROJECT NUMBER:

More information

Hydrology Study. For Bella Terrazza Portion of Lot 1, Block 39, Subdivision of S Tract, Rancho El Cajon El Cajon, CA 92021

Hydrology Study. For Bella Terrazza Portion of Lot 1, Block 39, Subdivision of S Tract, Rancho El Cajon El Cajon, CA 92021 Hydrology Study For Bella Terrazza Portion of Lot 1, Block 39, Subdivision of S Tract, Rancho El Cajon El Cajon, CA 92021 Prepared for Daryl Priest - Priest Development Corporation 124 West Main Street,

More information

Appendix G Preliminary Hydrology Study

Appendix G Preliminary Hydrology Study Appendix G Preliminary Hydrology Study Preliminary Hydrology Study VESTING TTM 72608 Long Beach, CA Prepared for: The Long Beach Project, LLC 888 San Clemente, Suite 100 New Port Beach, CA May 28, 2014

More information

PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY STUDY

PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY STUDY PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY STUDY FOR Tentative Tract Map West Side of Loma Alta Drive City of Oceanside, CA Prepared For: EMERALD HILLS LLC 4272 Dogwood Avenue Seal Beach, CA 90740 Contact: Mr. Jimmy Chen Ph:

More information

Chapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall

Chapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall 6.0 Introduction This chapter summarizes methodology for determining rainfall and runoff information for the design of stormwater management facilities in the City. The methodology is based on the procedures

More information

Hydrologic Study Report for Single Lot Detention Basin Analysis

Hydrologic Study Report for Single Lot Detention Basin Analysis Hydrologic Study Report for Single Lot Detention Basin Analysis Prepared for: City of Vista, California August 18, 2006 Tory R. Walker, R.C.E. 45005 President W.O. 116-01 01/23/2007 Table of Contents Page

More information

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY. Del Prado 2329 CENTRE CITY PARKWAY ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY. Del Prado 2329 CENTRE CITY PARKWAY ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY FOR Del Prado 2329 CENTRE CITY PARKWAY ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA OWNER: Touchstone Communities 12700 Stowe Drive, Suite 130 Poway, CA 92064 858-586-0414 ENGINEER: MASSON & ASSOCIATES,

More information

Hydrology Study. Ascension Heights Subdivision Ascension Drive at Bel Aire Road San Mateo, California (Unincorporated)

Hydrology Study. Ascension Heights Subdivision Ascension Drive at Bel Aire Road San Mateo, California (Unincorporated) Hydrology Study Ascension Heights Subdivision Ascension Drive at Bel Aire Road San Mateo, California (Unincorporated) Prepared for San Mateo Real Estate & Construction March 9, 21 Rev. 1 11-8-211 Rev.

More information

3.3 Acceptable Downstream Conditions

3.3 Acceptable Downstream Conditions iswm TM Criteria Manual - = Not typically used or able to meet design criterion. 1 = The application and performance of proprietary commercial devices and systems must be provided by the manufacturer and

More information

Preliminary Drainage Study: Town of Hillsboro Pedestrian & Traffic Safety Project Traffic Calming Project UPC# 70587

Preliminary Drainage Study: Town of Hillsboro Pedestrian & Traffic Safety Project Traffic Calming Project UPC# 70587 Preliminary Drainage Study: Town of Hillsboro Pedestrian & Traffic Safety Project Traffic Calming Project UPC# 70587 Introduction: The intent of this study was to perform a preliminary drainage study of

More information

January 20, Nate Hatleback Project Manager, City of Thornton Development Engineering 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303)

January 20, Nate Hatleback Project Manager, City of Thornton Development Engineering 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303) January 20, 2017 Nate Hatleback Project Manager, City of Thornton Development Engineering 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 (303) 538-7694 RE: Riverdale Five Retail Drainage Conformance Letter

More information

Introduction to Storm Sewer Design

Introduction to Storm Sewer Design A SunCam online continuing education course Introduction to Storm Sewer Design by David F. Carter Introduction Storm sewer systems are vital in collection and conveyance of stormwater from the upstream

More information

HYDROLOGY STUDY LA MIRADA BOULEVARD La Mirada, California

HYDROLOGY STUDY LA MIRADA BOULEVARD La Mirada, California HYDROLOGY STUDY 12000 LA MIRADA BOULEVARD La Mirada, California TTM 73119 Prepared for: The Olson Company 3010 Old Ranch Parkway, Suite 100 Seal Beach, CA 90740 Contact: Mr. Aaron Orenstein (562) 370-9531

More information

Contents. Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek

Contents. Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek Contents SITE LOCATION / DESCRIPTION... 3 WESTPOINTE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN... 3 THE ENCLAVE AT WESTPOINTE DETENTION POND... 3 Table

More information

Summary of Detention Pond Calculation Canyon Estates American Canyon, California

Summary of Detention Pond Calculation Canyon Estates American Canyon, California July 15, 2015 Bellecci & Associates, Inc Summary of Detention Pond Calculation Canyon Estates American Canyon, California 1. Methodology: Method: Unit Hydrograph Software: Bentley Pond Pack Version 8i

More information

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (TM) UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (TM) UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (TM) UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT To: Michael Hindle, P.E. Mark Niemiec, P.E. Project Engineer Manager of District Projects Padre Dam MWD Padre Dam MWD PD JN 214007 From: Subject:

More information

Preliminary Drainage Analysis

Preliminary Drainage Analysis Preliminary Drainage Analysis Tanimura and Antle Employee Housing Town of Spreckels County of Monterey, California LIB150205 May 29, 2015 Prepared For: Tanimura and Antle Produce Prepared By: 9699 Blue

More information

HYDROLOGIC-HYDRAULIC STUDY ISABELLA OCEAN RESIDENCES ISLA VERDE, CAROLINA, PR

HYDROLOGIC-HYDRAULIC STUDY ISABELLA OCEAN RESIDENCES ISLA VERDE, CAROLINA, PR HYDROLOGIC-HYDRAULIC STUDY ISABELLA OCEAN RESIDENCES ISLA VERDE, CAROLINA, PR 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description and Location Isabella Ocean Residences is a residential development to be constructed

More information

SECTION IV WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

SECTION IV WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS A. Watershed Modeling SECTION IV WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS An initial step in the preparation of this stormwater management plan was the selection of a stormwater simulation model to be utilized. It

More information

RETENTION BASIN EXAMPLE

RETENTION BASIN EXAMPLE -7 Given: Total Tributary Area = 7.5 ac o Tributary Area within Existing R/W = 5.8 ac o Tributary Area, Impervious, Outside of R/W = 0.0 ac o Tributary Area, Pervious, Outside of R/W = 1.7 ac o Tributary

More information

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GASTON GYPSUM POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GASTON GYPSUM POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GASTON GYPSUM POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY Section 257.82 of EPA s regulations requires the owner or operator of an existing or new CCR surface impoundment or

More information

LIST OF TABLES... ii LIST OF FIGURES... iii LIST OF APPENDICES... iv. Section 1 - Introduction Purpose of Study... 1

LIST OF TABLES... ii LIST OF FIGURES... iii LIST OF APPENDICES... iv. Section 1 - Introduction Purpose of Study... 1 Preliminary Hydrologic Analysis for Alberhill Villages April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Name Page Number LIST OF TABLES... ii LIST OF FIGURES... iii LIST OF APPENDICES... iv Section 1 - Introduction...

More information

APPENDIX J-3 Technical Report on Airport Drainage, Northern Sector Airport and Ordinance Creek Watershed, Airport Creek Hydrologic Models

APPENDIX J-3 Technical Report on Airport Drainage, Northern Sector Airport and Ordinance Creek Watershed, Airport Creek Hydrologic Models APPENDIX J-3 Technical Report on Airport Drainage, Northern Sector Airport and Ordinance Creek Watershed, Airport Creek Hydrologic Models Introduction Technical Report on Airport Drainage Appendix J-3:

More information

Drainage Analysis. Appendix E

Drainage Analysis. Appendix E Drainage Analysis Appendix E The existing and proposed storm drainage systems have been modeled with Bentley CivilStorm V8 computer modeling software. The peak stormwater discharge was determined for

More information

November 21, City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303) RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report

November 21, City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303) RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report November 21, 2016 City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 (303) 538-7295 RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report As per your request, we are submitting to you the drainage report

More information

APPENDIX J-3. Orcem Stormwater Management and Treatment Facilities Design Summary

APPENDIX J-3. Orcem Stormwater Management and Treatment Facilities Design Summary APPENDIX J-3 Orcem Stormwater Management and Treatment Facilities Design Summary Stormwater Management & Treatment Facilities Design Summary INTRODUCTION KPFF Consulting Engineers has compiled this report

More information

DRAINAGE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

DRAINAGE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Project Name: Firm Name: Map ID: Engineer: Address: City: State: Zip: Phone Number: Fax Number: Property Owner: Address: City: State: Zip: Reviewed By: Date Received: Date Accepted for Review: The following

More information

APPENDIX F RATIONAL METHOD

APPENDIX F RATIONAL METHOD 7-F-1 APPENDIX F RATIONAL METHOD 1.0 Introduction One of the most commonly used procedures for calculating peak flows from small drainages less than 200 acres is the Rational Method. This method is most

More information

DRAINAGE REPORT. Project Name: PG&E Gas Operations Technical Training Center Winters, CA. Date: February 4, Prepared by: BKF Engineers

DRAINAGE REPORT. Project Name: PG&E Gas Operations Technical Training Center Winters, CA. Date: February 4, Prepared by: BKF Engineers DRAINAGE REPORT Project Name: PG&E Gas Operations Technical Training Center Winters, CA Date: February 4, 2015 Prepared by: BKF Engineers Client: Pacific Gas & Electric Company This report has been prepared

More information

INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257

INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257 INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.81 HUFFAKER ROAD (PLANT HAMMOND) PRIVATE INDUSTRIAL LANDFILL (HUFFAKER ROAD LANDFILL) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion

More information

6.0 Runoff. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Flood Control Design Runoff

6.0 Runoff. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Flood Control Design Runoff October 2003, Revised February 2005 Chapter 6.0, Runoff Page 1 6.1 Introduction 6.0 Runoff The timing, peak rates of discharge, and volume of stormwater runoff are the primary considerations in the design

More information

LAKE COUNTY HYDROLOGY DESIGN STANDARDS

LAKE COUNTY HYDROLOGY DESIGN STANDARDS LAKE COUNTY HYDROLOGY DESIGN STANDARDS Lake County Department of Public Works Water Resources Division 255 N. Forbes Street Lakeport, CA 95453 (707)263-2341 Adopted June 22, 1999 These Standards provide

More information

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GREENE COUNTY ASH POND ALABMA POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GREENE COUNTY ASH POND ALABMA POWER COMPANY INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GREENE COUNTY ASH POND ALABMA POWER COMPANY Section 257.82 of EPA s regulations requires the owner or operator of an existing or new CCR surface impoundment

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS PART III - MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS Section 105 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS AND SCOPE 105.1

TABLE OF CONTENTS PART III - MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS Section 105 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS AND SCOPE 105.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART III - MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS Section 105 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN SECTION TITLE PAGE 105.1. SPECIFICATIONS AND SCOPE 105.1 105.2. METHODS OF ANALYSIS 105.1 105.2.1. Rational Method

More information

THE CROSSROADS IN WINCHESTER 4. DRAINAGE PLAN. 4. Drainage Plan. a. Drainage Plan Description

THE CROSSROADS IN WINCHESTER 4. DRAINAGE PLAN. 4. Drainage Plan. a. Drainage Plan Description THE CROSSROADS IN WINCHESTER 4. DRAINAGE PLAN 4. Drainage Plan a. Drainage Plan Description The Specific Plan area drains naturally into two separate watersheds: approximately 6 percent of the Specific

More information

FORT COLLINS STORMWATER CRITERIA MANUAL Hydrology Standards (Ch. 5) 1.0 Overview

FORT COLLINS STORMWATER CRITERIA MANUAL Hydrology Standards (Ch. 5) 1.0 Overview Chapter 5: Hydrology Standards Contents 1.0 Overview... 1 1.1 Storm Runoff Determination... 1 1.2 Design Storm Frequencies... 1 1.3 Water Quality Storm Provisions... 2 1.4 Design Storm Return Periods...

More information

Chapter 4. Drainage Report and Construction Drawing Submittal Requirements

Chapter 4. Drainage Report and Construction Drawing Submittal Requirements 4.0 Introduction The requirements presented in this section shall be used to aid the design engineer or applicant in the preparation of drainage reports, drainage studies, and construction drawings for

More information

Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Update: Base Strategy and Methodology to Address Hydromodification Impacts

Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Update: Base Strategy and Methodology to Address Hydromodification Impacts Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Update: Base Strategy and Methodology to Address Hydromodification Impacts 1.0 INTRODUCTION The proposed hydromodification base strategy (Base Strategy)

More information

Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Update: Base Strategy and Methodology to Address Hydromodification Impacts

Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Update: Base Strategy and Methodology to Address Hydromodification Impacts Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Update: Base Strategy and Methodology to Address Hydromodification Impacts 1.0 INTRODUCTION The proposed hydromodification base strategy (Base Strategy)

More information

The site slopes generally from the southwest to northeast at approximately 3.7 percent.

The site slopes generally from the southwest to northeast at approximately 3.7 percent. March 3, 2017 Nate Hatleback Project Manager, City of Thornton Development Engineering 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 (303) 538-7694 RE: Riverdale Five Retail Drainage Conformance Letter Dear

More information

FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT FALLBROOK FILING NO. 3 Thornton, CO

FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT FALLBROOK FILING NO. 3 Thornton, CO FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT FALLBROOK FILING NO. 3 Thornton, CO May 6, 2016 JN: 14053 Prepared for: Carlson Associates CalAtlantic Homes PO Box 247 6161 S. Syracuse Way, Suite 200 Eastlake, CO 80614 Greenwood

More information

Subject: Mt. San Antonio College- Measure RR Updated Hydrology Study

Subject: Mt. San Antonio College- Measure RR Updated Hydrology Study To: Cc: Mike Klein Mt. San Antonio College Sidney Lindmark, AICP Mt SAC Environmental Consultant From: Alysen Weiland, PE - Psomas Date: May 6, 2016 Subject: Mt. San Antonio College- Measure RR Updated

More information

Learn how to design inlet grates, detention basins, channels, and riprap using the FHWA Hydraulic Toolbox and WMS

Learn how to design inlet grates, detention basins, channels, and riprap using the FHWA Hydraulic Toolbox and WMS v. 11.0 WMS 11.0 Tutorial Learn how to design inlet grates, detention basins, channels, and riprap using the FHWA Hydraulic Toolbox and WMS Objectives Learn how to use several Hydraulic Toolbox calculators

More information

HYDROLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS. 22 nd Annual Nonpoint Source Pollution Conference Saratoga Springs, NY

HYDROLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS. 22 nd Annual Nonpoint Source Pollution Conference Saratoga Springs, NY LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT HYDROLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS 22 nd Annual Nonpoint Source Pollution Conference Saratoga Springs, NY May 18, 2011 PRESENTATION AGENDA Introduction Definitions Discuss Impacts to Hydrologic

More information

RE: Final Drainage Letter: Northwest Aurora Alley Improvements 2016

RE: Final Drainage Letter: Northwest Aurora Alley Improvements 2016 April 12, 2016 Mr. Craig Perl, P.E. Senior Engineer City of Aurora Public Works Department 15151 E. Alameda Parkway Aurora, CO 80012 RE: Final Drainage Letter: Northwest Aurora Alley Improvements 2016

More information

Preliminary Stormwater Quality Mitigation Report

Preliminary Stormwater Quality Mitigation Report Preliminary Stormwater Quality Mitigation Report MGA Chatsworth Campus 20000 Prairie Street Chatsworth, CA TUSTIN 17782 17th Street Suite 200 Tustin, CA 92780-1947 714.665.4500 Fax 714.665.4501 LOS ANGELES

More information

RATIONAL METHOD INPUT PARAMETERS

RATIONAL METHOD INPUT PARAMETERS RATIONAL METHOD INPUT PARAMETERS TIME OF CONCENTRATION Study Area Rational Method Nodes Upper Elevation, ft Lower Elevation, ft Flow Length, mi Tc, min Quarry Phase 1 10 12 352.2 221 0.014 0.17 Quarry

More information

Technical Memorandum

Technical Memorandum Tucson Office 3031 West Ina Road Tucson, AZ 85741 Tel 520.297.7723 Fax 520.297.7724 www.tetratech.com Technical Memorandum To: Kathy Arnold From: Greg Hemmen, P.E. Company: Rosemont Copper Company Date:

More information

Applying the Water Quality Volume

Applying the Water Quality Volume Applying the Water Quality Volume Justin Reinhart, PE Division of Surface Water Northeast Ohio Stormwater Training Council Cleveland, Ohio & Richfield, Ohio July 12, 2018 July 25, 2018 Post-Construction

More information

Appendix B. Storm Drain System Data

Appendix B. Storm Drain System Data MENIFEE VALLEY CAMPUS MASTER PLAN FINAL EIR MT. SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Appendix Appendix B. Storm Drain System Data June 2017 MENIFEE VALLEY CAMPUS MASTER PLAN FINAL EIR MT. SAN JACINTO

More information

ENGINEERING REVIEW CHECKLIST City of Mount Clemens

ENGINEERING REVIEW CHECKLIST City of Mount Clemens (To be completed by the Developer s & Submitted with ing Plans) DATE: PROJECT NAME: Site Plan Approved: Date DESIGN ENGINEERING COMPANY: ing Company Contact Information: Name: Phone: Email: Owner Contact

More information

100-yr Design Runoff (cfs) Basin ID 103b A a B B C Totals

100-yr Design Runoff (cfs) Basin ID 103b A a B B C Totals PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The drainage for this site has been designed to be less than the maximum allowable runoff from each basin as stated in the Overall Rigden Farm drainage plan. Table 1 compares the actual

More information

MODULE 1 RUNOFF HYDROGRAPHS WORKSHEET 1. Precipitation

MODULE 1 RUNOFF HYDROGRAPHS WORKSHEET 1. Precipitation Watershed MODULE 1 RUNOFF HYDROGRAPHS WORKSHEET 1 A watershed is an area of land thaaptures rainfall and other precipitation and funnels it to a lake or stream or wetland. The area within the watershed

More information

Arvada Plaza Redevelopment. Walmart Store # (Lot 1) Industrial Realty Group, LLC (Lot 2)

Arvada Plaza Redevelopment. Walmart Store # (Lot 1) Industrial Realty Group, LLC (Lot 2) Drainage Analysis Arvada, CO Arvada Plaza Redevelopment Including: Walmart Store #4734-00 (Lot 1) & Industrial Realty Group, LLC (Lot 2) (W 58 th Ave & Independence Street) Arvada, Colorado Preliminary

More information

SECTION III: WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

SECTION III: WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS Trout Creek Watershed Stormwater Management Plan SECTION III: WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS A. Watershed Modeling An initial step this study of the Trout Creek watershed was the selection of a stormwater

More information

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT NEWCASTLE FIRE STATION OLD STATE HIGHWAY

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT NEWCASTLE FIRE STATION OLD STATE HIGHWAY PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT FOR THE NEWCASTLE FIRE STATION OLD STATE HIGHWAY PREPARED FOR THE NEWCASTLE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT JULY 2014 BY ROSEVILLE DESIGN GROUP, INC. ROSEVILLE DESIGN GROUP, Inc Established

More information

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR. Chick-Fil-A S Ferdon Blvd, Crestview FL. February 10 th, 2017

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR. Chick-Fil-A S Ferdon Blvd, Crestview FL. February 10 th, 2017 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR Chick-Fil-A 3000 S Ferdon Blvd, Crestview FL February 10 th, 2017 PROJECT #010014-01-047 954.712.7482 www.bowmanconsulting.com Table of Contents Introduction.1 Project

More information

Hydromodification Management Measures

Hydromodification Management Measures Chapter 7 Hydromodification Management Measures This Chapter summarizes the requirements for controlling erosive flows from development projects. 7.1 Why Require Hydromodification Management? Changes in

More information

Hydromodification Management Measures

Hydromodification Management Measures Chapter 7 Hydromodification Management Measures This Chapter summarizes the requirements for controlling erosive flows from development projects. 7.1 Why Require Hydromodification Management? Changes in

More information

APPENDIX IV. APPROVED METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN (NORTH ORANGE COUNTY)

APPENDIX IV. APPROVED METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN (NORTH ORANGE COUNTY) APPENDIX IV. APPROVED METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN (NORTH ORANGE COUNTY) Hydromodification design criteria for the North Orange County permit area are based on the 2- yr, 24-hr

More information

City of Fort Collins. Spring Creek Place (2105 South College Avenue) Preliminary Drainage Report

City of Fort Collins. Spring Creek Place (2105 South College Avenue) Preliminary Drainage Report City of Fort Collins Spring Creek Place (2105 South College Avenue) Preliminary Drainage Report OCTOBER 2016 VERSION 3 Prepared By: 4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1500 Denver, CO 80237 Daniel L. Skeehan,

More information

BMP Design Aids. w w w. t r a n s p o r t a t i o n. o h i o. g o v. Equations / Programs

BMP Design Aids. w w w. t r a n s p o r t a t i o n. o h i o. g o v. Equations / Programs BMP Design Aids 1 Equations / Programs Outlet Discharge Equations Hydrograph and Pond Routing Programs USGS StreamStats 2 Ohio Department of Transportation 1 Training Intent Introduction and overview of

More information

APPENDIX C PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY STUDY (BWE 2017)

APPENDIX C PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY STUDY (BWE 2017) UC San Diego Voigt Parking Structure Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration October 2017 APPENDIX C PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY STUDY (BWE 2017) UC San Diego Voigt Parking Structure

More information

Appendix J: The Project Stormwater Control Plan by Lea & Braze Engineering, Inc.

Appendix J: The Project Stormwater Control Plan by Lea & Braze Engineering, Inc. Appendix J: The Project Stormwater Control Plan by Lea & Braze Engineering, Inc. STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN 23 LOT SUBDIVISION ON PROCTOR ROAD CASTRO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA Owner/Developer: Hue Tran 4584 Ewing

More information

FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT CORNERSTONE RIVER VALLEY VILLAGE FILING NO. 1 CITY OF THORNTON, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO

FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT CORNERSTONE RIVER VALLEY VILLAGE FILING NO. 1 CITY OF THORNTON, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT CORNERSTONE RIVER VALLEY VILLAGE FILING NO. 1 CITY OF THORNTON, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO PREPARED FOR: Thornton Cornerstone LLC 558 Castle Pines Parkway Suite B4-321 Castle

More information

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT Silvercreek Junction STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT Howitt Creek at the Silvercreek Parkway Site Guelph, Ontario August, 2008 TSH File 22304A-04 August 19, 2008 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT Howitt Creek

More information

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY Section 257.82 of EPA s regulations requires the owner or operator of an existing or new CCR surface impoundment or any

More information

E. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

E. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT E. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 1. Existing Conditions The Project Site is located within the Lower Hudson Watershed. According to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), Lower Hudson

More information

Stormwater Management Studies PDS Engineering Services Division ES Policy # 3-01

Stormwater Management Studies PDS Engineering Services Division ES Policy # 3-01 Stormwater Management Studies PDS Engineering Services Division Revised Date: 2/28/08 INTRODUCTION The City of Overland Park requires submission of a stormwater management study as part of the development

More information

CORBIN AND NORDHOFF IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS ENV EIR F. HYDROLOGY

CORBIN AND NORDHOFF IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS ENV EIR F. HYDROLOGY F. HYDROLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Project Site The Project Site is located at 19601 Nordhoff Street in the Chatsworth area of the City of Los Angeles, California, within the Chatsworth - Porter Ranch

More information

DICKINSON BAYOU WATERSHED STEERING COMMITTEE FINAL MEMBER CRITERIA COMPARISON

DICKINSON BAYOU WATERSHED STEERING COMMITTEE FINAL MEMBER CRITERIA COMPARISON DICKINSON BAYOU WATERSHED STEERING COMMITTEE FINAL MEMBER CRITERIA COMPARISON May 25, 2006 INTRODUCTION The Dickinson Bayou Watershed covers approximately 95.5 square miles and stretches from western Brazoria

More information

Module 3 and Module 4 Watershed Analysis and RUSLE Calculation. Noboru Togawa. Presented to: Dr. Pitt Construction Site Erosion Control

Module 3 and Module 4 Watershed Analysis and RUSLE Calculation. Noboru Togawa. Presented to: Dr. Pitt Construction Site Erosion Control Module 3 and Module 4 Watershed Analysis and RUSLE Calculation by Presented to: Dr. Pitt Construction Site Erosion Control Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering The University

More information

Final Drainage Report

Final Drainage Report Thornton Electric Substation Project Final Drainage Report December 14, 2016 DRAFT Prepared for: Xcel Energy, 1800 Larimer Street, Suite 400, Denver, Colorado 80202 Prepared by: 350 Indiana Street, Suite

More information

HY-12 User Manual. Aquaveo. Contents

HY-12 User Manual. Aquaveo. Contents Y-12 User Manual Aquaveo Contents Overview...2 Watershed Parameters...3 Channel Parameters...3 Storm Drain Parameters...3 Design of new systems...4 Analysis of existing systems...4 Steady flow...4 ydrographic

More information

PART V - STORM DRAIN DESIGN CRITERIA

PART V - STORM DRAIN DESIGN CRITERIA PART V - STORM DRAIN DESIGN CRITERIA A. Hydrology Studies and Hydraulic Analyses 1. Drainage area master plans and calculations are to be submitted with all subdivision improvement plans, permit improvement

More information

PART V - STORM DRAIN DESIGN CRITERIA

PART V - STORM DRAIN DESIGN CRITERIA PART V - STORM DRAIN DESIGN CRITERIA A. Hydrology Studies and Hydraulic Analyses 1. Drainage area master plans and calculations are to be submitted with all subdivision improvement plans, permit improvement

More information

Appendix L. Drainage Report

Appendix L. Drainage Report Appendix L Drainage Report 2nd Street and Pacific Coast Highway Retail Project City of Long Beach County of Los Angeles, CA DRAINAGE REPORT April 5, 2017 DRAINAGE REPORT For: 2nd Street and Pacific Coast

More information

Location Drainage Study

Location Drainage Study Location Drainage Study PROJECT ROUTE: LIMITS: MUNICIPALITY/COUNTY: JOB NUMBER: IL 47 at Burlington Road 750ft NW to 750ft SE of IL 47(Burlington), & 1000ft S to 1000ft N of Burlington (IL47) Kane County

More information

Appendix E.2 Preliminary Hydrology Report

Appendix E.2 Preliminary Hydrology Report Appendix E.2 Preliminary Hydrology Report PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY STUDY HARVARD WESTLAKE SCHOOL PARKING STRUCTURE 3700 Coldwater Canyon North Hollywood, CA 91604 KPFF Job # 109046 August 12, 2013 CLIENT:

More information

Section 600 Runoff Table of Contents

Section 600 Runoff Table of Contents Section 600 Runoff Table of Contents 601 INTRODUCTION...600-1 602 RATIONAL METHOD...600-1 602.1 Rational Method Formula...600-2 602.2 Time of Concentration...600-2 602.3 Intensity...600-4 602.4 Runoff

More information

SECTION 4 STORM DRAINAGE

SECTION 4 STORM DRAINAGE 4.01 GENERAL SECTION 4 STORM DRAINAGE These standards shall provide minimum requirements for the design of Storm Drainage and related appurtenances within the City of West Sacramento rights of way and

More information

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. Spring Lake Park Schools Westwood Middle School st Avenue NE, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. Spring Lake Park Schools Westwood Middle School st Avenue NE, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432 PAN 16-112, Westwood Middle School, Page 1 of 6 COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW MEETING DATE: August 22, 2016 AGENDA NUMBER: 10 FILE NUMBER: 16-112 ITEM: Westwood Middle School RECOMMENDATION:

More information

Chapter 7. Street Drainage. 7.0 Introduction. 7.1 Function of Streets in the Drainage System. 7.2 Street Classification

Chapter 7. Street Drainage. 7.0 Introduction. 7.1 Function of Streets in the Drainage System. 7.2 Street Classification 7. Introduction This chapter summarizes methods to evaluate runoff conveyance in various street cross sections and curb types in the Town of Castle Rock and identifies acceptable upper limits of street

More information

MORENO MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN

MORENO MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Riverside, California MORENO MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN ZONE FOUR Original Plan September 1980 Revision No. 2 April 2015 WARREN D. WILLIAMS General

More information

STORM DRAINS AND IRRIGATION

STORM DRAINS AND IRRIGATION TABLE OF CONTENTS PART III - MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS Section 105 STORM DRAINS AND IRRIGATION 105.1. STORM DRAINS... 105.1 105.2. METHODS OF ANALYSIS... 105.1 105.2.1. Rational Method... 105.1 105.2.2.

More information

A Hydrologic Study of the. Ryerson Creek Watershed

A Hydrologic Study of the. Ryerson Creek Watershed A Hydrologic Study of the Ryerson Creek Watershed Dave Fongers Hydrologic Studies Unit Land and Water Management Division Michigan Department of Environmental Quality May 8, 2002 Table of Contents Summary...2

More information

Stormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia

Stormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia Stormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia Adopted November 15, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. FORWARD... 1 2. GENERAL LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS... 2 2.1. DETENTION REQUIREMENTS... 2 2.1.1.

More information

Southeast Policy Area Drainage Study

Southeast Policy Area Drainage Study Southeast Policy Area Drainage Study Prepared for City of Elk Grove January 2014 448-00-12-03 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 1 2.0 Watershed Description... 1 3.0 Drainage Plan Concept... 1 4.0

More information

ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE ZONED UNINCORPORATED AREAS ARTICLE 1500 OF PUTNAM COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA Page 149 ARTICLE 1500 DRAINAGE AND STORM SEWERS

ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE ZONED UNINCORPORATED AREAS ARTICLE 1500 OF PUTNAM COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA Page 149 ARTICLE 1500 DRAINAGE AND STORM SEWERS OF PUTNAM COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA Page 149 ARTICLE 1500 DRAINAGE AND STORM SEWERS 1500.01 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1500.02 NATURE OF STORM WATER FACILITIES 1500.03 DRAINAGE EASEMENTS 1500.04 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT

More information

Drainage Report. New Braunfels Municipal Airport. Master Plan Update 2005

Drainage Report. New Braunfels Municipal Airport. Master Plan Update 2005 Drainage Report Master Plan Update 2005 General The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), Aviation Division, retained the consulting engineering team of Parkhill, Smith & Cooper, Inc. (PSC), to prepare

More information

CONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECKLIST

CONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECKLIST CONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECKLIST The design engineer is responsible for ensuring that plans submitted for city review are in accordance with this checklist. It is requested that the executed checklist be submitted

More information

Engineering Report Preliminary Floodplain Study. Executive Summary

Engineering Report Preliminary Floodplain Study. Executive Summary Executive Summary Engineering Report Preliminary Floodplain Study The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has updated the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) for Finney County, including the City of

More information

Appendix A Stormwater Site Plan Report Short Form

Appendix A Stormwater Site Plan Report Short Form Appendix A Stormwater Site Plan Report Short Form The Stormwater Site Plan Report Short Form may be used for projects that trigger only Minimum Requirements #1-#5. These projects typically fall within

More information

Municipal Stormwater Ordinances Summary Table

Municipal Stormwater Ordinances Summary Table APPENDIX F Municipal Ordinances Summary Table Municipality Abington Bryn Athyn Borough Hatboro Borough Ordinance, SALDO Runoff equals pre post Erosion Sediment Control Water Quality Requirements Any which

More information

Public Works and Engineering

Public Works and Engineering 6.C Exhibit Incorporated in 1909 Public Works and Engineering Committee Report To: From: Mayor and Board of Trustees Bill Emmerich For Village Board Meeting of: November 27, 2017 Subject: Division and

More information

Appendix F HYDROLOGY/WATER QUALITY REPORT TIESLAU CIVIL ENGINEERING

Appendix F HYDROLOGY/WATER QUALITY REPORT TIESLAU CIVIL ENGINEERING Appendix F HYDROLOGY/WATER QUALITY REPORT TIESLAU CIVIL ENGINEERING T IE S L A U C I V IL E N G I NE E R IN G, IN C. P.O. B o x 2 2 9 7, K i n g s B ea c h, C A 9 6 1 4 3 p h : (5 3 0 )5 4 6-0 8 6 1 8

More information