Economic Optimization of Waste Fermentation through Additional Energy Exploitation (Peter Lutz) Turnkey Construction. Project Development.

Transcription

1 Economic Optimization of Waste Fermentation through (Peter Lutz) Turnkey Construction Project Development Financing Planning & Permission Construction Management Maintenance PPP Models / Contracting

2 INDEX Company

3 The Group Peter Lutz TEJOORI LIMITED Munich Venture Partners

4 Core Expertise History Dry fermentation of biowaste by batch procedure Aerobisation of digestate / 35 Employees Development of Dry Fermentation technology 2003 Construction and operation of pilot plant for City of Munich (AWM - Abfallwirtschaftsbetriebe München) 2006 Rollout of Dry Fermentation 2007 Construction of 3 biogas plants according to procedure Construction volume: approx. 10M 2008 Construction of 8 dry fermentation plants Construction volume: approx. 40M

5 Future Worldwide Energy Demand Company Exajoule Type of Energy Open Geo & Oceanic Solar New Biomass Wind Water Trad. Biomass Nuclear Natural Gas Crude Oil Carbon *1Exajoule (EJ) = 10 Bill. Gigajoule 1(GJ) = 2.8 MWh Source: Globale Marktpotenziale für Erneuerbare Energien, Shell 1999

6 The Process Company

7 City of Munich (AWM) Company

8 Company Padua & Munich Biowaste Biogas Yield 195 Gasertrag Output Nm³/t FM FM Specif. Padua Output Nm³/t FM 175 m 3 /t or 365 kwh el /t FM Specif. Munich Output 80 to 110Nm³/t FM Verweilzeit Detention Period in Tagen (Days)

9 Biogas Content Company &/or CO 2 Methane content Carbon dioxide content Hydrogen sulphide content Date

10 Company Göhren, near Erfurt: 625 KWel Local Heat & Drying

11 Company BioFert, Saalfeld, near Erfurt: 1050 KW Waste Heat for Drying Capacity: 18,200 Mg/a

12 Continuous Biogas Yield Company Time

13

14 Saalfeld: CHP Circuit Diagram Company

15 Electrical Power of Plant in Saalfeld Power (kw) Datum kw Power Cogen. 1 kw Power Cogen. 2 kw Total Power

16 Company Generation of Electricity, Renewables in Kusel

17 The I. Input of Substrata II. Filling of Digester III. Substratum after Fermentation Waste/Biowaste Biogas Electrical Power Heat Fertilizer Quality compost Refuse Derived Fuels (RDF)

18 City of Munich (AWM) 25,000 t/a Company

19 City of Munich (AWM) Company

20 City of Munich (AWM): Drying Company

21 Company ABE/AWR Borgstedt, near Hamburg 30,000 t/a

22 AWR Borgstedt, near Hamburg Company

23 Company ABE/AWR Borgstedt, near Hamburg Local Heat

24

25

26 City of Zurig Waste Treatment & Recycling

27 Company Offer Italy: 50,000 t/a Local Heat for RDF + Drying

28 Munich Green & Biowaste 25,000 t/p.a. Electrical Power 570 kw In Operation as of 11/07 Drying Plant Company Saalfeld, near Erfurt Biowaste 20,000 t/p.a. Electrical Power 1,100 kw In Operation as of 10/07 Drying Plant Kusel, near Kaiserslautern Renewables 7,500 t/p.a. Electrical Power 330 kw In Operation as of 01/07 Local Heat / Drying

29 Company Rendsburg, near Hamburg Biowaste 30,000 t/p.a. Electrical Power 1,000 kw In Operation as of 10/08 Local Heating Göhren, near Erfurt Renewables 14,000 t/p.a. Electrical Power 625 kw In Operation as of 05/08 Local Heating Melzingen, near Hamburg Renewables 11,000 t/p.a. Electrical Power 500 kw In Operation as of 05/08 Local Heating / Drying Plant

30 Company Ostrhauderfehn, near Oldenburg Renewables 12,000 t/p.a. Electrical Power 500 kw In Operation as of 11/08 Local Heating / Drying Plant Vechta, near Bremen Biowaste 10,000 t/p.a. Electrical power 330 kw In Operation as of 12/08 Drying Plant Schmölln, near Erfurt Renewables 16,000 t/p.a. Electrical Power 1,000 kw In Operation as of 12/08 Local Heating

31 Company Erfurt Biowaste 20,000 t/p.a. Electrical power 660 kw In Operation as of 11/08 t. b. d. Cesena, near Bologna, Italy Biowaste 30,000 t/p.a. Electrical power 1,000 kw In Operation as of 12/08 Cooling being tested Naples, Italy Biowaste 30,000 t/p.a. Electrical power 1,000 kw In Operation as of 12/08 Drying / Cooling being tested

32 Company Dry Fermentation & Further Energy Using Cogeneration Heat Additional energy exploitation of substrata lying idle to date Robust, sophisticated, yet simple technology Low investment costs Low staff costs Low maintenance costs Low operational costs High gas yield High gas quality Little water consumption High safety & emission standards High system availability High efficiency, due to additional cost advantages

33 Company Summary Dry Fermentation allows low-cost, robust and stable waste management. Dry Fermentation ideally allows efficient energy production from by-product afflicted waste without elaborate and costly pre-treatment Dry Fermentation ideally complements existing composting plants The efficient, sophisticated technology and low susceptibility entail significant economic benefits in waste treatment.

34 Thank you for your attention! Energy Technologies GmbH & Co. KG Feringastr Munich / Unterfoehring Tel: (+49) 089/ Fax:(+49) 089/ contact@bekon.eu