3. Management IAEA. International Atomic Energy Agency

Transcription

1 3. Management IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency

2 3. Management (Phase 1) Evaluation Conditions Energy strategy and nuclear power compatibility analyzed Unique MS conditions evaluated Available Nuclear technology identified Ownership options and operational responsibilities considered Authorities and responsibilities established Appropriate expertise and experience involved Commitment to Management systems to promote safety culture Basis for Evaluation A government report A NEPIO report A NEPIO report A government report A government report Participation of external advisors with appropriate experience A NEPIO plan IAEA EM WS 2010 August 2

3 3. Management (Phase 1) Evaluation 3.1. Energy strategy and nuclear power compatibility analysed a) A government report justifying the role of NP in the future energy strategy of the Member State. (Cases) Energy strategy is continuously and includes nuclear, approved by energy ministry How was the viability of NP evaluated? Using IAEA tools? 3.2. Unique Member State conditions evaluated a) A report produced by the NEPIO describing national criteria and general specifications for an NPP to be implemented in the Member State. (Cases) A set of main conditions is defined, already discussed with potential vendors Outsource to a consulting company as a part of Project Management Stated in Draft Document of Bid Invitation Specification (BIS), Country s User Consideration Document (UCD), Guidance for the Application & Development of Sustainable Nuclear Energy System in the Country IAEA EM WS 2010 August 3

4 3. Management (Phase 1) Evaluation 3.3 Available nuclear technologies identified A report produced by the NEPIO based on analysis of information including that provided by potential vendors showing that there are available NPP designs fulfilling national criteria. (Cases) Discussed with vendors in workshops as described in presentation Matured SMR is not identified no viable options in MW range Entire package, not just technology, is assessed in technology selection IAEA EM WS 2010 August 4

5 Reference information Technology selection: for consideration by users Near term : most new nuclear build will likely be evolutionary designs pursuing economies of scale and based on operational experiences. Longer term: innovative designs would emerge in the market including SMR. Innovative designs would need verification and demonstration (classic development process: experimental, prototype, demonstration before commercialization) Desirable reactor & size would be different by countries (grid, finance, electricity market, multiple-purpose use etc.) IAEA 5

6 Relevant to your concern Small and Medium-sized Reactor (SMR) 1. History of pursuit of economics of scale and continued deployment in India 2. Many SMR designs popping up such as; LWR (Light-water-cooled): 335MWe IRIS (USA), 90MWe SMART (RoK), 300MWe CAREM (Argentina), 300MWe VBER (Russia), 125 MWe mpower (USA) etc. GCR (Gas-cooled):165MWe PBMR (S. Africa), 268MWe GTMHR (USA), 160MWe HTR-PM (China) LMR (Liquid-Metal-cooled): 50MWe 4S Nuclear Battery (Japan), CANDLE (Japan), TWR (USA) 3. Current interest in Member States; Developing countries: For use in a small grid Existing nuclear power countries : For local solution (power source for isolated area, multi-purpose energy source) Deregulated and unbundled electricity business environment : For incremental investment to avoid financial risk IAEA EM WS 2010 August 6

7 Reference information Consideration may be given also to non-electric applications of NP Global demand for portable water increase: desalination Most of the world s energy consumption is for heat and transportation. NE has potential to penetrate into these sectors currently served by fossil fuels (price volatility and finite supply) Technology development is ongoing so that nuclear energy can help chemical energy production - Recovery of oil from tar sand (Canada) - Sweetening of oil by adding hydrogen - Coal gasification (S. Africa, Australia) desalination oil recovery from tar sand IAEA 7

8 Reference information Screening Step-by-step screening process addressing the following points; a) Definition of the users needs considering the following (but not limited to) Status of power grid system and its future growth (size and network), potential for sharing the assets with neighbouring countries Necessary capacity - Unit size (MWe) Preference for proven designs Certification of the design by the Regulator in the country of the supplier Meeting contemporary standard Utility requirements Easiness for localization and supporting domestic partner Technical background in the country Relevance with resources use ( indigenous U/Th resources) Availability of fuel cycle services etc. b) Tendering bid c) Bid evaluation considering long-term economics, price, compatibility of national nuclear energy strategy and technology transfer, fuel supply IAEA 8

9 3. Management (Phase 1) Evaluation 3.4. Ownership options and operational responsibilities considered a) A plan produced by the NEPIO analysing possible ownership and organizational structures for financing, implementation and operation of the NPP and demonstrating capability for safe and successful implementation of a nuclear power programme. (Cases) Outsource to a consulting company as a part of Project Management 3.5. Authorities and responsibilities established a) A Government report describing the authorities and responsibilities of future organizations. (Cases) Will involve National Electric Power company Will involve electric regulatory commission (regulator of electricity market) for discusson, since regulatory aspects in privatised market needs to be investigated definition of o-o suggested to be included in work scope of consultant To be developed after discussion with potential vendors IAEA EM WS 2010 August 9

10 3. Management (Phase 1) Evaluation 3.6. Appropriate expertise and experience involved a) Evidence that external advisors and consultants with appropriate experience have participated in the preparation and/or review of relevant documents. (Cases) Outsource to a consulting company as a part of Project Management 3.7. Commitment to management systems that promote and support a strong safety culture, evident a) A plan produced by the NEPIO to ensure that the management systems in future key organizations are designed in such a way that they provide structure and direction to the organization that permits and promotes the development of leadership and a strong safety culture. (Cases) At this stage, a separate group, reporting to Chairman, suggested to be established to set policy and monitor implementation. IAEA EM WS 2010 August 10

11 3. Management (Phase 2) Evaluation Conditions Basis for Evaluation BIS Available a) Documented Bid Invitation Specification (BIS) available. Adequate staff to prepare for and analyse bids available Bid evaluation criteria determined a) Description of organization including roles/responsibilities of departments and individuals with respect to Bid assessment, etc. b) Evidence that NPP Owner staff members are trained/qualified Clear description of how bids will be evaluated. Evidence that criteria Contracting strategy established Project management organization established Document reviewing contracting strategies and justifying the chosen approach a) adequate staffing b) Roles and responsibilities defined etc Management systems established a) All participating organizations established and have documented management systems IAEA EM WS 2010 August 11

12 3. Management (Phase 2) Evaluation 3.1. BIS Available a) Documented Bid Invitation Specification (BIS) available. (Cases) BIS developed by consultant after owner model developed and approved 3.2. Adequate staff to prepare for and analyse bids available a) Description of organization including roles and responsibilities of departments and individuals with respect to Bid assessment, supervision of NPP construction, development of knowledge base, understanding of O&M requirements. (Cases) A team was set up; need information on size, composition on optimized team and training for team necessary from the Agency (Agency draft updated Bid Spec/Eval document ) b) Evidence that NPP Owner staff members are trained/qualified. IAEA EM WS 2010 August 12

13 3. Management (Phase 2) Evaluation 3.3. Bid evaluation criteria determined Clear description of how bids will be evaluated. Evidence that criteria include any country specific requirements, safety and security aspects, the complete fuel cycle requirements, as well as financial, legal, technical and commercial aspects. Agency draft updated Bid Spec/Eval document IAEA EM WS 2010 August 13

14 Reference information Bid process IAEA

15 3. Management: Phase Contracting strategy established a) Document reviewing contracting strategies and justifying the chosen approach. Approval that chosen strategy is consistent with national legislation. Implications recognized and plan to fulfil necessary requirements in place Project management organization established a) Justification of adequate staffing (numbers, skills, experience). b) Roles and responsibilities within the organization clearly defined, particularly with respect to control of work and acceptance. c) Project reporting mechanisms defined. d) Acceptance procedures and criteria defined. e) Plans to acquire/develop required commissioning skills. f) Interfaces with other organizations defined and agreed on. IAEA EM WS 2010 August 15

16 Reference information Contractual approach Three different types of contractual approach applied for NPP : 1)Turnkey approach, where a single contractor or a consortium of contractors takes the overall technical responsibility for the whole works; 2) Split-package approach, where the overall technical responsibility is divided between a relatively small number of contractors, each building a large section of the works; 3) Multi-contract approach, where the owner or his architectengineer (A/E) assumes overall responsibility for engineering the station, issuing a large number of contracts. IAEA EM WS 2010 August 16

17 AE=Architect-engineer FS=Fuel supplier MC=Main contractor EM=Equipment manufacturer RA=Regulatory authority SS=System supplier U=Utility IAEA EM WS 2010 August 17

18 Reference information Decision factors for selection of contractual approach Potential vendors and their particular experiences and attributes; Standardization and proven quality; Government and industrial relationships; Competitive and economic considerations; Foreign financing possibilities; Guarantee and liability considerations; Planning and implementation of the project and subsequent projects; Availability of qualified project management, co-ordinating and engineering manpower; Development of national engineering and industry capability; and Owner experience in handling large projects. IAEA EM WS 2010 August 18

19 Relevant to your concern Alternative method of contract and ownership Traditional model (Sovereign-based and cooperate-based) Rationale of bringing in BOO/BOOT model ( outsourcing the development) 1) Limited host country s financial resources 2) Limited host country s technical expertise 3) Speed to market 4) Transfer of risk in bringing project to market 5) Bringing in market competition Change in the BG 1) Deregulated electricity market (developers participation) 2) Desired time-to-market New business model (BOO/BOOT, Regional sharing) Issues for consideration 1) Risk of recovery of investment (developer s view) Long Investment recovery period, Off-take arrangement 2) Keeping the developers liable to safety and waste(?) (host s view) 3) Host government s responsibility should not be taken light 4) Safety should not be neglected by the developer/owner/operator IAEA EM WS 2010 August 19

20 3. Management: Phase Management systems established a) All participating organizations (including the regulatory bodies) established and have documented management systems which promote strong safety safeguards and security culture. Management systems are consistent with IAEA recommendations. IAEA EM WS 2010 August 20

21 Reference information Management system The IAEA revised the 1996 Safety Standards 50- C/SG-Q: QA Requirements and Safety Guides Reasons for change Considerable new developments in the management system practices and changes in the Management System Standards ISO9001:2000 IAEA/FORATOM Workshops and feedback highlighted the need to change to introduce the concept of an integrated management system Harmonization of terminology with ISO 9001:2000 IAEA EM WS 2010 August 21

22 Reference information Common Situation with QA Systems Quality Manuals & Procedures sit on shelves Production of documents is seen as the primary objective QUA L I T Y Procedures Vol 1 Procedures Vol 2 Procedures Vol 3 QualityVol 1 QualityVol Rev b QualityVol 1 Rev a QA Engineer Quality is the role of Quality Department QUALITY Quality is MY Business Q U A L I T Y D E P A R T M E N T Q U A L I T Y P R O C E D U R E S QUALITY RECORDS QUALITY RECORDS QUALITY RECORDS Quality has been considered to be all about obtaining signatures Q A M a na ge r IAEA 1069_28.pre EM WS 2010 August 22 S ig n a tu r e Sig n a tu r e Sig n a tu r e

23 Reference information The new IAEA requirements and guidance that will replace 50-C/SG-Q There are 3 new IAEA Safety Standards Series documents: The Management System for Facilities and Activities, (Requirements) GS-R-3 Application of Management System for Facilities and Activities, (Guidance) GS-G-3.1 Application of Management System for Nuclear Facilities, (Guidance) Currently DS349 IAEA EM WS 2010 August 23

24 Reference information The new documents include the the concept of an integrated management system The management system ; a set of interrelated or interacting elements that establishes policies and objectives and which enables those objectives to be achieved in a safe, efficient and effective manner Quality Control Quality Assurance Integrated Management System IAEA EM WS 2010 August 24

25 Reference information INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, The Management System for Facilities and Activities, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GS-R-3, IAEA, Vienna (2006). INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Application of the Management System for Facilities and Activities, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GS-G-3.1, IAEA, Vienna (2006). INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Nuclear Power Project Management a Guidebook, Technical Reports Series No 279, IAEA, Vienna (1988). INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Managing the First NPP Project, IAEA-TECDOC-1555, IAEA, Vienna (2007). INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, The Operating Organization for Nuclear Power Plants, IAEA Safety Standards series No. NS-G-2.4 (2002). IAEA EM WS 2010 August 25

26 IAEA EM WS 2010 August 26