Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition #

Transcription

1 Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition # Record of Site Condition Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act Summary Record of Site Condition Number Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2015/02/09 Certification Date 2014/06/06 Current Property Use Commercial Intended Property Use Residential Certificate of Property Use Number No CPU Applicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard, with Non-potable Ground Water, Medium and Fine Textured Soil, for Residential property use Property Municipal Address 230 DEW STREET, KING, ON, L7B 1K9240 DEW STREET, KING, ON, L7B 1K9 Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry. Contents of this Record of Site Condition This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change. Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/02/09 1 of 19

2 PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC Owner Name Authorized Person Mailing Address Postal Code ONTARIO INC. PETER SCIAVILLA A3, 30 WERTHEIM COURT, RICHMOND HILL ONTARIO, CANADA L4B 1E9 Phone (905) Fax Address Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/02/09 2 of 19

3 RSC Property Location Information Municipal Address(es) Municipality Legal Description Assessment Roll Number(s) 230 DEW STREET, KING, ON L7B 1K9 240 DEW STREET, KING, ON L7B 1K9 King See Attached Lawyer s Letter Property Identifier Number(s) (LT) RSC Property Geographical References Coordinate System UTM Datum NAD 83 Zone 17 Easting 618, Northing 4,865, RSC Property Use Information The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use. Current Property Use Intended Property Use Certificate of Property Use has been issued under section of the EPA Commercial Residential No Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/02/09 3 of 19

4 Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/02/09 4 of 19

5 PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS Qualified Person's Information Name Type of Licence Under Professional Engineers Act BOB GORDANIFAR Licence Licence Number QP Employer Name Mailing Address CCI GROUP INC. 200, 7900 KEELE STREET, CONCORD ONTARIO, L4K 2A3 CANADA Phone (905) Fax (905) Address bobg@ccigroupinc.ca Municipal Information Local or Single-Tier Municipality Upper-Tier Municipality King York Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change District Office District Office District Office Address York-Durham District Office 230 Westney Rd. S., 5th floor, Ajax ON L1S 7J5 Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/02/09 5 of 19

6 Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Report Document used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04) (YYYY/MM/DD) 2014/06/05 Type of Report Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD) Author of Report Name of Consulting Company P1 ESA Phase One Environmental Site Assessment 2014/10/30 Bob Gordanifar, P. Eng., QP CCI GROUP INC. Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Reports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD) Author of Report EcoLog Report 2013/08/01 EcoLog ERIS Ltd. Name of Consulting Company EcoLog ERIS Ltd. Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/02/09 6 of 19

7 Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Report Document used as the phase two environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing The date the last work on all of the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 33.5(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04) (YYYY/MM/DD) 2014/06/06 Type of Report Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD) Author of Report Name of Consulting Company P2 ESA Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment 2014/11/20 Bob Gordanifar, P. Eng., QP CCI GROUP INC. Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Reports and other documents relied upon in making any certifications in the RSC for the purposes of Part IV of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase two environmental site assessment Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD) Author of Report Name of Consulting Company N/A Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/02/09 7 of 19

8 Environmental Condition Section 41 applies? Section 43.1 applies? No No Site Condition Information Certification date (YYYY/MM/DD) 2014/06/06 Total area of RSC property (in hectares) Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC property Soil Texture Assessment/Restoration Approach Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of ground water? Is there soil present that is sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze soil on, in or under the property in accordance with s. 6, Schedule E of O.Reg. 153/04? Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of soil on, in or under the property which is used in the RSC? Name of the laboratory used to analyze any samples collected of soil, ground water or sediment Ground water condition (potable, non-potable) Medium and Fine Full Depth Generic Yes Yes Yes EXOVA Non-potable Applicable Site Condition Standard TABLE 3 Local or single-tier municipality non-potable written notification date 2014/09/15 Upper-tier municipality non-potable written notification date 2014/09/15 Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/02/09 8 of 19

9 Table 1 Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil Contaminant Name Maximum Concentration Applicable Site Condition Standard Unit of Measure 1 Acenaphthene < µg/g 2 Acenaphthylene < µg/g 3 Anthracene < µg/g 4 Benz[a]anthracene < µg/g 5 Benzo[a]pyrene < µg/g 6 Benzo[b]fluoranthene < µg/g 7 Benzo[ghi]perylene < µg/g 8 Benzo[k]fluoranthene < µg/g 9 Chrysene < µg/g 10 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < µg/g 11 Fluoranthene < µg/g 12 Fluorene < µg/g 13 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene < µg/g 14 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** < µg/g 15 Naphthalene < µg/g 16 Phenanthrene < µg/g 17 Pyrene < µg/g 18 Boron (Hot Water Soluble)* µg/g 19 Chromium VI < µg/g 20 Cyanide (CN-) < µg/g 21 Electrical Conductivity ms/cm 22 Mercury < µg/g 23 Sodium Adsorption Ratio Antimony < µg/g 25 Arsenic µg/g 26 Selenium µg/g 27 Barium µg/g 28 Beryllium µg/g 29 Boron (total) µg/g 30 Cadmium µg/g 31 Chromium Total µg/g 32 Cobalt µg/g 33 Copper µg/g 34 Lead µg/g 35 Molybdenum µg/g...continued on next page Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/02/09 9 of 19

10 Table 1 Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil Continued from previous page... Contaminant Name Maximum Concentration Applicable Site Condition Standard Unit of Measure 36 Nickel µg/g 37 Silver < µg/g 38 Thallium < 1 1 µg/g 39 Uranium µg/g 40 Vanadium µg/g 41 Zinc µg/g 42 Benzene < µg/g 43 Ethylbenzene < µg/g 44 Toluene < µg/g 45 Xylene Mixture < µg/g 46 Bromodichloromethane < µg/g 47 Bromoform < µg/g 48 Dibromochloromethane < µg/g 49 Acetone < µg/g 50 Bromomethane < µg/g 51 Carbon Tetrachloride < µg/g 52 Chlorobenzene < µg/g 53 Chloroform < µg/g 54 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < µg/g 55 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- < µg/g 56 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- < µg/g 57 Dichlorodifluoromethane < µg/g 58 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < µg/g 59 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < µg/g 60 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < µg/g 61 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < µg/g 62 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < µg/g 63 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < µg/g 64 Dichloropropene,1,3- < µg/g 65 Ethylene dibromide < µg/g 66 Hexane (n) < µg/g 67 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < µg/g 68 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < µg/g 69 Methyl tert-butyl Ether (MTBE) < µg/g 70 Methylene Chloride < µg/g...continued on next page Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/02/09 10 of 19

11 Table 1 Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil Continued from previous page... Contaminant Name Maximum Concentration Applicable Site Condition Standard Unit of Measure 71 Styrene < µg/g 72 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < µg/g 73 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < µg/g 74 Tetrachloroethylene < µg/g 75 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < µg/g 76 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < µg/g 77 Trichloroethylene < µg/g 78 Trichlorofluoromethane < µg/g 79 Vinyl Chloride < µg/g 80 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 5 65 µg/g 81 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < µg/g 82 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 < µg/g 83 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 < µg/g Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/02/09 11 of 19

12 Table 1 Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued) Ground Water Contaminant Name Maximum Concentration Applicable Site Condition Standard Unit of Measure 1 Antimony µg/l 2 Arsenic µg/l 3 Selenium µg/l 4 Sodium 206, µg/l 5 Chloride 487, µg/l 6 Chromium VI < µg/l 7 Cyanide (CN-) < 2 66 µg/l 8 Mercury < µg/l 9 Barium µg/l 10 Beryllium µg/l 11 Boron (total) µg/l 12 Cadmium µg/l 13 Chromium Total µg/l 14 Cobalt 4 66 µg/l 15 Copper µg/l 16 Lead µg/l 17 Molybdenum µg/l 18 Nickel µg/l 19 Silver < µg/l 20 Thallium µg/l 21 Uranium µg/l 22 Vanadium µg/l 23 Zinc µg/l 24 Bromodichloromethane < µg/l 25 Bromoform < µg/l 26 Dibromochloromethane < µg/l 27 Acetone 2, µg/l 28 Bromomethane < µg/l 29 Carbon Tetrachloride < µg/l 30 Chlorobenzene < µg/l 31 Chloroform < µg/l 32 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < µg/l 33 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- < µg/l 34 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- < µg/l 35 Dichlorodifluoromethane < µg/l...continued on next page Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/02/09 12 of 19

13 Table 1 Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued) Ground Water Continued from previous page... Contaminant Name Maximum Concentration Applicable Site Condition Standard Unit of Measure 36 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < µg/l 37 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < µg/l 38 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < µg/l 39 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < µg/l 40 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < µg/l 41 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < µg/l 42 Dichloropropene,1,3- < µg/l 43 Ethylene dibromide < µg/l 44 Hexane (n) < µg/l 45 Methyl Ethyl Ketone µg/l 46 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < µg/l 47 Methyl tert-butyl Ether (MTBE) < µg/l 48 Methylene Chloride < µg/l 49 Styrene < µg/l 50 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < µg/l 51 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < µg/l 52 Tetrachloroethylene < µg/l 53 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < µg/l 54 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < µg/l 55 Trichloroethylene < µg/l 56 Trichlorofluoromethane < µg/l 57 Vinyl Chloride < µg/l 58 Benzene µg/l 59 Ethylbenzene < µg/l 60 Toluene µg/l 61 Xylene Mixture < µg/l 62 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < µg/l 63 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < µg/l 64 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F µg/l 65 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 < µg/l Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/02/09 13 of 19

14 Remedial Action and Mitigation Remediated Soils Estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil. Indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process. Soil Remediation Process Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³) 0.0 Description of Remediation Description of any action taken to reduce the concentration of contaminants (including soil removals) on, in or under the RSC property. Excavation and disposal of contaminated soil Soil or Sediment Removed and Not Returned Estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property. Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³) Estimated Quantity of Sediment (in-ground volume in m³) 0.0 Soil Brought to the Property Estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property and that is identified in section 28 of Schedule A. Estimated Quantity of Soil Brought to the Property (in-ground volume in m³) 0.0 Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/02/09 14 of 19

15 Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures Ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing. Ground water control or treatment measures that are required for the RSC property after the certification date. Estimated volume of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property. Estimated Volume of Ground Water (in litres) Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/02/09 15 of 19

16 Other Activities Including Risk Management Measures Constructed works that prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property. Constructed works that after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property. Monitoring or Maintenance Soil Management Measures Soil monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement or any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date. Ground Water Management Measures Ground water monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works or known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date. Remediated or Removed Soil, Sediment or Ground Water From Near Property Boundary Has any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC property boundary been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation? Yes Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/02/09 16 of 19

17 Qualified Person s Statements and Certifications As the qualified person, I certify that: A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary. As of 2014/06/06, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC. Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. I have, within the six months immediately before the submission of this record of site condition, given written notice of intention to apply non-potable ground water site condition standards to the clerk of the local municipality in which the property is located and the clerk of any upper-tier municipality in which the property is located. As of 2014/06/06, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 37 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment. As of 2014/06/06, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards. I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation. I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation. I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry. The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location. I do not hold and have not held and my employer CCI GROUP INC. does not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessment or risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSC are true as of 2014/06/06. By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees. By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, BOB GORDANIFAR, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2014/11/26: a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition. I Agree Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/02/09 17 of 19

18 Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or Agent The following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change as part of the record of site condition Certificate of Status or equivalent for the owner Lawyer s letter consisting of a legal description of the property Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired A Current plan of Survey Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model Owner or agent certification statements Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/02/09 18 of 19

19 Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/02/09 19 of 19

20 Request ID: Province of Ontario Date Report Produced: 2014/11/04 Demande n : Province de l'ontario Document produit le : Transaction ID: Ministry of Government Services Time Report Produced: 12:27:02 Transaction n : Ministère des Services gouvernementaux Imprimé à : Category ID: CT Catégorie : CERTIFICATE OF STATUS ATTESTATION DU STATUT JURIDIQUE This is to certify that according to the records of the Ministry of Government Services D'après les dossiers du Ministère des Services gouvernementaux, nous attestons que la société O N T A R I O I N C. Ontario Corporation Number Numéro matricule de la société (Ontario) is a corporation incorporated, amalgamated or continued under the laws of the Province of Ontario. The corporation came into existence on est une société constituée, prorogée ou née d'une fusion aux termes des lois de la Province de l'ontario. La société a été fondée le D E C E M B E R 1 6 D É C E M B R E, and has not been dissolved. et n'est pas dissoute. Dated Fait le N O V E M B E R 0 4 N O V E M B R E, Director Directeur The issuance of this certificate in electronic form is authorized by the Ministry of Government Services. La délivrance du présent certificat sous forme électronique est autorisée par le Ministère des Services gouvernementaux.

21

22

23 DAVID CHONG Barrister andsolicitor Suite 202 Telephone No: (416) Don Mills Road Facsimile No: (416) Don Mills, Ontario M3B3N7 CANADA January 20,2015 Brownfields Filing and Review Environmental Assessment and Approvals Branch Ontario Ministry ofthe Environment 2 St. Clair Avenue West Floor 12A Toronto, ON M4V 1L5 Attention: Record of Site Condition Officer Dear Sir/Madam: Re: Ontario Inc. ("Owner") 230 Dew Street & 240 Dew Street ("RSC Land") Township ofking Record of Site Condition This letter is further to my letter dated October 10, The RSC Land is part of a land assembly by the Owner and a planned residential development. The governmental requirements ofthe Municipality of King Township are that the lands are to be Land Titles Absolute and that the lands be consolidated into one parcel. The RSC Land is comprised of: Part oflot 39, Plan 337 Except Part 4, Plan 65R-353 Township ofking (230 Dew Street) (PIN (LT)) Parcel A and

24

25 PARCEL REGISTER (ABBREVIATED) FOR PROPERTY IDENTIFIER V Ontario ServiceOntario LAND REGISTRY OFFICE # (LT) PAGE 1 OF 2 PREPARED FOR DavidOOl ON 2013/07/29 AT 09:37:45 SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS IN CROWN GRANT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: PT LTS 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 & 43, PL 337, PTS 1, 2 & 3, 65R3869 & PT 1, 65R34181; TOWNSHIP OF KING PROPERTY REMARKS: ESTATE/QUALIFIER: FEE SIMPLE ABSOLUTE RECENTLY: CONSOLIDATION FROM PIN CREATION DATE: 2013/03/26 OWNERS' NAMES ONTARIO INC. CAPACITY SHARE REG. NUM. INSTRUMENT TYPE PARTIES FROM PARTIES TO CERT/ CHKD ** PRINTOUT INCLUDES ALL DOCUMENT TYPES (DFLETED INSTRUMENTS NOT INCLUDED) 65R /02/03 PLAN REFERENCE YR /03/20 TRANSFER $800,000 NAWROCKI, SHEILA ONTARIO INC. YR /03/20 TRANSFER $800,000 NAWROCKI, SHEILA ONTARIO INC. YR /03/20 TRANSFER $900,000 DAVIS, ROLPH AUBREY LANGFORD, MARGARET EDYTHE ONTARIO INC. YR /03/20 TRANSFER $800,000 QUATTROCIOCCHI, VILMA ONTARIO INC. YR /03/20 CHARGE $3, 500, ONTARIO INC. VANGUARD LAW GROUP LLP, IN TRUST YR /03/21 TRANSFER OF CHARGE VANGUARD LAW GROUP LLP, IN TRUST VANGUARD LAW GROUP LLP, IN TRUST OLYMPIA TRUST REMARKS: YR YR1805S /04/05 APL CONSOLIDATE ONTARIO INC. YR /05/01 APL CH NAME INST REMARKS: YR ,YR YR1797&96 YR VANGUARD LAW GROUP LLP, IN TRUST SONI, SANJAY YR /06/06 APL CH NAME REMARKS: YR INST OLYMPIA TRUST OLYMPIA TRUST COMPANY YR /06/06 TRANSFER OF REMARKS: YR CHARGE SONI, SANJAY SONI, SANJAY OLYMPIA TRUST COMPANY YR /06/06 TRANSFER OF CHARGE REMARKS: YR SONI, SANJAY OLYMPIA TRUST COMPANY NOTE: ADJOINING PROPERTIES SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED TO ASCERTAIN DESCRIPTIVE INCONSISTENCIES, IF ANY, WITH DESCRIPTION REPRESENTED FOR THIS PROPERTY. NOTE: ENSURE THAT YOUR PRINTOUT STATES THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES AND THAT YOU HAVE PICKED THEM ALL Up.

26

27

28 PARCEL REGISTER (ABBREVIATED) FOR PROPERTY IDENTIFIER LAND PAGE 1 OF 2 REGISTRY PREPARED FOR JOANNE OFFICE # (LT) ON 2013/08/07 AT 15:54:18 SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS IN CROWN GRANT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: PT LTS 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 & 43, PL 337, PTS 1, 2 & 3, 65R3869 & PT 1, 65R34181; TOWNSHIP OF KING PROPERTY REMARKS: ESTATE/QUALIFIER: RECENTLY: PIN CREATION DATE: FEE SIMPLE ABSOLUTE CONSOLIDATION FROM /03/26 OWNERS NAMES CAPACITY SHARE ONTARIO INC. REG. NUM. DATE INSTRUMENT TYPE AMOUNT PARTIES FROM PARTIES TO CERT/ CHKD ** PRINTOUT INCLUDES ALL DOCUMENT TYPES (DELETED INSTRUMENTS NOT INCLUDED) ** 65R /02/03 PLAN REFERENCE C YR /03/20 TRANSFER $800,000 NAWROCKI, SHEILA ONTARIO INC. C YR /03/20 TRANSFER $800,000 NAWROCKI, SHEILA ONTARIO INC. C YR /03/20 TRANSFER $900,000 DAVIS, ROLPH AUBREY ONTARIO INC. C LANGFORD, MARGARET EDYTHE YR /03/20 TRANSFER $800,000 QUATTROCIOCCHI, VILMA ONTARIO INC. C YR /03/20 CHARGE $3,500, ONTARIO INC. VANGUARD LAW GROUP LLP, IN TRUST C YR /03/21 TRANSFER OF CHARGE VANGUARD LAW GROUP LLP, IN TRUST VANGUARD LAW GROUP LLP, IN TRUST C OLYMPIA TRUST REMARKS: YR YR /04/05 APL CONSOLIDATE ONTARIO INC. C YR /05/01 APL CH NAME INST VANGUARD LAW GROUP LLP, IN TRUST SONI, SANJAY C REMARKS: YR ,YR YR & YR YR /06/06 APL CH NAME INST OLYMPIA TRUST OLYMPIA TRUST COMPANY C REMARKS: YR YR /06/06 TRANSFER OF CHARGE SONI, SANJAY SONI, SANJAY C OLYMPIA TRUST COMPANY REMARKS: YR YR /06/06 TRANSFER OF CHARGE SONI, SANJAY OLYMPIA TRUST COMPANY C REMARKS: YR NOTE: ADJOINING PROPERTIES SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED TO ASCERTAIN DESCRIPTIVE INCONSISTENCIES, IF ANY, WITH DESCRIPTION REPRESENTED FOR THIS PROPERTY. NOTE: ENSURE THAT YOUR PRINTOUT STATES THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES AND THAT YOU HAVE PICKED THEM ALL UP.

29 PARCEL REGISTER (ABBREVIATED) FOR PROPERTY IDENTIFIER LAND PAGE 2 OF 2 REGISTRY PREPARED FOR JOANNE OFFICE # (LT) ON 2013/08/07 AT 15:54:18 SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS IN CROWN GRANT REG. NUM. DATE INSTRUMENT TYPE AMOUNT PARTIES FROM PARTIES TO CERT/ CHKD YR /09/18 TRANSFER OF CHARGE SONI, SANJAY OLYMPIA TRUST COMPANY C REMARKS: YR YR /10/02 NOTICE $2 SONI, SANJAY SONI, SANJAY C OLYMPIA TRUST COMPANY REMARKS: YR R /03/19 PLAN REFERENCE C YR /03/19 APL ABSOLUTE TITLE ONTARIO INC. C YR /03/21 APL CONSOLIDATE ONTARIO INC. C YR /03/26 TRANSFER OF CHARGE SONI, SANJAY OLYMPIA TRUST COMPANY C REMARKS: YR YR /03/26 TRANSFER OF CHARGE SONI, SANJAY SONI, SANJAY C OLYMPIA TRUST COMPANY REMARKS: YR YR /04/23 CHARGE $4,400, ONTARIO INC. MARSHALLZEHR GROUP INC. C YR /04/23 POSTPONEMENT SONI, SANJAY MARSHALLZEHR GROUP INC. C OLYMPIA TRUST COMPANY REMARKS: YR , YR , YR , YR , YR , YR , YR TO YR NOTE: ADJOINING PROPERTIES SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED TO ASCERTAIN DESCRIPTIVE INCONSISTENCIES, IF ANY, WITH DESCRIPTION REPRESENTED FOR THIS PROPERTY. NOTE: ENSURE THAT YOUR PRINTOUT STATES THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES AND THAT YOU HAVE PICKED THEM ALL UP.

30

31 Areas of Potential Environmental Concern Area of Potential Environmental Concern (APEC) Location of APEC on Phase One Property Potentially Contaminating Activity (PCA) Location of PCA Contaminants of Potential Concern Media Potentially Affected (groundwater, soil, and/or sediment) 1) Former automotive garage used for storage and maintenance of snow removal equipment North portion of 230 Dew Street (northwest portion of Site) 52) Storage, maintenance, fuelling and repair of equipment, vehicles, and material used to maintain transportation systems On-Site PHCs, VOCs, Metals, BTEX Soil, groundwater 2) Illegal dumping of fill to the northwest of the former automotive garage at 230 Dew Street. North portion of 230 Dew Street (northwest portion of Site) 30) Importation of fill material of unknown quality On-Site PHCs, PAHs, metals Soil

32 Current and Past Uses of the Site Year Name of Owner(s) Description of Property (including tenants) Property Use Observations from the Chain of Title, Aerial Photographs, Fire Insurance Plans (FIPs), etc to 1952 Frederick Dew Part of Lots 39 to 43, Vacant, agricultural use Agricultural or Other Use 1946 aerial photograph show site as undeveloped 1952 to to 1979 Doris Layton Dorothy M. Lee Part of Lot 39, 230 Dew Street (residential dwelling) Residential 1979 to 1992 Sheila & John Nawrocki 230 Dew Street, snow removal business operated out of garage building (Nawrocki Contracting) Residential and commercial City directories, Chain of Title shows that 230 Dew street was privately owned 1960 and 1976 aerial photographs shows three (3) buildings on the Site 1992 to 2012 Sheila & John Nawrocki Part of Lot 39, 230 Dew Street, snow removal business no longer operating, building used for vehicle storage Residential 1952 to 1964 The Director, The Veterans Land Act 1964 to 1965 Maurice D. Lee 1965 to to 1987 Dennis & Marion Cotter Jerry & Jane Noble Part of Lots 40, 41, 42, and 43, 240 Dew Street (residential dwelling) Residential 240 Dew Street was privately owned during this period. Aerial photographs illustrate a building on the Site to 1992 Rolph Davis 1992 to 2012 Luciano & Vilma Quattrociocchi 2012 to August 2013 August 2013 to present Ontario Inc. 230, 240 Dew Street (residential dwellings) Vacant, undeveloped land Residential, Commercial Previous Environmental Reports, Interviews identify that former Site buildings were still present in January Site reconnaissance identified that structures at the Site had been demolished. Most recent property use was mixed Commercial/Residential

33 Phase Two ESA Conceptual Site Model

34 Phase Two Conceptual Site Model 230 & 240 Dew Street, King City, ON 1.1 Site Description The Site (Phase Two RSC Property) is located approximately 35 m west of the northwest corner of the Dew Street and King Boulevard, in the Township of King, Ontario. The Site measures 0.76 hectares (approximately 1.88 acres) and was used for mixed residential and commercial purposes. The Site buildings were demolished prior to the completion of the Phase One or Phase Two ESA, including the removal of all building foundations, and the Site was proposed for future residential developments. 1.2 Background The need for the Phase Two ESA was identified in the CCIG Phase One ESA completed for the Site in December The Phase One ESA identified the following APECs during the completion of the Phase One ESA. Area of Potential Environmental Concern (APEC) Location of APEC on Phase One Property Potentially Contaminating Activity (PCA) Location of PCA Contaminants of Potential Concern Media Potentially Affected (groundwater, soil, and/or sediment) 1) Former private automotive garage used for storage and maintenance of snow removal equipment North portion of 230 Dew Street (northwest portion of Site) 52) Storage, maintenance, fuelling and repair of equipment, vehicles, and material used to maintain transportation systems On-Site PHCs, VOCs, Metals, BTEX Soil, groundwater 2) Illegal dumping of fill to the northwest of the former private automotive garage at 230 Dew Street. North portion of 230 Dew Street (northwest portion of Site) 30) Importation of fill material of unknown quality On-Site PHCs, PAHs, metals Soil During removal of building foundations for the former garage building at the Site, staining was observed around an oil/water interceptor located inside the former structure on the north side. Conversations held with a previous tenant at the Site did not identify any significant spills. As discussed in the Phase One ESA report, an occurrence report was provided to CCIG as part of a regulatory request, which identified that fill material was illegally dumped at the Site. Discussions held with York Region personnel identified that the material has been removed from the Site. However, residual fill material of unknown quality may have remained at the Site which could impact shallow surface soils. 1

35 Phase Two Conceptual Site Model 230 & 240 Dew Street, King City, ON In order to investigate the APECs identified, two (2) Phase Two ESA investigations consisting of drilling, soil and groundwater sampling and chemical analyses were conducted at the Site. The initial Phase Two ESA was conducted by CCIG in April, 2013 (Refer to CCIG s Phase Two ESA report, dated April 15, 2013). The second Phase Two ESA was conducted to satisfy the requirements of Ontario Regulation 153/04, as amended. 1.3 Scope of Work In order to investigate the APECs identified, two (2) Phase Two ESA investigations, consisting of drilling, soil and groundwater sampling and chemical analyses were conducted at the Site. The initial Phase Two ESA was conducted by CCIG in April, 2013 in accordance with the Canadian Standard Association (CSA) Standard Z (Refer to CCIG s Phase Two ESA report, dated April 15, 2013). The second Phase Two ESA was conducted to satisfy the requirements of Ontario Regulation 153/04, as amended. CCIG supervised the drilling and monitoring well installation conducted by Strong Soil Search and Profile Drilling Ltd., between April 8th & July 10th, Ten (10) boreholes (BHs) were advanced at the Phase II RSC Property to depths ranging from 3 meters below grade (mbg) to 5 mbg, while two (2) additional boreholes were advanced at 250 Dew Street. On May 22, 2014, an addition nine (9) boreholes were drilled at the Site by Pontil Drilling, to depths ranging from 1.5 mbg to 8.2 mbg. Four (4) of these boreholes were developed into groundwater monitoring wells. Two (2) additional boreholes were advanced on June 6, 2014 to 0.61 mbg to obtain average concentrations of metal parameters in the vicinity of BH306. It should be noted that originally, the client intended to file one RSC for both properties at Dew Street and 250 Dew Street; however, the Regional Municipality of York later objected to the use of Table 3 Standards for 250 Dew Street. As the Phase Two ESA was conducted before receiving the Region s objection, the Phase Two ESA included both the Phase Two RSC Property as well as 250 Dew Street. The boreholes advanced at 250 Dew Street were only to provide site coverage and were not intended to address any APECs. For assessment purposes, CCIG selected the Ministry of Environment (MOE) 2011 Table 3 Site Condition Standards (SCS) for Residential/Parkland/Institutional (RPI) Property Use in a nonpotable groundwater situation with medium/fine textured soil for 230 and 240 Dew Street. The Phase Two RSC Property is not environmentally sensitive as per the criteria in Section 41 of O.Reg. 153/04: the Site is not located within an area of natural significance, it is not adjacent to or within 30 m of an area of natural significance, and ph test results indicate values which fall within the range of 5 9 for surface soils, and 5 11 for subsurface soils. Based on The Oak Ridges Moraine (ORM) mapping and the information provided by The Regional Municipality of York, the Site is not located within 30 metres of a natural core area or natural linkage area of the 2

36 Phase Two Conceptual Site Model 230 & 240 Dew Street, King City, ON ORM. Correspondence with the Regional Municipality of York identified that the north portion of the east adjacent property, 250 Dew Street, is located in a Highly Vulnerable Area (HVA) of the ORM. Additionally, the northwest portion of the west adjacent property (230A Dew Street) is located in a Wellhead Protection Area (WPA). However, it should be noted that a HVA or a WPA are not considered Areas of Natural Significance, as defined in Subsection 1 (1) of O.Reg. 153/04 (as amended). The Phase Two RSC Property is not subject to Section 43.1 of O.Reg. 153/04: borehole investigations identified that the Site is not in an area of shallow soil (depth to bedrock based on available topographic maps is approximately 250 mbg), the Site does not include all or part of a water body, and it is not adjacent to a water body or include land located within 30 m of a water body. 1.4 Results In general, the soil profile comprised of fill material underlain by sandy silt to silt till to the explored depths of the boreholes. Bedrock was not encountered in any of the boreholes during drilling; however, based on available topographic and bedrock geology maps, depth to bedrock is expected to be approximately 250 mbg. Monitoring wells were installed during this Phase Two ESA in the unconfined aquifer at the Site. The measured depths to the groundwater table ranged from 3.50 to 3.75 mbg. No free product or oily sheen was observed in any of the monitoring wells with exception of BH1(MW) located at northwest corner of the former private automotive garage building. Petroleum hydrocarbon free product and strong odor was observed during purging and groundwater sampling. Based on the groundwater elevation contours, we have interpreted the direction of the groundwater flow to be in a north to north-easterly direction. The horizontal hydraulic gradient was calculated based on two sets of monitoring wells and ranged from m/m [BH101(MW) to BH103(MW)] and m/m [BH2(MW) to BH4(MW)] in north-easterly direction, with an average horizontal hydraulic gradient of m/m. The vertical hydraulic gradient in the vicinity of the former private automotive garage building was calculated between the deeper aquifer monitoring well BH301(MW) and the remaining monitoring wells. Based on June 2014 groundwater elevation measurements, vertical hydraulic gradients were calculated at a minimum value of m/m in a downward direction between BH2(MW) and BH301(MW), at a maximum value of m/m in a downward direction between BH1A(MW) and BH301(MW), and at an average value of m/m in a downward direction. Based on September, 2014 groundwater elevation measurements, vertical hydraulic gradients were calculated at a minimum value of m/m in an upward direction between BH4(MW) and BH301(MW), at a maximum value of m/m in a downward direction 3

37 Phase Two Conceptual Site Model 230 & 240 Dew Street, King City, ON between BH1A(MW) and BH301(MW), and at an average value of m/m in a downward direction. A total of twenty-two (22) soil samples and seventeen (17) groundwater samples including five (3) duplicate samples of each soil and groundwater, were analyzed by AGAT Laboratories Ltd. for the presence of various contaminants of concern (COCs) to investigate soil and groundwater quality impacts related to the aforementioned APECs. These COCs included: PHC F1-F4, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX), VOCs, PAHs, ph, metals, and inorganics. An additional seventeen (17) soil and six (6) groundwater samples, including three (3) duplicate samples of soil and one (1) duplicate sample of groundwater, were analyzed by Exova. The results of chemical analyses identified the following parameters in soil and groundwater exceeding the MOE Table 3 SCS, from boreholes located at the northern portion of 230 Dew Street. Cadmium and lead (surface soils): BH104 S1 ( mbg) and BH201 S1 ( mbg). PHC F2 and F3 (groundwater): monitoring well BH1 (MW). No other exceedences of the MOE Table 3 SCS at 230 and 240 Dew Street were identified in the remaining soil and or groundwater samples. PHC contamination can be attributed to the former garage building located on the Site. Cadmium exceedences can possibly be attributed to the use of phosphate fertilizers on the Site, which can lead to elevated cadmium levels in soil. Lead contamination may be attributed to lead-based paint chips mixed with the soil. Based on the results of the subsurface investigation, significant migration of contaminated soil or groundwater has not occurred. Samples collected from boreholes advanced downgradient from the contaminated areas showed no exceedences of the Table 3 SCS. Climatic and meteorological effects on the Site may lead to seasonal fluctuations in groundwater elevations. Quarterly sampling events completed post-remediation (June 2014 and September 2014) show that groundwater elevations in all monitoring wells were higher in September, but that groundwater flow direction generally was unaffected. Based on the results of the Phase Two ESA investigations conducted at the Site, the soil and groundwater has impacts above the 2011 MOE Table 3 SCS at the northern portion of 230 Dew Street. Remediation of subsurface impacts is detailed in the Remediation Report, included in Phase Two ESA Report. 1.5 Contaminant Fate and Transport 4

38 Phase Two Conceptual Site Model 230 & 240 Dew Street, King City, ON The chemical constituents identified in the shallow soil at the Site comprise metals (lead and cadmium). The relevant transport mechanisms for the COCs in soil are via leaching and mixing with groundwater chemical constituents by advection, mechanical dispersion and molecular diffusion along groundwater flow paths. The transport of these solutes in groundwater will be retarded by sorption and ion exchange mechanisms (i.e. metal ions) depending on the surface characteristics of the soil mineral particles and the exchangeable cations present. Depending on the ph of the soil pore water in the unsaturated zone and in the groundwater, as well as the availability of exchangeable ions, metal ions will be removed from solution by exchange reactions at cationic exchange sites on the soil mineral particle surfaces. Metal ions can also be removed from the solution through ionic and non-ionic binding interactions with iron and aluminum oxyhydroxide precipitates. These species can also be immobilized through complex interactions with organic and inorganic ligands/complex agents and precipitate formation. As a result, due to retardation effects by sorption/ion exchange and other mechanisms, the estimated linear groundwater velocity is likely overestimated, and the actual contaminant velocity at the Site is anticipated to be significantly lower. 1.6 Human Health, Ecological Receptors and Exposure Pathways Based on the proposed residential land use of the Phase Two property, the potential on-site human receptors that may be present comprise long-term workers (adult), property visitors (adult, child, and toddler), and construction workers (adult). A construction worker while performing ground intrusive works at the Site could potentially be exposed to the COCs in soil by direct dermal contact, incidental ingestion, and soil particle inhalation. The exposure to longterm workers will be limited as the Site will be developed and covered by asphalt and landscape areas; however, in the absence of soil cover systems, the long term workers could be exposed via the direct contact, incidental ingestion, and the soil particulate inhalation pathways. The relevant human health exposure pathways are illustrated in Figure 10. Based on the future residential land use of the Phase Two property, the potential on-site ecological receptors that may be present comprise terrestrial vegetation, such as trees, shrubs, grass and weeds; soil invertebrates such as earthworms, centipedes, millipedes, and nematodes; terrestrial mammals such as voles, moles, shrews, mice, raccoons, and foxes; and terrestrial birds, such as pigeons, sparrows, robins, and hawks. The potential complete exposure pathways considered for soil invertebrates, terrestrial birds and mammals are via dermal contact, and incidental ingestion. The relevant ecological exposure pathways are illustrated in Figure 10. Both human and ecological exposure pathways will be eliminated following completion of the soil and groundwater remediation program, which will remove all contaminated material from the Site. 5

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54