Herger Ranch /- Acres Madison, CA. Presented By:

Transcription

1 Herger Ranch /- Acres Madison, CA Presented By:

2 Herger Ranch /- Acres Madison, CA Location: This ranch is located on the NW corner of Highway 16 and Road 89 in Madison, CA. The property stretches all of the way from Highway 16 to Cache Creek. Madison is a small town with a population of approximately 500 people. The location of this property gives it an enormous amount of upside potential. The North 25% of the property would make an ideal location for a gravel mine and is within the Cache Creek Management Plan. This property boasts some of the best soils in the world and will efficiently grow just about anything. APN#: Farmable Acres: FSA Base: There are farmable acres according to the Farms Service Agency. The remainder of the acreage is comprised of roads, ditches, 2 homes, 1 shop, and a portion of Cache Creek. There are FSA base acres on the subject property. The following is a breakdown of that base: Crop Name Base Acres Direct Yield CCYield Wheat Corn Barley Total: Acres Wells: Soils: This ranch is comprised of 3 agricultural wells. Each is strategically placed to irrigate the various fields throughout the ranch. The well locations and water quality reports can be found within this brochure. The water table in this area is reported to be less than 200 feet making this ranch inexpensive to irrigate relative to other ranches in California where they are currently pumping water from over 1000 feet deep. This ranch is comprised of Class I & Class II Soils. A detailed soils map & fertility recommendation for both Walnuts & Almonds can be found within this brochure.

3 Mining: Leases: This property is located in an area with an abundance of gravel. Teichert, SYAR, Granite Construction, and Solano Concrete Company are some of the nearby neighbors who have been actively mining for years. This property is purported to contain vast amounts of gravel beneath it. Any potential mining would first need to be approved by the Yolo County Planning Department. The farm is currently leased to Circle G Farms. Circle G is a long time Yolo County Farming family with a great reputation for excellent yields and are easy & honest people to work with. The farm is currently leased for the 2014 crop year, but would be available for a potential buyer to farm in Homes: There are two homes on the subject property. One of them is a 1227 sqft 3 bedrooms 1 bathroom and is currently occupied by a relative of the sellers. The 2 nd home on the property is a 1304 sqft 3 bedroom 1 bathroom home and is currently unoccupied. The home needs a lot of work prior to being re-occupied. Barn: Mineral Rights: Taxes: Price: Listing: Comments: There is an old dairy barn on the subject property. The roof & foundation seem to be in good condition, but the siding needs some TLC. It will make for a great location to store parts and irrigation supplies for any potential buyer. All of the oil, gas, and mineral rights currently held by the sellers will transfer to the buyer at the close of escrow. This property is enrolled in the Willamson Act. Property taxes will remain low at the close of escrow. Call For Price This farm is co listed between Charter Realty and William T. Morgan Real Estate This property has a lot of upside potential. It has gravel, class I &II soils, and at its present time has low carrying costs. This property can be divided into sections; with the part of the ranch being developed into a walnut, pistachio, or almond orchard and the other into a lucrative gravel mine. The property taxes currently stand at less than $10,000 annually and because of its enrolment in the Williamson Act, they won t change at the close of escrow. This ranch is co-listed with William Morgan of William T. Morgan Real Estate.

4 Photo Gallery Class I & II soils produce some of the highest yielding crops in the world. This fresh cut alfalfa is one of many crops this ranch is capable of producing. The neighbors have planted almonds and walnuts are being grown in the vicinity. This is one of three wells on the property. The abundance of groundwater in the area make this ranch inexpensive to irrigate. Photo from the 2014 tomato harvest. California grows more than 90% of U.S. processing tomatoes.

5

6 Sunland Analytical Sunrise Gold Cir.#10 Rancho Cordova, CA (916) Date Reported 07/09/14 Date Submitted 07/03/14 To: William Morgan William T. Morgan Real Estate 10 North East St. Suite 103 Woodland, CA, From: Gene Oliphant, Ph.D. \ Randy Horney General Manager \ Lab Manager The reported analysis was requested for the following: Location : HERGER RANCH-TOMATO Site ID: GREY CARL MAYER Thank you for your business. * For future reference to this analysis please use SUN # WATER ANALYSIS FOR IRRIGATION SUITABILITY Physical Characteristics NOTES ph 7.08 Normal Range ECe 0.91 mmho/cm Increasing Problem Tot.Dissolved Salts ppm Increasing Problem Sodium Adsorp.Ratio (SAR) 3.07 No Problem Chemical Analysis results in ppm results in meq/l Nitrate-N No Problem Phosphate-P 0.02 <.01 Potassium Sulfate-S Chloride No Problem Bicarbonate Increasing Problem Carbonate Sodium Calcium Magnesium Boron 1.89 Increasing Problem

7 Sunland Analytical Sunrise Gold Cir.#10 Rancho Cordova, CA (916) Date Reported 07/09/14 Date Submitted 07/03/14 To: William Morgan William T. Morgan Real Estate 10 North East St. Suite 103 Woodland, CA, From: Gene Oliphant, Ph.D. \ Randy Horney General Manager \ Lab Manager The reported analysis was requested for the following: Location : HERGER RANCH-PENROSE Site ID: GREEN WELL Thank you for your business. * For future reference to this analysis please use SUN # WATER ANALYSIS FOR IRRIGATION SUITABILITY Physical Characteristics NOTES ph 6.93 Normal Range ECe 1.21 mmho/cm Increasing Problem Tot.Dissolved Salts ppm Increasing Problem Sodium Adsorp.Ratio (SAR) 5.59 No Problem Chemical Analysis results in ppm results in meq/l Nitrate-N No Problem Phosphate-P 0.03 <.01 Potassium Sulfate-S Chloride Increasing Problem Bicarbonate Severe Problem Carbonate Sodium Calcium Magnesium Boron 2.13 Severe Problem

8 Sunland Analytical Sunrise Gold Cir.#10 Rancho Cordova, CA (916) Date Reported 07/09/14 Date Submitted 07/03/14 To: William Morgan William T. Morgan Real Estate 10 North East St. Suite 103 Woodland, CA, From: Gene Oliphant, Ph.D. \ Randy Horney General Manager \ Lab Manager The reported analysis was requested for the following: Location : HERGER RANCH-MIDDLE Site ID: BLUE PUMP Thank you for your business. * For future reference to this analysis please use SUN # WATER ANALYSIS FOR IRRIGATION SUITABILITY Physical Characteristics NOTES ph 6.97 Normal Range ECe 1.06 mmho/cm Increasing Problem Tot.Dissolved Salts ppm Increasing Problem Sodium Adsorp.Ratio (SAR) 3.94 No Problem Chemical Analysis results in ppm results in meq/l Nitrate-N No Problem Phosphate-P 0.04 <.01 Potassium Sulfate-S Chloride No Problem Bicarbonate Increasing Problem Carbonate Sodium Calcium Magnesium Boron 2.07 Severe Problem

9 121 58' 23'' W Irrigated Capability Class Yolo County, California (Penrose) ' 1'' W 38 42' 8'' N ' 8'' N 38 40' 43'' N ' 43'' N ' 23'' W N Map Scale: 1:12,900 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Meters Feet Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 10N WGS ' 1'' W Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 6/26/2014 Page 1 of 4

10 Irrigated Capability Class Yolo County, California (Penrose) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Rating Polygons Capability Class - I Capability Class - II Capability Class - III Capability Class - IV Capability Class - V Capability Class - VI Capability Class - VII Capability Class - VIII Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines Capability Class - I Capability Class - II Capability Class - III Capability Class - IV Capability Class - V Capability Class - VI Capability Class - VII Capability Class - VIII Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points Capability Class - I Capability Class - II Capability Class - III Capability Class - IV Capability Class - V Capability Class - VI Capability Class - VII Capability Class - VIII Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Yolo County, California Survey Area Data: Version 8, Dec 17, 2013 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Nov 3, 2010 Apr 29, 2012 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 6/26/2014 Page 2 of 4

11 Irrigated Capability Class Yolo County, California Penrose Irrigated Capability Class BrA Irrigated Capability Class Summary by Map Unit Yolo County, California (CA113) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Brentwood silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes % Ca Capay silty clay % Mf Marvin silty clay loam % Rh Riverwash % Ya Yolo silt loam % Totals for Area of Interest % Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 6/26/2014 Page 3 of 4

12 Irrigated Capability Class Yolo County, California Penrose Description Land capability classification shows, in a general way, the suitability of soils for most kinds of field crops. Crops that require special management are excluded. The soils are grouped according to their limitations for field crops, the risk of damage if they are used for crops, and the way they respond to management. The criteria used in grouping the soils do not include major and generally expensive landforming that would change slope, depth, or other characteristics of the soils, nor do they include possible but unlikely major reclamation projects. Capability classification is not a substitute for interpretations that show suitability and limitations of groups of soils for rangeland, for woodland, or for engineering purposes. In the capability system, soils are generally grouped at three levels-capability class, subclass, and unit. Only class and subclass are included in this data set. Capability classes, the broadest groups, are designated by the numbers 1 through 8. The numbers indicate progressively greater limitations and narrower choices for practical use. The classes are defined as follows: Class 1 soils have few limitations that restrict their use. Class 2 soils have moderate limitations that reduce the choice of plants or that require moderate conservation practices. Class 3 soils have severe limitations that reduce the choice of plants or that require special conservation practices, or both. Class 4 soils have very severe limitations that reduce the choice of plants or that require very careful management, or both. Class 5 soils are subject to little or no erosion but have other limitations, impractical to remove, that restrict their use mainly to pasture, rangeland, forestland, or wildlife habitat. Class 6 soils have severe limitations that make them generally unsuitable for cultivation and that restrict their use mainly to pasture, rangeland, forestland, or wildlife habitat. Class 7 soils have very severe limitations that make them unsuitable for cultivation and that restrict their use mainly to grazing, forestland, or wildlife habitat. Class 8 soils and miscellaneous areas have limitations that preclude commercial plant production and that restrict their use to recreational purposes, wildlife habitat, watershed, or esthetic purposes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 6/26/2014 Page 4 of 4

13