GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT SEPTEMBER 2015 QUARTERLY MONITORING EVENT. Tennessee Valley Authority Kingston Fossil Plant Ash Processing Area

Transcription

1 Tennessee Valley Authority Kingston Fossil Plant Ash Processing Area GROUWATER MONITORING REPORT SEPTEMBER 0 QUARTERLY MONITORING EVENT Prepared by Amos L. Smith, PG Chattanooga, Tennessee November, 0

2 TVA Kigsro Fossil Plant Ash Processing Area Grodrater Moirorig Repon - September DOCUMENT CERTIFICATION I certify under penalty of law that this document was prepared by me or under my supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. The information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. U. L~ trr?> / /(_jot/ fl --v? Amos L. Smith I Professional Geologist

3 TVA Kingston Fossil Plant Ash Processing Area Groundwater Monitoring Report September 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page DOCUMENT CERTIFICATION... i TABLE OF CONTENTS... ii INTRODUCTION... FACILITY DESCRIPTION... MONITORING NETWORK DESCRIPTION... GROUWATER SAMPLING METHODS... SAMPLE ANALYSIS A RESULTS... HYDROGEOLOGIC COITIONS... CONCLUSIONS... REFERENCES... LIST OF TABLES Table. Well Construction Details... Table. Summary of September -, 0 Unfiltered Groundwater Sample Results. Table. Groundwater Levels and Conditions September -, LIST OF FIGURES Figure. Groundwater Potentiometric Surface September -, 0... APPEICES A. Field Data Sheets B. Laboratory Analytical Report with Chain-of-Custody Record C. Time Series Graphs for Sample Constituents

4 TVA Kingston Fossil Plant Ash Processing Area Groundwater Monitoring Report September 0 INTRODUCTION This report contains groundwater monitoring results for samples collected during September -, 0, from the three designated compliance monitoring wells (AD-, AD-, AD-) located at the Kingston Fossil Plant (KIF) Ash Processing Area (also referred to as the Ball Field area). Sample collection and laboratory analyses were performed in accordance with TVA KIF groundwater sampling protocols designed to satisfy the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Region Groundwater Sampling Operating Procedure as detailed in US EPA Document Number SESDPROC- 0-R (US EPA, 0) and Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) Rule (TDEC, 0), except where noted in the groundwater sampling methods section. Groundwater samples were analyzed by Test America (located in Nashville, TN). FACILITY DESCRIPTION Construction of the Ash Processing Area was initiated in March 00 to process recovered ash material from the December, 00 failure of a containment dike of the KIF Dredge Cell Class II Landfill. The current facility overlies a portion of the abandoned Ash Disposal Area which ceased operations in 7, and the Metal Cleaning Pond which was placed into interim closure in March 00. Since 0, the Ash Processing Area facility has been used to receive and store fly ash from daily KIF production. In 0, wet sluicing operations were ceased, and the site began receiving only dry fly ash. Fly ash was transported by truck from the plant hoppers to the Ash Processing Area, where it was placed and compacted. This activity ceased in September 0. MONITORING NETWORK DESCRIPTION The Ash Processing Area groundwater monitoring network consists of three ASTM Type II monitoring wells installed in March, April, and May 00. The Ash Processing Area Construction and Operation Plan completed by TVA and submitted to TDEC in February 00, identified two existing wells (, A) to be utilized for facility monitoring that were later discovered to be abandoned, so new wells were installed. Each new well was constructed of two-inch diameter schedule 0 PVC with threaded/flush-joint casing and screen with 0.0-inch screen slots. Wells were screened in the first water bearing strata encountered in each borehole, with upgradient well AD- and downgradient well

5 TVA Kingston Fossil Plant Ash Processing Area Groundwater Monitoring Report September 0 AD- having approximately -meter (-foot) screens set in residuum, and downgradient well AD- having approximately.-meter (-foot) screen set in residuum. Well construction details are presented in Table below. Wells and wellhead protection features were in good condition during the September 0 sampling event. Well Diameter (cm) Table. Well Construction Details Depth to Top of Screen (m) Depth to Bottom of Screen (m) Well No. Total Well Depth (m) Material Screened AD-.... Soil/Residuum AD Soil/Residuum AD-.... Soil/Residuum Depths given are measured below the respective grade surface elevation; m - meters, cm - centimeters. The Ash Processing Area facility sampling frequency was changed to monthly beginning October 00 to monitor potential releases to groundwater and to establish a baseline of natural background constituent concentrations, per the request of US EPA and TVA personnel onsite involved in recovery operations. During July 0, the monthly sampling frequency was changed to quarterly by US EPA. GROUWATER SAMPLING METHODS Groundwater sampling operations were performed from September -, 0. Sampling was performed in general accordance with KIF site groundwater sampling protocol (TVA-KIF-SOP-0). Depths to water and total well depths were measured and recorded prior to sampling of individual wells. A bladder pump was used to purge and sample groundwater at each monitoring well. Each well was purged according to US EPA Low Stress (low-flow) purging procedures (EPA, 0) to reduce the likelihood of elevated sample turbidity and produce samples more representative of the groundwater conditions in the aquifer. Sampling collection protocols are based on stabilization of target field parameters, including a turbidity goal of NTUs or less. Stabilization criteria were met for all parameters. Drawdown levels for all three wells exceeded the ideal target of 0. meters per TVA-KIF-SOP-0, dropping between 0. and 0. meters each before reaching stability. Duplicate groundwater samples were collected from AD-. Field-measured groundwater quality indicator parameters (i.e., temperature, specific conductance, ph, dissolved oxygen, oxidation-reduction potential, and turbidity) were

6 TVA Kingston Fossil Plant Ash Processing Area Groundwater Monitoring Report September 0 monitored during well purging using a flow-through cell and instruments (Hydrolab multiprobe and handheld Hach turbidimeter) that were standardized daily to ensure calibration. Field data sheets for the September 0 event are included in Appendix A. After purging, unfiltered groundwater samples were collected directly from the pump discharge tubing into laboratory-supplied, pre-preserved (as appropriate) bottles. The bottleware was certified-clean by the manufacturer, to designated specifications that are acceptable to the analytical laboratory. Samples were sealed, labeled, recorded on a Chain-of-Custody form, and placed in an iced cooler for transport (per TVA-KIF-SOP- 07). Samples were delivered to Test America in Nashville, Tennessee for analysis. Copies of the Chain-of-Custody forms for the September 0 sampling event are attached in Appendix B. New sample tubing and in-line filters were used for each well. All non-disposable sampling equipment that came into contact with sampled media was decontaminated prior to use, between uses, and after sampling activities had been completed. Decontamination included immersion in, scrubbing with, and pumping decontamination fluids prior to air-drying/wiping and re-use/storage. These fluids include, in order of process: detergent solutions, potable water, organic desorbing agent, potable water, and a de-ionized water rinse. Fluids, disposable decontamination material, and disposable PPE were containerized onsite near the well or in centralized waste storage areas. These decontamination activities were carried out in accordance with the site standard equipment decontamination procedure (TVA-KIF-SOP-0).

7 TVA Kingston Fossil Plant Ash Processing Area Groundwater Monitoring Report September 0 SAMPLE ANALYSIS A RESULTS Groundwater samples were analyzed for wet chemistry parameters and total (unfiltered) metals, including the 7 required inorganic constituents specified by Appendix I of TDEC Rule per commitments made in the Ash Processing Area Construction and Operation Plan (TVA, 00). Only total (unfiltered) metals results are presented herein, which is consistent with established groundwater reporting at the site. Laboratory analytical results for unfiltered samples associated with the September 0 groundwater sampling event are summarized in Table. The laboratory reports presented in Appendix B include analytical methods and detection limits for each constituent. Reporting limits presented in Table occasionally vary for each parameter by well and by event, due to dilutions required because of matrix interferences or parameters that exceed the calibration range of the instrument; these are explicitly noted by data qualifiers on the laboratory reports in Appendix B. Maximum contaminants levels (MCLs) listed for the constituents of concern are promulgated by either TDEC Solid Waste Processing Rule Appendix III levels (TDEC, 0) or by US EPA National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (EPA, 00) primary MCLs as indicated on the laboratory results table (see Table ). A not applicable (N/A) designation is shown for cobalt and vanadium in Table since there is no EPA or TDEC MCL for these constituents. Constituent concentrations reported for all samples were below US EPA primary MCLs and TDEC MCLs. Time series graphs of the 7 required inorganic constituents specified in Appendix I of TDEC Rule are presented in Appendix C of this report; circled values of data presented indicate a value less than the reporting limit. All constituent concentrations appear to be stable or declining, except for cobalt. While concentrations have remained low (< ug/l) cobalt concentrations in wells AD- and AD- trended upward from 00 to 0. This corresponds to the time period immediately following intense construction activity at the site and concentrations have been declining since 0. There is no promulgated federal or TDEC MCL for cobalt.

8 TVA Kingston Fossil Plant Ash Processing Area Groundwater Monitoring Report September 0 Table. Summary of September 0 Unfiltered Groundwater Sample Results Parameter s KIF-AD KIF-ADDup KIF-AD KIF-AD MCL MCL Source Antimony µg/l < < < < TDEC/EPA Arsenic µg/l < TDEC/EPA Barium µg/l...,000 TDEC/EPA Beryllium µg/l < < < < TDEC/EPA Cadmium µg/l < < < < TDEC/EPA Chromium µg/l < < < < 0 TDEC/EPA Cobalt µg/l < N/A Copper µg/l < < < <,00 EPA Fluoride mg/l 0. <0. <0. 0. TDEC/EPA Lead µg/l < < < < TDEC/EPA Mercury µg/l <0. <0. <0. <0. TDEC/EPA Nickel µg/l < TDEC Selenium µg/l < < < < 0 TDEC/EPA Silver µg/l < < < < 0 TDEC Thallium µg/l < < < < TDEC/EPA Vanadium µg/l N/A Zinc µg/l < < < <,000 EPA Turbidity NTU N/A TSS mg/l <. < <,000 EPA DUP Well Sample Duplicate MCL Maximum Contaminant Level TDEC Maximum contaminant level (MCL) from Rule , Appendix III (March 0) EPA US Environmental Protection Agency National Primary Drinking Water Regulations

9 TVA Kingston Fossil Plant Ash Processing Area Groundwater Monitoring Report September 0 The September 0 equipment rinsate blank samples contain less than detectable concentrations for all total-fraction constituents. All analytical testing was performed within recommended sample holding times. Analytical data underwent automated data verification to review the laboratory-reported QA/QC results against project-specific QC limits to determine data usability against the project-specific and data validation guidelines. HYDROGEOLOGIC COITIONS The KIF plant site is located in the Valley and Ridge physiographic province of the Appalachian Highlands region. This region is characterized by a sequence of long narrow ridges and valleys trending northeast-southwest. In general, ridges are formed by relatively resistant sandstone, limestone, and dolomite units while the valleys are underlain by soluble limestone and easily weathered shale. The controlling structural feature of the site is a series of northeast-striking thrust faults which have forced older Cambrian and Ordovician rocks over younger units. Bedrock dips southeast at angles ranging from a few degrees to about 0 degrees. The Ash Processing Area is immediately underlain by an ash-fill layer of varying thickness, ranging from 7. m to. m, generally increasing from the northwest perimeter to southeast. In some areas, a thin stratum of clayey soil-fill overlies the ash, typically less than m in thickness. Quaternary alluvium underlies the ash, ranging in thickness from about.7 m to.0 m. The alluvial deposits are unconsolidated and lenticular, and consist of clay, silt, and sand with occasional gravel. A thin layer of residuum is occasionally present directly above bedrock. The residuum is typically composed of clay and silt with weathered fissile shale fragments. Bedrock underlying alluvium is primarily represented by the Conasauga Group (middle to upper Cambrian age). The only exception is a small area along the northern margin of the site underlain by the Rome formation (lower Cambrian age). Specific geologic units within the Conasauga Group represented at the site include the Nolichucky, Maryville, Rogersville, Rutledge, and Pumpkin Valley formations. These formations are locally of low water-producing capacity, and predominantly consist of shale with interbedded siltstone, limestone, and conglomerate. Total thickness of the Conasauga Group beneath the site is unknown but is estimated to be approximately 0 meters.

10 TVA Kingston Fossil Plant Ash Processing Area Groundwater Monitoring Report September0 The Rome formation is generally composed of interbedded shale, sandstone, and siltstone. The elevation of the top of rock in the Ash Processing Area is relatively uniform, varying from approximately to 7 m-msl, based on borings conducted in January and February of 00. Outside this area, the bedrock surface rises steeply to the west and southwest. The lower bedrock terrace corresponding to the processing area represents an erosional surface associated with the ancestral Emory River. Groundwater movement at the plant site generally follows topography with groundwater flowing eastward and southeastward from Pine Ridge toward the Emory River. Groundwater originating on, or flowing beneath, the Ash Processing Area ultimately discharges to the KIF Intake Channel. Groundwater levels measured in site monitoring wells on September -, 0, before sample collections are presented in Table. The shallow groundwater potentiometric surface derived from these measurements is shown on Figure ; groundwater flow shown is inferred to move generally southeastward across the Ash Processing Area toward the plant Intake Channel. An average hydraulic gradient estimated between the northwestern and southeastern boundaries of the disposal area, the mean horizontal hydraulic conductivity of the alluvial aquifer underlying the Ash Processing Area, and the local Darcy flux are presented in Table. Table. Groundwater Levels and Conditions September -, 0 Well No. KIF- AD- KIF- AD- KIF- AD- Top of Casing Elevation (m) Depth to Water (m) Water Elevation (m-msl)* Well Bottom Depth (m) Average Hydraulic Gradient Mean Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity of Underlying Alluvial Aquifer (m/day)** Estimated Local Darcy Flux (m/day)*** E-0 *msl Mean Sea Level. **Cell fluxes modeled in Kingston Ash Recovery Project, Groundwater Flow and Transport Model Report, Document No. EPA-RPT-0, range from.0e-0 to.e-0 m/day, with an average of.e-0 m/day.

11 Figure. Groundwater Potentiometric Surface September -, 0 TVA Kingston Fossil Plant Ash Processing Area Groundwater Monitoring Report September 0

12 TVA Kingston Fossil Plant Ash Processing Area Groundwater Monitoring Report September 0 CONCLUSIONS Groundwater analytical data for the June 0 monitoring event showed all constituent concentrations were below TDEC MCLs and US EPA primary MCLs. While the concentrations remained low (< ug/l), cobalt had displayed an increasing trend at wells AD- and AD- which corresponds to the time of intense construction activity at the site. Since 0 cobalt, and all sample constituents, show a stable or declining trend. Cobalt, which does not have an associated US EPA or TDEC promulgated MCL. The facility groundwater monitoring network will be sampled again during December 0 and results will be reported once the data is available. REFERENCES EPRI, 0, MANAGES: Groundwater Data Management and Evaluation Software, Product #, Palo Alto, CA. Gilbert, Richard.O., 7. Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC), Division of Solid Waste Management. Rule Solid Waste Processing and Disposal. Revised March 0. Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), Decontamination of Equipment SOP (TVA-KIF-SOP- 0). Revision, October 0. TVA, Ash Processing Area Construction and Operation Plan. Revision, February 00. TVA, Field Documentation SOP (TVA-KIF-SOP-0). Revision, December 0. TVA, Field Quality Control Sampling SOP (TVA-KIF-SOP-). April 00. TVA, Groundwater Sampling SOP (TVA-KIF-SOP-0). Revision, August 0. TVA, Hydrolab Datasonde Standardization and Field Parameter Measurement (TVA- KIF-SOP-). Revision, September 0. TVA, Management of Investigative Derived Waste (IDW) (TVA-KIF-SOP-). February 0. TVA, Sample Labeling, Packing, and Shipping SOP (TVA-KIF-SOP-07). Revision, October 0.

13 TVA Kingston Fossil Plant Ash Processing Area Groundwater Monitoring Report September 0 REFERENCES (Continued) TVA, Kingston Ash Recovery Project, Groundwater Flow and Transport Model Report, Document No. EPA-RPT-0, prepared for the Tennessee Valley Authority, Revision 0, July, 0. TVA, Addendum to the Kingston Ash Recovery Project, Groundwater Flow and Transport Model Report, Document No. EPA-RPT-0A, prepared for the Tennessee Valley Authority, Revision 00, July, 0. US EPA Region, Low Stress (Low Flow) Purging and Sampling Procedure for the Collection of Ground Water Samples from Monitoring Wells, Revision. January 0. US EPA Region, Groundwater Sampling Operating Procedure, Revision. Document Number SESDPROC-0-R. March 0. US EPA, National Primary Drinking Water Standards, Revision May 00. EPA -F May 00.

14 TVA Kingston Fossil Plant Ash Processing Area Groundwater Monitoring Report September 0 APPEIX A FIELD DATA SHEETS

15 Preliminary Groundwater Data Field Worksheet Sheet r-=---;-~:;--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~---.-:-:-:-:-~~~~~~----, --'---;:::====:;:...:::.:,_;:==;:::::::==:::::::::; Project/Site Well Number Purge Year Kingston Ballfield Site AD- 0 Date / Depth to Water (m) I Bottom of Well (m) I Well Diameter (mm) ',. ::J Deoth of Screen Survey Leader WFN 0 Open Bore Hole (m) (m) Sample Label To KIF-AD-GW-0' z.z [Bottom of Well - Depth to Water] x Volume Factor = [( 0. )m. (.. - )m] x (.07 )Lim = Purge Pump:! Bladder 0 Centrifugal 0 Peristaltic 0 Dedicated Sample Pump:! Bladder 0 Centrifugal 0 Peristaltic 0 Dedicated Pump Depth m Well Volume /(;,cg (L) other (list): other (list): Field Crew ~Unfilte re d Filter Type and Size: LJ Filtered LJ Both Target Purge Volume Actual Purge Volume N/A (L) (L),0 ~~~~ ~ Pump Duration: Analysis JJ.me U CT Pump Rate ""Jmin) CO (umhos/cm) EPA 0. 0 (+/ ) ORP Turbidity (mv) (NTU) SM 0 EPA 0. Vol. Factor Um mm....::;..::=-=-=~;;:._ ''"'""--.f---"'-"---~--~' (0. in) 0.7 Year ( in).07 7 ( in).0 ---'-----' '--_ :,<----' '~---'-f ( in).7 i- :.; Ti::..::m:.:::e:'-+.::.J;...L.,~---...:.=:.=..:...c...:::l..;~: ;T;c.i.:..::e.:...:----i-:..:..:.;c;.: -- 7 ( in) Initial: I itlal: in.. TVA 00A (-00)

16 Preliminary Groundwater Data Field Worksheet Sheet of ~Pr~aj~ec~U~S~ite r-W-e--Nu_m_b-er----~ Pu-rg-e-;::=ve=a=r:=;~M-o-n~th~;:=Da=y==~ Kingston Ballfield Site AD- 0 Date / $ 7' :?/ Depth to Water (m) I Bottom of Well (m) I Well Diameter (mm) Survey Leader Field -Crew '- ~.0 WFN [] Depth of Screen D Open Bore Hole (m) (m) Sample Label!~ Unfiltered LJ Filtered D Both To KIF-AD-GW-0tl IS.7 7. ~;:::. AP.i.-AVl-t7'U IS (Bottom of Well. Depth to Water] x Volume Factor = ((.0 )m. (.Cf )m] x (.07 )Lim =.~ Purge Pump: ~ Bladder 0 Centrifugal D Peristaltic D Dedicated Sample Pump: ~ Bladder D Centrifugal 0 Peristaltic D Dedicated Filler Type and Size: Well Volume Target Purge Volume Actual Purge Volume (L) N/A (L) (L) &.~ Other (list): Other (list): ~ Time oo CT min 700 Analysis Time ~ CT CO (+/-) ORP (umhos/cm) (mv) EPA 0. SM 0 Turbidity (NTU) EPA =;..::=-=-==.;;.,;; '-'-"' ,...,---..,,.--7 -t.7 (0. in) Year C0 Acidity ( in) mg/l 7 ( in) Turbidity 0 --_._., _.,.-...,..._.,_.,... ~-t-~(~ep...,a 0+., t ( in) i--:-:::..:.;z;~ :..:ti::..::m~e L..L..!..,;;µ~~~>=..: '-T:..:..:im.:..=e:.:..: :fa~µ='c~ 7 ( in) Initial: Initial: Initial: in mm D Ferrous ~ Metals ~ Mineral 0 Dis. Mineral D Phenol 0 Fill TIC Others (list): ~ Dis. Metals ~ Nutrient ~ TSSITDS Vol. Factor Um TVA 00A [-00]

17 Preliminary Groundwater Data Field Worksheet Sheet of r=--;--:-=;: ~ ---;:::=====~,.---==:::;:::.:====, Project/Site Well Number Purge Year Month Kingston Ballfield Site AD- 0 Date /? Depth to Water (m) I Bottom of Well (m) I Well Diameter (mm) Survey Leader Field Crew z.. WFN :'.l Depth of Screen I Open Bore Hole (m) (m) Sample Label Unfiltered LJ Filtered LJ Both To KIF-AD-GW-o fz.j/s Fiiter Type and Size:.0. [Bottom of Well. Depth to Water] x Volume Factor Well Volume Target Purge Volume Actual Purge Volume [(. )m. (,f )m] x (.07 )Lim = (L) N/A (L) (L) &.S ;_/. 0 Purge Pump: ~ Bladder D Centnfugal D Peristaltic D Dedicated Other (list): Sample Pump: l:l Bladder 0 Centrifugal D Peristaltic 0 Dedicated other (list): Depth to Water Pump Depth ~ CO (+/-) ORP Reviewed By: ~~ - Pump./ Duration: '-"O Time /() s CT min 700 Analysis Time &>c t7f CO (umhos/cm) EPA 0. 0 (+/-) ORP Turbidity (mv) (NTU) SM 0 EPA 0. Vol. Factor Um mm J.~ ' '-----t.7 (0. in) 0.7 ( in).07 7 ( in).0 t-="""?'---~-r-:::-'----:--_._--t-~""--7'---'--t-=-'--...,.-:::"".'"":'.. -t ( In).7...,:..;~ :.:Ti= m:.:::e::.+-:j"""'-+-~..:..:.:..:.: :- T:.:..: im.:.:: e.:...: :.:~,, ( in) Initial: Initial: ' in 0 Ferrous 0 Phenol Others (list): ~ Metals 0 Filt TIC ~ Dis. Metals ~ TSS/TDS.. TVA 00A (-00)

18 TVA Kingston Fossil Plant Ash Processing Area Groundwater Monitoring Report September 0 APPEIX B LABORATORY DATA SHEETS A CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD

19 ANALYTICAL REPORT TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. TestAmerica Nashville 0 Foster Creighton Drive Nashville, TN 70 Tel: ()7-077 TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Client Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater For: Tennessee Valley Authority PO BOX 00 Knoxville, Tennessee 70 Attn: Amos Smith 7 Authorized for release by: /7/0 :0:0 PM Gail Lage, Senior Project Manager ()0-7 gail.lage@testamericainc.com The test results in this report meet all 00 NELAC and 00 TNI requirements for accredited parameters, exceptions are noted in this report. This report may not be reproduced except in full, and with written approval from the laboratory. For questions please contact the Project Manager at the address or telephone number listed on this page. This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature is intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature. Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.

20 Client: Tennessee Valley Authority Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater Table of Contents TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Cover Page Table of Contents Sample Summary Case Narrative Definitions Client Sample Results QC Sample Results QC Association Chronicle Method Summary Certification Summary Chain of Custody Receipt Checklists Tracer Carrier Summary Page of TestAmerica Nashville /7/0

21 Client: Tennessee Valley Authority Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater Sample Summary TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Matrix Collected Received 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Water 0// : 0// : 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Water 0// :0 0// : 0-- KIF-AD-AW-0 Water 0// :0 0// : 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Water 0// : 0// : 0-- KIF-GW0-GW-0 Water 0// : 0// : 0-- KIF-AR-GW-0 Water 0// : 0// : 7 TestAmerica Nashville Page of /7/0

22 Case Narrative Client: Tennessee Valley Authority TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater Job ID: 0-- Laboratory: TestAmerica Nashville Narrative Comments No additional comments. Job Narrative 0-- Receipt The samples were received on //0 : AM; the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and, where required, on ice. The temperatures of the coolers at receipt time were 0.º C and.º C. RAD Method(s) 0.0: Radium- prep batch - The barium carrier recovery is outside the upper control limit (0%) at % for 0-- associated with the following samples: KIF-AD-GW-0 (0--), KIF-AD-GW-0 (0--), KIF-GW0-GW-0 (0--), KIF-AR-GW-0 (0--), (LCS -/-A), (LCSD -/-A) and (MB -/-A). There was physical evidence of matrix interference apparent during the initial preparation of the sample noted in N.C.M The QC samples associated with the batch have acceptable carrier recovery indicating the presence of matrix interference. Method(s) 0.0: Radium- Prep Batch -: The following sample has a barium carrier recovery above the % QC limit; (0--C--A; 7%). The LCS and LCSD (laboratory control sample/laboratory control sample duplicate) have acceptable spike recoveries demonstrating acceptable sample preparation and instrument performance. The samples associated with the batch have been truncated to 0% to reduce any potential bias a high carrier recovery may have. The data have been qualified and reported. KIF-AD-GW-0 (0--), KIF-AD-GW-0 (0--), KIF-GW0-GW-0 (0--), KIF-AR-GW-0 (0--), (LCS -/-A), (LCSD -/-A) and (MB -/-A) 7 Method(s) 0.0: Radium- Prep Batch -: The absolute value of the negative result for the following sample is outside the three sigma uncertainty: KIF-GW0-GW-0 (0--). A recount was not possible due to the passing of a full decay cycle of actinium-. The data has been qualified and reported. Method(s) PrecSep-: Radium- Prep Batch and Radium- batch : Insufficient sample volume was available to perform a sample duplicate (DUP) for the following samples: KIF-AD-GW-0 (0--), KIF-AD-GW-0 (0--), KIF-GW0-GW-0 (0--) and KIF-AR-GW-0 (0--). A laboratory control sample and laboratory control sample duplicate were used instead. Method(s) PrecSep-: Radium- prep bath and radium- prep batch : The Barium carrier recovery is outside the upper control limit (%)for the following sample: KIF-AR-GW-0 (0--). There was physical evidence of matrix interference apparent during the initial preparation of the sample. The QC samples associated with the batch have acceptable carrier recovery indicating the presence of matrix interference. No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. Narrative HPLC/IC No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page. Metals Method(s) 00., 00A: The initial calibration blank (ICB) had detects above the reporting limit (RL) for Nickel and Manganese. The low-level calibration verification check recovered within acceptable limits. The vial that contained the blank standard was re-poured and was reanalyzed with acceptable results. (ICB 0-77/) No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. TestAmerica Nashville Page of /7/0

23 Case Narrative Client: Tennessee Valley Authority TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater Job ID: 0-- (Continued) Laboratory: TestAmerica Nashville (Continued) General Chemistry No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page. 7 TestAmerica Nashville Page of /7/0

24 Client: Tennessee Valley Authority Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater Definitions/Glossary TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Qualifiers HPLC/IC Qualifier Qualifier Description F MS and/or MSD Recovery is outside acceptance limits. Metals Qualifier Qualifier Description J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value. B Compound was found in the blank and sample. General Chemistry Qualifier F Rad Qualifier U X Glossary Abbreviation Qualifier Description Duplicate RPD exceeds the control limit Qualifier Description Result is less than the sample detection limit. Carrier is outside acceptance limits. These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report. Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis %R Percent Recovery CFL Contains Free Liquid CNF Contains no Free Liquid DER Duplicate error ratio (normalized absolute difference) Dil Fac Dilution Factor DL, RA, RE, IN Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample DLC Decision level concentration MDA Minimum detectable activity EDL Estimated Detection Limit MDC Minimum detectable concentration MDL Method Detection Limit ML Minimum Level (Dioxin) NC Not Calculated Not detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown) PQL Practical Quantitation Limit QC Quality Control RER Relative error ratio RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry) RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin) TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin) 7 TestAmerica Nashville Page of /7/0

25 Client: Tennessee Valley Authority Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater Client Sample ID: KIF-AD-GW-0 Date Collected: 0// : Date Received: 0// : Method: Anions, Ion Chromatography Client Sample Results RL MDL TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Lab Sample ID: 0-- Prepared Analyzed Fluoride mg/l /07/ : Method: Metals (ICP/MS) RL Antimony mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: Arsenic Barium 0.0 Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Copper Lead Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium Zinc Method:. - Mercury (CVAA) J MDL D D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Dil Fac mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0/0/ : mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0/0/ : mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0/0/ : mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: RL Mercury mg/l 0// : 0/0/ :0 MDL D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 7 General Chemistry RL MDL D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Total Suspended Solids mg/l 0// :0 Method: Radium- (GFPC) Count Uncert. Radium U (σ+/-) 0.0 Total Uncert. (σ+/-) MDC 0. Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac pci/l 0// : // 0: Carrier %Yield Qualifier Limits Ba Carrier 0 - Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 0// : // 0: Method: Radium- (GFPC) Count Uncert. Radium- -0. U (σ+/-) 0. Total Uncert. (σ+/-) 0. MDC 0.7 Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac pci/l 0// :7 // : Carrier %Yield Qualifier Limits Ba Carrier 0 - Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 0// :7 // : Y Carrier. 0-0// :7 // : TestAmerica Nashville Page 7 of /7/0

26 Client: Tennessee Valley Authority Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater Client Sample ID: KIF-AD-GW-0 Date Collected: 0// :0 Date Received: 0// : Method: Anions, Ion Chromatography Client Sample Results RL MDL TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Lab Sample ID: 0-- Prepared Analyzed Fluoride F mg/l /07/ 0: Method: Metals (ICP/MS) RL Antimony mg/l 0// :0 0// : Arsenic 0.00 J Barium 0.0 Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt 0.00 Copper Lead Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium Zinc Method:. - Mercury (CVAA) J MDL D D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Dil Fac mg/l 0// :0 0// : mg/l 0// :0 0// : mg/l 0// :0 0/0/ : mg/l 0// :0 0// : mg/l 0// :0 0// : mg/l 0// :0 0// : mg/l 0// :0 0/0/ : mg/l 0// :0 0// : mg/l 0// :0 0/0/ : mg/l 0// :0 0// : mg/l 0// :0 0// : mg/l 0// :0 0// : mg/l 0// :0 0// : mg/l 0// :0 0// : RL Mercury mg/l 0// : 0/0/ : MDL D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 7 General Chemistry RL MDL D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Total Suspended Solids mg/l 0// :0 TestAmerica Nashville Page of /7/0

27 Client: Tennessee Valley Authority Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater Client Sample ID: KIF-AD-AW-0 Date Collected: 0// :0 Date Received: 0// : Method: Anions, Ion Chromatography Client Sample Results RL MDL TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Lab Sample ID: 0-- Prepared Analyzed Fluoride mg/l /07/ : Method: Metals (ICP/MS) RL Antimony mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: Arsenic J Barium 0.0 Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Copper Lead Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium Zinc Method:. - Mercury (CVAA) J MDL D D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Dil Fac mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0/0/ : mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0/0/ : mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0/0/ : mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: RL Mercury mg/l 0// : 0/0/ : MDL D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 7 General Chemistry RL MDL D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Total Suspended Solids mg/l 0// :0 TestAmerica Nashville Page of /7/0

28 Client: Tennessee Valley Authority Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater Client Sample ID: KIF-AD-GW-0 Date Collected: 0// : Date Received: 0// : Method: Anions, Ion Chromatography Client Sample Results RL MDL TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Lab Sample ID: 0-- Prepared Analyzed Fluoride mg/l /07/ : Method: Metals (ICP/MS) RL Antimony mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: Arsenic J Barium 0.00 Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt 0.00 Copper Lead Nickel 0.0 Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium Zinc Method:. - Mercury (CVAA) J MDL D D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Dil Fac mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0/0/ : mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0/0/ : mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0/0/ : mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: RL Mercury mg/l 0// : 0/0/ : MDL D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 7 General Chemistry RL MDL D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Total Suspended Solids mg/l 0// :0 Method: Radium- (GFPC) Count Uncert. Radium- 0.0 U (σ+/-) 0.0 Total Uncert. (σ+/-) 0.0 MDC 0.07 Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac pci/l 0// : // 0: Carrier %Yield Qualifier Limits Ba Carrier. 0 - Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 0// : // 0: Method: Radium- (GFPC) Count Uncert. Radium- 0. U (σ+/-) 0.7 Total Uncert. (σ+/-) 0.7 MDC 0.0 Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac pci/l 0// :7 // : Carrier %Yield Qualifier Limits Ba Carrier. 0 - Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 0// :7 // : Y Carrier. 0-0// :7 // : TestAmerica Nashville Page of /7/0

29 Client: Tennessee Valley Authority Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater Client Sample ID: KIF-GW0-GW-0 Date Collected: 0// : Date Received: 0// : Method: Anions, Ion Chromatography Client Sample Results RL MDL TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Lab Sample ID: 0-- Prepared Analyzed Fluoride mg/l /07/ : Method: Metals (ICP/MS) RL Antimony mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: Arsenic 0.00 J Barium 0.0 Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Copper 0.00 Lead Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium Zinc Method:. - Mercury (CVAA) J MDL D D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Dil Fac mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0/0/ 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0/0/ 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0/0/ 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: RL Mercury mg/l 0// : 0/0/ :7 MDL D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 7 General Chemistry RL MDL D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Total Suspended Solids mg/l 0// :0 Method: Radium- (GFPC) Count Uncert. Radium- 0.0 (σ+/-) 0.07 Total Uncert. (σ+/-) 0.0 MDC 0.00 Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac pci/l 0// : // 0: Carrier %Yield Qualifier Limits Ba Carrier Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 0// : // 0: Method: Radium- (GFPC) Count Uncert. Radium U (σ+/-) 0.0 Total Uncert. (σ+/-) 0.0 MDC 0. Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac pci/l 0// :7 // : Carrier %Yield Qualifier Limits Ba Carrier Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 0// :7 // : Y Carrier // :7 // : TestAmerica Nashville Page of /7/0

30 Client: Tennessee Valley Authority Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater Client Sample ID: KIF-AR-GW-0 Date Collected: 0// : Date Received: 0// : Method: Anions, Ion Chromatography Client Sample Results RL MDL TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Lab Sample ID: 0-- Prepared Analyzed Fluoride mg/l /07/ :7 Method: Metals (ICP/MS) RL Antimony mg/l 0// :0 0// 0:7 Arsenic J Barium 0.00 Beryllium J Cadmium 0.00 Chromium Cobalt 0. Copper Lead Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium Zinc Method:. - Mercury (CVAA) J 0.07 B MDL D D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Dil Fac mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0/0/ 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0/0/ 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0/0/ 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0: mg/l 0// :0 0// 0:7 RL Mercury mg/l 0// : 0/0/ : MDL D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 7 General Chemistry RL MDL D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Total Suspended Solids mg/l 0// :0 Method: Radium- (GFPC) Count Uncert. Radium (σ+/-) Total Uncert. (σ+/-) 0.0 MDC 0.0 Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac pci/l 0// : // 0: Carrier %Yield Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Ba Carrier X 0-0// : // 0: Method: Radium- (GFPC) Count Uncert. Radium- 0.0 U (σ+/-) 0.7 Total Uncert. (σ+/-) 0.7 MDC 0. Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac pci/l 0// :7 // : Carrier %Yield Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Ba Carrier 7 X 0-0// :7 // : Y Carrier. 0-0// :7 // : Dil Fac TestAmerica Nashville Page of /7/0

31 Client: Tennessee Valley Authority Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater Method: Anions, Ion Chromatography Lab Sample ID: MB 0-77/ Analysis Batch: 77 MB MB QC Sample Results RL MDL TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA Prepared Analyzed Fluoride mg/l /07/ : Lab Sample ID: LCS 0-77/7 Analysis Batch: 77 Spike Added LCS LCS D Dil Fac Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Fluoride.0.7 mg/l 0 - Lab Sample ID: 0-- MS Analysis Batch: 77 Sample Sample Result Qualifier Spike Added MS MS D %Rec %Rec. Limits Client Sample ID: KIF-AD-GW-0 Prep Type: Total/NA Fluoride F.0. F mg/l 0-0 Lab Sample ID: 0-- MSD Analysis Batch: 77 Sample Sample Result Qualifier Spike Added MSD MSD D %Rec %Rec. Limits Client Sample ID: KIF-AD-GW-0 Prep Type: Total/NA Fluoride F.0. mg/l D %Rec %Rec. Limits RPD RPD Limit 7 Method: Metals (ICP/MS) Lab Sample ID: MB 0-0/-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 7 Prep Batch: 0 MB MB RL Antimony mg/l 0// :0 0// : Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Lead Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium Zinc MDL D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac mg/l 0// :0 0// : mg/l 0// :0 0// : mg/l 0// :0 0// : mg/l 0// :0 0// : mg/l 0// :0 0// : mg/l 0// :0 0// : mg/l 0// :0 0// : mg/l 0// :0 0// : mg/l 0// :0 0// : mg/l 0// :0 0// : 0.0 J mg/l 0// :0 0// : Lab Sample ID: MB 0-0/-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 77 Prep Batch: 0 MB MB RL Beryllium mg/l 0// :0 0/0/ : MDL D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac TestAmerica Nashville Page of /7/0

32 Client: Tennessee Valley Authority Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater Method: Metals (ICP/MS) (Continued) QC Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Lab Sample ID: MB 0-0/-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 77 Prep Batch: 0 MB MB RL Copper mg/l 0// :0 0/0/ : Nickel MDL D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac mg/l 0// :0 0/0/ : Lab Sample ID: LCS 0-0/-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 7 Prep Batch: 0 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Added Antimony mg/l - Arsenic mg/l - Barium mg/l - Cadmium mg/l - Chromium mg/l - Cobalt mg/l - Lead mg/l - Selenium mg/l 0 - Silver mg/l - Thallium mg/l - Vanadium mg/l 7 - Zinc mg/l - D %Rec Limits 7 Lab Sample ID: LCS 0-0/-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 77 Prep Batch: 0 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Added D %Rec Limits Beryllium mg/l - Copper mg/l 0 - Nickel mg/l 0 - Lab Sample ID: 0-- MS Client Sample ID: KIF-AD-GW-0 Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 7 Prep Batch: 0 Sample Sample Spike MS MS %Rec. Added D %Rec Limits Antimony mg/l 70 - Arsenic 0.00 J mg/l 70 - Barium mg/l 70 - Cadmium mg/l Chromium mg/l 70 - Cobalt mg/l 70 - Lead mg/l 70 - Selenium mg/l 70 - Silver mg/l Thallium mg/l Vanadium J mg/l 70 - Zinc mg/l 70 - TestAmerica Nashville Page of /7/0

33 Client: Tennessee Valley Authority Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater Method: Metals (ICP/MS) (Continued) QC Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Lab Sample ID: 0-- MS Client Sample ID: KIF-AD-GW-0 Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 77 Prep Batch: 0 Sample Sample Spike MS MS %Rec. Result Qualifier Added Beryllium mg/l 70 - Copper mg/l 70 - Nickel mg/l 70 - Lab Sample ID: 0-- MSD Client Sample ID: KIF-AD-GW-0 Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 7 Prep Batch: 0 Sample Sample Spike MSD MSD %Rec. RPD Result Qualifier Added Antimony mg/l 70-0 Arsenic 0.00 J mg/l Barium mg/l Cadmium mg/l Chromium mg/l 70-0 Cobalt mg/l 70-0 Lead mg/l 70-0 Selenium mg/l 70-0 Silver mg/l 70-0 Thallium mg/l 70-0 Vanadium J mg/l Zinc mg/l D D %Rec %Rec Limits Limits RPD Limit 7 Lab Sample ID: 0-- MSD Client Sample ID: KIF-AD-GW-0 Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 77 Prep Batch: 0 Sample Sample Spike MSD MSD %Rec. RPD Added D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Beryllium mg/l Copper mg/l Nickel mg/l Method:. - Mercury (CVAA) Lab Sample ID: MB 0-/-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: MB MB RL MDL D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury mg/l 0// : 0/0/ :0 Lab Sample ID: LCS 0-/-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Added D %Rec Limits Mercury mg/l - TestAmerica Nashville Page of /7/0

34 Client: Tennessee Valley Authority Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater Method:. - Mercury (CVAA) (Continued) QC Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Lab Sample ID: LCSD 0-/-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD Added Mercury mg/l - Lab Sample ID: 0-- MS Client Sample ID: KIF-AD-GW-0 Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: Sample Sample Spike MS MS %Rec. Result Qualifier Added Mercury mg/l 70 - Lab Sample ID: 0-- MSD Client Sample ID: KIF-AD-GW-0 Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: Sample Sample Spike MSD MSD %Rec. RPD Result Qualifier Added Mercury mg/l 70 - Method: SM 0D - Solids, Total Suspended (TSS) Lab Sample ID: MB 0-7/ Analysis Batch: 7 MB MB RL MDL D D D %Rec %Rec %Rec Limits Limits Limits RPD RPD Limit Limit Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA Prepared Analyzed Total Suspended Solids mg/l 0// :0 D Dil Fac 7 Lab Sample ID: LCS 0-7/ Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 7 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Added D %Rec Limits Total Suspended Solids 0. mg/l Lab Sample ID: 0-70-B- DU Analysis Batch: 7 Sample Client Sample ID: Duplicate Prep Type: Total/NA Sample DU DU RPD D RPD Limit Total Suspended Solids.0. F mg/l 7 0 Lab Sample ID: 0--C- DU Analysis Batch: 7 Sample Client Sample ID: Duplicate Prep Type: Total/NA Sample DU DU RPD D RPD Limit Total Suspended Solids..0 mg/l 0 TestAmerica Nashville Page of /7/0

35 Client: Tennessee Valley Authority Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater QC Sample Results Method: SM 0D - Solids, Total Suspended (TSS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: MB 0-/-A Analysis Batch: 0 MB MB RL MDL TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA Prepared Analyzed Total Suspended Solids mg/l 0// :0 Lab Sample ID: MB 0-0/ Analysis Batch: 0 MB MB RL MDL D Dil Fac Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA Prepared Analyzed Total Suspended Solids mg/l 0// :0 Lab Sample ID: LCS 0-0/ Analysis Batch: 0 Spike Added LCS LCS D Dil Fac Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Total Suspended Solids 0.0 mg/l 0 - Lab Sample ID: 0--B- DU Analysis Batch: 0 Sample Sample Result Qualifier DU DU D %Rec %Rec. Limits Client Sample ID: Duplicate Prep Type: Total/NA Total Suspended Solids mg/l 0 D RPD RPD Limit 7 Lab Sample ID: 0-0-F- DU Analysis Batch: 0 Sample Client Sample ID: Duplicate Prep Type: Total/NA Sample DU DU RPD D RPD Limit Total Suspended Solids..000 mg/l 0 Method: Radium- (GFPC) Lab Sample ID: MB -/-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: Count Total MB MB Uncert. Uncert. (σ+/-) (σ+/-) MDC Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Radium- 0.0 U pci/l 0// : // 0: MB MB Carrier %Yield Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Ba Carrier 0 0-0// : // 0: TestAmerica Nashville Page 7 of /7/0

36 Client: Tennessee Valley Authority Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater Method: Radium- (GFPC) (Continued) QC Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Lab Sample ID: LCS -/-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: Total Radium- Carrier Ba Carrier LCS %Yield LCS Qualifier Spike Added LCS LCS Result Qual Uncert. (σ+/-) MDC Limits 0 - pci/l %Rec %Rec. Limits 7 - Lab Sample ID: LCSD -/-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: Total Radium- Carrier Ba Carrier LCSD %Yield. LCSD Qualifier Spike Added LCSD LCSD Uncert. Result Qual (σ+/-) MDC %Rec Limits RER Limit Limits 0 - pci/l %Rec RER 7 TestAmerica Nashville Page of /7/0

37 Client: Tennessee Valley Authority Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater QC Association Summary TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- HPLC/IC Analysis Batch: 77 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA Water KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- MS KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- MSD KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-AD-AW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-GW0-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-AR-GW-0 Total/NA LCS 0-77/7 Lab Control Sample Total/NA MB 0-77/ Method Blank Total/NA Metals Prep Batch: 0 Water 00.0 Water 00.0 Water 00.0 Water 00.0 Water 00.0 Water 00.0 Water 00.0 Water 00.0 Water 00.0 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA Water KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- MS KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- MSD KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-AD-AW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-GW0-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-AR-GW-0 Total/NA LCS 0-0/-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA MB 0-0/-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 00. Water 00. Water 00. Water 00. Water 00. Water 00. Water 00. Water 00. Water Prep Batch: Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA Water. 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- MS KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- MSD KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-AD-AW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-GW0-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-AR-GW-0 Total/NA LCS 0-/-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA LCSD 0-/-A Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA MB 0-/-A Method Blank Total/NA Analysis Batch: 7 Water. Water. Water. Water. Water. Water. Water. Water. Water. Water. Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA Water KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- MS KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- MSD KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-AD-AW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-GW0-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-AR-GW-0 Total/NA Water Water Water Water Water Water Water TestAmerica Nashville Page of /7/0

38 Client: Tennessee Valley Authority Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater Metals (Continued) Analysis Batch: 7 (Continued) QC Association Summary TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch LCS 0-0/-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water MB 0-0/-A Method Blank Total/NA Analysis Batch: Water Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA Water. 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- MS KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- MSD KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-AD-AW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-GW0-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-AR-GW-0 Total/NA LCS 0-/-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA LCSD 0-/-A Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA MB 0-/-A Method Blank Total/NA Analysis Batch: 77 Water. Water. Water. Water. Water. Water. Water. Water. Water. Water. Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA Water KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- MS KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- MSD KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-AD-AW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-GW0-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-AR-GW-0 Total/NA LCS 0-0/-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA MB 0-0/-A Method Blank Total/NA Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water General Chemistry Analysis Batch: 7 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 0-70-B- DU Duplicate Total/NA Water SM 0D 0--C- DU Duplicate Total/NA 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-AD-AW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA LCS 0-7/ Lab Control Sample Total/NA MB 0-7/ Method Blank Total/NA Leach Batch: Water Water Water Water Water Water Water SM 0D SM 0D SM 0D SM 0D SM 0D SM 0D SM 0D Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch MB 0-/-A Method Blank Total/NA Water D7- Analysis Batch: 0 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 0-- KIF-GW0-GW-0 Total/NA Water SM 0D TestAmerica Nashville Page 0 of /7/0

39 Client: Tennessee Valley Authority Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater General Chemistry (Continued) Analysis Batch: 0 (Continued) QC Association Summary TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 0-- KIF-AR-GW-0 Total/NA Water SM 0D 0--B- DU Duplicate Total/NA 0-0-F- DU Duplicate Total/NA LCS 0-0/ Lab Control Sample Total/NA MB 0-/-A Method Blank Total/NA MB 0-0/ Method Blank Total/NA Rad Prep Batch: Water Water Water SM 0D SM 0D SM 0D Water SM 0D Water SM 0D Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA Water PrecSep_0 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-GW0-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-AR-GW-0 Total/NA Prep Batch: Water Water Water PrecSep_0 PrecSep_0 PrecSep_0 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA Water PrecSep- 0-- KIF-AD-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-GW0-GW-0 Total/NA 0-- KIF-AR-GW-0 Total/NA LCS -/-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA LCSD -/-A Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA MB -/-A Method Blank Total/NA Water Water Water Water Water Water PrecSep- PrecSep- PrecSep- PrecSep- PrecSep- PrecSep- 7 TestAmerica Nashville Page of /7/0

40 Lab Chronicle Client: Tennessee Valley Authority TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater Client Sample ID: KIF-AD-GW-0 Lab Sample ID: 0-- Date Collected: 0// : Date Received: 0// : Prep Type Batch Type Batch Method Run Dil Factor Initial Amount Amount Prepared or Analyzed Analyst Total/NA Analysis 00.0 ml 77 /07/ : CLN TAL NSH Final Batch Number Total/NA Prep ml 0 ml 0 0// :0 ZLN TAL NSH Total/NA Analysis ml 0 ml 7 0// 0: KKK TAL NSH Total/NA Prep ml 0 ml 0 0// :0 ZLN TAL NSH Total/NA Analysis ml 0 ml 77 0/0/ : KKK TAL NSH Total/NA Prep. 0 ml 0 ml 0// : RDF TAL NSH Total/NA Analysis. 0 ml 0 ml 0/0/ :0 RDF TAL NSH Total/NA Analysis SM 0D 00 ml 00 ml 7 0// :0 SMB TAL NSH Total/NA Prep PrecSep-. ml.0 g 0// : CMC TAL SL Total/NA Analysis 0.0. ml // 0: MFM TAL SL Total/NA Prep PrecSep_0. ml.0 g 0// :7 JAC TAL SL Total/NA Analysis 0.0. ml 70 // : MFM TAL SL Client Sample ID: KIF-AD-GW-0 Lab Sample ID: 0-- Date Collected: 0// :0 Date Received: 0// : Prep Type Batch Type Batch Method Run Dil Factor Initial Amount Amount Prepared or Analyzed Analyst Total/NA Analysis 00.0 ml 77 /07/ 0: CLN TAL NSH Final Batch Number Total/NA Prep ml 0 ml 0 0// :0 ZLN TAL NSH Total/NA Analysis ml 0 ml 7 0// : KKK TAL NSH Total/NA Prep ml 0 ml 0 0// :0 ZLN TAL NSH Total/NA Analysis ml 0 ml 77 0/0/ :0 KKK TAL NSH Total/NA Prep. 0 ml 0 ml 0// : RDF TAL NSH Total/NA Analysis. 0 ml 0 ml 0/0/ : RDF TAL NSH Total/NA Analysis SM 0D 00 ml 00 ml 7 0// :0 SMB TAL NSH Lab Lab 7 Client Sample ID: KIF-AD-AW-0 Lab Sample ID: 0-- Date Collected: 0// :0 Date Received: 0// : Prep Type Batch Type Batch Method Run Dil Factor Initial Amount Amount Prepared or Analyzed Analyst Total/NA Analysis 00.0 ml 77 /07/ : CLN TAL NSH Final Batch Number Total/NA Prep ml 0 ml 0 0// :0 ZLN TAL NSH Total/NA Analysis ml 0 ml 7 0// 0: KKK TAL NSH Total/NA Prep ml 0 ml 0 0// :0 ZLN TAL NSH Total/NA Analysis ml 0 ml 77 0/0/ : KKK TAL NSH Total/NA Prep. 0 ml 0 ml 0// : RDF TAL NSH Total/NA Analysis. 0 ml 0 ml 0/0/ : RDF TAL NSH Total/NA Analysis SM 0D 00 ml 00 ml 7 0// :0 SMB TAL NSH Lab TestAmerica Nashville Page of /7/0

41 Lab Chronicle Client: Tennessee Valley Authority TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater Client Sample ID: KIF-AD-GW-0 Lab Sample ID: 0-- Date Collected: 0// : Date Received: 0// : Prep Type Batch Type Batch Method Run Dil Factor Initial Amount Amount Prepared or Analyzed Analyst Total/NA Analysis 00.0 ml 77 /07/ : CLN TAL NSH Final Batch Number Total/NA Prep ml 0 ml 0 0// :0 ZLN TAL NSH Total/NA Analysis ml 0 ml 7 0// 0: KKK TAL NSH Total/NA Prep ml 0 ml 0 0// :0 ZLN TAL NSH Total/NA Analysis ml 0 ml 77 0/0/ : KKK TAL NSH Total/NA Prep. 0 ml 0 ml 0// : RDF TAL NSH Total/NA Analysis. 0 ml 0 ml 0/0/ : RDF TAL NSH Total/NA Analysis SM 0D 00 ml 00 ml 7 0// :0 SMB TAL NSH Total/NA Prep PrecSep- 0. ml.0 g 0// : CMC TAL SL Total/NA Analysis ml // 0: MFM TAL SL Total/NA Prep PrecSep_0 0. ml.0 g 0// :7 JAC TAL SL Total/NA Analysis ml 70 // : MFM TAL SL Client Sample ID: KIF-GW0-GW-0 Lab Sample ID: 0-- Date Collected: 0// : Date Received: 0// : Prep Type Batch Type Batch Method Run Dil Factor Initial Amount Amount Prepared or Analyzed Analyst Total/NA Analysis 00.0 ml 77 /07/ : CLN TAL NSH Final Batch Number Total/NA Prep ml 0 ml 0 0// :0 ZLN TAL NSH Total/NA Analysis ml 0 ml 7 0// 0: KKK TAL NSH Total/NA Prep ml 0 ml 0 0// :0 ZLN TAL NSH Total/NA Analysis ml 0 ml 77 0/0/ 0:0 KKK TAL NSH Total/NA Prep. 0 ml 0 ml 0// : RDF TAL NSH Total/NA Analysis. 0 ml 0 ml 0/0/ :7 RDF TAL NSH Total/NA Analysis SM 0D 00 ml 00 ml 0 0// :0 SMB TAL NSH Total/NA Prep PrecSep- 0. ml.0 g 0// : CMC TAL SL Total/NA Analysis ml // 0: MFM TAL SL Total/NA Prep PrecSep_0 0. ml.0 g 0// :7 JAC TAL SL Total/NA Analysis ml 70 // : MFM TAL SL Lab Lab 7 Client Sample ID: KIF-AR-GW-0 Lab Sample ID: 0-- Date Collected: 0// : Date Received: 0// : Prep Type Batch Type Batch Method Run Dil Factor Initial Amount Amount Prepared or Analyzed Analyst Total/NA Analysis 00.0 ml 77 /07/ :7 CLN TAL NSH Final Batch Number Total/NA Prep ml 0 ml 0 0// :0 ZLN TAL NSH Total/NA Analysis ml 0 ml 7 0// 0:7 KKK TAL NSH Total/NA Prep ml 0 ml 0 0// :0 ZLN TAL NSH Total/NA Analysis ml 0 ml 77 0/0/ 0:07 KKK TAL NSH Total/NA Prep. 0 ml 0 ml 0// : RDF TAL NSH Total/NA Analysis. 0 ml 0 ml 0/0/ : RDF TAL NSH Lab TestAmerica Nashville Page of /7/0

42 Lab Chronicle Client: Tennessee Valley Authority TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater Client Sample ID: KIF-AR-GW-0 Lab Sample ID: 0-- Date Collected: 0// : Date Received: 0// : Prep Type Batch Type Batch Method Run Dil Factor Initial Amount Amount Prepared or Analyzed Analyst Total/NA Analysis SM 0D 00 ml 00 ml 0 0// :0 SMB TAL NSH Final Batch Number Total/NA Prep PrecSep-. ml.0 g 0// : CMC TAL SL Total/NA Analysis 0.0. ml // 0: MFM TAL SL Total/NA Prep PrecSep_0. ml.0 g 0// :7 JAC TAL SL Total/NA Analysis 0.0. ml 70 // : MFM TAL SL Laboratory References: TAL NSH = TestAmerica Nashville, 0 Foster Creighton Drive, Nashville, TN 70, TEL ()7-077 TAL SL = TestAmerica St. Louis, 7 Rider Trail North, Earth City, MO 0, TEL ()- Lab 7 TestAmerica Nashville Page of /7/0

43 Client: Tennessee Valley Authority Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater Method Summary TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Method Method Description Protocol Laboratory 00.0 Anions, Ion Chromatography MCAWW TAL NSH 00. Metals (ICP/MS) EPA TAL NSH. Mercury (CVAA) EPA TAL NSH SM 0D Solids, Total Suspended (TSS) SM TAL NSH 0.0 Radium- (GFPC) EPA TAL SL 0.0 Radium- (GFPC) EPA TAL SL Protocol References: EPA = US Environmental Protection Agency MCAWW = "Methods For Chemical Analysis Of Water And Wastes", EPA-00/-7-00, March And Subsequent Revisions. SM = "Standard Methods For The Examination Of Water And Wastewater", Laboratory References: TAL NSH = TestAmerica Nashville, 0 Foster Creighton Drive, Nashville, TN 70, TEL ()7-077 TAL SL = TestAmerica St. Louis, 7 Rider Trail North, Earth City, MO 0, TEL ()- 7 TestAmerica Nashville Page of /7/0

44 Certification Summary Client: Tennessee Valley Authority TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater Laboratory: TestAmerica Nashville All certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all certifications are applicable to this report. Authority Program EPA Region Certification ID Expiration Date ALA ALA NA: NELAP & ALA -- ALA ISO/IEC Alaska (UST) State Program UST Arizona State Program AZ Arkansas DEQ State Program California State Program -- Connecticut State Program PH Florida NELAP E Georgia State Program N/A 0-0- Illinois NELAP * Iowa State Program Kansas NELAP 7 E- -- * Kentucky (UST) State Program 0-0- Kentucky (WW) State Program Louisiana NELAP Maryland State Program 0-- Massachusetts State Program M-TN Minnesota NELAP Mississippi State Program N/A 0-0- Montana (UST) State Program NA 0--0 Nevada State Program TN New Hampshire NELAP -0- New Jersey NELAP TN -0- * New York NELAP 0-- North Carolina (WW/SW) State Program 7 -- North Dakota State Program R * Ohio VAP State Program CL Oklahoma State Program 0-- Oregon NELAP TN Pennsylvania NELAP Rhode Island State Program LAO00-0- South Carolina State Program 00 (00) 0-- South Carolina (Do Not Use - DW) State Program 00 (00) --7 Tennessee State Program Texas NELAP T USDA Federal S- -0- Utah NELAP TN Virginia NELAP Washington State Program C West Virginia DEP State Program 0-- Wisconsin State Program Wyoming (UST) ALA Laboratory: TestAmerica St. Louis All certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all certifications are applicable to this report. Authority Program EPA Region Certification ID Expiration Date Alaska State Program MO California ELAP 0-- Connecticut State Program PH * Certification renewal pending - certification considered valid. TestAmerica Nashville Page of /7/0

45 Certification Summary Client: Tennessee Valley Authority TestAmerica Job ID: 0-- Project/Site: TVA-KIF Groundwater Laboratory: TestAmerica St. Louis (Continued) All certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all certifications are applicable to this report. Authority Program EPA Region Certification ID Expiration Date Florida NELAP E Illinois NELAP Iowa State Program Kansas NELAP 7 E- -- * Kentucky (DW) State Program 0 -- L-A-B DoD ELAP L0 0-- Louisiana NELAP Louisiana (DW) NELAP LA Maryland State Program 0-0- Missouri State Program * Nevada State Program MO New Jersey NELAP MO * New York NELAP 0-- North Dakota State Program R NRC NRC Oklahoma State Program Pennsylvania NELAP South Carolina State Program * Texas NELAP T USDA Federal P Utah NELAP MO Virginia NELAP Washington State Program C 0-0- West Virginia DEP State Program * Certification renewal pending - certification considered valid. TestAmerica Nashville Page 7 of /7/0

46 Test America THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING Nashville, TN Cooler Received/Opened On: Tracking#.f ef!::f:!;j (last digits, FedEx) COOLER RECEIPT FORM 0- Chain of Custody Courier: Fed-Ex IR Gun ID: 70. Temperature of rep. sample or temp blank when opened: a. } Degrees Celsius. If Item # temperature is 0 C or less, was the representative sample or temp blank frozen? YES NO.~. Were custody seals on outside of NA If yes, how many and where: -'O?"-_fu...,,~~"'"::...;;."" Were the seals intact, signed, and dated correctly? ~.. NO... NA. Were custody papers inside cooler? ~.. NO... NA I certify that I opened the cooler and answered questions - (intial)... GY_" Were custody seals on containers: YES and Intact YES... No...@ Were these signed and dated correctly? YES... No.."@. Packing mat'i used? Bubblewrap~eanuts Vermiculite Foam Insert Paper Other None. Cooling process: ~ Ice-pack Ice {direct contact). Did all containers arrive in good condition (unbroken)?. Were all container labels complete{#, date, signed, pres., etc)?. Did all container labels and tags agree with custody papers? a. Were VOA vials received? b. Was there any observable headspace present in any VOA vial? Dry ice Other None... NO... NA &... NO... NO... NA YES..(@)..NA YES... NO.~. Was there a Trip Blank in this cooler? NA If multiple coolers, sequence #,.A I certify that I unloaded the cooler and answered questions 7- (intiall G-Y- a. On pres'd bottles, did ph test strips suggest preservation reached the correct ph level? YES.. No@ 7 I b. Did the bottle labels indicate that the correct preservatives were used ~.. NO... NA. Was residual chlorine present? YES... No.,@ I certify that I checked for chlorine and ph as per SOP and answered questions - (intiall eza 7. Were custody papers properly filled out {ink, signed, etc)? ~... NO... NA. Did you sign the custody papers in the appropriate place? Q... NO... NA. Were correct containers used for the analysis requested? Q... NO... NA 0. Was sufficient amount of sample sent in each NO... NA I certi that I entered this ro"ect into LIMS and answered uestions 7 0 intial I certif that I attached a label with the uni ue LIMS number to each container intial. Were there Non-Conformance issues at login? YES.@ Was a NCM generated? YEs.{j;b... # BIS = Broken in shipment Cooler Receipt Fonn.doc LF- Revised // End offonn Page of /7/0

47 TestAmerica THE LEADER IN ENVI RONMENTAL TESTIN G Nashville, TN Cooler Received/Opened On COOLER RECEIPT FORM. Tracking # -'-----'Cf...:=W:.=.. (last digits, FedEx) Courier: FedEx IR Gun ID 7. Temperature of rep. sample or temp blank when opened :~Degrees Celsius Loc:0. If Item # temperature is 0 C or less, was the representative sample or temp blank frozen? YES NO.@). Were custody seals on outside of NO... NA If yes, how many and where: '-- +:'-'-"_0_.rt_+_-. Were the seals intact, signed, and dated NO... NA. Were custody papers inside cooler? ~.. NO... NA I certify that I opened the cooler and answered questions - (intiall,l-f-_,_/...,,<; Were custody seals on containers: YES and Intact YES... No.@ Were these signed and dated correctly? YES... No.?r;W. Packing mat'i used? Bubblewrap <!'.:~ti ~eanuts Vermiculite Foam Insert Paper Other None. Cooling process: ~ Ice-pack Ice (direct contact) Dry Ice Other None. Did all containers arrive in good condition (unbroken)? ~.. NO... NA. Were all container labels complete(#, date, signed, pres., etc)?. Did all container labels and tags agree with custody papers? '... NO... NO... NA a. Were VOA vials received? YES.. ~.. NA b. Was there any observable heads pace present in any VOA vial? YES... NO.~. Was there a Trip Blank in this cooler? YEs...@.. NA If multiple coolers, sequence# /l/.lj I certify that I unloaded the cooler and answered questions 7- (inti al) ~:&- a. On pres'd bottles, did ph test strips suggest preservation reached the correct ph level? YES.. No.Q 7 i I I I b. Did the bottle labels indicate that the correct preservatives were NO... NA. Was residual chlorine present? YES... NO,@ I certify that I checked for chlorine and ph as per SOP and answered questions - (intiall ~ 7. Were custody papers properly filled out (ink, signed, NO... NA. Did you sign the custody papers in the appropriate NO... NA J.. NO... NA. Were correct containers used for the analysis NO... NA 0. Was sufficient amount of sample sent in each container? I certify that I entered this project into LIMS and answered questions 7-0 (intial) I certify that I attached a label with the unique LIMS number to each container (inti al). Were there Non-Conformance issues at login? YES.. ~ Was a NCM generated? YEse.. # BIS = Broken in shipment Cooler Receipt Fann.doc LF- End of Form Revised / Page of /7/0

48 TestAmerica Nashville 0 Foster Creighton Drive --- ~~ _ Chain of Custody Record Test America Nashville, TN 70 Phone () Fax () 7-0 Lab PM: Carrier Tracking No(s): COC No: Client Information SambJ { / /;fi Ni / k,o fs Lage, Gail t 0';7~ 0--. Client Contact: Phone: (,Sb70"g7'ft.O Page: Amos Smith ~'S"~ /,'/-:z-zj7 gail.lage@testamericainc.com Page of Company: Tennessee Valley Authority!'H'E LE.A.DER IN E'MliiRONMENTAL T.ESTSNG Job#: Analysis Requested Address Due Date Req"<!;J.;,~y d ; : Preservation Codes:.~,,,.. PO BOX 00 " :.,. -.' : ~~.~' A-HCL M-Hexane City: TAT Requested (days):.. ~. B-NaOH N-None Knoxville ',. C - Zn Acetate 0-AoNa0 ~ " State. Zip:.. ;c,, D-NitricAcid P- Na0S TN, 70 ' E-NaHS0 Q-NaS0 " >;: F-MeOH R-NaSS0 0 PO#:,,.,' G-Amchlor S-HS0 Ph Z-?si ~?tc Contract# 7 P0#0 'o <;' H - Ascorbic Acid T - TSP Dadecahydrate WO#: z,_ I-Ice U-Acetone 0 alsmith@tva.gov f J -DI Water V-MCAA Ill.,..., K- EDTA W-ph- Project Name: Project#: c L-EDA Z - other (specify) TVA KIF Groundwater Event Desc: TVA KIF Groundwater 00 ;r - ~ "' c Site: SSOW#: "' E,~... I' :!ii g Other: :;; Tennessee ~ t.' t~ """" "' s: CJ CJ s: o CJI :..:, CJ.. Cl) <!JI Matrix.. ' C>. C!J Sample ~ \. :c g i :c E Type {w water,., ::J CJ S=solld, "'' -' : "'' ~ r+j.. <( I -'.z <( Sample (C=comp, I CJ.. CPwasteloll. - <( I- II) ~.e_ : "' "'. ~ I w II) <( w Sample Identification Sample Date Time G=arab\ BT Tissuc, AsAJr \ u.., u.. :;;... ~ :;;..... ',,...,.,,,,:':"r. ~.~- r'",.. ~: "' ;\ '... :.,,:..:.,':' ': --~..;. -::::><.., pre?eriiati()n coile:. : xx N. o:...-: N ~'.')' D o:-. /\~:. b ; ~..,. _;.. ' "". Y' f;~~- ~'t~ : IFi: x.. ~... :;,,... :, KIF-AD-GW- 0Z-/ Water CiU. i o/tj G )( y. x '/_ x ".:,, l> Water t< r:-adz- tj-c;c; z / &Vl itjtj G x IX x Loc:0.'..... <J~Aoz-Aw~aZl!S ()C/z//S /otj Water x 'X.x. tt:j J< IF-ADZ -ms- o'lz/ls ozll< /OSD Water x x k./f-adz-iyfsj>- JCf '7.l/s tc/vis /DSO 7 Water "' )<. x j, :Z: ~{P-AD~-GllJ~ o<j7.~ls!)7~ /0_<:::. c Water j t }, x J. t,: ~/<Jf'-G,t.Jc>!-atJ- 0-IS c:jcf?? JC::: j-z,/(} {ft Water x y x y x ;t ~ /;-~: Water k.!f CAR~ GtJ- OC/7/" QC/ZAIS I z_,/ o ~.>< >( x x,.{'..,..; '" Water i ~}; - -, Water Possible Hazard Identification Water.., = ;' ' /,, '.:'" ;.f Soecial Instructions/Note:.,,..,;,:.. _.. 7,;-: Sample Disposal (A fee may be assessed if samples are retained longer than month} gi Non-Hazard DF!ammable qkin Irritant goisonb CJnknown qadiological DReturn To Client _ '==bisposal By Lab grchive For Months Deliverable Requested: I, II, Ill, IV, Other (specify) Special lnstructions~q,f ments: Empty Kit Relinquished by: Date: Time: / I / Relinquished~~ ~ Company ; ;;q';; /oqos '/)/.. Method of Shipment: Rere~ /;// ~ Datemmef.:a' Relinquished by: Datemma: Company ReQafved by: Lj! - Date!Time: Company ~ jf)f~ Co~;i/ / Page 0 of /7/0 Relinquished by: Datemme: Campany Received by: r Date!Time: Company Custody Seals Intact: 'Custody Seal No.: CoolerTemperature(s) 'C and Other Remarks: b. Yes No O<..I OJ

49 TestAmerica Nashville 0 Foster Creighton Drive Nashville, TN 70 Phone () Fax () 7-0 Client Information (Sub Contract Lab) Client Contact Shipping/Receiving Ccmpany: TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. Address: 7 Rider Trail North, City: Earth City State, Zip: MO, 0 Phone: --(Tel) --77(Fax) Project Name: KIF Groundwater Site: TVA KIF Groundwater Sampler: Phone: Due Date Requested: /7/0 TAT Requested (days): PO#: WO#: Project#: 00 SSOW#: Chain of Custody Record llllllllllllllllllllll~ll~llllllllllll~l~ll l llllllllllll TestAmerica Lab PM: Lage, Gail gail.lage@testamericainc.com ;i ::; -i; E' {!. ~ "O c ~ Analysis Requested Carrier Tracking No(s): TI<E LEADER m EN\'!RO!llWENf Af.. TESTING COCNo: 0-0. Page: Page of H - Ascorbic Acid M-Hexane N-None 0-AsNa0 P-Na.0S Q-NaS0 R-NaSS0 S-HS0 T TSP Dodecahydrate Li-Acetone V-MCAA W-ph- Z - other (specify) Page of /7/0 Sample Identification - Client ID KIF-AD-GW-0 KIF-AD-GW-0 KIF-GW0-GW-0 KIF-AR-GW-0 Possible Hazard Identification Unconfirmed Deliverable Requested: I, II, Ill, IV, Other (specify) Empty Kit Relinquished by: Relinquished by: Custody Seals Intact /J. Yes /J. No I Custody Seal No.: // // // // Date!Tme: Sample Time : Eastern : Eastern : Eastern : Eastern Date: Sample Type (C=comp, G=arab. (,'.t' Matrix Water Water Water x x x x x x Sa~le Disposal (A fee may be assessed if samples are retained longer than month) Return To Client '==t:iisoosal By Lab Yrchive For Months Special Instructions/QC Requirements: Time: Method of Shipment Dr/Z-/< Date!Time: 7 l)'/.) ~y &Jr7 Company Company Received by: DatefTime: Company Cooler Temperature(S) C and Other Remarks: